SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Effects of Egg Shape Index on Egg Quality in Partridges

Kınalı Kekliklerde Yumurta Şekil İndeksinin Yumurta Kalitesine Etkileri

Sezai Alkan(Ordu Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0601-0122
İsmail Türker(UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3125-6810
Pages
140–151
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, eggshape index is an important factor affecting egg quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of the egg shape index on egg quality traits in Partridge (Alectoris Chukar).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the eggs were classified as three different groups in terms of egg shape index which are ≤ 75, < 76 -77 > and ≥ 78 and 114, 56 and 73 eggs were used in the groups, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, eggshape index is an important factor affecting egg quality.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kınalı keklik (alectoris chukar) · yumurta · yumurta kalite özellikleri

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of the egg shape index on egg quality traits in Partridge (Alectoris Chukar). For this purpose, the eggs were classified as three different groups in terms of egg shape index which are ≤ 75, < 76 -77 > and ≥ 78 and 114, 56 and 73 eggs were used in the groups, respectively. Albumen ratio, albumen weight, yolk weight, yolk/albumen ratio and Haugh unit were significantly affected by egg shape index in this research. On the other hand, egg weight, egg volume, shell surface area, eggshell thickness, unit surface eggshell weight, shell ratio, albumen index, yolk index, yolk ratio and eggshell weight traits were not affected by egg shape index. It was determined that there was a significant relationship between egg shape index and albumen ratio, albumen weight, yolk weight, yolk/albumen ratio and Haugh unit in this study. According to the findings, eggshape index is an important factor affecting egg quality.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Kınalı Kekliklerde (Alectoris Chukar) yumurta şekil indeksinin yumurtanın iç ve dış kalite özelliklerine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, yumurtalar şekil indeksi bakımından ≤ 75, < 76 -77 > ve ≥78 olmak üzere üç farklı gruba ayrılmıştır ve gruplarda sırasıyla 114, 56 ve 73 adet yumurta kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada ak oranı, ak ağırlığı, sarı ağırlığı, sarı-ak oranı ve Haugh birimi yumurta şekil indeksi tarafından önemli derecede etkilenmiştir. Buna karşın, yumurta ağırlığı, yumurta hacmi, kabuk yüzey alanı, kabuk kalınlığı, birim yüzey kabuk ağırlığı, kabuk oranı, ak indeksi, sarı indeksi, sarı oranı ve kabuk ağırlığı özellikleri yumurta şekil indeksi tarafından etkilenmemiştir. Yumurta şekil indeksi ile ak oranı, ak ağırlığı, sarı ağırlığı, sarı/ak oranı ve Haugh birimi arasından önemli ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bulgulara göre, yumurta şekil indeksi yumurta kalitesini etkileyen önemli bir faktördür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alkan, S., Türker, İ. (2021). Effects of Egg Shape Index on Egg Quality in Partridges. Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.54370/ordubtd.996530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Abanikannda O. T. F., Olutogun O, Leigh A. O., & Ajayi L. A. (2007). Statistical modeling of egg weight and egg dimensions in commerical layers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6, 59-63. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.623.2958&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  2. Alipanah M., Deljo J., Rokouie M., & Mohammadnia R. (2013). Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in khazak layers. Trakia Journal of Sciences 2, 175-180. http://tru.uni-sz.bg/tsj/N2,%20Vol.11,%202013/M.Alipanah.pdf
  3. Aktan S. (2004). Determining some exterior and interior quality traits of quail eggs and phenotypic correlations by digital image analysis. Hayvansal Üretim, 45(1): 7-13. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=TR2005000043
  4. Alkan S, Karabağ K, Balcıoğlu M S & Galiç A (2007). Kınalı kekliklerde (Alectoris chukar) bazı yumurta özelliklerinin ve canlı ağırlıkların belirlenmesi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2): 225-228. http://ziraatdergi.akdeniz.edu.tr/_dinamik/144/229.pdf
