SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1

Are we catching up - Teaching Mathematics with Technology in Early Childhood Classrooms

Neredeyiz? - Erken Çocukluk Sınıflarında Teknolojiyle Matematik Öğretimi

Filiz Elmalı(FIRAT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5060-7383
Oğuzhan Özdemir(Fırat University)0000-0002-5310-6605
Seda Özer Şanal(Fırat University)0000-0002-6260-9212
Pages
141–173
Publication Date
2025-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications for future studies and limitations of the study are provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study contributes to the existing research on early childhood teachers’ perceptions of technology and its integration into mathematics-related activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this qualitative study, the analysis draws on focus group discussions with 20 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications for future studies and limitations of the study are provided.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:erken çocukluk · teknoloji entegrasyonu · matematik öğretimi

Abstract

This study contributes to the existing research on early childhood teachers’ perceptions of technology and its integration into mathematics-related activities. In this qualitative study, the analysis draws on focus group discussions with 20 teachers. The findings suggest that although early childhood teachers held a positive attitude towards technology and acknowledged its role in young children’s lives and learning, its integration remains limited in these classrooms. The participant teachers mentioned barriers that hinder technology integration, including inadequate classroom equipment, limited teacher competence, and insufficient professional development opportunities. Also, most participants reported only using songs, videos, and images to teach mathematical concepts through drills and practice within a controlled instructional setting. Therefore, education authorities should re-consider early childhood teacher education programs and professional development opportunities to enable pre- and in-service teachers to teach mathematical concepts to young children with technology. Implications for future studies and limitations of the study are provided.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin teknoloji hakkındaki genel algıları ve teknolojiyi matematik etkinliklerine entegre edilmesi üzerine olan alanyazına katkı yapmayı amaçlanmıştır. Toplamda 20 okul öncesi öğretmeninin katıldığı bu nitel çalışmada veriler odak grup görüşmeleri ile toplanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin teknolojiye karşı olumlu bir tutuma sahip oldukları ve teknolojinin küçük çocukların yaşamlarında ve öğrenmelerinde önemli rol oynadığını kabul ettikleri, ancak anasınıflarında teknoloji entegrasyonunun hala sınırlı seviyede olduğu bulunmuştur. Öğretmenler sınıflardaki yetersiz veya eksik ekipman, teknoloji kullanımına yönelik becerilerindeki sınırlılıklar ve sınırlı mesleki gelişim olanakları gibi bariyerlerin varlığından söz etmişlerdir. Ayrıca öğretmenler matematik etkinliklerinde teknolojiyi sadece şarkı çalmak, resim göstermek ve video oynatmak gibi kendi kontrollerinde olacak şekilde kullandıklarını ifade etmişlerdir. Sonuç olarak, okul öncesi öğretmen yetiştiren kurumların eğitim programlarını ve Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı’nın ise öğretmenlere sunulan ve teknoloji kullanımına yönelik olan hizmet-içi eğitimlerinin yapısını yeniden değerlendirmeleri önerilmektedir. Yapılan bu çalışmanın sınırlılıkları ve gelecekte yapılacak olan çalışmalara yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Elmalı, F., Özdemir, O., Şanal, S. Ö. (2025). Are we catching up - Teaching Mathematics with Technology in Early Childhood Classrooms. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1551416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (150)

  1. Akilovna, E. M. (2024). The use of modern technologies in the development of mathematical knowledge of preschoolers. Information Horizons: American Journal of Library and Information Science Innovation, 2(1), 105-108.
  2. Akman, B. (2002). Okulöncesi dönemde matematik [Mathematics in preschool]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 244–248.
  3. Akyüz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(172), 150-162.
  4. Alomyan, H., & Alelaimat, A. (2021). Employing ICTs in kindergartens in remote areas of Jordan: Teachers' perspectives on uses, importance, and challenges. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2145-2157. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.2145
  5. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2015). Growing up digital: Media research. https://imgs.drafare.com/m/11bb84c374631de6.pdf
  6. Atik, İ. (2017). Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programı-2015 sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’de mesleki eğitim [Vocational education in Turkey according to the results of the International Student Assessment Program-2015]. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(3), 484-493.
