Journals / Sayıştay Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 116

THE RISING PROTECTIONISM TENDENCY IN THE NEW ERA AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBALIZATION

YENİ DÖNEMDE YÜKSELEN KORUMACILIK EĞİLİMİ VE KÜRESELLEŞMENİN GELECEĞİ

Pages
91–119
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The new globalization discourse declared by China has the potential to create remarkable results both economically and politically.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is seen that the rising protectionism tendency after the 2008 global financial crisis has been adopted much more by the countries considered as the defenders of liberal policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increasing state interventionism in the last decade in the countries such as the USA and the EU where liberal economic-political structure is dominant has changed the balances in the global economy in the 21st century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The new globalization discourse declared by China has the potential to create remarkable results both economically and politically.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Neoliberal Politikalar · Küreselleşme · 2008 Küresel Krizi

Abstract

It is seen that the rising protectionism tendency after the 2008 global financial crisis has been adopted much more by the countries considered as the defenders of liberal policies. The increasing state interventionism in the last decade in the countries such as the USA and the EU where liberal economic-political structure is dominant has changed the balances in the global economy in the 21st century. The discussion of the new structure where the state rose to prominence along with the global crisis, on one hand, and the alternative globalization moves by China called as “Beijing Consensus” and “New Globalization”, on the other hand, led to different approaches concerning the future of globalization gaining importance in the 21st century. Therefore, in this study, the dynamics of the protectionist policies applied in the era of neoliberal globalization and the new global economic order, which has been under construction in recent years, were determined. As a result, on the one hand, it was expressed that globalization should be managed by strengthening global governance and adhering to neoliberal structure, and on the other hand, the initiatives of China who wants to be the pioneer of a new global economic order by shifting the centre of global economy to Asia, were found striking. The new globalization discourse declared by China has the potential to create remarkable results both economically and politically.

Özet

2008 küresel finans krizi sonrasında yükselen korumacılık eğiliminin liberal politikaların savunucusu konumundaki ülkeler tarafından daha fazla benimsendiği görülmektedir. ABD ve AB ülkeleri gibi liberal ekonomi-politik yapının egemen olduğu yerlerde devlet müdahaleciliğinin son on yılda giderek yeniden yükselmesi, 21. yüzyılda küresel ekonomideki dengeleri değiştirmiştir. Küresel kriz ile birlikte bir yandan devletin ön plana çıktığı yeni kurgunun tartışılmaya başlanması, diğer yandan Çin’in “Pekin Mutabakatı” ve “Yeni Küreselleşme” olarak adlandırdığı alternatif küreselleşme hamleleri, 21. yüzyılda küreselleşmenin geleceğine yönelik farklı yaklaşımların önem kazanmasına yol açmıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada neoliberal küreselleşme çağında uygulanan korumacı politikalar ile son dönemlerde inşa edilmeye çalışılan yeni küresel ekonomik düzeninin dinamikleri ortaya konulmuştur. Buna göre bir tarafta neoliberal kurguya bağlı kalınarak küresel yönetişimin güçlendirilerek küreselleşmenin yönetilmesi gerektiği ifade edilirken diğer tarafta küresel ekonominin merkezini Asya’ya taşıyarak yeni bir küresel ekonomik düzenin öncülüğünü yapmak isteyen Çin’in girişimleri dikkat çekmektedir. Çin öncülüğünde ortaya konulan yeni küreselleşme söylemi, ekonomi-politik açıdan dikkate değer sonuçlar yaratma potansiyeline sahiptir

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, O., DEVELİ, E. S. (2020). THE RISING PROTECTIONISM TENDENCY IN THE NEW ERA AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBALIZATION. Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 116, 91–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/132591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aiginger, Karl (2009), “The Current Economic Crisis: Causes, Cures and Consequences”, WIFO Working Papers, No. 341, Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Vienna, s. 1-31.
  2. Akerlof, George ve Shiller, Robert J. (2009), Hayvansal Güdüler (Çev. Neşenur Domaniç & Levent Konyar), 2. Baskı,
  3. Scala Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  4. Ateş, Davut (2011), “Ekonomik Kriz Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Küreselleşmenin Geleceği”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12(1), s. 1-16.
  5. Avram, Silvia, Figari, Francesco, Leventi, Chrysa, Levy, Horacio, Navicke, Jekaterina, Matsaganis, Manos, Militaru, Eva, Paulus, Alari, Rastringina, Olga ve Sutherland, Holly (2013), “The Distributional Effects of Fiscal Consolidation in Nine Countries”, Working Paper No: EM 2/13, s. 1-45.
  6. Binay, Murat ve Atalay, Nesrin (2019), “Global Governance: Economic Growth and Income Distribution”, Sayıştay Dergisi, 112(Ocak-Mart), s. 137-158.
  7. Bontout, Olivie ve Lokajickova, Terezie (2013), “Social Protection Budgets in the Crisis in the EU”, Publications Office of the European Union, s. 1-42.
  8. Cai, Peter (2017), “Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Lowy Institute for International Policy, s. 1-22.
  9. Cankaya, Şükrü (2014), “Mali Şeffaflık ve Hesap Verebilirlik”, Sayıştay Dergisi, 94(Temmuz-Eylül), s. 143-146.
  10. Chen, Wenjie, Mrkaic, Mico ve Nabar, Malhar (2019), “The Global Economic Recovery 10 Years After the 2008 Financial Crisis”, IMF Working Paper, s. 1-32.
  11. Cheng, Leonard K. (2016), “Three Questions on China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, China Economic Review, 40, s. 309-313.
  12. Choi, Jin Wook (2013), “The 2007-2010 US Financial Crisis: Its Origins, Progressions, and Solutions”, The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 10(2), s. 65-77.
  13. Claessens, Stijn (2010), “The Financial Crisis: Policy Challenges for Emerging Markets and Developing Countries”, The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 4(2), s. 177–196.
  14. Coşkun, Alev (2011), Liberal Ekonominin Çöküşü ve Küresel Ekonomik Kriz, 2. Baskı,
  15. Cumhuriyet Kitapları, İstanbul.
  16. Crotty, James (2009), “Structural Causes of The Global Fnancial Crisis: A Critical Assessment of The ‘New financial Architecture’”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, s. 563–580.
  17. Crouhy, Michel G., Jarrow, Robert A. ve Turnbull, Stuart M. (2008), “The Subprime Credit Crisis of 2007”, The Journal of Derivatives, 16(1), s. 81-110.
  18. Demir, Faruk, Karabıyık, Ayşegül, Ermişoğlu, Emine ve Küçük, Ayhan (2008), “ABD Mortgage Krizi”, Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurulu, Çalışma Tebliği, 3, Ankara. Durusoy