SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 22

Biocomposites Derived from Agricultural Waste: Materials, Processing Methods, and Performance Evaluation

Tarımsal Atıklarından Elde Edilen Biyo-kompozitler: Malzemeler, İşleme Yöntemleri ve Performans Değerlendirmesi

Hasan Şahin(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3977-4252
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that lignocellulosic residues such as rice husk, wheat straw, sugarcane pulp, coconut fiber, and hazelnut shell, when properly processed, significantly increase the stiffness and the strength of polymeric and cemented composites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increasing production of agricultural waste in recent years, while creating significant environmental and economic challenges, also presents a significant opportunity as a renewable resource for sustainable material development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effects of waste type, fiber extraction, surface treatment methods, matrix selection, and processing techniques on the performance of composite materials were reviewed using the studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2015 and 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that lignocellulosic residues such as rice husk, wheat straw, sugarcane pulp, coconut fiber, and hazelnut shell, when properly processed, significantly increase the stiffness and the strength of polymeric and cemented composites.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Biyokütle değerlendirmesi · Tarımsal atıklar · Biyo-kompozitler

Abstract

The increasing production of agricultural waste in recent years, while creating significant environmental and economic challenges, also presents a significant opportunity as a renewable resource for sustainable material development. This study aimed to systematically examine recent developments in the use of agricultural waste and by-products as reinforcement and filler materials in biocomposite production. The effects of waste type, fiber extraction, surface treatment methods, matrix selection, and processing techniques on the performance of composite materials were reviewed using the studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2015 and 2025. The results show that lignocellulosic residues such as rice husk, wheat straw, sugarcane pulp, coconut fiber, and hazelnut shell, when properly processed, significantly increase the stiffness and the strength of polymeric and cemented composites. In particular, it was noted that mechanical tests such as tensile, flexural, and compressive are necessary to characterize the anisotropic behavior and fracture mechanisms of biocomposites and to ensure process consistency. Thermal and morphological analyses revealed that agricultural waste fillers can function as nucleating agents by improving crystallinity and interfacial adhesion at low concentrations. Despite these advantages, challenges related to raw material variability, moisture sensitivity, and scalability remain. The technical feasibility and sustainability potential of biocomposites derived from agricultural wastes were also evaluated. This study might serve as a guide for future research aimed at improving the durability, standardization, structural and industrial applicability of biocomposite materials.

Özet

Son yıllarda artan tarımsal atık üretimi, önemli çevresel ve ekonomik zorluklar yaratmakla birlikte, sürdürülebilir malzeme geliştirme için yenilenebilir bir kaynak olarak önemli bir fırsat da sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, tarımsal atık ve yan ürünlerin biyo-kompozit malzemelerde takviye ve dolgu malzemesi olarak kullanımındaki son gelişmeleri sistematik olarak incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışma, 2015 ile 2025 yılları arasında hakemli dergilerde yayınlanan çalışmalarda atık türü, lif ekstraksiyonu, yüzey işleme yöntemleri, matris seçimi ve işleme tekniklerinin kompozit malzemelerin performansı üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmiştir. Sonuçlar, pirinç kabuğu, buğday samanı, şeker kamışı posası, hindistan cevizi lifi ve fındık kabuğu gibi lignoselülozik kalıntıların, uygun şekilde işlendiğinde, polimerik ve çimentolu kompozitlerin sertliğini ve mukavemetini önemli ölçüde artırdığını göstermektedir. Özellikle, biyo-kompozitlerin anizotropik davranışını ve kırılma mekanizmalarını karakterize etmek ve işlem tutarlılığını sağlamak için çekme, eğilme ve basınç gibi mekanik testlerin gerekli olduğu belirtilmiştir. Termal ve morfolojik analizler, tarımsal atık