  7. Aubrey, C., & Dahl, S. (2014). The confidence and competence in information and communication technologies of practitioners, parents, and young children in the early years foundation stage. Early Years, 34(1), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2013.792789
  8. Aunio, P., Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., Pan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2008). Children’s early numeracy in England, Finland, and People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760802343881
  9. Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.003
  10. Bailey, D. H., Siegler, R. S., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Developmental Science, 17(5), 775-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12155
  11. Batdal, G. (2006). İlköğretim birinci kademe matematik programının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi [The assessment of primary school first stage mathematics program in the view of teachers] [Master’s thesis, İstanbul University]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  12. Bayırlı, H., Geçici, M. E., & Erdem, C. (2021). Matematik kaygısı ile matematik başarısı arasındaki ilişki: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. [The relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis.]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.783083
  13. Beavis, C., O'Mara, J., & McNeice, L. (2012). Digital games: Literacy in action. Wakefield Press.
  14. Beisly, A., Evans, S., & Latta, L. (2024). Process over product: Associations among math anxiety, feelings about math, and instructional beliefs in early childhood preservice teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09613-3
  15. Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015). A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 263-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9419-2
  16. Bey, M. A. (2012). The negative and positive characteristics of teacher technology professional development programs in relation to efficient classroom integration and knowledge of interactive whiteboards [Doctoral Dissertation, Saint Joseph’s University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1426408879?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
  17. Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2020). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3
  18. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers and Education, 77, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013
  19. Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1–6.
  20. Bouchard, T. J., Barsaloux, J., & Drauden, G. (1974). Brainstorming procedure, group size, and sex as determinants of the problem-solving effectiveness of groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036450
  21. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  22. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  23. Cheng, S. L., Chen, S. B., & Chang, J. C. (2021). Examining the multiplicative relationships between teachers’ competence, value, and pedagogical beliefs about technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 734-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13052
  24. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology—A response to “Fool’s Gold”. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal), 11(1), 7-69. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17793/
  25. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early mathematics: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
  26. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2013). Rethinking early mathematics: What is a research-based curriculum for young children? In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 121–147). Springer.
  27. Cortini, M., Galanti, T., & Fantinelli, S. (2019). Focus group discussion: How many participants in a group? Encyclopaideia, 23(54), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/9603
  28. Cowan, J. E. (2008). Strategies for planning technology-enhanced learning experiences. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(2), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.2.55-59
  29. Çabuk, H. (2024). Problems encountered in the management of preschool educational institutions [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  30. Danby, S., Fleer, M., Davidson, C., & Hatzigianni, M. (2018). Digital childhoods: Technologies and children's everyday lives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6484-5
  31. Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2021). Criteria for selecting apps: Debating the perceptions of young children, parents and industry stakeholders. Computers and Education, 165, 104-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104134
  32. Dolu, A. (2020). Sosyoekonomik faktörlerin eğitim performansı üzerine etkisi: PİSA 2015 Türkiye örneği [The impact of socioeconomic factors on educational performance: PISA 2015 Turkey case. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(2), 41-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/yead.607838
  33. Dong, C. (2018). Young children nowadays are very smart in ICT: Preschool teachers’ perceptions of ICT use. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1506318
  34. Dong, C., & Newman, L. (2016). Ready, steady… pause: Integrating ICT into Shanghai preschools. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1144048
  35. Donohue, C., & Schomburg, R. (2017). Technology and interactive media in early childhood programs: What we’ve learned from five years of research, policy, and practice. YC Young Children, 72(4), 72-78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90013713
  36. Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Nanotechnology and mobile learning: Perspectives and opportunities in young children’s education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.115975
  37. Dumuid, D. (2020). Screen time in early childhood. The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, 4(3), 169-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30005-5
  38. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
  39. Eleftheriadi, A., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2021). Teaching mathematics in early childhood education with ICT: The views of two contrasting teachers’ groups. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21601/jdet/11117
  40. Ergün, S. (2003). Okul öncesi eğitim alan ve almayan ilköğretim birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik yetenek ve başarılarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [A comparative investigation of mathematics skills and achievements of primary school first grade students who did and didn't get pre-primary education] [Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=wcvSN6fRWhpcE9QZ2CpKUQ&no=ZetxsDji3CYPgc78PeS06Q
  41. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  42. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
  43. Ertürk, Z., & Akan, O. E. (2018). TIMSS 2015 matematik başarısını etkileyen değişkenlerin yapısal eşitlik modeli ile incelenmesi [Investigating the variables affecting TIMSS 2015 mathematics achievement with structural equation modeling]. Ulusal Eğitim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(2), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.32960/uead.407078
  44. Fleer, M. (2018). Digital animation: New conditions for children's development in play-based setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 943-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12637
  45. Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The mathematics anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463
  46. Fox, J., Diezmann, C., & Lamb, J. (2016). Early childhood teachers’ integration of ICTs: Intrinsic and extrinsic barriers. In B. White, M. Chinnappan, & S. Trenholm (Eds.), Opening up mathematics education research: Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 246-253). MERGA.
