SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

Happiness at the Macro Level: A Critical Discussion on the Compatibility of Different Indicators

Aslı Ermiş Mert(KOC UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5599-3407
Pages
309–323
Publication Date
2022-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research has been determined to be needed that will examine happiness at the macro level using an inclusive multidimensional approach rather than only focusing on a single indicator, in particular by taking into account various means of inequality, primarily regarding gender, income, living standards/conditions as well as issues such as access to health, education, employment opportunities, and information, as parts of the broader concept.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents a critical discussion mainly based on the macro-level (societal) determinants of happiness by focusing on gender equality, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and countries’ commitment to reducing inequality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim is to critically evaluate the compatibility of these components through the examples of happiest and unhappiest countries to arrive at conclusions regarding the importance of these means as a whole.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research has been determined to be needed that will examine happiness at the macro level using an inclusive multidimensional approach rather than only focusing on a single indicator, in particular by taking into account various means of inequality, primarily regarding gender, income, living standards/conditions as well as issues such as access to health, education, employment opportunities, and information, as parts of the broader concept.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Happiness · Gender inequality · Income inequality

Abstract

This paper presents a critical discussion mainly based on the macro-level (societal) determinants of happiness by focusing on gender equality, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and countries’ commitment to reducing inequality. The aim is to critically evaluate the compatibility of these components through the examples of happiest and unhappiest countries to arrive at conclusions regarding the importance of these means as a whole. Rankings based on these determinants reveal an apparent compatibility to exist for both ends of happiness with countries’ gender equality, GDP per capita, and commitment to reducing inequality as well as gross national income (GNI) per capita (based on purchasing power parity [PPP]) and Gini coefficient. Exceptional cases are discussed based on their sociological and socioeconomic contexts. Further research has been determined to be needed that will examine happiness at the macro level using an inclusive multidimensional approach rather than only focusing on a single indicator, in particular by taking into account various means of inequality, primarily regarding gender, income, living standards/conditions as well as issues such as access to health, education, employment opportunities, and information, as parts of the broader concept.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mert, A. E. (2022). Happiness at the Macro Level: A Critical Discussion on the Compatibility of Different Indicators. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Abounoori, E., & Asgarizadeh, D. (2013). Macroeconomic factors affecting happiness. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 5(1), 5–22. google scholar
  2. Albert, Z. R. (2018). Gender equality strategy: UNDP Rwanda (2019-2022). United Nations Development Programme. google scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 2009–2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006 google scholar
  4. Audette, A. P., Lam, S., O’Connor, H., & Radcliff, B. (2019). (E)Quality of life: A cross-national analysis of the effect of gender equality on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(7), 2173–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0042-8 google scholar
  5. Berg, M. C., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations: In search for an optimum that does not appear to exist. In B. Greve (Ed.), Happiness and social policy in Europe (pp. 174–194). Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  6. Berry, M. (2015). When “bright futures” fade: Paradoxes of women’s empowerment in Rwanda. Signs, 41(1), 1–27. https://doi:10.1086/681899 google scholar
  7. Biswas-Diener, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2012). Happiness in India. In H. Selin & G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness across cultures: Views of happiness and quality of life in non-Western cultures (pp.125–140). Springer. google scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). On gender inequality and life satisfaction: Does discrimination matter? (SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 657). Stockholm School of Economics, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm. google scholar
  9. Brempong, K., & Camacho, S. (2006). Corruption, growth, and income distribution: Are there regional differences? Economics of Governance, 7, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-005-0008-2 google scholar
  10. Callen, T. (2020, February 24). Gross domestic product: An economy’s all. Finance & Development. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm google scholar
  11. Causa, O., de Serres, A., & Ruiz, N. (2014). Can growth-enhancing policies lift all boats? An analysis based on household disposable incomes. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2015(1), 227–268. google scholar
  12. Chancel, L., Thiry, G., & Demailly, D. (2014). Beyond-GDP indicators: To what end? Iddri Study, 4(14), 1. google scholar
  13. Coccia, M. (2018). Economic inequality can generate unhappiness that leads to violent crime in society. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 4(1), 1–24. google scholar
  14. Conceição, P. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier: Human development and the anthropocene. UNDP. New York. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/eg/hdr_2020_overview_english.pdf google scholar
  15. Dang, H., & Lanjouw, P. (2018). Inequality in India on the rise (Policy Brief 6/18). UNU-WIDER. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Policy-brief/PDF/PB-2018-6-Inequality-in-India-on-the-rise.pdf google scholar
  16. Dawson, N. M. (2018). Leaving no-one behind? Social inequalities and contrasting development impacts in rural Rwanda. Development Studies Research, 5(1), 1–14. google scholar
  17. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz; pp. 89–125). Academic Press. google scholar
  18. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107 google scholar
  19. Easterlin, R. A. (2017). Paradox lost? Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(4), 311–339. google scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216941 google scholar
  21. Ferrant, G., A. Kolev, & Tassot, C. (2017). The pursuit of happiness: Does gender parity in social institutions matter? OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 337. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f7e0c69c-en google scholar
  22. García-Muñoz, T. M., Milgram-Baleix, J., & Odeh-Odeh, O. (2019). Inequality and life satisfaction in low-and middle-income countries: The role of opportunity. Societies, 9(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9020037 google scholar
  23. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2009). Does inequality matter to individual welfare? An initial exploration based on happiness surveys from Latin America. In A. K. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 158–201). Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  24. Gornick, J. C. (1999). Gender equality in the labour market. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 210–242). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  25. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y google scholar