  5. Alkan S., Karabağ K., Galiç A., & Balcıoğlu B. S. (2008). Kınalı Kekliklerde (Alectoris Chukar) Disi-Erkek Oranının Kuluçka Üzerine Etkileri. Lalahan Hayvan Arastırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 48(1), 45-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/lahaed/issue/39441/465202
  6. Alkan S., Karsli T., Galiç A., & Karabağ K. (2013). Determination of phenotypic correlations between internal and external quality traits of Guinea fowl eggs. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(5), 861-867. http://vetdergikafkas.org/uploads/pdf/pdf_KVFD_1412.pdf
  7. Alkan S., & Durmuş İ. (2015). Alternatif kanatlı yetiştiriciliği: Beç tavuğu yetiştiriciliği. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(10), 806-810. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRnNE1qWXhNUT09
  8. Alkan S., Karslı T., Durmuş İ., & Karabağ K. (2016). Beç tavuklarında (Numida meleagris) yumurta şekil indeksinin yumurta kalitesine etkileri. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 4(9), 758-762. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpFeE56TTJOZz09/bec-tavuklarinda-numida-meleagris-yumurta-sekil-indeksinin-yumurta-kalitesine-etkileri
  9. Altuntaş E., & Şekeroğlu A. (2008). Effect of egg shape index on mechanical properties of chicken eggs. Journal of Food Engineering, 85, 606-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.022
  10. Aysöndü M. H. (2005). Kaya kekliklerinde (A.chukar) farklı barındırma şeklinin yumurta verimi, kuluçka özellikleri ve yumurta kalitesi üzerine etkileri [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Fırat Üniversitesi.
  11. Bernacki Z., & Heller K. (2003). Ocena jakosci jaj perlic szarych wroznych okresearch niesnosci. Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych i Biologicznych, 51, 27-32. https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-ae3f16da-a0c6-479d-88c6-c1c699ae1280
  12. Çağlayan T., Alaşahan S., Kırıkçı K., & Günlü A. (2009). Effect of different egg storage periods on some egg quality characteristics and hatchability of Partridge (Alectoris graeca). Poultry Science, 88, 1330-3. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00091
  13. Çetin O., Kırıkçı K., & Gülşen N. (1997). Some productivity characteristics of Chukar partridges (A. chukar) in different management conditions. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 13(2), 5-10. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/229471
  14. Çetin O. (2000). Farklı kesim yaşlarında kaya kekliklerinin (A. greaca) besi ve karkas özellikleri. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, 2, 41-44.
  15. Çetin O., Kırıkçı K., Günlü A., Tepeli C., & Yılmaz A. (2001, Mayıs, 21-24). Kaya kekliklerinde (A. Graeca) zorlamalı tüy dökümünün yumurta ve kuluçka verim özelliklerine etkisi ve elde edilen civcivlerin büyüme, besi performansı ve karkas özellikleri. I. Doğu Anadolu Kanatlı Yetiştiriciliği Sempozyumu (pp. 153-160), Van, Türkiye.
  16. Çetin O, Kırıkçı K, Günlü A, Garip M & Çağlayan T (2008). Kekliklerde (A. graeca) yumurtlama zamanının kuluçka sonuçları ile bazı yumurta özelliklerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1). 11–17. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunivbd/issue/2897/40227
  17. Demirel Ş., & Kırıkçı K. (2009). Effect of different egg storage times on some egg quality characteristics and hatchability of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Poultry Science,,88, 440–444. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00131
  18. Duman M., Şekeroğlu A., Yıldırım A., Eleroğlu H., & Camcı O. (2016). Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. European Poultry Science, 80, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2016.117
  19. Emamgholi B. H., Zerchdaron S., Hassani S., Abbasi M. A., & Khan Ahmadi A. R. (2010). Heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Iranian native fowl. British Poultry Science, 51, 740-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.528750
  20. Fajemilehin S. O. K., Odubola O. O., Fagbuaro S. S., & Akinyemi M. O. (2009). Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in the Nigerian helmeted guinea fowl, Numida meleagris galeata pallas. Applied Tropical Agriculture, 14, 102-108.
