SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Conceptual Development of Ethical Climate and Its Impacts on Individuals and Organizations

Etik İklim: Kavramsal Gelişimi, Bireysel ve Örgütsel Etkileri

Seval AKSOY
OYA ERDİL
Alper ERTÜRK
Pages
133–151
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that there are positive relationships between OEC and OI, as well as OEC and OC, also POF mediates the relationships between OEC and OI / OC

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of “Organizational Ethical Climate OEC ” is a subject matter of organizational attitude research study on which many researchers have been conducted so far, especially after 2000’s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, relationships among OEC and organizational identification OI , commitment OC and personorganization fit POF are analyzed through an empirical research conducted in manufacturing firms located in Kocaeli.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate that there are positive relationships between OEC and OI, as well as OEC and OC, also POF mediates the relationships between OEC and OI / OC
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Özdeşleşme · Örgütsel Etik İklim · Örgütsel Bağlılık

Abstract

The concept of “Organizational Ethical Climate OEC ” is a subject matter of organizational attitude research study on which many researchers have been conducted so far, especially after 2000’s. In this research, relationships among OEC and organizational identification OI , commitment OC and personorganization fit POF are analyzed through an empirical research conducted in manufacturing firms located in Kocaeli. Results indicate that there are positive relationships between OEC and OI, as well as OEC and OC, also POF mediates the relationships between OEC and OI / OC

Özet

“Örgütsel Etik İklim ÖEİ ” kavramı özellikle 2000’li yıllarda üzerinde fazlasıyla araştırma yapılmış olan bir örgütsel davranış çalışma konusudur. Yapılan bu çalışmada, ÖEİ’nin örgütsel özdeşleşme ÖÖ , örgütsel bağlılık ÖB ve kişi-örgüt uyumu KÖU kavramlarıyla olan ilişkileri, Kocaeli’nde faaliyet göstermekte olan imalat firmalarında yapılan bir uygulamalı çalışma ile test edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, ÖEİ ile ÖÖ ve ÖB arasında pozitif ilişkinin bulunduğu, ayrıca ÖEİ ile ÖB ve ÖÖ arasındaki ilişkide KÖU’nun kısmi ara değişken rolü oynadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, S., ERDİL, O., ERTÜRK, A. (2017). Conceptual Development of Ethical Climate and Its Impacts on Individuals and Organizations. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 133–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/125968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abbey, A., ve Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362-368.
  2. Agarwal, J. ve Maloy, D. C. (1999). Ethical work climate dimensions in a not-for- profit organization: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(1), 1-14.
  3. Akbaş, T. T., (2010). Örgütsel etik iklimin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisi. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(19), 211-137.
  4. Allen, N.J. ve Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  5. Ambrose, M. L., Arnaud, A, ve Schminke, M. (2008). Individual moral development and ethical climate: the influence of person-organization fit on job attitudes.Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3),323-333.
  6. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  7. Aydin, İ. P. (2001). Yönetsel, mesleki ve örgütsel etik. Ankara:
  8. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Aydoğan, Z. F. (2003). Örgüt kültürü ve iklimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 203- 215. Barnett, T. ve Schubert E. (2002). Perceptions of the ethical work climate and convenantal relationships. Journal of Business Ethics. 36(3), 279-290.
  9. Bartel, C. A. (2001). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: effects of community identification.Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 379-413.
  10. Brislin, R.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials.Triandis, H.C. ve Berry, J.W. (Ed), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 2, Allyn& Bacon, Boston, MA, 389-444.
  11. Büte, M. (2011). Etik iklim, örgütsel güven ve bireysel performans arasındaki ilişki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 171-192.
  12. Cable, D. M. ve Judge, T. A. (1996). Pay preferences and job search decisions: a person-organization fit perspective.Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.
  13. Carroll, A.B., (1991). The pyramid of social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders.Business Horizons, 94(4), 39-48.
  14. Coldwell, D. A., Billsberry, J., MeurS V. N. ve Marsh, P. J. (2008). The effects of person-organization fit on employee attraction: towards a testable explanatory model.Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 611-622.
  15. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? a native's point of view on a decade of paradigma w