  47. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, N. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  48. Fregola, C. (2015). Mathematics and educational psychology: Construction of learning environments. In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning: Potential, promises and pitfalls (pp. 175-200). Springer.
  49. Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report of the Society for Research in Child Development, 22(1), 3-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521700.pdf
  50. Gjelaj, M. (2013). Effects of preschool education in preparing children for the first grade in terms of linguistic and mathematical development. Creative Education, 4, 263-266. http://dspace.epoka.edu.al/handle/1/785
  51. Göktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005–2011. Computers and Education, 68, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.002
  52. Gözüm, A. İ. C., & Kandır, A. (2021). Digital games pre-schoolers play: Parental mediation and examination of educational content. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3293-3326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10382-2
  53. Griffith, S. F., Hagan, M. B., Heymann, P., Heflin, B. H., & Bagner, D. M. (2020). Apps as learning tools: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 145(1), e20191579. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1579
  54. Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). Interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science and Education, 11, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013076706416
  55. Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  56. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
  57. Huber, B., Yeates, M., Meyer, D., Fleckhammer, L., & Kaufman, J. (2018). The effects of screen media content on young children’s executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.006
  58. Ihmeideh, F. (2009). Barriers to the use of technology in Jordanian pre-school settings. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390903255619
  59. Ihmeideh, F., & Al-Maadadi, F. (2018). Towards improving kindergarten teachers’ practices regarding the integration of ICT into early years settings. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0366-x
  60. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
  61. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for teachers. ISTE. http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
  62. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The horizon report: 2011 edition. The New Media Consortium.
  63. Kalas, I. (2010). Recognizing the potential of ICT in early child education: Analytical survey. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000190433
  64. Kara, N., & Cagiltay, K. (2017). In-service preschool teachers’ thoughts about technology and technology use in early educational settings. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(2), 119-141. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/307727
  65. Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2009). Technology and early childhood education: A technology integration professional development model for practicing teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0341-0
  66. Kesici, A., & Aşılıoğlu, B. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematiğe yönelik duyuşsal özellikleri ile temel eğitimden ortaöğretime geçiş (TEOG) sınavları öncesi yaşadıkları stresin matematik başarısına etkisi [The effect of secondary students' affective features towards mathematics and the stress they experience before the TEOG exam on their mathematical success]. KEFAD, 18(3), 394–414. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1487200
  67. Konca, A. S. (2022). Digital technology usage of young children: Screen time and families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1097-1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01245-7
  68. Kurupınar, A., Kanmaz, T., & Gürler, S. A. (2024). Preschool teachers' views on innovative educational practices. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(1), 1-15.
  69. Lavidas, K., Katsidima, M. A., Theodoratou, S., Komis, V., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2021). Preschool teachers’ perceptions about TPACK in Greek educational context. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(3), 395-410.
  70. Liamputtong, P. (2010). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Sage Publication.
  71. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publication.
  72. Lindmeier, A., Seemann, S., Kuratli-Geeler, S., Wullschleger, A., Dunekacke, S., Leuchter, M., Vogt, F., Opitz, E. M., & Heinze, A. (2020). Modelling early childhood teachers’ mathematics-specific professional competence and its differential growth through professional development – an aspect of structural validity. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1710558
  73. Litkowski, E. C., Duncan, R. J., Logan, J. A., & Purpura, D. J. (2020). When do preschoolers learn specific mathematics skills? Mapping the development of early numeracy knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 195, 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104846
  74. Liu, X., & Pange, J. (2015). Early childhood teachers’ perceived barriers to ICT integration in teaching: A survey study in Mainland China. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0025-7
  75. Liu, X., Toki, E., & Pange, J. (2014). The use of ICT in preschool education in Greece and China: A comparative study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1281
  76. Luo, W., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & Li, H. (2021). Are early childhood teachers ready for digital transformation of instruction in Mainland China? A systematic literature review. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 105718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105718
  77. Magen-Nagar, N., & Firstater, E. (2019). The obstacles to ICT implementation in the kindergarten environment: Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1577769
  78. Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12622
  79. Mertala, P. (2017). Wag the dog–The nature and foundations of preschool educators' positive ICT pedagogical beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.037
  80. McManis, L. D., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2012). Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. Young Children, 67(3), 14-24.
