SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Investigation of the parameters affecting the total efficiency of solar energy panels designed with half and full photovoltaic cells

Yarım ve tam fotovoltaik hücreleri ile tasarlanan güneş enerjisi panellerinin toplam verimliliğini etkileyen parametrelerinin incelenmesi

Sevgi Duman(Erciyes Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2904-5515
Mustafa Alçı(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5478-6908
Pages
592–600
Publication Date
2022-07-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to these, information is given about the efficiency, production processes and some other disadvantages of half and full PV cells.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Solar power (SP) has been one of the most promising renewable energy sources to alleviate global environmental concerns and meet growing energy demand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this comparison, it is aimed to show the advantages of half-cell PV modules over full-cells, such as low power loss, reduced shade sensitivity, high price-performance ratio, less hot spot effect and improved heat dissipation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to these, information is given about the efficiency, production processes and some other disadvantages of half and full PV cells.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güneş enerjisi paneli (GEP) · Fotovoltaik · Yarım PV hücre

Abstract

Solar power (SP) has been one of the most promising renewable energy sources to alleviate global environmental concerns and meet growing energy demand. Solar energy is used in different ways. One of them is photovoltaic (PV) cells. Photovoltaic cells are semiconductor materials that convert solar energy directly into electrical energy. Conventional photovoltaic modules are modeled with full PV cells. Today, the use of half-cell modules, which is a new technology, is increasing rapidly. Although half PV cells have several advantages over full PV cells, there are also some manufacturing disadvantages. In this study, as a result of a comprehensive literature review, the parameters affecting the total efficiency of half and full cell PV modules are compared. With this comparison, it is aimed to show the advantages of half-cell PV modules over full-cells, such as low power loss, reduced shade sensitivity, high price-performance ratio, less hot spot effect and improved heat dissipation. In addition to these, information is given about the efficiency, production processes and some other disadvantages of half and full PV cells.

