Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast and current management

Memenin duktal karsinoma in situ hastaliğı ve güncel tedavi yaklaşımları

Pages
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to multimodality of treatment options current management of diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is reviewed with the light of the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is one of the most debatable entities among breast lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although it seems to be a precursor lesion for invasive breast ca, in patients with merely biopsy performed or untreated after ineffectively resection, invasive breast cancer develops in 40%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to multimodality of treatment options current management of diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is reviewed with the light of the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mastektomi · segmental · Radyoterapi

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is one of the most debatable entities among breast lesions. It is difficult to standardise the management due to improvemenents in imaging studies, better definition of pathological subtypes, wide spectrum of treatment modalities. Although it seems to be a precursor lesion for invasive breast ca, in patients with merely biopsy performed or untreated after ineffectively resection, invasive breast cancer develops in 40%. Moreover, in 10-25% of patients with DCIS, invasive breast cancer is also defined. Mamograpy is stil the choice of diagnosis, although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used. Core biopsy and radioisotope/dye techniques for tumor identification is also gaining acceptance. Mastectomy and breast conserving surgery (BCS) are widely used in treatment. Radiotherapy in treatment is still one of the most debatable subjects among authors although the benefits are proven. Due to multimodality of treatment options current management of diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is reviewed with the light of the literature.

Özet

Meme lezyonları arasında duktal karsinoma in situ (DKİS) en çok tartışılan konudur. Görüntüleme teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler, patolojik alt tiplerinin daha iyi tanımlanması, tedavi seçeneklerinde yelpazenin çok geniş olmasıyla, standartların belirlenmesi kolay değildir. Meme kanseri bütün olarak gözönüne alındığında, bunların içinde en hızlı artan patolojinin DKİS olduğu görülür. İnvaziv meme kanserinde öncü lezyon gibi görünse de, sadece biyopsi yapılmış ve tam olarak çıkarılmamış, sonrasında tedavi görmemiş hastalarda %40 oranında invaziv meme kanseri gelişir. Buna ilave olarak DKİS örneklerinde yaklaşık %10-25 oranında invaziv kanser bulunur. Tanı yöntemleri arasında mammografi değerini korurken, MR daha sık kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Core biyopsi öne çıkmakta ve izotop ile tümör işaretleme gündemdedir. Tedavide mastektomi ve meme koruyucu tedavi (MKC) yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bir çok hasta için faydası kanıtlanmış olmasına rağmen, radyoterapi (RT) en çok tartışılan konulardan biri olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu nedenle klinik, patolojik ve hasta ile ilgili risk faktörleri değerlendirilerek, DKİS de tanıdan tedaviye güncel yaklaşımlar gözden geçirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, A. N. (2009). Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast and current management. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/131310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Boughey JC, Gonzalez RJ, Bonner E, Kuerer HM. Current treatment and clinical trial developments for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Oncologist 2007; 11: 1276- 1287
  2. Goodwin A, Parker s, Ghersi D, Wilcken N. Post-operative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cochran Database Syst Rev 2009, 21; 1: CD000563
  3. Robinson EK, Hunt KK. Noninvasive breast cancer. In: Feig BW, Berger DH, Fuhrman GM (Eds) The MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Handbook. 3rd edition. Lippincot William Wilkins: Philedelphia 2003: p.1-12
  4. Donegan WL, Spratt JS (Eds). Cancer of the breast. Saunders: Missouri 2002: p. 507-534
  5. Meijnen P, Gilhuijs KG, Rutgers EJ. The effect of margin on the clinical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of breast. J Surg Oncol 2008; 98; 579-584
  6. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS, et al. Three dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1996; 201: 427-432
  7. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW. MR imaging of mammographical detected clustered microcalcifications:Is there any value? Radiology 1998; 207: 675-681
  8. Jaffer S, Bleiweiss IJ. Histologic classification ductal carcinoma in situ. Microsc Res Tech 2002; 59; 92-101
  9. Carrera C, Payne S. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: The need for psychosocial research. Psychooncology 1999; 8: 538-545
  10. Nakhlis F, Morrow M. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 821-839
  11. Lagios M. Duct carcinoma in situ: Pathology and treatment. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70; 853-871
  12. Lagios M. Controversies in diagnosis, biology and treatment. Breast J 1995; 1; 68-78
  13. Silverstein MJ, Cohlan BF, Gierson ED, et al. Duct carcinoma in situ: 227 cases without microinvasion. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28: 630-634
  14. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, et al. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 1996; 77: 2267-2274
  15. Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2263-2271
  16. MacDonald HR, Silverstein MJ, Mabry H, et al. Local control in ductal carcinoma in situ treated excision alone: incremental benefit of larger margins. Am J Surg 2005: 190: 521-525
  17. Silverstein MJ, Lagios DM, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ducta