SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

The Impact of Neuromarketing on Consumer Decision Processes: A Conceptual Literature Review

Nöropazarlamanın Tüketici Karar Süreçlerine Etkisi: Kavramsal Literatür İncelemesi

Pınar Coşkun(MUNZUR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6636-6951
Pages
39–59
Publication Date
2026-01-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the article provides an integrative framework that maps the opportunities, boundaries, and risks of neuromarketing and outlines directions for future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Neuromarketing is an interdisciplinary approach that integrates neuroscientific and psychophysiological techniques into marketing research in order to better understand consumer behavior beyond self-reports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By capturing consumers’ largely unconscious reactions to products, brands, and advertising, neuromarketing helps illuminate the cognitive and affective processes that shape attention, emotional arousal, memory, motivation, and ultimately purchasing decisions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the article provides an integrative framework that maps the opportunities, boundaries, and risks of neuromarketing and outlines directions for future research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nöropazarlama · Tüketici Davranışı · Nörogörüntüleme Araçları

Abstract

Neuromarketing is an interdisciplinary approach that integrates neuroscientific and psychophysiological techniques into marketing research in order to better understand consumer behavior beyond self-reports. By capturing consumers’ largely unconscious reactions to products, brands, and advertising, neuromarketing helps illuminate the cognitive and affective processes that shape attention, emotional arousal, memory, motivation, and ultimately purchasing decisions. Drawing on a conceptual review that does not claim to be a systematic review, this article synthesizes the main neuromarketing tools e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) as well as complementary techniques such as eye-tracking, galvanic skin response, and facial expression coding, and discusses what each can and cannot reveal about consumer decision processes. The review highlights how neuromarketing can extend conventional methods by offering more direct indicators of consumer responses, with implications for marketing communication and managerial decision-making (e.g., message design, branding, pricing, and customer experience). At the same time, the study emphasizes critical limitations such as cost, standardization challenges, and the artificiality of laboratory settings alongside ethical concerns related to privacy, informed consent, transparency, and the protection of cognitive autonomy. Overall, the article provides an integrative framework that maps the opportunities, boundaries, and risks of neuromarketing and outlines directions for future research.

Özet

Nöropazarlama, tüketici davranışını öz-bildirimlere dayalı geleneksel yöntemlerin ötesinde anlamak amacıyla nörobilimsel ve psikofizyolojik tekniklerin pazarlama araştırmalarına entegre edildiği disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımdır. Ürün, marka ve reklam gibi pazarlama uyaranlarına verilen büyük ölçüde bilinçdışı tepkileri ölçerek; dikkat, duygusal uyarılma, bellek, motivasyon ve satın alma kararı gibi süreçlerin bilişsel ve duygusal bileşenlerini görünür kılmayı hedefler. Bu çalışma, sistematik derleme iddiası taşımayan kavramsal bir literatür incelemesi çerçevesinde, nöropazarlama alanındaki temel ve güncel araştırmaları sentezlemekte; fonksiyonel manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (fMRI), elektroensefalografi (EEG), pozitron emisyon tomografisi (PET) ve manyetoensefalografi (MEG) gibi nörogörüntüleme araçlarının yanı sıra göz izleme, galvanik deri tepkisi ve yüz ifadelerinin kodlanması gibi tamamlayıcı teknikleri işlevleri ve sınırlılıklarıyla birlikte değerlendirmektedir. İnceleme, nöropazarlamanın tüketici karar süreçlerine ilişkin daha nesnel göstergeler sunarak pazarlama iletişimi ve yönetim uygulamalarına (örn. mesaj tasarımı, markalama, fiyatlandırma ve müşteri deneyimi) katkı sağlayabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bununla birlikte maliyet, standardizasyon eksikliği ve laboratuvar ortamının dış geçerliliği sınırlaması gibi metodolojik sorunlar ile mahremiyet, aydınlatılmış onam, şeffaflık ve bilişsel özerkliğin korunması gibi etik riskler vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak çalışma, nöropazarlamanın fırsatlarını ve sınırlarını bütüncül biçimde çerçeveleyerek gelecek araştırmalar için bir yön haritası sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Coşkun, P. (2026). The Impact of Neuromarketing on Consumer Decision Processes: A Conceptual Literature Review. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.61337/tusbd.1744715