dolgu maddelerinin düşük konsantrasyonlarda kristalliği ve arayüzey yapışmasını iyileştirerek çekirdeklenme ajanı olarak işlev görebileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu avantajlara rağmen, hammadde değişkenliği, neme duyarlılık ve ölçeklenebilirlik ile ilgili zorluklar devam etmektedir. Genel olarak, bu inceleme tarımsal atıklardan elde edilen biyo-kompozitlerin teknik fizibilitesini ve sürdürülebilirlik potansiyelini araştırmıştır. Bu çalışma; biyo-kompozit malzemelerin dayanıklılığını, standardizasyonunu yapısal ve endüstriyel uygulanabilirliğini iyileştirmeyi amaçlayan gelecekteki araştırmalar için bir yol gösterici olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, H., *, H. Ş. (2026). Biocomposites Derived from Agricultural Waste: Materials, Processing Methods, and Performance Evaluation. Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 22. https://ajindex.com/articles/1276904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Abare, A. Y., Jawaid, M., Hamid, N. H., Bakar, B. F. A., Ismail, A. S., Sarmin, S. N., Fouad, H., ve Midani, M. (2023). Evaluation of Physical, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Woven Kenaf/Bio-epoxy Composites. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 53, 15280837231163342. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837231163342
  2. Abdallah, Y. K., ve Estévez, A. T. (2023). Biowelding 3D-Printed Biodigital Brick of Seashell-Based Biocomposite by Pleurotus Ostreatus Mycelium. Biomimetics, 8(6), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8060504
  3. Al Rashdi, S. S. A., Patil, G. N., Al Balushi, N. A. M., ve Manivannan, S. A. (2022). Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofiber Obtained from Agriculture Waste. Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering), 15(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.2174/2405520415666220905120334
  4. Badgar, K., Abdalla, N., El-Ramady, H., ve Prokisch, J. (2022). Sustainable Applications of Nanofibers in Agriculture and Water Treatment: A Review. Sustainability, 14(1), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010464
  5. Bajracharya, R. M., Bajwa, D. S., ve Bajwa, S. G. (2017). Mechanical Properties of Polylactic Acid Composites Reinforced with Cotton Gin Waste and Flax Fibers. Procedia Engineering, 200, 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.052
  6. Bhavsar, P., Balan, T., Fontana, G. D., Zoccola, M., Patrucco, A., ve Tonin, C. (2021). Sustainably Processed Waste Wool Fiber‐Reinforced Biocomposites for Agriculture and Packaging Applications. Fibers, 9(9), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9090055
  7. Cintura, E., Faria, P., Duarte, M., ve Nunes, L. (2022). Bio-Wastes as Aggregates for Eco-Efficient Boards and Panels: Screening Tests of Physical Properties and Bio-Susceptibility. Infrastructures, 7(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7030026
  8. Ditta, Z. M., Tanapongpisit, N., Saenrang, W., Fongkaew, I., Chainakun, P., Seemakram, W., Boonlue, S., Sata, V., ve Ekprasert, J. (2022). Bio-strengthening of Cementitious Composites from Incinerated Sugarcane Filter Cake by a Calcifying Bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. WH. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11330-5
  9. Divakaran, D., Sriariyanun, M., Jagadeesan, R., Suyambulingam, I., Sanjay, M. R., ve Siengchin, S. (2023). Isolation and Characterization of an Agro-Industrial Waste-Based Novel Cellulosic Micro Fillers From Mustard (Brassica juncea) seed oil cake: A waste to wealth approach. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14, 22921-22937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04346-y
  10. Eyide, O., Amenaghawon, N. A., Modebe, L. U., ve Mee, J. A. (2023). Optimization of Mechanical Properties of Bonded Particle Boards Produced From Agricultural Waste Wood Chips. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 27(4), 733-740. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v27i4.13
  11. Falalu, S. U., Adam, A. B., Zaharaddeen, M., Ahmad, K. B., Kaugama, A. A., ve Bilkisu, I. A. (2023). Agro Based Material (Rice Husk Powder and Carbon Nanotubes) as Reinforcement in the Development of a New Polymer Bio-composite. Earthline Journal of Chemical Sciences, 10(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.34198/ejcs.10223.229241
  12. Falkovich, S. G., Larin, S. V., Lukasheva, N. V., Nazarychev, V. M., Tolmachev, D. A., Glova, A. D., Mezhenskaia, D. A., Kenny, J. M., ve Lyulin, S. V. (2016). Computational Modeling of Polylactide and Its Cellulose-Reinforced Nanocomposites. In Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposites Based on Cellulosic Reinforcements, pp. 313-341. William Andrew Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44248-0.00010-9
