✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
In such cases, MRI and serial mammograms are not useful in diagnosis and these cases should be localized and marked with imaging techniques for histopathologic evaluation.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this case report, the coexistence of radial scar and tubular carcinoma in an architectural distortion area that didn't change in a period of 2 years is reported.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this case report, the coexistence of radial scar and tubular carcinoma in an architectural distortion area that didn't change in a period of 2 years is reported.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In such cases, MRI and serial mammograms are not useful in diagnosis and these cases should be localized and marked with imaging techniques for histopathologic evaluation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Orta yaşlı · Skar · Adenokarsinom
Abstract
In this case report, the coexistence of radial scar and tubular carcinoma in an architectural distortion area that didn't change in a period of 2 years is reported. In such cases, MRI and serial mammograms are not useful in diagnosis and these cases should be localized and marked with imaging techniques for histopathologic evaluation.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
İNCİ, E., CİMİLLİ, A. T., ÇELİKER, F. B., BAYRAMOĞLU, S., AKSOY, S. (2005). Coexistence of radial scar and tubular carcinoma in an architectural distortion area on mammograph: Case report. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 36–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/131768