  81. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  82. Mishra, L. (2016). Focus group discussion in qualitative research. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5223.2016.00001.2
  83. Munhall, P. L. (2012). A phenomenological method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp. 113-176). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  84. Mutohar, A. (2012). Identifying and bridging the gaps of ICT integration in primary and secondary education in Indonesia [Master’s thesis, The University of Texas]. https://tdl-ir-api.tdl.org/
  85. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation programs. Position statement. https://www.naeyce.org/positionstatement/ppp
  86. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. https://www.naeyce.org
  87. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2023). Equitable integration of technology for mathematics learning: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Equitable-Integration-of-Technology-for-Mathematics-Learning/
  88. Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415619773
  89. Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003
  90. Nikolopoulou, K. (2020). Preschool teachers’ practices of ICT-supported early language and mathematics. Creative Education, 11, 2038-2052. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110149
  91. Nikolopoulou, K. (2021). Mobile devices in early childhood education: Teachers’ views on benefits and barriers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3279-3292.
  92. Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2015). Barriers to the integration of computers in early childhood settings: Teachers’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9281-9
  93. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
  94. Ogegbo, A. A., & Aina, A. (2020). Early childhood development teachers' perceptions on the use of technology in teaching young children. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-10.
  95. Özenç, B., & Arslanhan, S. (2010). PISA 2009 sonuçlarına ilişkin bir değerlendirme [An evaluation of PISA 2009 results]. Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı, 1-6. https://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1292255907-8.PISA_2009_Sonuclarina_Iliskin_Bir_Degerlendirme.pdf
  96. Palaiologou, I. (2016). Children under five and digital technologies: Implications for early years pedagogy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.929876
  97. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Comparing tablets and PCs in teaching mathematics: An attempt to improve mathematics competence in early childhood education. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 241-253. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/187376/
  98. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4
  99. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). The effectiveness of computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’ understanding of numbers: An empirical study conducted in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1849-1871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9693-7
  100. Parette, H. P., & Blum, C. (2013). Instructional technology in early childhood: Teaching in the digital age. Brookes.
  101. Parette, H. P., Blum, C., & Boeckmann, N. M. (2009). Evaluating assistive technology in early childhood education: The use of a concurrent time series probe approach. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0319-y
  102. Parette, H. P., Quesenberry, A. C., & Blum, C. (2010). Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings: A 21st century view of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0352-x
  103. Parette, H. P., & Stoner, J. B. (2008). Benefits of assistive technology user groups for early childhood education professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0211-6
  104. Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8
  105. Platas, L. M., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Sitabkhan, Y. (2016). Using an assessment of early mathematical knowledge and skills to inform policy and practice: Examples from the early grade mathematics assessment. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.20881
  106. Potter, S. L., & Rockinson‐Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Technology integration for instructional improvement: The impact of professional development. Performance Improvement, 51(2), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21246
  107. Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2016). Professional development for quality teaching and learning: A focus on student learning outcomes. In T. Petty, A. Good, & S. M. Putman (Eds.), Handbook of research on professional development for quality teaching and learning (pp. 652-677). IGI Global.
  108. Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
  109. Ramani, G. B., Jaeggi, S. M., Daubert, E. N., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Domain-specific and domain-general training to improve kindergarten children’s mathematics. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 468-495. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.31
  110. Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2009). The status of professional development for K-12 online teachers: Insights and implications. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 523-545. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28226/
  111. Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2020). The Common Sense Census: Media use by kids age zero to eight, 2020. Common Sense Media. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ba15befec4eb7899898240d/t/5fb2e58acc0b050e6bd149ed/1605559694662/2020_zero_to_eight_census_FINAL_WEB.pdf
  112. Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301-1308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466268
  113. Ryoo, J. H., Molfese, V. J., Heaton, R., Zhou, X., Brown, E. T., Prokasky, A., & Davis, E. (2014). Early mathematics skills from pre-kindergarten to first grade: Score changes and ability group differences in Kentucky, Nebraska, and Shanghai samples. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 162-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14538975
  114. Saracho, O. N. (2015). Developmentally-appropriate technology and interactive media in early childhood education. In K. Heider & M. Renck Jalongo (Eds.), Young children and families in the information age: Educating the young child (pp. 183-205). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9184-7_11
  115. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.014
  116. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
  117. Sarıer, Y. (2020). TIMSS uygulamalarında Türkiye’nin performansı ve akademik başarıyı yordayan değişkenler [Turkey's performance in TIMSS applications and variables predicting academic achievement]. Temel Eğitim Dergisi, 2(2), 6-27. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/temelegitim/issue/57288/745624
  118. Schoon, I., Nasim, B., & Cook, R. (2021). Social inequalities in early childhood competences, and the relative role of social and emotional versus cognitive skills in predicting adult outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 47(5), 1259-1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3724
  119. Schriever, V., Simon, S., & Donnison, S. (2020). Guardians of play: Early childhood teachers’ perceptions and actions to protect children’s play from digital technologies. International Journal of Early Years Education, 28(4), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1850431
  120. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers and Education, 44(3), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
  121. Sprague, D., Williamson, J., & Foulger, T. S. (2022). Design guidelines for post-COVID era preparation programs: Action steps toward technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(2), 177–187. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/221098/
  122. Stagi, L. (2000). Il focus group come tecnica di valutazione. Pregi, difetti, potenzialità [The focus group as an evaluation technique. Pros, cons, potentials]. Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 20, 61-82.
