Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Lichtenstein hernioplasty in a district hospital

Bir ilçe hastanesinde Lichtenstein hernioplasti yapılan olguların analizi

Pages
75–77
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: LH operation for inguinal hernia seems to be a safe, efficient and simple technique with low complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The results of Lichteinstein hernioplasty (LH) technique experience was discussed on the basis of surgical literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: 61 patients operated with LH technique between July 2010 and January 2012 was analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: LH operation for inguinal hernia seems to be a safe, efficient and simple technique with low complication rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The results of Lichteinstein hernioplasty (LH) technique experience was discussed on the basis of surgical literature. Material and Methods: 61 patients operated with LH technique between July 2010 and January 2012 was analyzed retrospectively. Results: 61 patients were examined (58 male, 3 female, median ages: 49.9, age range: 16-81). Median length of hospital stay was 1.3 days. 72% of patients had indirect inguinal hernia, and 56% was right sided. Spinal anesthesia was applied in 60% of patients. In follow-up, one patient suffered from chronic pain, and one patient had recurrent hernia. Conclusion: LH operation for inguinal hernia seems to be a safe, efficient and simple technique with low complication rates.

Özet

Amaç: İnguinal herni onarımında Lichtenstein hernioplasti (LH) tekniği sonuçlarının cerrahi literatür eşliğinde incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Temmuz 2010-Ocak 2012 tarihleri arasında 61 hastaya yapılan LH ameliyatı retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: 58 erkek ve 3 kadın hasta incelendi. Yaş ortalaması 49.9 (16-81) olarak bulundu. Hastanede ortalama yatış süresi 1.3 gün olup %72 olgu indirekt tip ve %56 olgu sağ inguinal yerleşimliydi. Olguların %60’ına spinal anestezi uygulandı. Bir olguda nüks saptandı. Sonuç: LH, inguinal herni ameliyatlarında güvenli, efektif, basit ve düşük komplikasyonlu bir yöntem olarak görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇEL, O., KÖŞÜM, A. (2012). Analysis of Lichtenstein hernioplasty in a district hospital. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 75–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/129375

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Cheek CM, Black NA, Devlin HB. Groin hernia surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80: S1-80
  2. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tensionfree hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 188-193
  3. Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, Tian J, Yang K. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 35-42
  4. Mayagoitia JC. Inguinal hernioplasty with the prolene hernia system. Hernia 2004; 8: 64-66
  5. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. The Lichtenstein repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 1099-1117
  6. Nogueras MG, Gutierrez JR, Cavalle FM. Tension free hernioplasty technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. Video Rev Surg 1994; 11: 27-30
  7. Chang EG. When to use mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Milit Med 1991; 156: 364-368
  8. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. The Lichtenstein repair. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78: 1025-1046
  9. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open “Tension-Free” repair of inguinal hernias; The Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 447-453
  10. Goldstein HS. Selecting the right mesh. Hernia 1999; 3: 23-26
  11. Vrijland WW, van den Tol MP, Luijendijk RW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 293-297
  12. Koukourou A, Lyon W, Rice J, Wattchow DA. Prospective randomized trial of polypropylene mesh compared with nylon darn in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 931-934
  13. Juul P, Christensen K. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 316-319
  14. Paajanen H. Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy under local infiltration anaesthesia as rapid outpatient procedure. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl 2001; 215: 51-54
  15. Turhan AN, Kapan S, İpek SF, Hatipoğlu S, Aygün E. İnguinal herni tamirinde anterior preperitoneal mesh ve Lichtenstein mesh takviyelerinin karşılaştırılması. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2005; 1: 16-19
  16. Mottin CC, Ramos RJ, Ramos MJ. Using the prolene hernia system(phs) for inguinal hernia repair. Rev Col Bras Cir 2011; 38: 24-27
  17. Hakeem A, Shanmugam V. Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17: 1791-1796
  18. Dennis R, O’Riordan D. Risk factors for chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89: 218-220
  19. Ocakoğlu A. Lichtenstein yöntemi (Prolen Yama Tekniği) ile kasık fıtığı tamiri. J Kartal TR 201