SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

The Effect of Some Rootstocks on Growth of ‘Vanda’ Sweet Cherry Cultivar Nursery

‘Vanda’ Kiraz Çeşidinin Fidan Gelişimi Üzerine Bazı Anaçların Etkisi

Mehmet Fikret Balta(Ordu Ünitversitesi)0000-0002-3859-6490
Cenk Çelikbaş(ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8813-1843
Orhan Karakaya(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0783-3120
Hüseyın Kırkaya(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8371-5324
Slawomir świerczyński(Poznan University)0000-0002-2754-9576
Magdalena Urbaniak(European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences)0000-0002-5050-5213
Pages
169–178
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out to determine effect of PHL-A, Gisela 5 and Colt rootstocks on nursery growth in ‘Vanda’ sweet cherry cultivar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of rootstocks on growth of Vanda trees in nursery was found to be significant (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kiraz · fidan boyu · sürgün uzunluğu

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine effect of PHL-A, Gisela 5 and Colt rootstocks on nursery growth in ‘Vanda’ sweet cherry cultivar. The effect of rootstocks on growth of Vanda trees in nursery was found to be significant (p<0.05). Generally, the effect of Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks on nursery growth of ‘Vanda’ cultivar was similar. Depending on rootstocks, nursery height, scion trunk diameter, number of lateral shoots, shoot length, fresh mass of nursery, fresh weight of leaves, dry weight and leaf area was ranked from 125.7 (Gisela 5) to 198.8 cm (Colt), 12.8 (Gisela 5) to 22.4 mm (Colt), 1.1 (PHL-A) to 9.9 (Colt), 21.53 (Gisela 5) to 42.63 cm (Colt), 0.5 (Gisela 5) to 1.95 kg (Colt), 145.0 (PHL-A) to 323.0 g (Colt), 56.2 (PHL-A) to 117.5 g (Colt) and 109 (Gisela 5) to 149.7 cm2 (Colt), respectively. Consequently, it has been determined that ‘Vanda’ cultivar showed more vigor growth on Cold rootstock when compared to Gisela 5 ve PHL-A rootstocks.

