Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Human Security as Final Cause of Political Society

Siyasi Toplumun Esas Amacı Olarak İnsan Güvenliği

Hakkı Hakan Erkiner(Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi)0000-0002-0779-6414
Emerant Yves Omgba Akoudou(Yurtdışı Türkler ve Akraba Topluluklar Başkanlığı İbni Haldun Sosyal Bilimler Burs Programı Bursiyeri, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Hukuku Doktora Programı Öğrencisi)0000-0003-4960-1096
Pages
120–153
Publication Date
2021-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It tests that by rereading Aristotelian essentialism and contractualist philosophies in a way that they inform human security as a natural law, evidenced in the Man’s political animality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since its advent in international affairs in the 1990s the concept of human security has been subject to a great interest within the academia and political milieus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various conceptions of it were advanced and received concrete forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It tests that by rereading Aristotelian essentialism and contractualist philosophies in a way that they inform human security as a natural law, evidenced in the Man’s political animality.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Human security · political society · human nature

Abstract

Since its advent in international affairs in the 1990s the concept of human security has been subject to a great interest within the academia and political milieus. Various conceptions of it were advanced and received concrete forms. This paper is a contribution both to the understanding of human security and the sense of its satisfaction related to political society. Precisely from an essentialist perspective, it advances a naturalistic conception of human security, which enables to account of it as the human natural order, inescapably implying conservation. That way, it stands as the final cause of political society, that is to say, its foundation and its finality. It tests that by rereading Aristotelian essentialism and contractualist philosophies in a way that they inform human security as a natural law, evidenced in the Man’s political animality.

