SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Peripheral giant cell granuloma: Case report

Periferik dev hücreli granülom: Olgu sunumu

ÖMER ERDUR
Fatma Tülin KAYHAN
Mehmet Serhad TOPRAK
Öztürk AKTAŞ
Pages
122–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no evidence of recurrence during a 10-month follow-up period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Peripheral giant cell granuloma (giant cell epulis, osteoclastoma, reparatory giant cell granuloma, giant cell hiperplasia) is a rare reactive exophytic lesion of the oral cavity, originating from the periosteum or periodontal membrane.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this report, we presented a 62-year-old male patient with an enlarging mass on the right upper gum, after tooth extraction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no evidence of recurrence during a 10-month follow-up period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Peripheral giant cell granuloma (giant cell epulis, osteoclastoma, reparatory giant cell granuloma, giant cell hiperplasia) is a rare reactive exophytic lesion of the oral cavity, originating from the periosteum or periodontal membrane. The etiology is not well-known, however it is thought to be a secondary reaction to chronic irritation. In this report, we presented a 62-year-old male patient with an enlarging mass on the right upper gum, after tooth extraction. According to the biopsy which revealed peripheral giant cell granuloma, entire lesion was excised and underlying defective bone was curetted as treatment. The wide defective mucosal area was closed by palatal flap. There was no evidence of recurrence during a 10-month follow-up period.

Özet

Periferik dev hücreli granülom (dev hücreli epulis, osteoklastom, dev hücreli reperatif granülom, dev hücreli hiperplazi), oral kavitenin periosteum veya periodontal membran kaynaklı nadir rastlanan ekzofitik bir lezyonudur. Dişeti ve dişşiz çenelerde alveolar krest üzerinde oluşan kitlelerdir. Nedeni tam olarak bilinmese de kronik irritasyona sekonder bir reaksiyon olarak geliştiğine inanılır. Bu olguda sağ üst premolar diş çekimini takiben gelişen bir lezyonu bulunan 62 yaşında erkek hasta sunulmuştur. Kitle klinik muayene sonrası biyopsi alınıp sonrasında tamamıyla eksize edildi. Operasyon sırasında defektin alt kısmındaki kemik defekt kürete edildi. Eksizyon yapılan alanda geniş bir mukozal defekt oluştuğundan sert damaktan destrükte alana flep kaydırıldı. Hastanın yapılan 10 aylık takibinde nüks gözlenmedi. Bu olguda neden olarak diş çekimi düşünülmekle birlikte etyolojik faktör tam olarak belirlenemedi. Olgu literatür eşliğinde tartışıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDUR, Ö., KAYHAN, F. T., TOPRAK, M. S., AKTAŞ, Ö. (2008). Peripheral giant cell granuloma: Case report. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 122–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/131330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kfir Y, Buchner A, Hansen LS. Reactive lesions of the gingiva. A clinicopathological study of 741 cases. J Periodontal 1980; 51; 655-661
  2. Shafer WG, Levy BM (Eds). Tratado de patologia Bucal. 4th ed. Mexico DF: Interamericana; 1986. p. 143-145
  3. Katsikeris N, Kakarantza –Angelopoulou E, Angelopoulos AP. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: clinico- pathologic study 224 new cases and 956 reported cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17: 94-99
  4. Flaitz CM. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: a potentially aggresive lesion in children. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 232-233
  5. Pandolfi PJ, Felefli S, Flaitz CM, Johnson JV. An aggresive giant cell granuloma in a child. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 23: 353-355
  6. Wood NK, Goaz PW (Eds). Diagnostico diferencial de las lesiones orales y maxilofaciales. Madrid: Harcourt Brace de Espana SA; 1998. p.110-113,282-283
  7. Chaparro Avendano AV, Berini-Aytes L, Gay Escoda C. Peripheral giant cell granuloma. A report of five cases review of the literature. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10: 48-52
  8. Rosai J, Ackerman LV (Eds). Ackerman’s surgical pathology. St.Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1989;p.191-192
  9. De Souza PE, Paim JF, Carvalhais JN, Gomez RS. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, MDM2, Ki-67 and PCNA in central giant cell granuloma and giant cell tumor. J Oral Pathol Med 1999; 28:54-58
  10. Bhaskar SN, Cutright DE, Beasley JD 3th, Perez B. Giant cell reperative granuloma (peripheral): report of 50 cases. J Oral Surg 1971; 29: 110-115
  11. Giansanti JS, Waldron CA.Peripheral giant cell granuloma: a review of 720 cases. J Oral Surg 1969; 27: 787-791
  12. Smith BR, Fowler CB. Primary hiperparathyroidism presenting as a “peripheral” giant cell granuloma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 46: 65-69
  13. Gunhan M, Gunhan O, Celasun B, Mutlu M, Bostancı H. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in peripheral cell granulomas of the oral cavity. J Oral Sci 1998; 40: 57-60
  14. Matsumura T, Sugahara T, Wada T, Kawakatsu K. Recurrent giant cell reperative granuloma: Report of a case and histochemical patterns. J Oral Surg 1971; 29: 212-216 15. Bonetti F, Pelosi G, Martignoni G, et al. Peripheral giant cell granuloma: Evidence for osteoclastic differantiation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70: 471-475
  15. Andersen L, Fejerskov O, Phillipsen HP. Oral giant cell granulomas. A clinical and histological study of 129 new cases. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A] 1973; 81: 606-616.