SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikoloji Yazıları / 2008 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 21

The Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish "Suitability for Short-Term Cognitive Therapy Rating Scales"

Kısa Süreli Bilişsel Terapiye Uygunluk Ölçeği'nin (BİLTER-U) Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesine İlişkin Bir Ön Çalışma

GONCA SOYGÜT PEKAK
Çağay DURU
Pages
54–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of content validity, 3 judges, specialized in cognitive therapy, concluded that the scale is understandable and its factors are important for selecting patients to cognitive therapy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Suitability for Short-Term Cognitive Therapy Rating Scales (SSCT; Safran, Segal, Shaw & Vallis, 1996).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In terms of content validity, 3 judges, specialized in cognitive therapy, concluded that the scale is understandable and its factors are important for selecting patients to cognitive therapy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a preliminary evidence of the present study, the findings point out that the Turkish SSCT has acceptable psychometric properties for clinical and research settings.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Suitability for Short-Term Cognitive Therapy Rating Scales (SSCT; Safran, Segal, Shaw & Vallis, 1996). The scale is based on the evaluation of a cognitive focused assessment session using a certain coding system. In terms of content validity, 3 judges, specialized in cognitive therapy, concluded that the scale is understandable and its factors are important for selecting patients to cognitive therapy. In the following phase of the study, another judge group (N = 9) coded nine video taped intake sessions randomly selected from the pool of Hacettepe University Psychotherapy Research Laboratory. The Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) coefficient for the scale was calculated with the use of average measures method to determine the inter judge reliability coefficients for the data obtained from 9 judges. The ICC turned out to be .91. As a preliminary evidence of the present study, the findings point out that the Turkish SSCT has acceptable psychometric properties for clinical and research settings.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Safran, Segal, Shaw ve Vallis (1996) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Kısa Süreli Bilişsel Terapiye Uygunluk Ölçeği'nin (BİLTER-U) Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri incelenmektedir. Ölçek, bilişsel odaklı bir değerlendirme görüşmesinin kodlama sistemi üzerinden derecelendirilmesine dayanmaktadır. Ölçeğin kapsam geçerliği, bilişsel terapist olan üç yargıcının değerlendirmeleri temelinde incelenmiş ve ölçeğin anlaşılır olduğu ve içerdiği boyutların bilişsel terapiye hasta seçimi için önemli olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. İzleyen aşamada, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Psikoterapi Araştırmaları Laboratuvarı'nda (HÜ-PAL) yürütülen ön görüşmelere ilişkin görsel kayıt havuzundan seçkisiz olarak belirlenen 9 görüşme kaydı 9 yargıcı tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Görsel kayıtlara ilişkin yargıcılar arası güvenirlik katsayılarını belirlemek amacıyla 9 yargıcıdan elde edilen veriler ortalama değerler yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Buna göre, Sınıf-içi Korelasyon Katsayısı (ICC) .91 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu ön çalışmanın bulgularına göre, BİLTER-U'nun, Türkiye'de yürütülen klinik uygulama ve araştırma faaliyetlerinde kullanılabilirliği açısından, kabul edilebilir düzeyde psikometrik özelliklere sahip bir değerlendirme aracı olduğu düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKAK, G. S., DURU, Ç. (2008). The Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish "Suitability for Short-Term Cognitive Therapy Rating Scales". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 21, 54–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/128315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J. ve ark. (1979). Cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Gilford Press.
  2. Bergin, A. E. ve Garfield, S. L. (1994). Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4. baskı). New York: John Wiley ve Sons. Bordin, E. S. (1976). The generalizability of the concept of working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252-260.
  3. Bordin, E. S. (1980). Of human bonds that bind or free. Society for Psychotherapy Research, Pacific Grove, CA. Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapuetic working alliance: New directions. A. O. Horvath ve L. S. Greenberg, (Ed.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley. Dunn, H., Morrison, A. P. ve Bentall, R. P. (2006). The relationship between patient suitability,therapeutic alliance, homework compliance and outcome in Cognitive Therapy for psychosis. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 145-152.
  4. Erkuş, A. (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazılar. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  5. Fennell, M. J. V. ve Teasdale, J. D. (1987). Cognitive therapy for depression: Individual differences and the process of change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 253-272.
  6. Frank, J. D. (1979). The present status of outcome studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 310- 316. Hartley, D. (1985). Research on the tehrapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561-573.
  7. Horvath, O. A. ve Greenberg, L. S. (1986). The development of the working alliance inventory. L. S. Greenberg ve W. Pinsof, (Ed.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Horvath, O. A. ve Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta- analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139- 149. Horvath, O. A. (2005). The therapeutic relationship: Research and theory. An introduction to the special issue. Psychotherapy Research, 15, 3-7.
  9. James I. A., Blackburn I. M., Milne, D. L. ve Reichfelt F. K. (2001). Moderators of trainee therapists' competence in cognitive therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40,131-141.
  10. Kiesler, B. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research:Personality,psychopathology and psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Luborsky, L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The ground-work for a study of their relationship to its outcome. J. L. Claghorn, (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Maze