Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Successful treatment of Caesarean scar pregnancy with dilatation and curettage

Sezaryen Skar Gebeliğinin Dilatasyon ve Küretaj ile Başarılı Tedavisi

Pages
44–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We present a caesarean scar pregnancy which has been treated by dilatation- curettage successfully.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the pregnancy implanted in caesarean scar tissue is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It can cause a fatal clinical situation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We present a caesarean scar pregnancy which has been treated by dilatation- curettage successfully.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

While the pregnancy implanted in caesarean scar tissue is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy. It can cause a fatal clinical situation. Because of the fact that it could not been diagnosed early in the past, to prevent maternal mortality, massive hemorrhage and death by the reason of uterine rupture, the single treatment was urgent laparotomy and in case if necessity hysterectomy. Anyhow, there are some protective choices for the treatment. Because of its rarity, the data about the caesarean scar pregnancy generally predicated on the case reports. Therefore, there is no clinical management which has become a consensus of opinion. We present a caesarean scar pregnancy which has been treated by dilatation- curettage successfully.

Özet

Sezaryen skarında implantasyon gösteren gebelik, dış gebeliğin en nadir formu olup hayati tehlike içerebilen klinik bir durumdur. Geçmişte erken tanı koyulamadığı için; tek tedavi maternal morbidite, masif hemoraji ve uterin rüptür nedeniyle ölümü önlemek için acil laparotomi ve gerektiğinde histerektomi yapmaktı. Ancak bugün için tedavide koruyucu seçeneklerde mevcuttur. Nadir görülmesi nedeniyle sezaryen skar gebeliğine dair veriler çoğunlukla olgu sunumlarına dayanır. Bu nedenle tanı ve tedavisi üzerinde fikir birliğine varılmış bir klinik yönetimi bulunmamaktadır. Biz, dilatasyon-küretaj ile başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edilmiş sezaryen skar gebeliği olgusunu sunuyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, H., YAŞAR, L., EKİN, M., ÖZEL, G. (2014). Successful treatment of Caesarean scar pregnancy with dilatation and curettage. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 44–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/129060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Herman A. Ectopic pregnancies in a Caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 515-523
  2. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in Caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 278-284
  3. Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002; 57: 537-543
  4. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First- trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 220-227
  5. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1373-1381
  6. Molinaro TA, Barnhart KT. Ectopic pregnancies in unusual locations. Semin Reprod Med 2007; 25: 123-130
  7. Ayoubi JM, Fanchin R, Meddoun M, Fernandez H, Pons JC. Conservative treatment of complicated cesarean scar pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2001; 80: 469- 470
  8. Lee CL, Wang CJ, Chao A, Yen CF, Soong YK. Laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy in a previous cesarean section scar. Hum Reprod 1999;14: 1234-1236
  9. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 247-253.