  123. Steinkuehler, C. (2010). Video games and digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(1), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.1.7
  124. Steinkuehler, C., & Williams, C. (2009). Mathematics as narrative in WoW forum discussions. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(3).
  125. Swan, P., & Marshall, L. (2010). Revisiting mathematics manipulative materials. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 13–19. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.150611288294051
  126. Tezcan, M. (2013). Sosyolojik kuramlarda eğitim [Education in sociological theories]. Anı Yayıncılık.
  127. Trust, T., Maloy, R., Butler, A., & Goodman, L. (2022). Critical media literacy in teacher education: Discerning truth amidst a crisis of misinformation and disinformation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(2), 167–176. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/221058/
  128. United States Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National education technology plan update. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
  129. van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11-30.
  130. van de Sande, E., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The role of executive control in young children's serious gaming behavior. Computers and Education, 82, 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.004
  131. Van Eck, R. N. (2015). SAPS and digital games: Improving mathematics transfer and attitudes in schools. In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning: Potential, promises, and pitfalls (pp. 141–174). Springer.
  132. van Eeuwijk, P., & Zuzana, A. (2017). How to conduct a focus group discussion (FGD). Methodological manual. University of Basel.
  133. Vaugelade Berg, C. (2011). In-service teachers’ professional development: Which systemic aspects are involved? Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.585832
  134. Verbruggen, S., Depaepe, F., & Torbeyns, J. (2021). Effectiveness of educational technology in early mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 27, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100220
  135. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
  136. Wernholm, M., & Vigmo, S. (2015). Capturing children's knowledge-making dialogues in Minecraft. In J. Wishart & M. Thomas (Eds.), E-research in educational contexts: The roles of technologies, ethics and social media (pp. 230-246). Routledge.
  137. Willig, C. (2007). Reflections on the use of a phenomenological method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4(3), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701473425
  138. Wood, E., Specht, J., Willoughby, T., & Mueller, J. (2008). Integrating computer technology in early childhood education environments: Issues raised by early childhood educators. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 210-226. https://ajer.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/630/613
  139. Wu, Z., Yang, D., & Tinmaz, H. (2023). Chinese kindergarten teachers’ opinions on advanced technology use. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 38(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2239308
  140. Yadav, A., & Lachney, M. (2022). Teaching with, about, and through technology: Visions for the future of teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(2), 189–200. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/221072/
  141. Yao, W., Wang, L., & Liu, D. (2024). Augmented reality-based language and math learning applications for preschool children education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-12.
  142. Yayan, B. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mathematics achievement in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study-Repeat (TIMSS-R) [Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  143. Yelland, N. (2005). The future is now: A review of the literature on the use of computers in early childhood education (1994-2004). AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 13(3), 201-232. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6038/
  144. Yelland, N. (2018). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Young children and multimodal learning with tablets. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12635
  145. Yenilmez, K., & Özbey, N. (2006). Özel okul ve devlet okulu öğrencilerinin matematik kaygı düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma [A research on mathematics anxiety levels of private and public school students]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 431–448. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uefad/issue/16684/173379
  146. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  147. Yurtseven Avci, Z., O'Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
  148. Zaranis, N., & Oikonomidis, V. (2014). The main factors of the attitudes of Greek kindergarten teachers towards information and communication technology. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(4), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.970853
  149. Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613
  150. Zhao, Z., & Linaza-Iglesias, J. (2015). Relevance of videogames in the learning and development of young children. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.36.14108