  13. Ferri, M., Vannini, M., Ehrnell, M., Eliasson, L., Xanthakis, E., Monari, S., Sisti, L., Marchese, P., Celli, A., ve Tassoni, A. (2020). From Winery Waste to Bioactive Compounds and New Polymeric Biocomposites: A Contribution to the Circular Economy Concept. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.02.015
  14. Florencio, C., Bortoletto-Santos, R., Favaro, C. P., Brondi, M. G., Velloso, C. C. V., Klaic, R., Ribeiro, C., Farinasa, C. S., ve Mattoso, L. H. C. (2022). Advances in the Production and Formulation of Microbial Inoculants for a More Sustainable Agriculture. Quimica Nova, 45(9), 1133-1145. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170909
  15. González-Baldizón, Y., Pérez-Patricio, M., Camas-Anzueto, J. L., Rodríguez-Elías, O. M., Escobar-Gómez, E. N., Vazquez-Delgado, H. D., Guzman-Rabasa, J. A., ve Fragoso-Mandujano, J. A. (2022). Lamb Behaviors Analysis Using a Predictive CNN Model and a Single Camera. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4712. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094712
  16. Hokkanen, S., Bhatnagar, A., ve Sillanpää, M. (2016). A Review on Modification Methods to Cellulose-Based Adsorbents to Improve Adsorption Capacity. Water Research, 91, 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008
  17. Ilangovan, M., Navada, A. P., Guna, V., Touchaleaume, F., Saulnier, B., Grohens, Y., ve Reddy, N. (2022). Hybrid Biocomposites with High Thermal and Noise Insulation from Discarded Wool, Poultry Feathers, and Their Blends. Construction and Building Materials, 345, 128324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128324
  18. Jagadeesh, D., Sudhakara, P., Prasad, C. V., Kim, H. J., ve Song, J. I. (2013). A Study on the Mechanical Properties of Bio Composites from Renewable Agro-Waste/Poly(Lactic Acid). Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 7(1), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2013.1277
  19. Joshi, R., Bajpai, P. K., ve Mukhopadhyay, S. (2022). Processing and Performance Evaluation of Agro Wastes Reinforced Bio-Based Epoxy Hybrid Composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 237(2), 482-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221118686
  20. Khalife, E., Sabouri, M., Kaveh, M., ve Szymanek, M. (2024). Recent Advances in the Application of Agricultural Waste in Construction. Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2355. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP14062355
  21. Kossalbayev, B. D., Belkozhayev, A. M., Abaildayev, A., Kadirshe, D. K., Tastambek, K. T., Kurmanbek, A., ve Toleutay, G. (2025). Biodegradable Packaging from Agricultural Wastes: A Comprehensive Review of Processing Techniques, Material Properties, and Future Prospects. Polymers, 17(16), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162224
  22. Kubendiran, M., Karthikeyan, N., Kannan, C. R., Manivannan, S., Venkatesh, R., ve Naveen, S. (2023). Sustainable Development and Conservation of Agro-Waste Coconut Shell Powder Strengthen Lightweight Aluminum Bio-Composite for User Friendly. Environmental Quality Management, 33(4), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22114
  23. Kumar, K. S., Gairola, S., ve Singh, I. (2024). Waste Coffee Silverskin as a Potential Filler in Sustainable Composites: Mechanical, Thermal, and Microstructural Analysis. Industrial Crops and Products, 210, 118088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118088
  24. Kumar, S., Bhowmik, S., ve Mahakur, V. K. (2023a). Thermo-Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Naturally Derived Biocomposites for Prosthesis Applications: Analysis of the Interface Pressure and Stress Distribution on the Developed Socket. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 237(5), 1999-2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221131155
  25. Kumar, S. N., Jain, R., Anand, K., ve Ajay Kumar, H. (2022). Utilization of Agro Waste for the Fabrication of Bio Composites and Bio plastics—Towards a Sustainable Green Circular Economy. In Sustainability for 3D printing (pp. 131-147). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75235-4_7
  26. Kumar, S., Saha, A., ve Zindani, D. (2023b). Agro-Waste-Based Polymeric Composite Laminates for Aerospace Cabin Interior and Identification of Their Optimal Configuration. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14, 31907-31923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04914-2