Özet

Bu araştırma ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinin fidan gelişimi üzerine PHL-A, Gisela 5 ve Colt anaçlarının etkisini belirlenmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Anaçların ‘Vanda’ kiraz çeşidinde fidan gelişimi üzerine etkisi önemli bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Genel olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinin fidan gelişim üzerine Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçlarının etkisi benzer olmuştur. Anaçlara bağlı olarak, fidan boyu 125.7 (Gisela 5)-198.8 cm (Colt), kalem gövde çapı 12.8 (Gisela 5)-22.4 mm (Colt), yan dal sayısı 1.1 (PHL-A)-9.9 (Colt), sürgün uzunluğu 21.53 (Gisela 5)-42.63 cm (Colt), fidan yaş ağırlığı 0.5 (Gisela 5)-1.95 kg (Colt), yaprak yaş ağırlığı 145.0 (PHL-A)-323.0 g (Colt), yaprak kuru ağırlığı 56.2 (PHL-A)-117.5 g (Colt) ve yaprak alanı 109 (Gisela 5)-149.7 cm2 (Colt) arasında belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, ‘Vanda’ çeşidinde fidan gelişim performansı bakımından Colt anacının daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında, Colt anacına göre, Gisela 5 ve PHL-A anaçları üzerine aşılı fidanlar daha zayıf ve bodur bir gelişim göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balta, M. F., Çelikbaş, C., Karakaya, O., Kırkaya, H., świerczyński, S., Urbaniak, M. (2021). The Effect of Some Rootstocks on Growth of ‘Vanda’ Sweet Cherry Cultivar Nursery. Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.54370/ordubtd.971964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Ağlar, E. ve Yıldız, K. (2014). Influence of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2014.10.09
  2. Aglar, E., Yildiz, K. ve Long, L. E. (2016). The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of'0900 Ziraat'Sweet Cherry. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210401
  3. Aydın, E. ve Yarılgaç, T. (2020). Anaç adayı kiraz ve vişne genotiplerinin doku kültürü yöntemiyle çoğaltılması. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 9(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.732181
  4. Baryla, P., Kaplan, M. ve Krawiec, M. (2014). The effect of different types of rootstock on the quality of maiden trees of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cv.‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2014.051
  5. Baryla, P., Kaplan, M., Krawiec, M. ve Kiczorowski, P. (2013). The effect of rootstocks on the efficiency of a nursery of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) trees cv. ‘Regina’. Acta Agrobotanica, 66(4). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.058
  6. Bolsu, A., ve Akça, Y. (2011). Mahlep anacı üzerine aşılı 5 kiraz çeşidinin bazı morfolojik özellikleri ile meyve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(3), 152-157. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/204762
  7. Cantín, C. M., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y. ve Moreno, M. Á. (2010). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 123(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.016
  8. Fajt, N., Folini, L., Bassi, G. ve Siegler, H. (2014). Lapins on ten cherry rootstocks in the Alpe Adria region. Acta Horticulturae, 1020, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1020.51
  9. Gómez-del-Campo, M., Ruiz, C. ve Lissarrague, J. R. (2002). Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airén grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 53(2), 138-143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290286691
  10. Karakaya, O., Ozturk, B., Aglar, E. ve Balik, H. I. (2021). The influence of the rootstocks on biochemical and bioactive compound content of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry fruit. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 63(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00542-0
  11. Küçükyumuk, C., Sarısu, H., Yıldız, H., Kaçal, E. ve Koçal, H. (2015). Farklı anaçlar üzerine aşılı 0900 ziraat kiraz çeşidinde su stresinin bazı vejetatif gelişim parametrelerine etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.236404
  12. Lanauskas, J., Uselis, N., Kviklys, D., Kviklienė, N. ve Buskienė, L. (2012). Rootstock effect on the performance of sweet cherry cv. Lapins. Horticultural Science, 39(2), 55-60. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/50_2011-HORTSCI.pdf
  13. Lang, G. A. (2000). Precocious, dwarfing, and productive—how will new cherry rootstocks impact the sweet cherry industry? HortTechnology, 10(4), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.10.4.719
  14. Lang, G. A. (2001). Intensive sweet cherry orchard systems-rootstocks, vigor, precocity, productivity, and management. Compact Fruit Tree, 34(1), 23-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285788783
  15. Long, L. E. ve Kaiser, C. (2010). Sweet cherry rootstocks for the Pacific Northwest (1st edition). A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/parent/bv73c068r/file_sets/kw52j840j
  16. Long, E., L., Lang, G., Musacchi, S. ve Whiting, M. (2015). Cherry training systems (1st edition). A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. https://research.wsulibs.wsu.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2376/6087/pnw667print_0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  17. López-Ortega, G., García-Montiel, F. Bayo-Canha, A., Frutos-Ruiz, C. ve Frutos-Tomás, D. (2016). Rootstock effects on the growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet cherry cv. ‘Newstar’ in the growing conditions of the Region of Murcia. Scientia Horticulturae, 198, 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.041
