SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2

The Future of Digital Education: Artificial Intelligence, the Metaverse, and the Transformation of Education

Tolga Yıldız(İstanbul University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Psychology)0000-0001-9293-2013
Pages
969–988
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article advocates for a balanced approach to digital education, ensuring that technological progress enhances rather than detracts from the holistic development of learners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the historical evolution of education, highlighting significant shifts shaped by sociocultural dynamics and technological advancements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The introduction of radio and television in the 20th century further democratised education, making it more accessible and blurring the boundaries between traditional educational settings and daily life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article advocates for a balanced approach to digital education, ensuring that technological progress enhances rather than detracts from the holistic development of learners.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital Education · Artificial Intelligence · Metaverse

Abstract

This article examines the historical evolution of education, highlighting significant shifts shaped by sociocultural dynamics and technological advancements. In early human societies, education was an organic process, rooted in communal activities essential for survival. As societies progressed, education became more structured, serving not only as a tool for intellectual development but also as a means to reinforce social hierarchies, particularly during the Ancient Greek period and the Middle Ages. The Industrial Revolution marked a transformative shift, where education systems were standardised to meet the needs of an industrialised society, mirroring the factory environment to instil discipline and conformity. The introduction of radio and television in the 20th century further democratised education, making it more accessible and blurring the boundaries between traditional educational settings and daily life. The article underscores how digital technologies, especially the internet, have revolutionised education by introducing new modes of learning through different Web eras. These advancements have shifted education from static, one-size-fits-all models to more interactive and personalised learning environments. The rise of AI and the metaverse promises even greater customisation and immersive experiences in the learning process. However, the integration of these technologies also raises important ethical, social, and developmental challenges, particularly in terms of equity, accessibility, and the potential erosion of human connection in education. The article advocates for a balanced approach to digital education, ensuring that technological progress enhances rather than detracts from the holistic development of learners.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, T. (2024). The Future of Digital Education: Artificial Intelligence, the Metaverse, and the Transformation of Education. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2, 969–988. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.2.0664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Anderson, T. (Ed.) (2008). The Theory And Practice Of Online Learning. Edmonton: AU Press. google scholar
  2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/ irrodl.v12i3.890 google scholar
  3. Bowden, H. (1996). Classical Athens And The Delphic Oracle: Divination And Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  4. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor And Monopoly Capital: The Degradation Of Work In The Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press. google scholar
  5. Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The Global Auction: The Broken Promises Of Education, Jobs, And Incomes. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  6. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks And Promises Of Information Technologies For Education. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  7. Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What The Internet Is Doing To Our Brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  8. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise Of The Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. google scholar
  9. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002 google scholar
  10. Dean, T., & Wickham, C. (Ed.) (1990). City And Countryside In Late Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Essays Presented to Philip Jones. London: Hambledon. google scholar
  11. Epstein, S. A. (1998). Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in pre-industrial Europe. The Journal of Economic History, 58(3), 684-713. google scholar
  12. Erdoğan Coşkun, A. (2021). Eğitimde dijitalleşmenin oluşturduğu sosyo-kültürelliğin öğretmenin rolüne etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 53(53), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.817782 google scholar
  13. Erdoğan Coşkun, A. (2022). Conceptions of society and education paradigm in the twenty-first century. In: Alpaydın, Y., Demirli, C. (Eds) Educational Theory in the 21st Century. Maarif Global Education Series. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_7 google scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline And Punish: The Birth Of The Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. google scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy Of The Oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum. google scholar
  16. Green, A. (2013). Education And State Formation: Europe, East Asia and the USA. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  17. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671 google scholar
  18. Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1998). The Logic Of Education. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  19. Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2022). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1280-1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014 google scholar
  20. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133-160. http://dx.doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651 google scholar
  21. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x google scholar
  22. Lynch, J. P. (1972). Aristotle’s School: A Study Of A Greek Educational Institution. London: University of California Press. google scholar
  23. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument For AI In Education. Pearson Education. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google. com/tr//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf google scholar
  24. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions Of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  25. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100 google scholar
  26. Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting Educational Technology: Critical Questions For Changing Times. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  27. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI And The Future Of Education. Cambridge UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  28. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology And Less From Each Other. New York: Basic Books. google scholar
  29. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959 google scholar
  30. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology And Social Inclusion: Rethinking The Digital Divide. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. google scholar
  31. Yılmaz, E. O, & Toker, T. (2022). COVID-19 salgını öğretmenlerin dijital yeterliliklerini nasıl etkiledi? Milli Eğitim, 51(235), 2713-2730. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.896996 google scholar
  32. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: The future is now. Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 google scholar
  33. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age Of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight For A Human Future At The New Frontier Of Power. New York: PublicAffairs. google scholar