  27. Lendvai, L., Omastova, M., Patnaik, A., Dogossy, G., ve Singh, T. (2023). Valorization of Waste Wood Flour and Rice Husk in Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Hybrid Biocomposites. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 31(2), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02633-9
  28. Mishra, D. K., Singh, B. R., Kumar, S., Sharma, V. K., ve Singh, N. (2025). Design and Optimization of Agro-Residue Fiber-Reinforced Composite Panels for Sustainable Grain Storage. Fibers and Polymers, 26(11), 5023–5038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-025-01114-9
  29. Mishra, S., Cheng, L., ve Maiti, A. (2021). The Utilization of Agro-Biomass/Byproducts for Effective Bio-Removal of Dyes from Dyeing Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(1), 104901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104901
  30. Mohamed, G. R., Mahmoud, R. K., Shaban, M., Fahim, I. S., Abd El Salam, H. M., ve Mahmoud, H. M. (2023). Towards a Circular Economy: Valorization of Banana Peels by Developing Bio-Composites Thermal Insulators. Scientific Reports, 13, 12756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37994-1
  31. Mollaei, M., Karbasi, F., Sharifi Haddad, A., ve Baniasadi, H. (2024). Fabrication of Biocomposite Materials with Polycaprolactone and Activated Carbon Extracted from Agricultural Waste. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 702, 135175. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2024.135175
  32. Mu, B., Tang, W., Liu, T., Hao, X., Wang, Q., ve Ou, R. (2021). Comparative Study of High-density Polyethylene-Based Biocomposites Reinforced with Various Agricultural Residue Fibers. Industrial Crops and Products, 172, 114053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114053
  33. Mujtaba, M., Fernandes Fraceto, L., Fazeli, M., Mukherjee, S., Savassa, S. M., Araujo de Medeiros, G., do Espírito Santo Pereira, A., Mancini, S. D., Lipponen, J., ve Vilaplana, F. (2023). Lignocellulosic Biomass from Agricultural Waste to the Circular Economy: a Review with Focus on Biofuels, Biocomposites and Bioplastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136815
  34. Nath, P. C., Ojha, A., Debnath, S., Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Nayak, P. K., ve Inbaraj, B. S. (2023). Biogeneration of Valuable Nanomaterials from Agro-Wastes: A Comprehensive Review. In Agronomy, 13(2), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020561
  35. OpenAI. (2026, Nisan 10). Google. NotebookLM AI-Assisted Research and Summarization Tool [Large language model]. https://notebooklm.google/.
  36. Panda, J., Mishra, A. K., Mohanta, Y. K., Patowary, K., Rauta, P. R., ve Mishra, B. (2024). Exploring Biopolymer for Food and Pharmaceuticals Application in the Circular Bioeconomy: An Agro-Food Waste-to-Wealth Approach. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 15, 5607-5637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-024-02452-0
  37. Pavalaydon, K., Ramasawmy, H., ve Surroop, D. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Cellulose Nanocrystals from Bagasse and Coir Agro-Wastes for Reinforcing PVA-Based Composites. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(8), 9963–9984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01852-9
  38. Petcu, C., Hegyi, A., Stoian, V., Dragomir, C. S., Ciobanu, A. A., Lăzărescu, A. V., ve Florean, C. (2023). Research on Thermal Insulation Performance and Impact on Indoor Air Quality of Cellulose-Based Thermal Insulation Materials. Materials, 16(15), 5458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155458
  39. Phiri, R., Rangappa, S. M., Siengchin, S., ve Marinkovic, D. (2023). Agro-Waste Natural Fiber Sample Preparation Techniques for Bio-Composites Development: Methodological Insights. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 21(4), 631-656. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230905046P
  40. Prithivirajan, R., Jayabal, S., Sundaram, S. K., ve Sangeetha, V. (2016). Hybrid Biocomposites from Agricultural Residues: Mechanical, Water Absorption and Tribological Behaviors. Journal of Polymer Engineering, 36(7), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0113
  41. Quisperima, A., Pérez, S., Flórez, E., ve Acelas, N. (2022). Valorization of Potato Peels and Eggshells Wastes: Ca-Biocomposite to Remove and Recover Phosphorus from Domestic Wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 343, 126106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126106
