SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 8

ZAZA DİLİNDE ERGATİF SİSTEMİN TARİHİ GELİŞİMİ

İlyas Arslan
Pages
63–87
Publication Date
2016-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zaza · Ergatif · İrani Diller

Özet

Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, İ. (2016). ZAZA DİLİNDE ERGATİF SİSTEMİN TARİHİ GELİŞİMİ. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 8, 63–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/1284092

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (68)

  1. Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Generative Approaches to Ergativity. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (5), 966–995.
  2. Arkadiev, Peter. M. (2008). Differential Argument Marking in Two-Term Case Systems and its Implications for the general theory of Case Marking. In: Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 72, S. 151-17
  3. Bavant, Marc. 2008. Proto-Indo-European Ergativity. Still to be Discussed. In: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (4), S. 433–447.
  4. Bisang, Walter. 2002. Argument structure and its morphosyntactic representation: Nominatife/accusative, ergative/absolutive, active/inactive, direct/inverse. Vortrag zu 7th Summer School of the German Linguistic Society. Online: http://www.phil-fak.uniduesseldorf. de/summerschool2002/Bisang5.PDF. Böhm, Roger. 2001. Ergativität – Accusativität. und Notionalgrammatisches. In Hackmack, ed., 53-64. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/boehm.pdf.
  5. Butt, Miriam. & Deo, Ashwini. 2001. Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In KURDICA Newsletter for Kurdish Language and Studies 5: 1-18.
  6. Korrigierte Version (2005) auf http://ling.unikonstanz. de/pages/home/butt/main/papers/ia-erg.html. Butt, Miriam. 2006. The Dative-Ergative Connection. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) pp. 69–92.
  7. Butt, Miriam & Poudel, Tikaram. 2007. Distribution of the Ergative in Nepali. Leipzig: University of Konstanz. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) Projekt- SFB 471, Project A24. Bynon, Theodora. 1979. The ergative construction in Kurdish. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42 (02): 211- 224. Bynon, Theodora. 2005. Evidential, raised Possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Transactions of the philological Society 103:1-72.
  8. Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Leiden: Brill (Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series, 2). Online: http://azadegan.info/files/Etymological_Dictionary_of_the_Iranian_Verb.pdf.
  9. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1977. The Syntactic Development of Australian Languages. In Li, Charles N.,ed., 365-415.
  10. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1987. Studies in Ergativity. In Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 71:1-16.
  11. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Dixon, Robert M. W. 1995. Ergativity. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Gippert, J. 1996. Die historische Entwicklung der Zaza-Sprache. In Ware: Pêseroka Zon u Kulturê Ma: Dımıli-Kırmanc-Zaza 10:148-154.
  12. Gippert, J. 2008. Zur dialektalen Stellung des Zazaki. Die Sprache 47/1, 2007/2008: 77-107.
  13. Hackmack, Susanne & Karl Heinz Wagner, eds. 2001. Ergativ. (Bremer Linguististik Workshop 1). 53-64. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IASS. Online verfügbar: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/.
  14. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2004. Alignment in Kurdish: a diachronic perspective. Unveröffentlichtes Habilitationsschrift. Universität Kiel. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages (Empirical approaches to language typology; 37). Berlin [u.a.]: Mouton de Gruyter. Holmberg & Odden. 2004. Ergativity and Role-Marking in Hawrami. In SWL 1, August 5-8 University of Leipzig & Max Plank Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Johns, A. Massam, D. & Ndayiragije J. (Eds.). 2006. Ergativity. Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Springer. Jügel, Thomas. 2009. In Orientalia Suecana LVIII: 142-158.
  15. Karimi, Yadgar. 2012. The Evolution of Ergativity in Iranian Languages. In Asta Linguistica Asiatica 2:23-44.
  16. Kefer, Michel. 1986. Ergativität und syntaktische Relationen. In Burkhard, ed., 121-132.
  17. Laka, Itziar. 2006. Deriving split ergativity in the progresive: The case of Basque, In Johns, ed., 173-196.
  18. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lubotsky, A. & De Vaan, M. In: Gzella (ed) 2009:160-174.
  19. Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. In Journal of Indo-European Studies 21:303-329.
  20. McGrogor, William B. 2009. Typology of Ergativity. In Language and Linguistics Compass: 480-508.