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Ait Hammou, K., Galib, M. H., & Melloul, J. (2013). The contributions of neuromarketing in marketing research. Journal of Management Research, 5(4), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v5i4.4023
  2. Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Abdullah, M., Khraiwish, A., & Ashaari, A. (2023). Neuromarketing tools used in the marketing mix: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231156563
  3. Alvino, L., Pavone, L., Abhishta, A., & Robben, H. (2020). Picking your brains: Where and how neuroscience tools can enhance marketing research. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, Article 577666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.577666
  4. Ariely, D., & Berns, G. S. (2010). Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795
  5. Baillet, S. (2017). Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4504
  6. Bakardjieva, E., & Kimmel, A. J. (2017). Neuromarketing research practices: Attitudes, ethics, and behavioral intentions. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1162719
  7. Bell, L., Vogt, J., Willemse, C., Routledge, T., Butler, L. T., & Sakaki, M. (2018). Beyond self-report: A review of physiological and neuroscientific methods to investigate consumer behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01655
  8. Butler, M. J. R. (2008). Neuromarketing and the perceptions of knowledge. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4/5), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.260
  9. Coşkun, A. (2022). Nöropazarlama araçları ve uygulamaları. Bilim Yayınları.
  10. Duque-Hurtado, P., Samboni-Rodríguez, V., Castro-García, M., Montoya-Restrepo, L. A., & Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. (2020). Neuromarketing: Its current status and research perspectives. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157), 525–539.
  11. Ferrell, M. L., Beatty, A., & Dubljevic, V. (2025). The ethics of neuromarketing: A rapid review. Neuroethics, 18, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09591-8
  12. Fortunato, V. C. R., Giraldi, J. D. M. E., & De Oliveira, J. H. C. (2014). A review of studies on neuromarketing: Practical results, techniques, contributions and limitations. Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5446
  13. Foxall, G. R. (2008). Reward, emotion and consumer choice: From neuroeconomics to neurophilosophy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4/5), 368–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.258
  14. Fugate, D. L. (2007). Neuromarketing: A layman’s look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(7), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710834807
  15. Gill, R., & Singh, J. (2022). A study of neuromarketing techniques for proposing cost effective information driven framework for decision making. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49(Part 8), 2969–2981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.730
  16. Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2008). A current overview of consumer neuroscience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4/5), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.251
  17. Iloka, B. C., & Onyeke, K. J. (2020). Neuromarketing: a historical review. Neuroscience Research Notes, 3(3), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v3i3.54
  18. Ipsos. (2018). Ipsos Neuro take on the Super Bowl LII ads. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-02/ipsos-neuro-superbowl-lii-ads-2-15-2018.pdf
  19. Kenning, P., & Plassmann, H. (2005). Neuroeconomics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.07.006
  20. Khondakar, M. F. K., Sarowar, M. H., Chowdhury, M. H., Majumder, S., Hossain, M. A., Dewan, M. A. A., & Hossain, Q. D. (2024). A systematic review on EEG-based neuromarketing: Recent trends and analyzing techniques. Brain Informatics, 11(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-024-00229-8
  21. Khushaba, R. N., Greenacre, L., Kodagoda, S., Louviere, J., Burke, S., & Dissanayake, G. (2012). Choice modeling and the brain: A study on the electroencephalogram (EEG) of preferences. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 12378–12388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.084
  22. Kober, H., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Kross, E. F., Weber, J., Mischel, W., Hart, C. L., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Prefrontal–striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(33), 14811–14816. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007779107
  23. Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is neuromarketing? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007 Lim, W. M. (2018). Demystifying neuromarketing. Journal of Business Research, 91, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.036
  24. Lindström, M. (2009). Buyology: How everything we believe about why we buy is wrong. Random House Business.
