SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 22

Kutadgu-Bilig in the Context of World and Western Literature

DÜNYA VE BATI EDEBİYATI KARŞISINDA KUTADGU-BİLİG

Mahmut Arslan
Pages
573–581
Publication Date
2011-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper aims to examine the work in comparison with some pieces of the world and western literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kutadgu-Bilig is the first Islamic work which had been written after the acceptance of Islam in Turkish history.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This masterpiece is very significant not only as a cultural artifact, but also a stimulating work on the destiny of Turkish people that had joined sphere of a new culture and civilisation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper aims to examine the work in comparison with some pieces of the world and western literature.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yusuf Has Hacib · Kutadgu-Bilig · Türk edebiyatı

Abstract

Kutadgu-Bilig is the first Islamic work which had been written after the acceptance of Islam in Turkish history. This masterpiece is very significant not only as a cultural artifact, but also a stimulating work on the destiny of Turkish people that had joined sphere of a new culture and civilisation. Yusuf Has Hâcib wrote the Kutadgu-Bilig with the responsibility of being intellectual that derived from his society and state belongings. In that context, he aimed to stabilize the social structure which had been in the disorder of value. Therefore, Yusuf Has Hâcib wanted to form a system of state and society, and to achieve a Constitution, a moral and political doctrine for rulers and statesmen of Turkish states which would have been established in the future. This paper aims to examine the work in comparison with some pieces of the world and western literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, M. (2011). Kutadgu-Bilig in the Context of World and Western Literature. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 22, 573–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/1258473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. AdIVar, H. E. ingiliz Edebiyatz Tarihi.· Ba:;langu;tan Elizabeth Devrine Kadar. istanbul, 1940.
  2. Arslan, M. Kutadgu-Bilig'deki Toplum ve Devlet Anlayz:;z. istanbul, 1987.
  3. Auerbach, E. Roman Filolojisine Giri:;. istanbul, 1945.
  4. Avisseau, P. Literature Fran9aise Expliquee Par des Textes choisis. Paris, 1967.
  5. Bang-Gabain. Tilrkische TUlfan-Texte. Berlin, 1929-31.
  6. Bayrav, S. Symbolisme Mediaval. istanbul, 1956.
  7. Bedier, 1. Les legendes epiques, recherches sur laformation des chansons de geste. Paris, 1925.
  8. Bedier-Hazard. Histoire de la liuerature Fran9aise. Paris, 1923.
  9. Cohen, G. Le mouvement litteraire, intellectuel et moral au moyen age. C.VIIl. Paris, 1931.
  10. <;:agatay, S. Altun Yaruk'tan iki Par9a. Ankara, 1946.
  11. Koprulu, M. F. rark Edebiyatz TariM. istanbul, 1926.
  12. Langenbucher-Auerbach, Ba:;langlCzndan Bugilne Alman Edebiyatl. istanbul, 1970.
  13. Lanson, G. Histoire de la litterature Fran9aise. Paris, 1927.
  14. Le Coq. Tiirk/sehe Manisehaiea aus Choteho. Berlin, 1913.
  15. Levend, A. S. TurkEdebiyatl TariM. C. 1. Ankara, 1973.
  16. Paris, G. Histoire de la langue et de la litterature Fran9aise au moyen iige, Hachette, 1887.
  17. Perin, C. Franslz Edebiyatl Tarihi, C. I. istanbul, 1948.
  18. Ruben, W. Buddhizm Tarihi. Ankara, 1947. 581
  19. Tekin, S. "Mani Dininin UygurIar Tarafmdan Devlet Dini OIarak Kabul Edili~inin 1200.
  20. Ylldoniimii DolaYlslyla Birkay Not". Belleten, SaYl I. Ankara, 1963.
  21. Urgan, M. ingiliz Edebiyatl Tarihi, C. 1. istanbul, 1986.
  22. Vardar, B. Franslz Edebiyatl. istanbul, 1988.