Journals / Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 171 - Sayı: 171

FLUENT READING FROM PAST TO PRESENT

GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE AKICI OKUMA

Pages
189–208
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the importance of fluent reading in both social and academic lives is addressed and various suggestions were presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research; views on the components, assessment, teaching and theoretical structure of fluent reading in the period from the early 20th Century to the present were presented in parallel with its process of development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Examples of fluent reading strategies that could be implemented by individuals or groups are presented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the importance of fluent reading in both social and academic lives is addressed and various suggestions were presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akıcı okuma · prozodi · otomatikleşme

Abstract

In this research; views on the components, assessment, teaching and theoretical structure of fluent reading in the period from the early 20th Century to the present were presented in parallel with its process of development. It was discussed, in light of the literature, whether fluent reading is a skill based on simple repetition and explained by theory of automatization; the processes it has gone through in its process of development; how the definitions of fluent reading have changed over time; and whether cognitive psychology has had an impact upon this process of change. Examples of fluent reading strategies that could be implemented by individuals or groups are presented. Its connection with comprehension was addressed and the importance of modeling in the development of prosody was stressed. Moreover, points related to fluent reading that still remain ambiguous were discussed. Finally, the importance of fluent reading in both social and academic lives is addressed and various suggestions were presented.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, 20. yüzyılın başından günümüze kadar olan sürede akıcı okumanın, bileşenleri, değerlendirilmesi, öğretimi ve kuramsal yapısı hakkındaki görüşler, gelişim sürecine paralel olarak sunulmuştur. Akıcı okumanın basit tekrara dayalı ve otomatikleşme teorisi ile açıklanabilen bir beceri olup olmadığı; gelişim süresince hangi aşamalardan geçtiği, akıcı okumanın tanımlarının zaman içerisinde nasıl değiştiği ve bu değişimde bilişsel psikolojinin etkisinin olup olmadığı literatür ışığında tartışılarak verilmiştir. Akıcı okumanın uygulanması konusunda bireysel ve grupla uygulanabilen stratejilerden örnekler verilmiştir. Akıcı okumanın anlama ile ilişkisi üzerinde durulmuş ve prozodinin gelişiminde modellemenin öneminden bahsedilmiştir. Akıcı okuma ile ilgili henüz belirsizliği giderilmemiş noktalara da dikkat çekilmiştir. Akıcı okumanın hem sosyal hem de akademik yaşantıdaki önemi üzerinde durularak çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, H. K., BAŞTUĞ, M. (2013). FLUENT READING FROM PAST TO PRESENT. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 171 - Sayı: 171, 189–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/130679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ADAMS, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. AKYOL, H. (2006). Türkçe İlk Okuma Yazma Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti. ALLINGTON, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. Reading Teacher, 36(6), 556-561.
  3. BAŞTUĞ, M. (2012). İlköğretim Birinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Akıcı Okuma Becerilerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. BENJAMIN, R. G., & SCHWANENFLUGEL, P. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388-404.
  6. BOERSMA, P., & WEENINK, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.23) [Computer Software]. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences. BREZNITZ, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CARROLL, J. B. (1965). The contributions of psychological theory and educational research to the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 49(5), 273-281.
  7. COURBRON, C. (2012). The correlation between the three reading fluency subskills and reading comprehension in at-risk adolescent readers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty Universty. DAANE, M. C., CAMPBELL, J. R., GRIGG, W. S., GOODMAN, M. J., & ORANJE, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: Naep 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. DENO, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219-232.
  8. DENO, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184-192.
  9. DONAHUE, P. L., VOELKL, K. E., CAMPBELL, J. R., & MAZZEO, J. (1999). Naep 1998 reading report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: U.S. National Center for Education Statistics. DOWHOWER, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 389-406.
  10. DOWHOWER, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency's unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 165-175.
  11. FUCHS, L. S., FUCHS, D., HOSP, M. K., & JENKINS, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific studies of reading, 5(3), 239 - 256. GOSS, S. J. (2009). Prosody and reading comprehension i