Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Colonization of temporary hemodialysis catheters

Geçici hemodiyaliz kateterlerinde kolonizasyon

Pages
92–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As well as standard therapy additional precaution may be taken to decrease prevalence of catheter colonization and infection in such conditions that facilitate catheter colonization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Catheter colonization is a necessary step in catheter related bacteremia but pathogenesis hasn’t been clarified recently.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The data of 43 hemodialysis patients using temporary hemodialysis catheters were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As well as standard therapy additional precaution may be taken to decrease prevalence of catheter colonization and infection in such conditions that facilitate catheter colonization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Böbrek yetmezliği · akut · Böbrek yetmezliği

Abstract

Objective: Catheter colonization is a necessary step in catheter related bacteremia but pathogenesis hasn’t been clarified recently. In our study, we aimed to detect the incidence of catheter colonization and related parameters in patients with indwelling hemodialysis catheters. Material and Method: The data of 43 hemodialysis patients using temporary hemodialysis catheters were evaluated retrospectively. The relation between colonization and factors that affect catheter colonization such as catheter localization, life span of the catheter, accompanied disorders, antibiotic or intravenous iron use, presence of fever or leucocytosis and albumin concentration was investigated. Results: The life span of femoral (21), subclavian (14), and jugular (8) catheters were 17.9±9.9 days and bacterial growth was detected in 15 (34.9%) of the catheters. The most common determined pathogen was staphylococci (60%). Catheter withdrawal reasons were as follows: the most common reason was suspicion of catheter infection in culture positive group (40%) and recovery from acute renal failure (42.9%) in culture negative group. Catheter life span, parenteral iron use and diabetes prevalence were significantly high and albumin concentration was significantly low in culture positive group. Results: In our study it was shown that, diabetes, hypoalbuminemia, parenteral iron treatment and prolonged catheter life span facilitated the catheter colonization. As well as standard therapy additional precaution may be taken to decrease prevalence of catheter colonization and infection in such conditions that facilitate catheter colonization.

Özet

Amaç: Kateter ile ilişkili bakteriyemide kateter kolonizasyonu gerekli bir basamak olup, kolonizasyonu kolaylaştıran faktörler ile ilgili çalı şmalar sınırlıdır. Biz çalışmamızda geçici hemodiyaliz kateteri takılan hastalardaki kateter kolonizasyonu sıklığını ve bununla ilişkili olan parametreleri araştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Geçici hemodiyaliz kateteri ile hemodiyalize alınan toplam 43 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Kateter kolonizasyonu gelişimini etkileyebilecek değişkenlerden, kateterin yeri, kateterin kalış süresi, eşlik eden hastalıklar, antibiyotik ve intravenöz (IV) demir kullanımı, ateş ve lökositozun varlığı ve albümin gibi bazı laboratuvar parametreleri ile kolonizasyon arasında ilişki incelendi. Bulgular: Femoral (21), subklavian (14) ve juguler (8) kateterin kalma süreleri ortalama 17.9±9.9 gün idi ve kateterlerin 15’inde (%34.9) üreme saptanmış olup, en sık saptanan patojen %60 oranında stafilokoklar idi. Kateterlerin çıkartılma nedenlerine bakıldığında; kültür pozitif olanlardaki en sık çıkartılma nedeni kateter infeksiyon şüphesi (%40) iken, kültür negatif olanlardaki en sık çıkartılma nedeni ise akut böbrek yetmezliği (ABY)’ ndeki iyileşme (%42.9) olarak saptandı. Kateterinde üreme olanlarda; kateter kalma süresi, IV demir uygulanması ve diyabet sıklığı anlamlı olarak daha yüksek, albümin düzeyleri ise anlamlı olarak daha düşük saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda diyabet, hipoalbüminemi, IV demir tedavisi ve kateterin kalış süresinin uzamasının kateter kolonizasyonunu kolaylaştı rdığı gösterilmiştir. Bu gibi kolonizasyonu kolaylaştıran durumlarda standart önlemlerin yanı sıra ek önlemlerin alınması kateter kolonizasyonunu ve infeksiyonunu azaltmada yararlı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, Ş., ACARTÜRK, G., USLAN, İ., ÇÖLBAY, M., KARAMAN, Ö., ARSLAN, Z., ÇETİNKAYA, Z., DEMİR, S. (2006). Colonization of temporary hemodialysis catheters. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 92–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/131638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mandolfo S, Galli F, Costa S, Ravini P, Gaggia P, Imbasciati E. Factors influencing permanent catheter performance. J Vase Access 2001; 2: 106-109.
  2. Keane WF, Shapiro FL, Raij L. Incidence and type of infections occurring in 445 chronic hemodialysis patients. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1977; 23: 41-47.
  3. Marr KA, Sexton DJ, Conlon PJ, Corey GR, Schwab SJ, Kirkland KB. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 1997;127: 275-280.
  4. Tanriover B, Carlton D, Saddekni S, et al. Bacteremia associated with tunneled dialysis catheters: comparison of two treatment strategies. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 2151-2155.
  5. Unver S, Atasoyu EM, Evrenkaya TR, Ardic N, Ozyurt M. Risk factors for the infections caused by temporary double-lumen hemodialysis catheters. Arch Med Res 2006; 37: 348-352.
  6. Fux CA, Uehlinger D, Bodmer T, Droz S, Zellweger C, Muhlemann K. Dynamics of hemodialysis catheter colonization by coagulasenegative staphylococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26: 567-574.
  7. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1305-1309.
  8. Hung KY, Tsai TJ, Yen CJ, Yen TS. Infection associated with double lumen catheterization for temporary haemodialysis: experience of 168 cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 247-251.
  9. Kairaitis LK, Gottlieb T. Outcome and complications of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1710-1714.
  10. Butterly DW, Schwab SJ. Dialysis access infections. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2000; 9: 631-635.
  11. Bambauer R, Mestres P, Schiel R, et al. Surface treated large bore catheters with silver based coatings versus untreated catheters for extracorporeal detoxification methods. ASAIO J 1998; 44: 303-308.
  12. Cheesbrough JS, Finch RG, Burden RP. A prospective study of the mechanisms of infection associated with hemodialysis catheters. J Infect DİS 1986; 154: 579-589.
  13. Almirall J, Gonzalez J, Rello J, et al. Infection of hemodialysis catheters: incidence and mechanisms. Am J Nephrol 1989; 9: 454-459. NKF-DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 137-181.
  14. Powe NR, Jaar B, Furth SL, Hermann J, Briggs W. Septicemia in dialysis patients: incidence, risk factors and prognosis. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1081-1090.
  15. Naumovic RT, Jovanovic DB, Djukanovic LJ. Temporary vascular catheters for hemodialysis: a 3-year prospective study. Int J A