  42. Rahman, M. R., Bin Bakri, M. K., Jayamani, E., ve Chowdhury, F. I. (2022). Impact of Recycled Plastic Biocomposites on the Economy and Socioenvironment. In Recycled Plastic Biocomposites (pp. 247-259). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88653-6.00015-8
  43. Ram Kishore, S., Sridharan, A. P., Chadha, U., Narayanan, D., Mishra, M., Selvaraj, S. K., ve Patterson, A. E. (2024). Natural Fiber Biocomposites via 4D Printing Technologies: a Review of Possibilities for Agricultural Bio-Mulching and Related Sustainable Applications. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 9(1), 37-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00433-8
  44. Ranjan, N., Banerjee, S., Nayak, S., ve Das, S. (2023). Agro-Waste Fiber Reinforced Mortar for Augmenting the Performance of Masonry Structures. Construction and Building Materials, 363, 129848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129848
  45. Righetti, M. C., Cinelli, P., Mallegni, N., Massa, C. A., Bronco, S., Stäbler, A., ve Lazzeri, A. (2019). Thermal, Mechanical, and Rheological Properties of Biocomposites Made of Poly(Lactic Acid) and Potato Pulp Powder. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(3), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030675
  46. Rutitis, D., Smoca, A., Uvarova, I., Brizga, J., Atstaja, D., ve Mavlutova, I. (2022). Sustainable Value Chain of Industrial Biocomposite Consumption: Influence of COVID‐19 and Consumer Behavior. Energies, 15(2), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020466
  47. Savov, V., Antov, P., Kostadinova-Slaveva, A., Yusein, J., Dudeva, V., Todorova, E., ve Petrin, S. (2025). Development and Characterization of Sustainable Biocomposites from Wood Fibers, Spent Coffee Grounds, and Ammonium Lignosulfonate. Polymers, 17(19), 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192589
  48. Singh, B., Kumar, R., Sharma, S., Pattanaik, A., Kumar, P., Kedia, A., Mahapatro, A., Raja, V. K. B., Gupta, D., ve Ismail, A. I. (2025). Enhancing Cellulose-Rich Polylactic Acid (PLA)-Rice Residue-Reinforced Sustainable Biocomposites: Influence of Chemical Pretreatments on Strengthening the Thermomechanical Properties of Biocomposite Materials. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 327, 146631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.146631
  49. Siqueira, M. U., Contin, B., Fernandes, P. R. B., Ruschel-Soares, R., Siqueira, P. U., ve Baruque-Ramos, J. (2022). Brazilian Agro-industrial Wastes as Potential Textile and Other Raw Materials: a Sustainable Approach. Materials Circular Economy, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-021-00050-2
  50. Skrzypczak, D., Mikula, K., Izydorczyk, G., Dawiec-Liśniewska, A., Moustakas, K., Chojnacka, K., ve Witek-Krowiak, A. (2021). New Directions for Agricultural Wastes Valorization as Hydrogel Biocomposite Fertilizers. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113480
  51. Soburrun, V., ve Ramasawmy, H. (2022). Effective Treatment of Musa Acuminata Fibre Using Wood Ash Solution to Produce Bio-Composite with Enhanced Mechanical Properties. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 13(1), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01524-9
  52. Stalin, N., ve Shobhanadevi, N. (2023). Studies on Thermal, Structural, and Compositional Properties of Agro-Waste Jute Fiber Composite Reinforced with Cardanol Resin. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(12), 10413–10420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01958-0
  53. Tareq Noaman, A., Abed, M. S., Al-Gebory, L., Al-Zubaidi, A. B., ve Al-Tabbakh, A. A. (2023). Production of Agro-Waste Cement Composites: Influence of Nutshells on Mechanical and Hardened Properties. Construction and Building Materials, 394, 132137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.132137
  54. Thakur, V. K., ve Thakur, M. K. (2014). Processing and Characterization of Natural Cellulose Fibers/Thermoset Polymer Composites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 109, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.039
  55. Tolbert, C. L. (2025). Leveraging Variable Frequency Drive Data for Nondestructive Testing and Predictive Maintenance in Industrial Systems. NDT, 3(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ndt3020007
  56. Yiga, V. A., Lubwama, M., ve Hakkarainen, M. (2024). Utilization of Agricultural Residues for Production of Biocomposites and Bioplastics. In Comprehensive Polymer Science (Second Edition), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95486-0.00060-0