SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Politik Ekonomik Kuram / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

A Scientific Map of Publications on Sustainable Development Goals in Türkiye

Türkiye'de Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri Konulu Yayınların Bilimsel Haritası

Hande Boğazlıyan Turanlı(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8312-7167
Hüseyin Parmaksız(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8455-5625
Osman Akarsu(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0595-6795
Halil İbrahim Cebeci(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5058-7741
Pages
825–848
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research findings reveal that most studies in Türkiye focus on SDG 13, and the general trend in Türkiye is parallel to that of the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) declared by the United Nations requires each country to take ownership of this process and develop policies that embrace and contribute to it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 18 bibliometric analyses were performed using both the cumulative dataset meeting this criterion and the datasets obtained separately for each of the 17 SDGs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research findings reveal that most studies in Türkiye focus on SDG 13, and the general trend in Türkiye is parallel to that of the world.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik · Bibliyometrik Analiz · Bilimsel Haritalama

Abstract

The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) declared by the United Nations requires each country to take ownership of this process and develop policies that embrace and contribute to it. Academic studies conducted in the countries shed light on the process of producing these policies. This study attempts to reveal the scientific map of academic studies conducted in Türkiye on this subject to observe the trends in academia regarding SDGs. Accordingly, the general status of studies conducted on SDGs, international collaborations, the institutions working most on the subject, and the most studied concepts are examined. The study's dataset consists of bibliometric data from academic studies on sustainability retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database with the country selection ‘TURKIYE’ or ‘TURKEY’. A total of 18 bibliometric analyses were performed using both the cumulative dataset meeting this criterion and the datasets obtained separately for each of the 17 SDGs. The results of these analyses were integrated into electronic spreadsheets and visualised using Tableau, a business intelligence tool. The research findings reveal that most studies in Türkiye focus on SDG 13, and the general trend in Türkiye is parallel to that of the world. It has been observed that international collaboration in studies on sustainability exceeds 40%. The researchers from Türkiye collaborate the most with countries like the United States, China, and Iran. The three institutions conducting the most research on sustainability are Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul Technical University, and Yıldız Technical University.

Özet

Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından ilan edilen Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedeflerinin (SKH) gerçekleştirilmesi, her ülkenin bu sürecin sahiplenmesini ve onu kucaklayan ve ona katkıda bulunan politikalar geliştirmesini gerektirmektedir. Ülkelerde yürütülen akademik çalışmalar, bu politikaların üretilme sürecine ışık tutmaktadır. Bu çalışma, SKH'ler ile ilgili akademide gözlemlenen eğilimleri incelemek amacıyla Türkiye'de bu konuda yürütülen akademik çalışmaların bilimsel haritasını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, SKH'ler üzerine yapılan çalışmaların genel durumu, uluslararası iş birlikleri, konu üzerinde en çok çalışan kurumlar ve en çok çalışılan kavramlar incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın veri seti, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından “TURKIYE” veya “TURKEY” ülke seçimi ile elde edilen sürdürülebilirlik üzerine akademik çalışmalardan elde edilen bibliyometrik verilerden oluşmaktadır. Bu kriteri karşılayan kümülatif veri seti ve 17 SKH'nin her biri için ayrı ayrı elde edilen veri setleri kullanılarak toplam 18 bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu analizlerin sonuçları elektronik tablolara entegre edilmiş ve bir iş zekası aracı olan Tableau kullanılarak görselleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, Türkiye'deki çalışmaların çoğunun SKH 13'e odaklandığını ve Türkiye'deki genel eğilimin dünyadaki eğilimle paralel olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sürdürülebilirlikle ilgili çalışmalarda uluslararası iş birliğinin %40'ın üzerinde olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Türkiye'den araştırmacıların en çok iş birliği yaptığı ülkeler Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Çin ve İran'dır. Türkiye'de sürdürülebilirlik konusunda en fazla araştırma yapan üç kurum İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi ve Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi'dir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turanlı, H. B., Parmaksız, H., Akarsu, O., Cebeci, H. İ., *, H. B. T. (2026). A Scientific Map of Publications on Sustainable Development Goals in Türkiye. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 825–848. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1883880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (76)