  26. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., Sachs, J., & De Neve, J. E. (2020). World happiness report 2020. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. google scholar
  27. Izabiliza, J. (2003). The role of women in reconstruction: Experience of Rwanda. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SHS/pdf/Role-Women-Rwanda.pdf google scholar
  28. Kabene, S., Baadel, S., Jiwani, Z., & Lobo, V. (2017). Women in political positions and countries’ level of happiness. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 18(4), 209–217. google scholar
  29. Lashmar, H. (2018, 19 March). The human development index – A better indicator for success? United Nations Association. https://www.sustainablegoals.org.uk/human-development-index-better-indicator-success/ google scholar
  30. Lawson, M., & Martin, M. (2018). The commitment to Reducing Inequality Index 2018: A global ranking of governments based on what they are doing to tackle the gap between rich and poor. Development Finance International and Oxfam. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620553/rr-commitment-reducing-inequality-index-2018-091018-en.pdf google scholar
  31. Li, L., & Shi, L. (2019). Economic growth and subjective well-being: analyzing the formative mechanism of Easterlin Paradox. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 6(1), 1. google scholar
  32. Mahadea, D., & Kaseeram, I. (2015). Micro and macro aspects of happiness and subjective well-being. In V. Adkins (Ed.), Subjective well-being: Psychological predictors, social influences and economical aspects (pp. 39–56). Nova Science Publishers. google scholar
  33. Matfess, H. (2015). Rwanda and Ethiopia: Developmental authoritarianism and the new politics of African strong men. African Studies Review, 58, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2015.43 google scholar
  34. Mehen, M. A. (2013). The relationship between corruption and income inequality: A cross-national study (Master’s thesis, Georgetown University). google scholar
  35. Nikolova, M. (2016). Happiness and development (IZA Discussion Papers No. 10088). Institute of Labor Economics. google scholar
  36. Ngamaba, K. (2016). Happiness and life satisfaction in Rwanda. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 26(5), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2016.1208930 google scholar
  37. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100. google scholar
  38. Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2015). Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1630–1638. google scholar
  39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Closing the gender gap: Act now. Author. google scholar
  40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). GDP per capita. Society at a glance: Asia/Pacific 2014. Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/soc_aag-2014-7-en google scholar
  41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016, October 6). Statistical insights: What does GDP per capita tell us about households’ material well-being? In OECD Insights. OECD Statistics Directorate. google scholar
  42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018, May). Summary brief of “Is the last mile the longest? Economic gains from gender equality in Nordic countries. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/last-mile-longest-gender-nordic-countries-brief.pdf google scholar
  43. Oxfam. (2017). India: Extreme inequality in numbers. https://www.oxfam.org/en/india-extreme-inequality-numbers google scholar
  44. Raibley, J. R. (2012). Happiness is not well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1105–1129. google scholar
  45. Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: A multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–16. google scholar
  46. Sanandaji, N. (2016). The Nordic gender equality paradox: How Nordic welfare states are not only empowering women, but also (un)intentionally holding them back. Timbro. google scholar
  47. Schimmel, J. (2009). Development as happiness: The subjective perception of happiness and UNDP’s analysis of poverty, wealth and development. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 93–111. google scholar
  48. Schneider, S. M. (2019). Why income inequality is dissatisfying—Perceptions of social status and the inequality-satisfaction link in Europe. European Sociological Review, 35(3), 409–430. google scholar
  49. Selin, H., & Davey, G. (Eds.). (2012). Happiness across cultures: Views of happiness and quality of life in non-Western cultures. Springer Science & Business Media. google scholar
  50. Sen, A. (2020). Special contribution: Human development and Mahbub ul Haq. In P. Conceição (Ed.), Human development report 2020: The next frontier: Human development and the anthropocene. UNDP. New York. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/eg/hdr_2020_overview_english.pdf google scholar
  51. Sommet, N., Morselli, D., & Spini, D. (2018). Income inequality affects the psychological health of only the people facing scarcity. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1911–1921. google scholar
  52. Stewart, R., & Moslares, C. (2012). Income inequality and economic growth: The case of Indian states 1980-2009-10. Cuadernos de Economía, 31(SPE57), 41–64. google scholar
  53. United Nations Development Programme. (n.d.). Why is it important to express GNI per capita in purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollars? http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/why-it-important-express-gni-capita-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-international-dollars google scholar
  54. United Nations Development Programme. (2013, November). Income inequality. In Humanity divided: Confronting inequality in developing countries (pp. 63-113). Poverty Practice in the Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/poverty-reduction/humanity-divided--confronting-inequality-in-developing-countries.html google scholar
  55. UN News. (2021). Proportion of women parliamentarians worldwide reaches ‘all-time high’. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/03/1086582 google scholar
  56. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 33–68. google scholar
  57. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343. google scholar
  58. World Bank. (n.d.). Metadata Glossary: GNI per capita, PPP (current international dollars). https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/africa-development-indicators/series/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD google scholar
  59. World Bank. (2008-2017). GINI index (World Bank estimate). World Bank Development Research Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI google scholar
  60. World Bank. (2019a). World Development Indicators (GDP per capita (Current US Dollars)). https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.CD&country=# google scholar
  61. World Bank. (2019b). Gross domestic product. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf google scholar
  62. World Bank. (2019c). Gross national income per capita 2019, Atlas method and PPP. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GNIPC.pdf google scholar
  63. World Economic Forum. (2020). Global gender gap report 2020. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf google scholar
  64. Yu, Z., & Wang, F. (2017). Income inequality and happiness: An inverted U-shaped curve. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2052. google scholar
  65. Zagórski, K., Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. (2010). Economic development and happiness: Evidence from 32 Nations. Polish Sociological Review, 169(1), 3–19. google scholar