Journals / Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4

A Review of Electrostatic Spraying for Agricultural Applications

Pages
229–233
Publication Date
2016-10-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Tractor mounted and mobile knapsack electrostatic sprayers were explained and some experimental results of them were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pesticides are toxic chemicals designed to control certain pests, diseases or weeds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For these aspects the application of pesticide must be done accurately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tractor mounted and mobile knapsack electrostatic sprayers were explained and some experimental results of them were discussed.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Electrostatic fields · ULV · plant-protection treatments

Abstract

Pesticides are toxic chemicals designed to control certain pests, diseases or weeds. They can easily contaminate the air, ground, water sources, wild animals, birds and aquatic life when they run-off from fields. For these aspects the application of pesticide must be done accurately. One of the most important factors that affecting the success of application is choosing the right equipment. New technologies on sensor and image analyzing process promoted the success of application technique. Besides electrostatic spraying is a new trend to apply pesticides with less drift potential. In recent years electrostatic spraying has been used in many other applications such as painting, ink printing etc. Researches have indicated electrostatic spraying achieves better coverage of difficult targets than conventional spraying. Water consumption of that kind of sprayers is up to 10 times less than conventional spraying. On the other hand this method has some difficulties and disadvantages. In this study, electrostatic spraying in agricultural application was evaluated. Tractor mounted and mobile knapsack electrostatic sprayers were explained and some experimental results of them were discussed.

Özet

Pesticides are toxic chemicals designed to control certain pests, diseases or weeds. They can easily contaminate the air, ground, water sources, wild animals, birds and aquatic life when they run-off from fields. For these aspects the application of pesticide must be done accurately. One of the most important factors that affecting the success of application is choosing the right equipment. New technologies on sensor and image analyzing process promoted the success of application technique. Besides electrostatic spraying is a new trend to apply pesticides with less drift potential. In recent years electrostatic spraying has been used in many other applications such as painting, ink printing etc. Researches have indicated electrostatic spraying achieves better coverage of difficult targets than conventional spraying. Water consumption of that kind of sprayers is up to 10 times less than conventional spraying. On the other hand this method has some difficulties and disadvantages. In this study, electrostatic spraying in agricultural application was evaluated. Tractor mounted and mobile knapsack electrostatic sprayers were explained and some experimental results of them were discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Urkan, E., Guler, H., Komekcı, F. (2016). A Review of Electrostatic Spraying for Agricultural Applications. Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 229–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/1277079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ANSI/ASAE S572.1, 2013. Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra, W/Corr. 1 MAR2009 (R2013), pp.5 Anonymous, 2016a, March 2016.
  2. http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/farmmanagement/ chemical-use/agricultural-chemicaluse/ spraying-spray-drift-and-off-target-damage, April 2016.
  3. Anonymous, 2016b. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pesticidedrift/, March 2016.
  4. Anonymous, 2016c. http://psep.cce.cornell.edu/facts-slidesself/ facts/gen-peapp-drop-app.aspx, February 2016.
  5. Anonymous, 2016d. http://psep.cce.cornell.edu/facts-slidesself/ facts/gen-peapp-drop-app.aspx, April 2016.
  6. Anonymous, 2016e. http://vtpp.ext.vt.edu/pesticide-safetyeducation- program/pesticide-applicationequipment/ controlled-droplet-applicators-cda, April 2016.
  7. Anonymous, 2016f. http://english.finishingbrands.eu/about_us/ransburg.asp, April 2016.
  8. Anonymous, 2016g. http://bowleselectrostaticpainting.com/history-andexplanation- of-the-electrostatic-painting-process, April 2016.
  9. Anonymous, 2016h. http://www.ransburgcollection.com/Default.aspx?tabid= 66, March 2016.
  10. Anonymous, 2016i. http://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/Electrostatic/electros tatic, January 2016.
  11. Anonymous, 2016j. http://www.protecsolutions.com.tr/en/fields-ofusage. php?id=100114), March 2016.
  12. Arnold A.J. & B.J. Pye, 1980. Spray Application with Charged Rotary Atomizers. British Crop Protection Council Monograph 24, 109-125.
  13. Deveau J., 2009. Subject: Six Elements of Effective Spraying in Orchards and Vineyards.
  14. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/09- 039.htm, March 2016
  15. Giles D. K., T. C. Blewett, 1991. Effects of Conventional and Reduced-Volume, Charged-Spray Application Techniques on Dislodgeable Foliar Residue of Captan on Strawberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 1646-1651.
  16. Law, S. E, 1978. Embedded-Electrode Electrostatic-Induction Spray Charging Nozzle: Theoretical and Engineering Design. Transactions of the ASAE 21, 1096-1104
  17. Meijden, G., 1998. Pesticide Application Techniques In West- Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO Regional Office for Africa Accra, Ghana.
  18. Ozkan H. E., 2016. Subject: Best Management Practices for Boom Spraying. http://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/fabe- 527, Agriculture and Natural Resources, FABE-527. April 2016
  19. Patel, M. K., H. K. Sahoo, M. K. Nayak, A. Kumar, C. Ghanshyam, A. Kumar, 2015. Electrostatic Nozzle: New Trends in Agricultural Pesticides Spraying. SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (SSRG-IJEEE) – EFES April2015, ISSN:2348 – 8379, pp 6-11.
  20. Rayleigh, L., 1882. On the Equilibrium of Liquid Conducting Masses Charged with Electricity. Philosophical Magazine 14: 184–186. doi:10.1080/14786448208628425
  21. Wolf T., 2009. Best Management Practices for Herbicide Application Technology. Weeds, Herbicides and Management Volume 2. pp 24-30.