SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Politik Ekonomik Kuram / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

Assessing Life Cycle Cost from the Perspective of Climate Change: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Yaşam Döngüsü Maliyetinin İklim Değişikliği Perspektifinden Değerlendirmesi: Sistematik Bir İnceleme ve Bibliyometrik Analiz

Gülşah Kazak(Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1972-0820
Pages
914–931
Publication Date
2026-09-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that sustainability concerns strongly influence life cycle cost assessments from a climate change perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate change has a major impact on activities in all sectors and the costs involved.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strategies that address climate change have become essential for reaching these goals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that sustainability concerns strongly influence life cycle cost assessments from a climate change perspective.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Maliyet · Yaşam Döngüsü Maliyeti · Yaşam Boyu Maliyet Analizi

Abstract

Climate change has a major impact on activities in all sectors and the costs involved. These effects lead to economic consequences and are also important for environmental sustainability. Because of this, using resources efficiently, encouraging sustainable production and consumption, and reducing the effects of climate change are now key goals in environmental policy. Strategies that address climate change have become essential for reaching these goals. As a result, sectors need to include climate change in their cost analyses to stay competitive. This study aims to analyze scientific approaches to Life Cycle Costing (LCC) with a specific focus on the implications and integration of climate change. The review covers 1,427 publications published from 1994 to 2025. The publications examined in the study were obtained from the Web of Science database. Bibliometric analysis, along with a systematic literature search, was conducted to support the study findings. The review covered 1,427 publications from 1994 to 2025. There was a sharp rise in publications after 2015, showing that more researchers are interested in including climate change in life cycle cost analysis. The bibliometric analysis found that most research on the link between life cycle cost and climate change, when viewed broadly, comes from China and the United States. The results show that sustainability concerns strongly influence life cycle cost assessments from a climate change perspective. Studies on environmental costs highlight that including climate change impacts in these calculations can give sectors a long-term competitive edge.