  21. Melikishvili, Irine. 2008. Georgian as an Active/Ergative Split Language. In Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 2:138-147 Online: http://www.science.org.ge/2-2/Melikishvili.pdf. Mirdehghan & Jahangiri. 2005. Split-Ergative Morphology in Hindi/Urdu, Pashto & Balochi Languages. In J. Humanities 12 (3): 93-122.
  22. Otsuka, Yuko. 2000. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: Resumptive Pronouns Revisited. Mānoa: University of Hawaii at Mānoa. Otsuka, Yuko. 2006. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: In Johns, ed., 79-110.
  23. Peterson, J. 1999. Grammatische Relationen im Pali und die Entstehung von Ergativität im Indoarischen. In Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 112:227-263.
  24. Plank, Frans (ed). 1979. Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.
  25. Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Ergativity.handout.Sept 07.doc, Online: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mpolinsky/files/ergativity.MIT_.handout.pdf.
  26. Polinsky, Maria & Gallo, Carlos Gómez & Graff, Peter & Kravtchenko, Ekaterina. 2012. Subject preference and ergativity. In: Lingua 122:267–277.
  27. Pirejko, L.A. 1979. On the Genesis of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian. In: Plank 1979: 481-489.
  28. Primus, Beatrice. 1999.
  29. Cases and Thematic Roles - Ergative, Accusative and Active (Linguistische Arbeiten). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Primus, Beatrice. 2003. Ergativität im Deutschen? Das Deutsche im Rahmen der relationalen Typologie. Koreanische Zeitschrift für Germanistik 86:13-38. Online http://kgg.german.or.kr/kr/kzg/kzgtxt/86-02.pdf.
  30. Selcan, Zülfü. 1998. Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache: Nord-Dialekt (Dersim-Dialekt). Berlin: Wissenschaft & Technik. Selcan, Zülfü. 2013. Zur historischen Entwicklung der Zaza Sprache. In Acta Orientalica 74: 157-218.
  31. Stolz, Christina. 2000. Ergativität in Mayasprachen. Vorgetragen bei Bremer Linguistik Workshop. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/cstolz.pdf. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2009. Approaches to Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In Lingua Posnaniensis 51: 77-118. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010. Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan. In Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46:237–253.
  32. Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank., ed., 385-404.
  33. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1981. Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5:361–94.
  34. Wechsler, Stephen & Arka, I. W. 1998. Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: an Argument Structure Based Theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387-441. Onliner: http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wechsler/Balinese-NLLT.pdf.
  35. Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Generative Approaches to Ergativity. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (5), 966–995.
  36. Arkadiev, Peter. M. (2008). Differential Argument Marking in Two-Term Case Systems and its Implications for the general theory of Case Marking. In: Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 72, S. 151-17
  37. Bavant, Marc. 2008. Proto-Indo-European Ergativity. Still to be Discussed. In: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (4), S. 433–447.
  38. Bisang, Walter. 2002. Argument structure and its morphosyntactic representation: Nominatife/accusative, ergative/absolutive, active/inactive, direct/inverse. Vortrag zu 7th Summer School of the German Linguistic Society. Online: http://www.phil-fak.uniduesseldorf. de/summerschool2002/Bisang5.PDF. Böhm, Roger. 2001. Ergativität – Accusativität. und Notionalgrammatisches. In Hackmack, ed., 53-64. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/boehm.pdf.
  39. Butt, Miriam. & Deo, Ashwini. 2001. Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In KURDICA Newsletter for Kurdish Language and Studies 5: 1-18.
  40. Korrigierte Version (2005) auf http://ling.unikonstanz. de/pages/home/butt/main/papers/ia-erg.html. Butt, Miriam. 2006. The Dative-Ergative Connection. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) pp. 69–92.
  41. Butt, Miriam & Poudel, Tikaram. 2007. Distribution of the Ergative in Nepali. Leipzig: University of Konstanz. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) Projekt- SFB 471, Project A24. Bynon, Theodora. 1979. The ergative construction in Kurdish. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42 (02): 211- 224. Bynon, Theodora. 2005. Evidential, raised Possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Transactions of the philological Society 103:1-72.
  42. Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Leiden: Brill (Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series, 2). Online: http://azadegan.info/files/Etymological_Dictionary_of_the_Iranian_Verb.pdf.
  43. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1977. The Syntactic Development of Australian Languages. In Li, Charles N.,ed., 365-415.
