Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Genetic approach to common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery

Pediatrik Cerrahide Sık Karşılaşılan Konjenital Anomalilere Genetik Yaklaşım

Pages
91–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the most common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery were discussed as well as their genetic basis, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options in the light of up-to-date literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Genetic approach to common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery Congenital anomalies which occur 3-4% of births are developmental defects and are important cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When considering these anomalies in the newborn period or later, first they should be classified and possible treatment options should be reviewed promptly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the most common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery were discussed as well as their genetic basis, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options in the light of up-to-date literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Genetic approach to common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery Congenital anomalies which occur 3-4% of births are developmental defects and are important cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. When considering these anomalies in the newborn period or later, first they should be classified and possible treatment options should be reviewed promptly. At this stage, Pediatric Surgery Departments serve and contribute to the correction of these abnormalities. On the other hand, genetic services are important not only for the identification of genetic syndromes by dysmorphic examination but also for providing genetic counseling for families having possible risks and planning future pregnancies. In this review, the most common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery were discussed as well as their genetic basis, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options in the light of up-to-date literature.

Özet

Konjenital anomaliler, tüm doğumların %3-4’ünde görülen, perinatal mortalite ve morbidite nedeni olan önemli gelişimsel defektlerdir. Sıklıkla yenidoğan dönemi ve sonrasında bu anomalilerden biri veya daha fazlasının saptanması durumunda, öncelikle bunların sınıflandırılarak olası tedavi seçeneklerini hızlı bir biçimde gözden geçirmek gerekir. Bu aşamada Pediatrik Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı çoğu zaman devreye girmekte ve bu anomalilerin düzeltilmesine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Genetik servisleri ise bu gibi olgularda dismorfolojik muayene ile olası bir genetik sendromun tanımlanmasının yanısıra özellikle daha sonra olacak gebeliklerdeki risklerin belirtildiği genetik danışmanlık sürecinde aileler için büyük öneme sahiptir. Bu derlemede, Pediatrik Cerrahi alanında sık karşılaşılan konjenital anomaliler ve bunların genetik temelleri, tanı, tedavi ve prognoz açısından yeni yaklaşımların güncel literatür bilgileriyle sistematik bir şekilde sunulması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMAZ, A., DURMAZ, M. B., KARACA, E., ERGÜN, O., ÇOĞULU, Ö. (2013). Genetic approach to common congenital anomalies in pediatric surgery. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 91–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/132739

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Taçoy Ş, Mıhçı E. Konjenital anomalilere güncel yaklaşım. J Pediatr Sci 2005; 1: 48-55
  2. Brent RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 957-968
  3. Chung CS, Myrianthopoulos NC. Congenital anomalies: mortality and morbidity, burden and classification. Am J Med Genet 1987; 27: 505-523
  4. Robin NH. Congenital muscular torticollis. Pediatr Rev 1996; 17: 374-375
  5. Ballock RT, Song KM. The prevalence of nonmuscular causes of torticollis in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 16: 500-504
  6. Sherer DM. Spontaneous torticollis in a breech-presenting fetus delivered by an atraumatic elective cesarean section: a case and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13: 305-307
  7. Engin C, Yavuz SS, Sahin FI. Congenital muscular torticollis: is heredity a possible factor in a family with five torticollis patients in three generations? Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1147-1150
  8. Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Fujita A. The aetiological relationship between congenital torticollis and obstetrical paralysis. Int Orthop 1984; 8: 175-181
  9. Ippolito E, Tudisco C, Massobrio M. Long-term results of open sternocleidomastoid muscle tenotomy for idiopathic muscular torticollis. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67: 30-38
  10. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University. http:// omim.org 11. Greinwald JH Jr, Leichtman LG, Simko EJ. Hereditary thyroglossal duct cysts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122: 1094-1096
  11. Castillo-Taucher S, Castillo P. Autosomal dominant inheritance of thyroglossal duct cyst. Clin Genet 1994; 45: 111-112
  12. Gedikbasi A, Gul A, Sargin A, Ceylan Y. Cystic hygroma and lymphangioma: associated findings, perinatal outcome and prognostic factors in live-born infants. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276: 491-498
  13. Watson WJ, Thorp JM Jr, Seeds JW. Familial cystic hygroma with normal karyotype. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 37-40
  14. Van Staey M, de Bie S, Matton MT, De Roose J. Familial congenital esophageal atresia. Personal case report and review of the literature. Hum Genet 1984; 66: 260-266
  15. Chittmittrapap S, Spitz L, Kiely EM, Brereton RJ. Oesophageal atresia and associated anomalies. Arch Dis Child 1989; 64: 364-368
  16. Brunner HG, Winter RM. Autosomal dominant inheritance of abnormalities of the hands and fee