SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Monitoring of renal function in patients with RIFLE and AKIN scores to compare the effects on mortality and morbidity in ICU

Yoğunbakım hastalarında renal fonksiyonların RIFLE ve AKIN Skorları ile takibinin mortalite ve morbidite üzerindeki etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Evrim TÜLÜBAŞ KÜÇÜR
GÜRAY DEMİR
Erkan DUMAN
Dilek ALTUN
HALİL ÇETİNGÖK
Oya HERGÜNSEL
Zafer ÇUKUROVA
Pages
69–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There is no significant differences between AKIN and RIFLE classification for the morbity and mortality of ARF.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Acute kidney injury network (AKIN) in intesive care patients is a common clinical condition that adversely affect the clinical course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 190 patients followed up in our hospital’s intensive care unit and developed acute renal failure (ARF) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There is no significant differences between AKIN and RIFLE classification for the morbity and mortality of ARF.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Acute kidney injury network (AKIN) in intesive care patients is a common clinical condition that adversely affect the clinical course. RIFLE and AKIN classification is used to determine the prognosis and mortality. We aimed to find out which of the two different classification is more efficient and reliable on to determine the prevalence of morbidity and mortality in intensive care patients. Materials and Methods: 190 patients followed up in our hospital’s intensive care unit and developed acute renal failure (ARF) were included in the study. AKIN and RIFLE scores were compared. Results: In our research RIFLE and AKIN rating was found compatible with a statistically significant difference . Conclusion: There is no significant differences between AKIN and RIFLE classification for the morbity and mortality of ARF.

Özet

Amaç: Akut böbrek hasarı (ABH) yoğun bakım hastalarında sık karşılaşılan ve klinik seyri olumsuz yönde etkileyen bir klinik tablodur. RIFLE ve AKIN sınıflaması prognoz ve mortalite belirlemede kullanılmaktadır. Biz yaptığımız bu çalışma ile iki farklı sınıflamanın hangisinin yoğun bakım hastalarında mortalite ve morbidite tahmini üzerinde daha etkili ve güvenilir olduğunu saptamayı hedefledik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemiz yoğun bakımında takip edilip ABH gelişen 190 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilerek RIFLE ve AKIN skorları ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Yapılan incelemelerde AKIN derecelendirmesi ile RIFLE derecelendirmesi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede uyumlu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: RIFLE ve AKIN sınıflamalarının mortalite ve morbiditeyi göstermede birbirlerine üstünlükleri yoktur, evre arttıkça her iki sınıflamada da mortalite oranları artmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜR, E. T., DEMİR, G., DUMAN, E., ALTUN, D., ÇETİNGÖK, H., HERGÜNSEL, O., ÇUKUROVA, Z. (2013). Monitoring of renal function in patients with RIFLE and AKIN scores to compare the effects on mortality and morbidity in ICU. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 69–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/129103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004; 8: R204-212
  2. Ostermann M, Chang R. Correlation between the AKI classification and outcome. Crit Care 2008; 12: R144
  3. Akpir K, Tuğrul S (Eds). Akut Renal Yetersizlik. Klinik Yoğun Bakım, İstanbul Tıp Kitapevi, İstanbul; 2009: s. 475-488
  4. Guyton AC, Hall JE (Eds). The Kıdneys and Body Fluids. In: Textbook of Medical Physiology. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia; 1996: p.315-347
  5. Schrier RW, Wang W, Poole B, Mitra A. Acute renal failure: definitions, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy. J Clin Invest 2004; 114: 5-14
  6. Hoste EA, Kellum JA. RIFLE criteria provide robust assessment of kidney dysfunction and correlate with hospital mortality. Critic Care Med 2006; 34: 2016-2017
  7. Ingham J. Acute renal failure in intensive care. Anesthesia Intensive Care Med 2006; 7: 116-118
  8. Waikar SS, Liu KD, Chertow GM. Diagnosis, epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 844-861
  9. Joannidis M, Metnitz B, Bauer P, Schusterschitz N, Moreno R, Druml W, Metnitz PG. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients classified by AKIN versus RIFLE using the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1692-1702
  10. Barrantes F, Tian J, Vazquez R, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Acute kidney injury criteria predict outcomes of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 1397-1403
  11. Keevil BG, Kilpatrick ES, Nichols SP, Maylor PW. Biological variation of cystation C: implications for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 1535-1539
  12. Chang CH, Lin CY, Tian YC, Jeng CC, Chang MY, Chen YC, Fang JT. Acute kidney injury classifition:compration of AKIN and RIFLE C-criteria. Shock 2010; 33: 247-252
  13. Wasén E, Isoaho R, Mattila K, Vahlberg T, Kivelä SL, Irjala K. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in the elderly: a comparison of creatinine-based formulae with serum cystatin C. J Intern Med 2004; 256: 70-78.