  21. Garip M., Çağlayan T., Kırıkçı K., & Günlü A. (2010). A comparison of egg quality characteristics of partridge and pheasant eggs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(2), 299-301. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tamer_Caglayan/publication/250303566_A_Comparison_of_Egg_Quality_Characteristics_of_Partridge_and_Pheasant_Eggs_P_colchicus_A_graeca/links/0deec5372ef6118f0e000000.pdf
  22. Günhan A. (2014). Kaya kekliği (a. graeca) yumurtalarında farklı depolama süresinin kuluçka sonuçları ve bazı yumurta kalite özelliklerine etkisi [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  23. Günlü A., Kırıkçı K., & Çetin O. (2001, Mayıs, 21-24). Orman içi ve kenarı köylerin ekonomik refahının arttırılmasında alternatif kanatlı yetiştiriciliği ve bunların önemi. I. Doğu Anadolu Kanatlı Yetiştiriciliği Sempozyumu (pp. 45-51), Van, Türkiye.
  24. Günlü A., Kırıkçı K., Çetin O., & Garip M. (2003). Some external and internal quality characteristics of partridge (A. graeca) eggs. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1(3-4), 197-199. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kemal-Kirikci/publication/265886337_Some_external_and_internal_quality_characteristics_of_partridge_A_graeca_eggs/links/542aab210cf277d58e875388/Some-external-and-internal-quality-characteristics-of-partridge-A-graeca-eggs.pdf
  25. Kırıkçı K., Tepeli C., Çetin O., Günlü A., & Yılmaz A. (1999). Farklı barındırma ve aydınlatma sartlarında kaya kekliklerinin (a. Graeca) bazı verim özellikleri. Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 15-22.
  26. Kırıkçı K., Çetin O., Günlü A., Tepeli C., & Yılmaz A. (2003). Investigating of the possibility of second production in a year from rock Partridges (a. Graeca) under intensive breeding. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 1(2), 267-269. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2003.378
  27. Kırıkçı K., Günlü A., Çetin O., & M. Garip (2007). Effect of hen weight on egg production and some egg quality characteristics in the Partridge (Alectoris graeca). Poultry Science, 86, 1380-1383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.7.1380
  28. Kul S., & Şeker I. (2004). Phenotypic correlations between some external and internal egg quality traits in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). International Journal of Poultry Science, 3(6), 400-405. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.599.5627&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  29. Kuzniacka K. N., Bernecki Z., & Adamski M. (2004). Jakos i wylegowosc jaj perlic szarych (Numida meleagris) utrzymywanych eksrensywnie. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Techniczno-Rolniczej w Bydgoszczy. Zootechnika, 34, 115-123. https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-article-c5830782-bdef-424c-8742-6e918c365af0
  30. Narushin V. G. (2005). Egg geometry calculation using the measurements of length and breadth. Poultry Science, 84(3), 482-484. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.482
  31. Nowaczewski S., Witkiewicz K., Fratczak M., Kontecka H., Rutkowski A., Krystianiak S., & Rosinski A. (2008). Egg quality from domestic and French Guinea fowl. Nauka Przyroda Technologie, 2(2), 1-9. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.600.4605&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  32. Olawumi S. O., & Ogunlade J. T. (2008). Phenotypic correlation between some external and internal egg quality traits in the exotic ISA Brown layer breeders. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 2(1), 30-35. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simeon-Olawumi/publication/250303553_Phenotypic_Correlations_Between_Some_External_and_Internal_Egg_Quality_Traits_in_the_Exotic_Isa_Brown_Layer_Breeders/links/5f6874ba299bf1b53ee770b8/Phenotypic-Correlations-Between-Some-External-and-Internal-Egg-Quality-Traits-in-the-Exotic-Isa-Brown-Layer-Breeders.pdf
  33. Onunkwo D. N., & Okara I. C. (2015). Phenotypic correlation between external and internal egg quality traits in three varieties of helmeted Guinea fowl from 28 to 46 weeks of age. International Journal of Livestock Research, 5, 60-70.
