SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

İŞBİRLİKLİ ÖĞRENME SÜRECİNDE KULLANILAN PORTFOLYO DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÖĞRENCİ BAŞARISI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ)

Mehmet Taşdemir
Adem Taşdemir
Kasım Yıldırım
Pages
53–66
Publication Date
2013-01-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ile birlikte uygulaması yapılan portfolyo değerlendirmesinin etkilerinin araştırıldığı 

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ile birlikte uygulaması yapılan portfolyo değerlendirmesinin etkilerinin araştırıldığı 
📊
Key Findings & Data:İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ile birlikte uygulaması yapılan portfolyo değerlendirmesinin etkilerinin araştırıldığı 
💡
Conclusion & Impact:İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ile birlikte uygulaması yapılan portfolyo değerlendirmesinin etkilerinin araştırıldığı 
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:işbirlikli öğrenme yöntemi · portfolyo değerlendirmesi · akademik başarı

Özet

İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ile birlikte uygulaması yapılan portfolyo değerlendirmesinin etkilerinin araştırıldığı 

🔖

Cite This Article

Taşdemir, M., Taşdemir, A., Yıldırım, K. (2013). İŞBİRLİKLİ ÖĞRENME SÜRECİNDE KULLANILAN PORTFOLYO DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÖĞRENCİ BAŞARISI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ). Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 53–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/1263127

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Apple, S.J. (2000). Clarifying the preschool assessment process: Traditional practises and alternative approaches. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27, 219-225.
  2. Aseltine, J. (1993). Performance assessment: looking at the real achievement of middle level students. School in the Middle, 3, 27–30.
  3. Barootchi, N., & Keshavarz, M.H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests. Educational Research, 44, 279-288.
  4. Bolig, E., & Day, J. (1993). Dynamic assessment and giftedness: the promise of assessing training responsiveness. Roeper Review, 16, 110–13.
  5. Coleman, L. (1994). Portfolio assessment: a key to identifying hidden talents and empowering teachers of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 65–9.
  6. Cook-Benjamin, L. (2001). Portfolio assessment: benefits, issues of implementation, and reflections on its use. Assessment Update, 13, 6-7.
  7. Dutt-Doner, K. M., & Personett, C. (1997, March). Using portfolio to assess students in an undergraduate teacher education course: What did the students and instructor learn? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 410247).
  8. Gilmand, D.A., & McDermott, M. (1994). Portfolio collections: an alternative to testing. Contemporary Education, 65, 73–6.
  9. Gömleksiz, M. (1997). Kubaşık Öğrenme. Adana: Baki Kitabevi.
  10. Güvenç, H., & Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2007). The effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping on learning strategy use, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7, 117-127.
  11. Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolios. College Composition and Communication, 44, 176–90.
  12. Henkin, R. (1993). Emerging feminist themes found in graduate students’ portfolios written by women elementary school teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 15, 20–28.
  13. Johnson, D,W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  14. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson F. (2000). Joining Together: Group Theory and Skills. (7th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  15. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Nr.4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
  16. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano: Kagan Cooperative Learning
  17. Krause, S. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education: Effects of instruction on preservice teachers’ early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 130-39.
  18. Lambdin, D.V., & Walker, V.L. (1994). Planning for classroom portfolio assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 318–324.
  19. Lin, E. (2006). Cooperative learning in the science classroom: A new learning model for a new year. The Science Teacher, 34-39.
  20. Lucas-Lescher, M. (1995). Portfolios: Assessing Learning in the Primary Grades. Washington, D.C.: NEA Professional Library.
  21. Lyn, E.L., & Struewing, N.A. (2000). Portfolio assessment in the inclusive early childhood classroom. Young Exceptional Children, 5, 2-10.
  22. Madaus, G., & Kelleghant, T. (1993). The British experience with authentic testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 458–69.
  23. McManus, S.M., & Gettinger, M. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviours. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 13-22.
  24. Moss, P.M. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational Research, 23, 5–12.
  25. Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. California: Sage Publications.
  26. Quarstein, V.A., & Peterson, P.A. (2001). Assessment of cooperative learning: A goal-criterion approach. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 59-77.
  27. Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep. Medical Teacher, 27, 509–513.
  28. Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative Learning. London: Allyn and Bacon.
  29. Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
  30. Smith, J., Brewer, D.M., & Heffner, T. (2003). Using portfolio assessment with young children who are at risk for school failure. Preventing School Failure, 48, 38-40.
  31. Strom, R., & Strom, P. (1998). Student participation in the evaluation of cooperative learning. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 22, 265. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from Academic Search Complete database.
  32. Tigelaar, D., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., & Vleuten, C. (2005). Quality issues in judging portfolios: implications for organizing teaching portfolio assessment procedures. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 595-610.
  33. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. (2005). Research Methods in Education. New York: Pearson Education Inc.