  1. Adebayo, T. S. (2024). Exploring the heterogeneous impact of technological innovation on income inequality: Formulating the SDG policies for the BRICS-T economies. Energy & Environment, 35(4), 1773-1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x221145926
  2. Adebayo, T. S., Akadiri, S. S., Adamu, Y., & Olasehinde-Williams, G. O. (2023). Disaggregated energy consumption and ecological footprint: proposing an SDG framework for newly industrialised countries. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 32(4), 417-439. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijogct.2023.129579
  3. Ahmed, Z., Pinzon, S., & Rasheed, M. Q. (2025). Unlocking marginal SDG dynamics: A KRLS machine learning analysis of AI technologies and solar energy. Geoscience Frontiers, 102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102167
  4. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1453-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3
  5. Akça, M., Bulut, Ö. U., Topal, S., Balcı, Ö., Özyakışır, D., & Çamkaya, S. (2025). Is the Technology-Oriented Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Valid in Türkiye? An Assessment in the Context of SDG-10. Sustainability, 17(10), 4590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104590
  6. Akdam, N., Alamri, O. A., Dutta, S., Çiftci, F., & İyit, N. (2025). Bayesian estimation of the inverse Exponential Power distribution for COVID-19 case fatality analysis under SDG 3. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27264-7
  7. Al‐Mulali, U., Aslan, A., & Raboshuk, A. (2025). Uncertain Policies, Unsure Futures? Unraveling the Impact of Policy Shocks on SDG Achievements: A Case Study of 21 Countries. Sustainable Development. 34(3), 3169–3182.
  8. Aras, G., Kutlu Furtuna, O., & Hacioglu Kazak, E. (2024). SDG Impact Index with Double Materiality Perspective: Evidence from OECD Commercial Bank Industry. Social Indicators Research, 174(3), 967-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03421-9
  9. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  10. Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2019). Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities. World Development, 122, 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.026
  11. Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2021). Institutional quality, governance and progress towards the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(21), 11798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111798
  12. Barut, A., Kaya, E., Bekun, F. V., & Cengiz, S. (2023). Environmental sustainability amidst financial inclusion in five fragile economies: Evidence from lens of environmental Kuznets curve. Energy, 269, 126802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126802
  13. Bekil, B., & Genel, Z. (2024). Moda Markalarının SDG 12 Mesajlarının Genç Tüketiciler Algısındaki Rolü: Nitel Bir Araştırma. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (45), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1374012
  14. Beloskar, V. D., Haldar, A., & Gupta, A. (2024). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A bibliometric review of the literature on SDG 5 through the management lens. Journal of Business Research, 172, 114442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114442
  15. Bianchini, S., Bottero, P., Colagrossi, M., Damioli, G., Ghisetti, C. and Michoud, K. (2023). Mapping the Scientific Base for SDGs and Digital Technologies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/237170
  16. Borchardt S., Barbero Vignola G., Buscaglia D., Maroni M., Marelli L. (2023). Mapping EU Policies with the Agenda 2030 and SDGs. Fostering Policy Coherence through text-based SDG Mapping. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi:10.2760/110687, JRC130904.
  17. Brand, A., Furness, M., & Keijzer, N. (2021). Promoting policy coherence within the 2030 Agenda framework: Externalities, trade-offs and politics. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608
  18. Ciuciuc, V. E., Vătămănescu, E. M., & Gheorghiu, A. (2025). Sustainability in the Knowledge Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Policy Perspectives. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3205-3220). Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0245
  19. Çelik, S., Öztürk, Ö. F., Akkucuk, U., & Şaşmaz, M. Ü. (2025). Global Sustainability Performance and Regional Disparities: A Machine Learning Approach Based on the 2025 SDG Index. Sustainability, 17(16), 7411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167411
  20. Çetin-Ayşe, Ç. (2024). The startling effect of the word race: a glance at racism in Turkey through the eyes of young men who support gender equality. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 47(15), 3237-3258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2023.2294012
  21. Dai, J., Ahmed, Z., Pata, U. K., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Achieving SDG-13 in the era of conflicts: The roles of economic growth and government stability. Evaluation Review, 47(6), 1168-1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x231160626
  22. Dhaigude, A. S., Verma, A., & Nayak, G. (2025). Sustainable production and consumption: a bibliometric analysis of SDG-12 literature through a financial management lens. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), 2467882. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2467882
  23. Dias Paião Júnior, G., & Ferraz, D. (2024). Economic diversification and sustainable growth: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05667-2
  24. Dibbern, T. A., Rampasso, I. S., Pavan Serafim, M., Bertazzoli, R., Leal Filho, W., & Anholon, R. (2023). Bibliometric study on SDG 6: analysing main content aspects by using Web of Science data from 2015 to 2021. Kybernetes, 52(9), 3119-3135. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2021-0393
  25. Dinçer, H., El-Assadi, A., Saad, M., & Yüksel, S. (2024). Influential mapping of SDG disclosures based on innovation and knowledge using an integrated decision-making approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(1), 100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100466
