Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2026

The Volatility Analysis of Exchange-Traded Funds Under the DXY Index

DXY Endeksi Altında Borsa Yatırım Fonlarının Volatilite Analizi

Pages
58–69
Publication Date
2026-05-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis results showed that the DXY Index had a positive effect on the volatility of Türkiye's ETF and a negative effect on the volatility of all other countries' ETFs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the popularity of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), which emerged as a result of developments in financial engineering, has increased and they have become a global financial instrument for passive investments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the volatility dynamics of ETFs of four different countries (the UK, Brazil, the US, and Türkiye) traded in the US markets, under the impact of the Dollar Index (DXY), were analyzed using the CCC GARCH-X model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis results showed that the DXY Index had a positive effect on the volatility of Türkiye's ETF and a negative effect on the volatility of all other countries' ETFs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Porföy Çeşitlendirme · ETF · DXY Endeksi

Abstract

In recent years, the popularity of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), which emerged as a result of developments in financial engineering, has increased and they have become a global financial instrument for passive investments. In this context, the volatility dynamics of ETFs of four different countries (the UK, Brazil, the US, and Türkiye) traded in the US markets, under the impact of the Dollar Index (DXY), were analyzed using the CCC GARCH-X model. The analysis results showed that the DXY Index had a positive effect on the volatility of Türkiye's ETF and a negative effect on the volatility of all other countries' ETFs. In addition, a positive co-movement relationship was found among the examined ETFs, consistent with the integration of global markets. These findings are expected to contribute to the deepening and broadening of the literature, as well as to the strategy development and decision-making processes of market participants.

Özet

Son yıllarda, finansal mühendislik alanındaki gelişmelerin bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkan Borsa Yatırım Fonları’nın (ETF’lerin) popülaritesi artmış ve pasif yatırımlar için küresel bir finansal araç haline gelmiştir. Bu kapsamda, Dolar Endeksi (DXY) etkisi altında, ABD piyasalarında işlem gören dört farklı ülkenin (İngiltere, Brezilya, ABD ve Türkiye) ETF'lerinin volatilite dinamikleri CCC GARCH-X modeli kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, DXY Endeksi'nin Türkiye'nin ETF'sinin volatilitesi üzerinde pozitif, diğer tüm ülkelerin ETF'lerinin volatilitesi üzerinde ise negatif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, küresel piyasaların entegrasyonuyla uyumlu olarak, incelenen ETF'ler arasında pozitif bir ortak hareketlilik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Bu bulgular, literatürün derinleşmesine ve genişlemesine katkı sağlamakla birlikte, piyasa katılımcılarının strateji geliştirme ve karar alma süreçlerine de katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şencan, İ. (2026). The Volatility Analysis of Exchange-Traded Funds Under the DXY Index. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2026, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1782610