  18. Moreno, M. A., Adrada, R., Aparicio, J. ve BetráN, S. (2001). Performance of ‘Sunburst’sweet cherry grafted on different rootstocks. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 76(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2001.11511345
  19. Özçağıran R., Ünal A., Özeker E. ve İsfendiyaroğlu M. (2011). Ilıman İklim Meyve Türleri: Sert Çekirdekli Meyveler (3. baskı). Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  20. Poniedzialek, W., Szczygiel, A., Porebski, S. ve Gorski, A. (1997). Effect of budding dates and types of rootstock on bud establishment and growth of one-year old apple trees of two cultivars. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie. Ogrodnictwo, 23, 5-18. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PL1999000117
  21. Santos, A., Santos‐Ribeiro, R., Cavalheiro, J., Cordeiro, V. ve Lousada, J. L. (2006). Initial growth and fruiting of ‘Summit’sweet cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 34(3), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2006.9514416
  22. Schechter, I., Proctor, J. T. A. ve Elfving, D. C. (1991). Rootstock affects vegetative growth characteristics and productivity of ‘Delicious’ apple. HortScience, 26(9), 1145-1148. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.9.1145
  23. Szczepanski, K., Zwierz, J., Holownicki, R. ve Rejman, S. (1987). The relationship of a diameter and a height of an apple to its weight. Fruit Science Reports, 14(3). https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-5dfb32df-1dc6-452b-83db 80d67af6d9d5
  24. Sitarek, M. ve Bartosiewicz, B. (2012). Influence of five clonal rootstocks on the growth, productivity and fruit quality of ‘Sylvia’and ‘Karina’sweet cherry trees. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental plant research, 20(2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0010-z
  25. Sitarek, M. ve Rozpara, E. (2008). Growth of young (three-year-old) ‘Regina’ sweet cherry trees grafted on nine clonal rootstocks. Sustainable Fruit Growing: From Plant to Product (s. 117-121). Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Grzegorz-Doruchowski/publication/46386183
  26. Stachowiak, A. ve Swierczynski, S. (2004). Growth of six sweet cherry cultivars on Colt and on mazzard seedling (Prunus avium L.) rootstocks in a nursery. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu. Ogrodnictwo, 38, 149-156. http://www.up.poznan.pl/ogrodnictwo/Ogrodnictwo%2038/Stachowiak.pdf
  27. Stachowiak, A. ve Swierczynski, S. (2009). The influence of mycorrhizal vaccine on the growth of maiden sweet cherry trees of selected cultivars in nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 8(1), 3-11. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.574.5886&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  28. Stanisavljević, A., Bošnjak, D., Todorčić Vekić, T., Teklić, T., Špoljarević, M., Štolfa, I.,. ve Lisjak, M. (2015). Induction of lateral shoots of sweet cherry on the Gisela 6 rootstock. Poljoprivreda, 21(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.21.1.10
  29. Świerczyński, S. ve Stachowiak, A. (2012). Usefulness of ‘Frutana’interstock in the production of maiden sweet cherry trees in the nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 11(2), 263-273. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289629521
  30. Świerczyński, S., Borowiak, K., Bosiacki, M., Urbaniak, M. ve Malinowska, A. (2019). Estimation of the growth of ‘Vanda’ maiden sweet cherry trees on three rootstocks and after application of foliar fertilization in a nursery. Acta Scientarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 18(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.1.11
  31. Usenik, V., Fajt, N. ve Ătampar, F. (2006). Effects of rootstocks and training system on growth, precocity and productivity of sweet cherry. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 81(1), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2006.11512042
  32. Usenik, V., Fajt, N., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Slatnar, A., Stampar, F. ve Veberic, R. (2010). Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 58(8), 4928-4933. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903755b
  33. Webster, A. D. ve Lucas, A. (1997). Sweet cherry rootstock studies: Comparisons of Prunus cerasus L. and Prunus hybrid clones as rootstocks for Van, Merton Glory and Merpet scions. Journal of Horticultural Science, 72(3), 469-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1997.11515535
  34. Whiting, M. D. ve Lang, G. A. (2004). Bing'sweet cherry on the dwarfing rootstock Gisela 5: thinning affects fruit quality and vegetative growth but not net CO2 exchange. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129(3), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.3.0407
  35. Whiting, M. D., Lang, G., ve Ophardt, D. (2005). Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience, 40(3), 582-586. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.582
  36. Zec, G., Colovic, V., Milatovic, D., Colic, S., Vulic, T., Djordjevic, B. ve Djurovic, D. (2017). Rootstock influence on vigor and generative potential of young sweet cherry trees. Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, 71(2), 137-141. https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/jafes/article/view/1229/1237
  37. Stanisavljević, A., Bošnjak, D., Todorčić Vekić, T., Teklić, T., Špoljarević, M., Štolfa, I.,. ve Lisjak, M. (2015). Induction of lateral shoots of sweet cherry on the Gisela 6 rootstock. Poljoprivreda, 21(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.21.1.10