Özet

İklim değişikliğinin, tüm sektörlerdeki faaliyetleri ve bu faaliyetlere ilişkin maliyetleri önemli ölçüde etkilediği açıktır. Bu etkiler, yalnızca ekonomik sonuçlar doğurmakla kalmayıp aynı zamanda çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açısından da kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, kaynakların verimli kullanımı, sürdürülebilir üretim ve tüketim kalıplarının teşvik edilmesi ile iklim değişikliğinin etkilerinin azaltılması, günümüz çevre politikalarının temel hedefleri arasında yer almakta; bu hedeflere ulaşmada iklim değişikliğini dikkate alan stratejiler vazgeçilmez bir unsur olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle, sektörlerin rekabet gücünü sürdürebilmesi açısından, iklim değişikliğinin maliyet analizlerine entegre edilmesi bir gereklilik haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, iklim değişikliği perspektifinden yaşam döngüsü maliyetine ilişkin bilimsel yaklaşımları ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, Web of Science veri tabanında 1994–2025 yılları arasında konuya ilişkin yayımlanan toplam 1.427 yayın sistematik literatür incelemesi kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın analitik gücünü artırmak amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi de kullanılmıştır. Analiz bulguları, özellikle 2015 yılı itibarıyla yayın sayısında gözlemlenen artışın, yaşam döngüsü maliyet analizine iklim değişikliği değişkeninin entegre edilmesine yönelik akademik ilginin giderek arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Gerçekleştirilen bibliyometrik analiz sonucunda, yaşam döngüsü maliyeti ile iklim değişikliği ilişkisini bütüncül bir çerçevede ele alan çalışmaların büyük ölçüde Çin ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiştir. Bulgular ayrıca, iklim değişikliği perspektifinden gerçekleştirilen yaşam döngüsü maliyeti değerlendirmelerinin büyük ölçüde sürdürülebilirlik ekseninde şekillendiğini göstermektedir. Özellikle çevresel maliyetler odağında yürütülen çalışmalar, yaşam döngüsü maliyeti hesaplamalarında iklim değişikliği etkilerinin dikkate alınmasının, uzun vadede farklı sektörler açısından rekabet avantajı sağlayabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kazak, G., *, G. K. (2026). Assessing Life Cycle Cost from the Perspective of Climate Change: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 914–931. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1916115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Arenas, C. N., Bello, A. P., Molina, N. F., Botero, J. L., and Betancur, M. (2024). Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for the production of hydrangeas in Antioquia-Colombia. Agronomy, 14(7), 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071408
  2. Barringer, P. (2004). Life cycle cost analysis—Who does what? Maintenance Conference and Exhibition National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, 1–9.
  3. Basık, F. O. (2012). Cost Management in Competitive Strategy. Istanbul: Türkmen Publishing.
  4. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  5. European Commission Green Forum. (n.d.). Life-cycle costing. Life-cycle costing (LCC) is being applied by an increasing number of public authorities across the EU and in a range of sectors. Retrieved May 23, 2025 https://green-forum.ec.europa.eu/green-public-procurement/life-cycle-costing_en#:~:text=LCC%20means%20considering%20all%20the,water%20use%2C%20spares%2C%20and%20maintenance
  6. Finnveden, G., and Potting, J. (2014). Life cycle assessment. In P. Wexler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of toxicology (3rd ed., pp. 74–77). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00627-8
  7. Freire, F., and Marques, P. (2012). Electric vehicles in Portugal: An integrated energy, greenhouse gas and cost life-cycle analysis. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  8. Hu, M. (2023). An evaluation of the retrofit net zero building performances: Life cycle energy, emissions and cost. Building Research and Information, 51(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2142497
  9. IPCC. (2022). Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ISBN 978-92-9169-161-6
  10. Kaufman, R. J. (1969). Life Cycle Costing: Decision Making Tool For Capital Equipment Acquisitions. Journal of Purchasing, 5(3), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-493X.1969.TB00599.X
  11. Lee, S. H., An, L. S., and Kim, H. K. (2025). Risk-based bridge life cycle cost and environmental impact assessment considering climate change effects. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82568-4
  12. Lee, K. M., and Inaba, A. (2004). Life cycle assessment best practices of ISO 14040 series. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Committee on Trade and Investment.
  13. Liu, J., Liu, H., and Liu, Y. (2025). A sustainability-oriented framework for life cycle environmental cost accounting and carbon financial optimization in prefabricated steel structures. Sustainability, 17(10), 4296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104296
  14. Liu, Y., Pang, B., Wang, Y., Shi, C., Zhang, B., Guo, X., Zhou, S., and Wang, J. (2022). Life-cycle maintenance strategy of bridges considering reliability, environment, cost and failure probability CO₂ emission reduction: A bridge study with climate scenarios. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134740
  15. Mclaren, S. J., Elliot, T., Dowdell, D., Wakelin, S., Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Levasseur, A., and Hoxha, E. (2025). Policy implications of time-differentiated climate change analysis in life cycle assessment of building elements in Aotearoa New Zealand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30, 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02444-9
  16. Mehmood, K., Hassan, S. T., Qiu, X., and Ali, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of CO₂ emissions and economic performance in the United States and China: Navigating sustainable development in the climate change era. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(5), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101843
  17. Mitropoulos, L. K., and Prevedouros, P. D. (2015). Life cycle emissions and cost model for urban light duty vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.024
  18. Nemry, F., and Demirel, H. (2012). Impacts of climate change on transport: A focus on road and rail transport infrastructures. European Commission Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2791/15504
  19. Orfanidou, V. S., Rachaniotis, N. P., Tsoulfas, G. T., and Chondrokoukis, G. P. (2023). Life cycle costing implementation in green public procurement: A case study from the Greek public sector. Sustainability, 15(3), 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032817
  20. Pullin, A. S., and Stewart, G. B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20(6), 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
  21. Qiao, Y., Dave, E., Parry, T., Valle, O., Mi, L., Ni, G., Yuan, Z., and Zhu, Y. (2019). Life cycle costs analysis of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) under future climate. Sustainability, 11(19), 5414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195414
  22. Sathre, R., and Gustavsson, L. (2009). Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change. Applied Energy, 86(2), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.04.007
  23. Santero, N. J., and Horvath, A. (2009). Global warming potential of pavements. Environmental Research Letters, 4(3), 034011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034011
  24. Shang, Q., and Jin, X. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on climate finance: Current status and future directions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 119711–119732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31006-5
  25. Soleimani-Chamkhorami, K., Garmabaki, A. H. S., Kasraei, A., Famurewa, S. M., Odelius, J., and Strandberg, G. (2024). Life cycle cost assessment of railways infrastructure asset under climate change impacts. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 127, 104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104072
  26. U.S. Department of Defense. (1973). Life cycle costing guide for system acquisitions (Interim). Office of the Secretary of Defense.
  27. van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  28. Yildiz, N., Hemida, H., and Baniotopoulos, C. (2024). Operation, maintenance, and decommissioning cost in life-cycle cost analysis of floating wind turbines. Energies, 17(6), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061332