  26. Dindar, E. (2025). Performance Evaluation of Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability and GRI-Based SDG Disclosures in Turkey’s Automotive Sector. Sustainability, 17(19), 8905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198905
  27. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  28. Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2022). Collaboration effect by co-authorship on academic citation and social attention of research. Mathematics, 10(12), 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10122082
  29. Ekmen, O., & Kocaman, S. (2023). From pixels to sustainability: Trends and collaborations in remote sensing for advancing sustainable cities and communities (SDG 11). Sustainability, 15(22), 16094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216094
  30. Empig, E. E., Sivacioğlu, A., Pacaldo, R. S., Suson, P. D., Lavilles, R. Q., Teves, M. R. Y.,…Amparado Jr, R. F. (2023). Climate Change, Sustainable Forest Management, ICT Nexus, and the SDG 2030: A Systems Thinking Approach. Sustainability, 15(8), 6712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086712
  31. Fullman, N., Barber, R. M., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M.,. & Dubey, M. (2017). Measuring progress and projecting attainment on the basis of past trends of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet, 390(10100), 1423-1459.
  32. Garan, Ö., & Güneş, İ. (2025). Reframing SDG 11 Through the Triple Helix Model: Rethinking Urban Sustainability and Institutional Synergy. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 528-549. https://doi.org/10.26650/jepr1650031
  33. Ghanem, M. i. A. A. N., Javed, I., & Ekinci, A. (2025). Tracking Progress and Interlinkages in SDG Achievement: A Monitoring Index Approach with Insights from Jordan. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100882
  34. Gyamfi, B. A., Adebayo, T. S., Agozie, D. Q., Bekun, F. V., & Koy, A. (2025). Is sustainable energy consumption, technological advancement and urbanization fast addressing south Asia’s green energy expansion deficits?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(8), 19969-19998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04684-5
  35. Göçoğlu, V., Ayan, D., & Demirkol, A. (2025). Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Vulnerable Countries Through the SDG 13: A Cross‐Sectoral Analysis. Sustainable development. 34(1), 95–111 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70254
  36. Guillen-Royo, M., Guardiola, J., & Garcia-Quero, F. (2017). Sustainable development in times of economic crisis: A needs-based illustration from Granada (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.008
  37. Güldal, H. T. (2025). Bridging the gap between SDG 2 indicators and agricultural efficiency: Insights from OECD countries. New Medit: Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment= Revue Méditerranéenne dʹEconomie Agriculture et Environment, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2504a
  38. He, X., Khan, S., Ozturk, I., & Murshed, M. (2023). The role of renewable energy investment in tackling climate change concerns: Environmental policies for achieving SDG‐13. Sustainable development, 31(3), 1888-1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2491
  39. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi. (2025, 2 Temmuz). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleri nedir, neden insanlık için önemlidir? İGÜ Blog. https://gelisim.edu.tr/tr/gelisim-blog-icerik-surdurulebilir-kalkinma-hedefleri-nedir-neden-insanlik-icin-onemlidir
  40. Kartal, M. T., Mukhtarov, S., Depren, Ö., Ayhan, F., & Ulussever, T. (2025). How Can SDG‐13 Be Achieved by Energy, Environment, and Economy‐Related Policies? Evidence From Five Leading Emerging Countries. Sustainable development. 33(4), 5110–5133 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3391
  41. Khan, K. A., Alshahari, E. A., Akhayere, E., Kavaz, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty and renewable energy consumption at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for the United States. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(5), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2304614
  42. Khan, K. A., Subhan, M., Tiwari, S., Anser, M. K., & Destek, M. A. (2025). Impacts of natural resources and technological innovation on SDG achievement of OECD countries: How does democracy and globalization behave? Technology in Society, 81, 102778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102778
  43. Koçulu, A. (2025). Promoting Sustainable Life Through Global Citizenship-Oriented Educational Approaches: Comparison of Learn–Think–Act Approach-Based and Lecture-Based SDG Instructions on the Development of Students’ Sustainability Consciousness. Sustainability, 17(20), 9026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209026
  44. Koçulu, A., & Topçu, M. S. (2024). Development and implementation of a sustainable development goals (SDGs) unit: Exploration of middle school students’ SDG knowledge. Sustainability, 16(2), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020581
  45. Koff, H., Challenger, A., Ros Cuellar, J., Aguilar Orea, R., & Lara Lopez, M. d. S. (2023). How green are our laws? Presenting a normative coherence for sustainable development methodology. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(1), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1998
  46. Leal Filho, W., Vidal, D. G., Chen, C., Petrova, M., Dinis, M. A. P., Yang, P.,…Sharifi, A. (2022). An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9
  47. Lusseau, D., & Mancini, F. (2019). Income-based variation in Sustainable Development Goal interaction networks. Nature Sustainability, 2(3), 242-247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0231-4
  48. Lyu, Z., Lanre Ibrahim, R., Alomair, A., & Al Naim, A. S. (2025). Fossil Fuels, Clean Cooking Energy, and Health Inequality in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Distribution‐Sensitive Evidence for SDG‐Linked Transitions. Sustainable development, 34(S2), 1348–1373. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70395