Özet

Güneş enerjisi (GE), küresel çevre endişelerini azaltmak ve artan enerji talebini karşılamak için en umut verici yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından biri olmuştur. Güneş enerjisinden farklı şekillerde yararlanılmaktadır. Bunlardan biride fotovoltaik (PV) hücrelerdir. Fotovoltaik hücreler güneş enerjisini doğrudan elektrik enerjisine dönüştüren yarıiletken malzemelerdir. Geleneksel fotovoltaik modüller tam PV hücreler ile modellenmektedir. Günümüzde ise yeni bir teknoloji olan yarım hücreli modül kullanımı hızla artmaktadır. Yarım PV hücrelerin tam PV hücrelere göre çeşitli avantajları olmasına rağmen, bazı üretim dezavantajları da vardır. Bu çalışmada kapsamlı bir literatür incelemesi sonucu yarım ve tam hücreli PV modüllerin toplam verimliliğini etkileyen parametreler karşılaştırılarak yarım hücreli PV modüllerin, düşük güç kaybı, azaltılmış gölge duyarlılığı, fiyat performans oranının yüksek olması, daha az sıcak nokta etkisi ve iyileştirilmiş ısı dağılımı gibi tam hücrelere göre üstünlüklerinin gösterilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bunlara ek olarak yarım ve tam PV hücrelerinin verimlilikleri, üretim süreçleri ve diğer bazı dezavantajları hakkında da bilgiler verilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Duman, S., Alçı, M. (2022). Investigation of the parameters affecting the total efficiency of solar energy panels designed with half and full photovoltaic cells. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1073976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. L. E. Chaar L.A. lamont, and N. E. Zein, Review of Photovoltaic Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5), 2165-2175, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.004
  2. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html, Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2022
  3. J. Schneider, S. Schoenfelder, S. Dietrich, and M. Turek, Solar module with half size solar cells. 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 185-189, Amsterdam, Niederlande, 2014.
  4. I. M. Peters, Y. S. Khoo, and T. M. Walsh, Detailed current loss analysis for a PV module made with textured multicrystalline silicon wafer solar cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 4(2), 585–593,2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2295736
  5. https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2018/10/what-is-a-half-cell-solar-panel/, Erişim Tarihi: 07.01.2022
  6. S. Guo, J. P. Singh, I. M. Peters, A. G. Aberle, and T. M. Walsh, A quantitative analysis of photovoltaic modules using halved cells. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2013, 0-8, 2013. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2013/739374
  7. International technology roadmap for photovoltaic http://www.itrpv.net/.cm4all/, Erişim Tarihi: 07.10.2021
  8. A. Joshi, A. Khan, and A. Sp, Comparison of half cut solar cells with standard solar cells. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, pp. 10-12, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2019.
  9. S. Guo, J. Schneider, F. Lu, H. Hanifi, M. Turek, M. Dyrba, and I.M. Peters, Investigation of the short-circuit current increase for PV modules using halved silicon wafer solar cells. Solar Energy Material & Solar Cells, 133, 240–247, 2015. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.solmat.2014.11.012
  10. T. Tang, C. Gan, Z. Hu, H. Niu, J. Si, and X. Luo, A Quantitative Comparison Between Double Glass Photovoltaic Modules Using Half-Size Cells and Quarter-Size Cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 7(5), 1298 – 1303, 2017. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017. 2730358
  11. H. Hanifi, M. Pander, U. Zeller, K. Ilse, D. Dassler, M. Mirza, M.A. Bahattab, B. Jaeckel, C. Hagendorf, and M. Ebert, Loss analysis and optimization of PV module components and design to achieve higher energy yield and longer service life in desert regions. Applied Energy, 280, 116028,2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116028
  12. H. Hanifi, D. Dassler, J. Schneider, M. Turek, S. Schindler, and J. Bagdahn, Optimized Tab Width in Half-cell Modules. Energy Procedia, 92, 52–59,2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.009
  13. J. Muller, D. Hinken, S. Blankemeyer, H. Kohlenberg, U. Sonntag, K. Bothe, T. Dullweber, M. Kontges, and R. Brendel, Resistive Power Loss Analysis of PV Modules Made from Halved 15.6 × 15.6 cm2 Silicon PERC Solar Cells with Efficiencies up to 20.0%. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics,5,189–194, 2015. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2367868
  14. V. Tyagi, N.A. Rahim, N. Rahim, and L. Selvaraj, Progress in solar PV technology: research and achievement, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 443-461, 2013. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.028
  15. E. E. van Dyk and E. L. Meyer, Analysis of the effect of parasitic resistances on the performance of photovoltaic modules. Renewable Energy, 29(3), 333–344, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03) 00250-7
  16. L. J. Caballero, P. Sanchez-Friera, B. Lalaguna, J. Alonso, and M. A. Vazquez, Series resistance modelling of industrial screen printed monocrystalline silicon solar cells and modules including the effect of spot soldering. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, pp. 1388–1391, Waikolo, Hawaii, USA, 2006.
  17. N. D. Kumar, C. Mounika, T. Sailaja, and D. Mounika, Design and reduction of wattage losses in solar module using AR coating, cell-to-cell gap and thickness. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, pp. 42–47, Hyderabad, India, 2011.
  18. W. S. Su, Y. C. Chen, W. H. Liao, C. H. Huang, D. C. Liu, M. Y. Huang, Z. C. Wu, and S. J. Ho, Optimization of the output power by effect of backsheet reflectance and spacing between cell strings. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 3218–3220, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2011.
  19. S. Roberts, K. C. Heasman, and T. M. Bruton, The reduction of module power losses by optimisation of the tabbing ribbon. 16th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 2378–2382, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2020.
  20. A. Thomson, M. Ernst, I. Haedrich, and J. Qian, Impact of PV module configuration on energy yield under realistic conditions. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 49(2), 1-15, 2017. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11082-017-0903-0
  21. I. Haedrich, U. Eitner, M. Wiese, and H. Wirth, Unified methodology for determining CTM ratios: Systematic prediction of module power. Solar Energy Material Solar Cells, 131, 14–23, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.025
  22. K. R. McIntosh, R. M. Swanson, and J. E. Cotter, A simple ray tracer to compute the optical concentration of photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics, 14(2), pp. 167–177, 2006. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pip.647