  34. Özbey O., & Esen F. (2007). The Effects of Different Breeding Systems on Egg Productivity and Egg Quality Characteristics of Rock Partridges. Poultry Science, 86, 782-785. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.782
  35. Özçelik M. (2002). The phenotypic correlations among some external and internal quality characteristics in Japanese quail eggs. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 49, 67-72. http://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/48922/623961
  36. Özkan Ç. Ö. (2020). Damızlık Kınalı Kekliklerde (Alectoris chukar) Meselen E Liquid Takviyesinin Yumurta Verimi Üzerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. ADYÜTAYAM Dergisi, 8(1), 31-37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/adyutayam/issue/61049/906444
  37. Redondo P. G. (2010). Effect of long-term storage on the hatchability of red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) eggs. Poultry Science, 89, 379-383. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00408
  38. Sarıca M., Camcı Ö., & Selçuk E. (2003). Bıldırcın, sülün, keklik, etçi güvercin, beç tavuğu ve devekuşu yetiştiriciliği. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 4, s1-42.
  39. Sarıca M., Önder H., & Yamak U. S. (2012). Determining the most effective variables for egg quality traits of five hen genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14, 235-240. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hasan-Oender/publication/236267882_Determining_the_Most_Effective_Variables_for_Egg_Quality_Traits_of_Five_Hen_Genotypes/links/02e7e51778139b25d1000000/Determining-the-Most-Effective-Variables-for-Egg-Quality-Traits-of-Five-Hen-Genotypes.pdf
  40. Sreenivasiah, P. (2006). Poultry production: A unique encyclopedia. 3rd Ed. Bangalore, India.
  41. Şekeroğlu A., Kayaalp G. T., & Sarıca M. (2000). The regression and correlation analysis on egg parameters in Denizli poultry. Journal of Agricultural Faculty Çukurova University, 15, 69-74.
  42. Tebesi T., Madibela O. R., & Moreki J. C. (2012). Effect of storage time on internal and external characteristics of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) eggs. Journal of Animal Science Advance, 2(6), 534-542. http://moodle.buan.ac.bw/handle/123456789/318
  43. Tekinşen K. K., Ardıç M., & Torla E. (2008). Keklik yumurtasının başlıca nitelikleri. Türk Tarım, 184, 64-67.
  44. Türkoğlu M., Arda M., Yetişir R., Sarıca M., & Erensayın C. (1997). Science of poultry. Otakfon-Ofset.
  45. Türkoğlu M., & Sarıca M. (2014). Tavukçuluk Bilimi: Yetiştirme, besleme, hastalıklar. Bey-Ofset Matbaacılık.
  46. Yannakopoulos A. L., & Tserveni-Gousi A. S. (1986). Quality characteristics of quail eggs. British Poultry Science, 27, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668608416870
  47. Yılmaz A., Tepeli C., & Çağlayan T. (2011). External and internal egg quality characteristics in Japanese quails of different plumage color lines. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9(2), 375-379. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alper-Yilmaz7/publication/287844927_External_and_internal_egg_quality_characteristics_in_Japanese_quails_of_different_plumage_color_lines/links/589051434585157323405008/External-and-internal-egg-quality-characteristics-in-Japanese-quails-of-different-plumage-color-lines.pdf
  48. Zhang L. C., Ning Z. H., Xu G. Y., Hou Z. C., & Yang Z. (2005). Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in Brown-Egg Dwarf Layers. Poultry Science, 84, 1209-1213. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1209
  49. Demirel Ş., & Kırıkçı K. (2009). Effect of different egg storage times on some egg quality characteristics and hatchability of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Poultry Science,,88, 440–444. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00131