  49. Mbanda, V., & Fourie, W. (2020). The 2030 Agenda and coherent national development policy: In dialogue with South African policymakers on Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2025
  50. Munir, S., Anser, M. K., Khan, A. W., Alam, M. S., Aamir, A., & Zaman, K. (2025). Powering the transition: geoscientific insights and policy levers for global renewable energy investment, pricing reforms and decarbonization pathways towards SDG 7 and SDG 13. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00695-4
  51. Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P.,. Stafford-Smith, M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
  52. Onifade, S. T., Erdoğan, S., Alagöz, M., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Renewables as a pathway to environmental sustainability targets in the era of trade liberalization: empirical evidence from Turkey and the Caspian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(31), 41663-41674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13684-1
  53. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2016) Measuring distance to the SDGs targets: a pilot assessment of where OECD countries stand. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
  54. Ozili, P. K., & Iorember, P. T. (2024). Financial stability and sustainable development. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(3), 2620-2646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2803
  55. Parmaksız, H. (2025). Ajan yapay zekâ: Otonom sistemler, sürdürülebilir etki ve akademik evrim için çok boyutlu bir çerçeve. Sürdürülebilirlik, Yönetim & Ekonomi Dergisi, 1(2), 105-128.
  56. Reverte, C. (2022). The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross‐country empirical study. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1882-1899. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2354
  57. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
  58. Seçmen, S., & Ibrahim, F. A. (2025). Rethinking sustainable development goals (SDG) for floating slums in African coastal settings: Makoko community in Nigeria. Cities, 159, 105751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105751
  59. Siar, S. (2023). The challenges and approaches of measuring research impact and influence on public policy making. Public Administration and Policy, 26(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-05-2022-0046
  60. Singh, S., & Ru, J. (2023). Goals of sustainable infrastructure, industry, and innovation: a review and future agenda for research. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 28446-28458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25281-5
  61. Song, J., & Jang, C. H. (2023). Unpacking the sustainable development goals (SDGs) interlinkages: A semantic network analysis of the SDGs targets. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2784-2796. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2547
  62. Strezov, V., Evans, A., & Evans, T. J. (2017). Assessment of the economic, social and environmental dimensions of the indicators for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1649
  63. Swain, R. B., & Ranganathan, S. (2021). Modeling interlinkages between sustainable development goals using network analysis. World development, 138, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105136
  64. Trane, M., Marelli, L., Siragusa, A., Pollo, R., & Lombardi, P. (2023). Progress by research to achieve the sustainable development goals in the EU: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(9), 7055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097055
  65. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration (A/RES/55/2). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-millennium-declaration
  66. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  67. Wang, Q., Li, Y., Pata, U. K., & Li, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and global carbon inequality: Addressing the challenges and opportunities for SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 13. Geoscience Frontiers, 16(4), 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102072
  68. Velazquez, L. (2025). Higher Education Institutions as Leverage for Backing up SMEs’ Efforts to Meet SDG 9. Sustainability, 17(10), 4665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104665
  69. Verma, R., Kumar, A., Mashroofa, M. M., & Gupta, N. (2025). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in sustainable inclusive economic growth within the SDG 8 framework from 2015 to 2025 using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02124-6
  70. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Available online:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2025).
  71. Yadav, A., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S., & Ecer, F. (2025). Analyzing Barriers to Discrimination Mitigation for Women's Empowerment to Achieve SDG 5–Gender Equality. Sustainable development. 34(S2), 757–777 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70356
  72. Yap, S., Shan Lee, H., & Xin Liew, P. (2023). The role of financial inclusion in achieving financerelated sustainable development goals (SDGs): a cross-country analysis. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2023.2212028
  73. Yılmaz, G., & Adak, N. (2025). Transforming organizational culture: The first gender equality plan of Akdeniz University in Turkey. Social Inclusion, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9979
  74. Yildiz, D., & Markoc, I. (2025). From Simplicity to Sustainability: Structuring Minimalist Housing with SDG Metrics. Sustainability, 17(20), 9232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209232
  75. Yüncü, V. (2025). Deconstructing SDG Performance for Strategic Insight: Quantitative Insights from Türkiye and European Countries. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 47(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2025.29
  76. Xiao, H., Liu, Y., & Ren, J. (2023). Synergies and trade‐offs across sustainable development goals: A novel method incorporating indirect interactions analysis. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 1135-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2446