  23. H. Yousuf, M.A. Zahid, M.Q. Khokhar, J. Park, M. Ju, D. Lim, Y. Kim, E.C. Cho, and J. Yi, Cell-to-Module Simulation Analysis for Optimizing the Efficiency and Power of the Photovoltaic Module. Energies, 15, 1176, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ en15031176
  24. M. Mittag, A. Pfreundt, J. Shahid, N. Wöhrle, and D. H. Neuhaus, Techno-economic analysis of half cell modules: The impact of half cells on module power and costs. 36th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 9-13, Marseille, France, 2019.
  25. J. Jiang, J. Ni, Y. Zhang, D. Rong, Y. Li, T. Feng, Y. Geng, J. Zheng, F. Bo, and Y. He, Optimizing ribbons structure for power gain in half-cell modules. IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 3442-3445, Chicago, USA, 2019.
  26. A. Luque, and S. Hegedus, Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2010.
  27. M. Alçı ve S. Duman, Investigation of the effect of hot spot behavior and ribbon optimization on energy efficiency in half PV cells. 9th International Advanced Technologies Symposium, pp. 156-161, Türkiye, 2021.
  28. K. Brecl and M. Topic, Self-shading losses of fixed free-standing PV arrays. Renewable Energy, 36(11), 3211–3216, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. 2011.03.011
  29. K. Brecl, M. Bokalic, and M.Topic, Annual energy losses due to partial shading in PV modules with cut wafer-based Si solar cells. Renewable Energy, 168, 195-203, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. 2020.12.059
  30. T. Tang, C. Gan, Z. Hu, H. Niu, J. Si, and X. Luo, A Quantitative Comparison Between Double Glass Photovoltaic Modules Using Half-Size Cells and Quarter-Size Cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 7(5), 1298 – 1303, 2017. 10.1109/JPHOTOV. 2017.2730358
  31. H. Hanifi, J. Schneider, J. Bagdahn, H. Anhalt, and J. Bagdahn, Reduced shading effect on half-cell modules-measurement and simulation. 31st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 2529-2533, Hamburg, Germany, 2015.
  32. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/, Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2021
  33. M. Sayed, and L. Partain, Effect of shading on CdS CuxS solar cells and optimal solar array design. Energy Conversion, 14(2), 61-71, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7480(75)90083-2
  34. D. C. Jordan, T. J. Silverman, J. H. Wohlgemuth, S. R. Kurtz, and K. T. VanSant, Photovoltaic failure and degradation modes. Progress in Photovoltaics, 25(4), 18–326, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2866
  35. M. C. Alonso Garcia, W. Herrmann, W. Bohmer, and B. Proisy, Thermal and electrical effects caused by outdoor hot-spot testing in associations of photovoltaic cells. Progress in Photovoltaics, 11(5), 293-07, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.490
  36. M. Waqar Akram, G. Li, Y. Jin, C. Zhu, A. Javaid, M. Zuhaib Akram, and M. Usman Khan, Study of manufacturing and hotspot formation in cut cell and full cell PV modules. Solar Energy, 230, 247-259, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.052
  37. J. Qian, A. Thomson, A. Blakers, and M. Ernst, Comparison of half-cell and full-cell module hotspot-induced temperature by simulation. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 8(3), 834–839, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2817692
  38. J. Qian, C.E. Clement, M. Ernst, Y.S. Khoo, A. Thomson, and A. Blakers, Analysis of hotspots in half cell modules undetected by current test standards, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 9(3), 842–848,2019. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2898209
  39. T. Jung, H. Song, H. Ahn, G. Kang, A mathematical model for cell-to-module conversion considering mismatching solar cells and the resistance of the interconnection ribbon. Solar Energy, 103, 253–262, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.032
  40. https://www.pveasy.com.au/blog/2018/7/panels-with-half-cut-cells, Erişim Tarihi: 2.02.2022
  41. F. Gerenton, J. Eymard, S. Harrison, R. Clerc, and D. Munoz, Analysis of edge losses on silicon heterojunction half solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 204, 110213, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110213
  42. S. Braun, G. Hahn, R. Nissler, C. Pönisch, and D. Habermann, Multi-busbar solar cells and modules: high efficiencies and low silver consumption. Energy Procedia, 38, 334–339, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.286
  43. https://www.recgroup.com/sites/default/files/documents/whitepaper_twinpeak_technology.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2022
  44. S. Eiternick, F. Kaule, H.U. Zühlke, T. Kießling, M. Grimm, S. Schoenfelder, and M. Turek, High Quality Half-cell Processing Using Thermal Laser Separation. Energy Procedia 77, 340–345, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.048
  45. L. Xia, J. Chen, K. Liao, L. Huang, Q. Li, and X. Luo, Influence of laser cutting conditions on electrical characteristics of half-size bifacial silicon solar cells. Materials Science Semiconductor Processing, 105, 104747 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104747
  46. M.T. Sarniak, Modeling the Functioning of the Half-Cells Photovoltaic Module under Partial Shading in the Matlab Package. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2575, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072575
  47. M. Chiodetti, J. Dupuis, D. Boublil, K. Radouane, and P. Dupeyrat, Half-cell module behaviour and its impact on the yield of a pv plant. 36th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 1444-1448, Marseille, France, 2019
  48. S. Eiternick, K. Kaufmann, J. Schneider, and M. Turek, Loss analysis for laser separated solar cells. Energy Procedia, 55, 326–330, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.094
  49. A. Fell, J. Schön, M. Müller, N. Wöhrle, M. C. Schubert, and S. W. Glunz, Modeling of edge recombination losses in half-cells. 33rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, 8(2), 853–856, 2017.
  50. D. Roche, H. Outhred, and R.J. Kaye, Analysis and control of mismatch power loss in photovoltaic arrays. Progress in Photovoltaics, 3(2), 115-127, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.4670030204
  51. Z. Yang, K. Liao, J. Chen, L. Xia, and X. Luo, Output performance analysis and power optimization of different configurations half-cell modules under partial shading. Optik, 232, 166499, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166499
  52. S. Malik, D. Dassler, J. Fröbel, J. Schneider and M. Ebert, Outdoor data evaluation of half/Full-Cell modules with regard to measurement uncertainties and the application of statistical methods. 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 3269-3273, Amsterdam, Niederlande, 2014.