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Akel, V., & Gazel, S. (2014). Döviz kurları ile BIST sanayi endeksi arasındaki eşbütünleşme ilişkisi: Bir ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(4), 23-41. [https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.57171](https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.57171)
  2. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Lundblad, C. (2005). Does financial liberalization spur growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 3-55. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.007
  3. Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., & Moussawi, R. (2018). Do ETFs increase volatility? The Journal of Finance, 73(6), 2471–2535. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12727](https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12727)
  4. BlackRock, Inc. (2025). Borsa yatırım fonlarına ait bilgilendirme dokümanları ve prospektüsleri. [https://www.blackrock.com/](https://www.blackrock.com/) Adresinden 25 Temmuz 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  5. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1](https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076%2886%2990063-1)
  6. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1988). A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-varying Covariances. Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 116-131. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261521](https://doi.org/10.1086/261521)
  7. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 498–505. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358](https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358)
  8. Charupat, N., & Miu, P. (2012). An overview of the academic literature on ETFs. Journal of Applied Finance, 22(1), 58–71. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003884](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003884)
  9. Chen, J.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2010). An analysis of the spillover effects of exchange-traded funds. Applied Economics, 42(9), 1155–1168. doi.org/10.1080/00036840701721182
  10. Chen, J., & Malinda, M. (2014). The study of the spillover and leverage effects of financial exchange traded funds (ETFs). Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 11(2), 41–59. [https://ssrn.com/abstract=2558779](https://ssrn.com/abstract=2558779)
  11. Cheung, Y.-W., & Ng, L. K. (1996). A causality-in-variance test and its application to financial market prices. Journal of Econometrics, 72(1-2), 33–48. doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01691-1
  12. Da, Z., & Shive, S. (2018). Exchange Traded Funds and Asset Return Correlations. European Financial Management, 24(1), 136–168. [https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12137](https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12137)
  13. Daigler, R. T. (2018). Exchange traded funds: Leverage and liquidity. Applied Economics, 50(37), 4054–4073. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1441510](https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1441510)
  14. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
  15. Duan, J.-C., & Lin, C.-F. (2014). Predicting ETF volatility. Journal of Derivatives, 21(4), 81–98. [https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2014.21.4.081](https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2014.21.4.081)
  16. Engle, R. F., & Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometric Theory, 11(1), 122–150. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646660000858X](https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646660000858X)
  17. Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223–2261. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00494](https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00494)
  18. Gutierrez, J. A., Martinez, V., & Tse, Y. (2009). Where does return and volatility come from? The case of Asian ETFs. International Review of Economics & Finance, 18(4), 671–679. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.02.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.02.012)
  19. Hughen, J. C. (2003). How Effective is Arbitrage of Foreign Stocks? The Case of the Malaysia Exchange-Traded Fund. Multinational Business Review, 11(2), 17–27. [https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383X200300009](https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383X200300009)
  20. Hughen, J. C., & Beyer, S. B. (2015). Stock returns and the U.S. dollar: The importance of monetary policy. Managerial Finance, 41(10), 1046–1058. [https://doi.org/10.1108/MF09-2014-0234](https://doi.org/10.1108/MF09-2014-0234)
  21. Kiracı, K. (2020). BİST Ulaştırma Endeksi ile Dolar Endeksi ve Petrol Fiyatları Arasındaki İlişkinin Ampirik Olarak Analizi. Maruf Akademik Cilt Dergisi, 12(22), 180-189. [https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.688344](https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.688344)
  22. Köse, Y., & Yılmaz, E. (2022). Dolar Endeksi Uluslararası Bir Finansal Gösterge Olabilir Mi? Dünyada Önemli Borsa Endeksleri Üzerinde Ampirik İnceleme. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (35), 85–96. [https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.930312](https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.930312)
  23. Krause, T., & Tse, Y. (2014). Volatility and return spillovers in Canadian and US industry ETFs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 244–259. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.06.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.06.002)
  24. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159–178. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y](https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076%2892%2990104-Y)
  25. Li, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2025). ETF connectedness and its applications: Evidence from RCEP member countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 78. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2025.100908](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2025.100908)
  26. Öner, K., & İçellioğlu, B. (2018). Dolar Endeksi’nin Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Döviz Kurları Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 177–194. [https://doi.org/10.31751/gaziibfd.421696](https://doi.org/10.31751/gaziibfd.421696)
  27. Rey, H. (2013). Dilemma not trilemma: The global financial cycle and monetary policy independence. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 19575. doi.org/10.3386/w19575
  28. SSGA. (2025). What is an ETF? [http://www.ssga.com/](http://www.ssga.com/) Adresinden 25 Temmuz 2025 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  29. Yavas, B. F., & Dedi, L. (2016). An investigation of return and volatility linkages among equity markets: A study of selected European and emerging countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 223–233. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.025](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.025)
  30. Yavas, B. F., & Rezayat, F. (2016). Country ETF returns and volatility spillovers in emerging stock markets, Europe and USA. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), 419–437. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2014-0150](https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2014-0150)