Journals / Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 182 - Sayı: 182

ALLAGMATIC OF EMBODIMENT

TECESSÜMÜN ALAGMATİĞİ

Pages
27–52
Publication Date
2014-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As regard to phenomenological and hermeneutical interpretation of embodiment, in line with Simondonian and Deleuzean organology, the major emphasis is posited on Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s practical philosophy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Embodiment might be defined as a complex aporia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In its contingent contexture, it denotes both the corporeality and abstractness of the lived experience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As regard to phenomenological and hermeneutical interpretation of embodiment, in line with Simondonian and Deleuzean organology, the major emphasis is posited on Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s practical philosophy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tecessüm · Simondon · hermeneutik fenomenoloji

Abstract

Embodiment might be defined as a complex aporia. In its contingent contexture, it denotes both the corporeality and abstractness of the lived experience. Embodiment is, at the same time, a world-forming experience. It is thus the leitmotif of being and becoming. In brief, it does canvas not only the own-world but also the with-world. Drawing upon hermeneutic phenomenology and general organology, this paper interprets embodiment as an allagmatic system of transductive dispositions in-between immanence, attunement and narration. In this essay, embodiment is interpreted as a transductive system of operations, which is exposed through allagmatic of individuation. Throughout the study, allagmatic has been taken as a critical leitmotif of generating alternative appraisal of psychic and collective individuation. This essay suggests reading some of the key arguments of hermeneutic phenomenology of self, other and world in parallel paths to the possibility of a general organology of individuation. Gilbert Simondon’s ontology of interrelatedness and its critical version in Gilles Deleuze have been taken as central leitmotifs of enhancing allagmatic of embodiment. By reference to critique of hylomorphic exactitude, allagmatic of embodiment presents a reading of being as becoming. As regard to phenomenological and hermeneutical interpretation of embodiment, in line with Simondonian and Deleuzean organology, the major emphasis is posited on Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s practical philosophy.

Özet

Tecessüm karmaşık bir aporia olarak tanımlanabilir. Bağlamsal niteliği açısından, hayat tecrübesinin cismiyetini olduğu kadar, soyutluğunu da ifade eder. Tecessüm, aynı zamanda, dünya-kuran bir tecrübedir. Tecessüm, varlığın ve var’oluşun tekerrür vasfıdır. Ezcümle; tecessüm, yalnızca özgün-dünya’yı değil, aynı zamanda, birliktelik-dünyası’nı da resmeder. Hermeneutik fenomenoloji ve genel organolojiden hareketle bu çalışma tecessümü; içkinlik, aidiyet ve anlatısallık arası(nda) alagmatik bir aktarımlar sistemi olarak yorumlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada; tecessüm, bireyleşme alagmatiği üzerinden açığa serilen, aktarımsal bir operasyonlar sistemi olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma boyunca alagmatik, psişik ve kolektif bireyleşmenin alternatif bir okumasını oluşturmak için başvurulan eleştirel bir dayanak olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu makale; kendi, öteki ve dünya’nın hermeneutik fenomenolojisinin kimi öne çıkan argümanlarını, bireyleşmenin genel organolojisi imkânıyla paralel olarak okumayı önermektedir. Gilbert Simondon’un karşılıklı-bağlantısallık ontolojisi ile bunun Gilles Deleuze’deki eleştirel versiyonu, tecessümün allagmatiğini geliştirirken başvurulan merkezi temalardır. Hilomorfik kesinliğin eleştirisine referansla, tecessümün alagmatiği, oluş olarak varlık okuması sunmaktadır. Simondoncu ve Deleuzcü organolojiyle paralel olarak, tecessümün fenomenolojik ve hermeneutik yorumları açısından öncelik; Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger ve Hans-Georg Gadamer’in pratik felsefelerine atfedilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINER, R. (2014). ALLAGMATIC OF EMBODIMENT. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 182 - Sayı: 182, 27–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/132120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. BARBARAS, R. (2004). The Being of the Phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  2. BARTHES, R. (1975). “An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative”, New Literary History, 6(2), 237-279.
  3. BOURDIEU, P. (1991).
  4. Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  5. CHABOT, P. (2012). The Philosophy of Simondon: Between Technology and Individuation, London: Bloomsbury Academic. COMBES, M. (2012). Gilbert Simondon and the Philosophy of the Transindividual, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  6. CUTROFELLO, A. (2005). Continental Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction, New York: Routledge. DAMASIO, A. R. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, Boston: Mariner Books. DE BOER, K. (2000). Thinking in the Light of Time: Heidegger’s Encounter with Hegel, Albany: State University of New York Press.
  7. DELANDA, M. (1999). “Immanence and Transcendence in the Genesis of Form”. In I. BUCHANAN (Ed.), A Deleuzian Century? Durham: Duke University Press, 119-134.
  8. DELEUZE, G. (1990).
  9. The Logic of Sense, New York: Columbia University Press.
  10. DELEUZE, G. (2001a).
  11. Difference and Repetition, London: Continuum. DELEUZE, G. (2001b). “Review of Gilbert Simondon’s L’individu et sa genèse physic-biologique (1966)”, Pli, 12, 43-49.
  12. DELEUZE, G. & GUATTARI, F. (2005). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  13. DILTHEY, W. (2002). The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences. Selected Works, Vol. III, R. A. MAKKREEL, & F. RODI (Eds.), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. FREUD, S. (1955). “The Uncanny”. In J. STRACHEY (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVII, London: Hogarth Press, 218-252.
  15. FUCHS, T. & SCHLIMME, J. (2009). “Embodiment and Psychopathology: A Phenomenological Perspective”, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 570-575.
  16. GADAMER, H-G. (2004a).
  17. Truth and Method, New York: Continuum. GADAMER, H-G. (2004b).
  18. Philosophical Hermeneutics, Berkeley: University of California Press. GASCHÉ, R. (1986) The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  19. HEIDEGGER, M. (1994). Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  20. HEIDEGGER, M. (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  21. HEIDEGGER, M. (1996).
  22. Being and Time, Albany: State University of New York