  44. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1987. Studies in Ergativity. In Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 71:1-16.
  45. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Dixon, Robert M. W. 1995. Ergativity. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Gippert, J. 1996. Die historische Entwicklung der Zaza-Sprache. In Ware: Pêseroka Zon u Kulturê Ma: Dımıli-Kırmanc-Zaza 10:148-154.
  46. Gippert, J. 2008. Zur dialektalen Stellung des Zazaki. Die Sprache 47/1, 2007/2008: 77-107.
  47. Hackmack, Susanne & Karl Heinz Wagner, eds. 2001. Ergativ. (Bremer Linguististik Workshop 1). 53-64. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IASS. Online verfügbar: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/.
  48. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2004. Alignment in Kurdish: a diachronic perspective. Unveröffentlichtes Habilitationsschrift. Universität Kiel. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages (Empirical approaches to language typology; 37). Berlin [u.a.]: Mouton de Gruyter. Holmberg & Odden. 2004. Ergativity and Role-Marking in Hawrami. In SWL 1, August 5-8 University of Leipzig & Max Plank Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Johns, A. Massam, D. & Ndayiragije J. (Eds.). 2006. Ergativity. Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Springer. Jügel, Thomas. 2009. In Orientalia Suecana LVIII: 142-158.
  49. Karimi, Yadgar. 2012. The Evolution of Ergativity in Iranian Languages. In Asta Linguistica Asiatica 2:23-44.
  50. Kefer, Michel. 1986. Ergativität und syntaktische Relationen. In Burkhard, ed., 121-132.
  51. Laka, Itziar. 2006. Deriving split ergativity in the progresive: The case of Basque, In Johns, ed., 173-196.
  52. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lubotsky, A. & De Vaan, M. In: Gzella (ed) 2009:160-174.
  53. Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. In Journal of Indo-European Studies 21:303-329.
  54. McGrogor, William B. 2009. Typology of Ergativity. In Language and Linguistics Compass: 480-508.
  55. Melikishvili, Irine. 2008. Georgian as an Active/Ergative Split Language. In Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 2:138-147 Online: http://www.science.org.ge/2-2/Melikishvili.pdf. Mirdehghan & Jahangiri. 2005. Split-Ergative Morphology in Hindi/Urdu, Pashto & Balochi Languages. In J. Humanities 12 (3): 93-122.
  56. Otsuka, Yuko. 2000. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: Resumptive Pronouns Revisited. Mānoa: University of Hawaii at Mānoa. Otsuka, Yuko. 2006. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: In Johns, ed., 79-110.
  57. Peterson, J. 1999. Grammatische Relationen im Pali und die Entstehung von Ergativität im Indoarischen. In Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 112:227-263.
  58. Plank, Frans (ed). 1979. Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.
  59. Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Ergativity.handout.Sept 07.doc, Online: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mpolinsky/files/ergativity.MIT_.handout.pdf.
  60. Polinsky, Maria & Gallo, Carlos Gómez & Graff, Peter & Kravtchenko, Ekaterina. 2012. Subject preference and ergativity. In: Lingua 122:267–277.
  61. Pirejko, L.A. 1979. On the Genesis of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian. In: Plank 1979: 481-489.
  62. Primus, Beatrice. 1999.
  63. Cases and Thematic Roles - Ergative, Accusative and Active (Linguistische Arbeiten). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Primus, Beatrice. 2003. Ergativität im Deutschen? Das Deutsche im Rahmen der relationalen Typologie. Koreanische Zeitschrift für Germanistik 86:13-38. Online http://kgg.german.or.kr/kr/kzg/kzgtxt/86-02.pdf.
  64. Selcan, Zülfü. 1998. Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache: Nord-Dialekt (Dersim-Dialekt). Berlin: Wissenschaft & Technik. Selcan, Zülfü. 2013. Zur historischen Entwicklung der Zaza Sprache. In Acta Orientalica 74: 157-218.
  65. Stolz, Christina. 2000. Ergativität in Mayasprachen. Vorgetragen bei Bremer Linguistik Workshop. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/cstolz.pdf. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2009. Approaches to Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In Lingua Posnaniensis 51: 77-118. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010. Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan. In Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46:237–253.
  66. Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank., ed., 385-404.
  67. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1981. Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5:361–94.
  68. Wechsler, Stephen & Arka, I. W. 1998. Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: an Argument Structure Based Theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387-441. Onliner: http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wechsler/Balinese-NLLT.pdf.