  25. Litt, A., & Shiv, B. (2012). Manipulating basic taste perception to explore how product information affects experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.007
  26. Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976
  27. McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44(2), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019
  28. McDowell, W. S., & Dick, S. J. (2013). The marketing of neuromarketing: Brand differentiation strategies employed by prominent neuromarketing firms to attract media clients. Journal of Media Business Studies, 10(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2013.11073558
  29. Minz, N. K., Bhardwaj, I., Prakash, A., & Yadav, M. (2024). Ethics in neuromarketing: A systematic literature review. In J. Kukreja, V. Tewari, G. M., R. Chandra Poonia, & R. R. Verma (Eds.), Neuroscientific insights and therapeutic approaches to eating disorders (pp. 101–125). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3230-6.ch007
  30. Morin, C. (2011). Neuromarketing: The new science of consumer behavior. Society, 48, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1
  31. Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4/5), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.252
  32. Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Ahmadi, N., Ahani, A., Abumalloh, R. A., Asadi, S., Abdullah, R., Ibrahim, O., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2020). Neuromarketing: A review of research and implications for marketing. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems, 7(2), 23–31.
  33. Ohme, R., Reykowska, D., Wiener, D., & Choromanska, A. (2009). Analysis of neurophysiological reactions to advertising stimuli by means of EEG and galvanic skin response measures. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015462
  34. Pieters, R., & Wedel, M. (2004). Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.36.27794
  35. Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010
  36. Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., & Nichols, T. E. (2008). Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 40(2), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.048
  37. Pradeep, A. K. (2010). The buying brain: Secrets for selling to the subconscious mind. Wiley.
  38. Raichle, M. E. (1998). Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: A historical and physiological perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(3), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.765
  39. Rawnaque, F. S., Rahman, K. M., Anwar, S. F., et al. (2020). Technological advancements and opportunities in neuromarketing: A systematic review. Brain Informatics, 7, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-020-00109-x
  40. Sebastian, V. (2014). Neuromarketing and neuroethics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127(2), 763‐768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.351
  41. Singh, P., Alhassan, I., & Khoshaim, L. (2023). What do you need to know? A systematic review and research agenda on neuromarketing discipline. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 2007–2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18040101
  42. Stanton, S. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Huettel, S. A. (2017). Neuromarketing: Ethical implications of its use and potential misuse. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0
  43. Teixeira, T., Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2012). Emotion-induced engagement in Internet video advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0207
  44. Tirandazi, P., Bamakan, S. M. H., & Toghroljerdi, A. (2023). A review of studies on internet of everything as an enabler of neuromarketing methods and techniques. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79(7), 7835–7876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04988-1
  45. Ulman, Y. I., Çakar, T., & Yıldız, G. (2015). Ethical issues in neuromarketing: I consume, therefore I am! Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9581-5
  46. Vecchiato, G., Astolfi, L., De Vico Fallani, F., Toppi, J., Aloise, F., Bez, F., Wei, D., Kong, W., Dai, J., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., & Babiloni, F. (2011). On the use of EEG or MEG brain imaging tools in neuromarketing research. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, Article 643489. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/643489
  47. Venkatraman, V., Clithero, J. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Huettel, S. A. (2012). New scanner data for brand marketers: How neuroscience can help better understand differences in brand preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.008
  48. Yadete, F. D., & Kant, S. (2023). Neuro-marketing in understanding consumer behavior: A systematic literature review. Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56556/jssms.v2i2.483
  49. Yücel, A., & Coşkun, P. (2018). Nöropazarlama literatür incelemesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.460933
  50. Zaltman, G. (2000). Consumer behavior: Insights from brain science. Harvard Business School Press.