Özet

1990'larda uluslararası ilişkilerde ortaya çıkışından bu yana insan güvenliği kavramı, akademi ve siyasi çevrede büyük ilgi görmüştür. Bunun çeşitli kavramları geliştirildi ve somut biçimler aldı. Bu makale hem insan güvenliği anlayışına hem de politik toplumla ilgili memnuniyet duygusuna bir katkıdır. Kesin olarak özcü bir bakış açısıyla, kaçınılmaz bir şekilde korumayı ima eden, onu insan doğal düzeni olarak açıklamayı mümkün kılan, insan güvenliğinin doğalcı bir anlayışını geliştirir. Bu şekilde, siyasi toplumun nihai nedeni, yani onun temeli ve kesinliği olarak durur. Bunu, Aristotelesçi özcülük ve sözleşmeci felsefeleri, İnsanın politik hayvanlığında kanıtlandığı gibi, insan güvenliğini doğal bir yasa olarak bilgilendirecek şekilde yeniden okuyarak test eder.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erkiner, H. H., Akoudou, E. Y. O., *, H. H. E. (2021). Human Security as Final Cause of Political Society. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 120–153. https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.851072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. ABEL (D.), Theories of human nature: Classical and contemporary readings. McgrawHill, New York, 1992
  2. ACHARYA, (A.) “Human Security: East versus West”, International Journal, Vol. 56, n°3, 2001, pp. 442–460
  3. ALFORD, (C. F.) Narrative, Nature, and the Natural Law. From Aquinas to International Human Rights, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2010
  4. ATKINS, (Ph.) « Essential vs. Accidental Properties », Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy First published Tuesday April 29, 2008; substantive revision Monday April 18, 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/essential-accidental
  5. AXWORTHY (L.), « Human Security and Global Governance: Putting People First », Global Governance, vol. 22, 1, 2001
  6. BARTH, (H.), The Idea of Order, Contributions to a Philosophy of Politics, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, 1960
  7. BAUER, (S.) GERBIER (L.), « Famille », in CNRS (éd.), Grand Dictionnaire de la Philosophie, Larousse, Paris, 2003, pp. 1236-1237
  8. CHENET (F. X.), KANT, Philosophie pratique, Métaphysique des mœurs, Critique de la raison pratique, Philopsis éditions numériques, 2008
  9. Commission on Human Security, Human Security Now, New York, Commission on Human Security, 2003
  10. COURNARI, L. Aristote, Commentaire du livre IV des Politiques, Philopsis: Revue numérique, http://www.philopsis.fr
  11. DELEUZE, (G.) GUATTARI, (F.), L’anti-Œdipe, Minuit, Paris, 1972
  12. ELLIS, (B), The Philosophy of Nature, A Guide to the New Essentialism, Acumen Publishing Limited, Chesham, 2002
  13. ESTRADA-TANCK (E.D.), Human Security and Human Rights under International Law: Crossroads and Possibilities, European University Institute, 2010
  14. Dictionnaire sur PC Ortolang du CNRTL (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), comprenant les dictionnaires de l'Académie française jusqu'à la 9ème édition. http://www.cnrtl.fr
  15. FRIEDRICH (C. J.) (ed.), The Philosophy of Kant: Moral and Political Writings, New York: The Modem Library, 1949
  16. FUKUDA-PARR, (S.) MESSINEO, (C.) Human Security: A critical review of the literature, Centre for Research on Peace and Development, Working Paper n° 11, KU Leuven, January, 2012
  17. HOBBES, (Th.) Leviathan, 1651, R. TUCK (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
  18. HOBBES, (Th.) Leviathan or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil, printed for Andrew Crooke, at the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church-yard London, 1651
  19. KANT, (I.), The Doctrine of Virtue, transl. of M. J. GREGOR New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964
  20. KHONG (Y.F.), « Human Security: A Shotgun Approach to Alleviating Human Misery?» Global Governance, Vol. 7, 3 July–September 2001LIOTTA (P.H.), OWEN (T.). « Why Human Security?» in The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations. Vol 7, 1, Winter/Spring 2006, 37-54
  21. LEANING (J.), ARIE (S.), Human Security: A Framework for Assessment in Conflict and Transition. Prepared for US AID, Tulane Complex Emergency Response and Transition Initiative (CERTI), Tulane University. December 2000
  22. LEVI-STRAUSS, (Cl.) Les structures élémentaires de la parenté, PUF, Paris, 1949
  23. LOCKE, (J.), Two Treatises of Government, 1698, P. LASLETT (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988
  24. NEF, (J.) “Human Security, Mutual Vulnerability and Sustainable Development: A Critical View”, The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Vol. 7, n° 1 Winter-Spring 2006
  25. NIETZSCHE, (F.), La volonté de puissance, 2 tomes, coll. «tel», Gallimard, Paris, 1995
  26. OURLIAC, (P.) GAZZANIGA, (J.-L.), Histoire du droit privé français, II, 4, Albin Michel, Paris, 1985
  27. OWEN, (T.) “Human security. Conflict and Consensus: Colloquium Remarks and Proposal for a Threshold-Based definition”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 35, n°3, September 2004,, pp. 373-387
  28. RIMBOUX, (E.) “Politique”, Grand Dictionnaire de la Philosophie, Edition numérique, Larousse, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, pour la bibliothèque numérique Gallica, 2003
  29. ROBERTSON, (D.) The Routledge Dictionary of Politics, 3rd Ed. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge USA and Canada, New Fetter Lane, London, New York, 2004
  30. ROUSSEAU, (J-J.) The Social Contract, “6. The Social Compact”, eBooks@Adelaide, The University of Adelaide Library, 2012, http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/r/rousseau/jean_jacques/r864s/index.html
  31. RUSSELL, (B.), A History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1945
  32. SAINT-HILAIRE, (J. B.) La Politique d'Aristote, Traduite en Français d'après le Texte Collationné sur Les Manuscrits et les Éditions Principales, Troisième Édition, Revue et Corrigée, Paris, Librairie Philosophique de Ladrange, 1874
  33. SCRUTON, (R.), “Politics”, The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Political Thought, 3rd edition, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2007
  34. TANZELLA-NITTI (G.), « The Aristotelian-Thomistic Concept of Nature and the Contemporary Debate on the Meaning of Natural Laws », Acta Philosophica, n°6, 1997
  35. TRICAUD, (F.) “Hobbes et Locke: convergences et divergences”, in: XVII-XVIII. Bulletin de la société d'études angloaméricaines, des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècle, n°25, 1987
  36. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1994, Published for the, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994
  37. United Nations, General Assembly, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 10 September 2012 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/66/L.55/Rev.1 and Add.1)], Follow-up to paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 World Summit Outcome, A/RES/66/290 66/290, 25 October 2012
  38. VLIETINCK, (E.), « La philosophie de l'histoire », in Revue néo-scolastique de philosophie, 25ᵉ année, n°97, 1923, p. 85-95; https://www.persee.fr/doc/phlou_0776-555x_1923_num_25_97_2334