SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2

Exploring the Role of Digitalized Migration in Polycrisis: Opportunities and Limitations in the Context of e-Residency

Oğuz Kuş(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2593-4980
Elif Karakoç Keskin(YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2831-2247
Şafak Tanır Levendeli(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3952-5157
Pages
511–538
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal the potential, opportunities, limitations, and risks of e-Residency as a digitalised migration infrastructure, particularly its role in strengthening individual resilience amid economic instability, armed conflict, and global health emergencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the digitalised dimensions of migration during polycrises that increasingly restrict physical mobility and introduces digitalised migration as an analytical framework through the case of the government-supported e-Residency programme.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employing a data collection and analysis process that integrates traditional and innovative methods, this study examines the dynamics driving individuals towards transnational virtual mobility during periods of polycrisis and identifies the opportunities and limitations of this digitalised migration form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal the potential, opportunities, limitations, and risks of e-Residency as a digitalised migration infrastructure, particularly its role in strengthening individual resilience amid economic instability, armed conflict, and global health emergencies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digitalised migration · polycrisis · e-Residency

Abstract

This study examines the digitalised dimensions of migration during polycrises that increasingly restrict physical mobility and introduces digitalised migration as an analytical framework through the case of the government-supported e-Residency programme. Using Estonia’s e-Residency as an example, the study conceptualises the integration of digital identity holders into Estonia’s economic and administrative systems as virtual mobility, highlighting emerging migrant subjectivities and contributing to contemporary migration debates. Employing a data collection and analysis process that integrates traditional and innovative methods, this study examines the dynamics driving individuals towards transnational virtual mobility during periods of polycrisis and identifies the opportunities and limitations of this digitalised migration form. First, user comments on Turkish-language YouTube videos about Estonia’s e-Residency programme were gathered and analysed to explore digital discussions using clustering algorithms and interpretive content analysis. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted with e-Residents and field experts, and the resulting data were analysed through interpretive content analysis. The findings reveal the potential, opportunities, limitations, and risks of e-Residency as a digitalised migration infrastructure, particularly its role in strengthening individual resilience amid economic instability, armed conflict, and global health emergencies. They also underscore the economic and intangible advantages that digitalised migration offers to source and destination countries in the era of polycrisis.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kuş, O., Keskin, E. K., Levendeli, Ş. T., *, O. K. (2025). Exploring the Role of Digitalized Migration in Polycrisis: Opportunities and Limitations in the Context of e-Residency. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 2, 511–538. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2025.45.2.0885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Abaku, T., Calzati, S., & Masso, A. (2021). Exploring digital sustainability of/through Estonia’s e-residency: Africa’s case and the importance of culture for sustainability. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 300-313. google scholar
  2. Arthur, L. P., & Smith, I. (2022). Human journeys in the digital age: Advances and challenges in digital historical migration studies. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 4. doi: 10.3389/fhumd.2022.915978 google scholar
  3. Bartlett, A., Montes, M. N., Verheijen, L., Leurs, K., & Broersma, M. (2025). Digital tactics of refugee women: Towards an inclusive framework for digital literacy. Social Inclusion, 14. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10866 google scholar
  4. Blue, A. (2021). Evaluating Estonian E-Residency as a tool of soft power. Place Brand Public Diplomacy, 17, 359–367. google scholar
  5. Bridle, J. (2016). Algorithmic citizenship, digital statelessness. GeoHumanities 2(2), 377-381. google scholar
  6. Brown, H. (2020). 10 Ways e-residents are adapting their businesses during the crisis. Retrieved from https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/blog/posts/10-ways-e-residents-are-adapting-their-businesses-during-the-crisis/ google scholar
  7. Calzada, I. (2021). Pandemic citizenship: Will COVID-19 reinforce nation-state borders and liquify citizens? Academia Letters Article 910. doi:10.2935/AL910. google scholar
  8. Calzada I (2023) Emerging digital citizenship regimes: pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships. Citizenship Studies, 27(2), 160-188. google scholar
  9. Cantat, C., Pécoud, A., & Thiollet, H. (2023). Migration as a crisis. American Behavioural Scientist, 69(6), 627-649. google scholar
  10. Castles, S. Miller, M. J. (1998). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (2nd ed.). London, UK: Guilford Press. google scholar
  11. Datareportal. (2023). Global social media statistics. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/social-media-users. google scholar
  12. De Haas, H. (2021). A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies, 9. google scholar
  13. deMarrais, K. (2003). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In K. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 51–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. google scholar
  14. Drisko, J. Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  15. e-Residency. (2022). How can e-⁠Residency empower women entrepreneurs? Retrieved from https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/blog/posts/how-can-e-residency-empower-women-entrepreneurs. google scholar
  16. e-Residency. (2024). e-Residency in numbers. Republic of Estonia, e-Residency. Retrieved from https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/dashboard/ google scholar
  17. e-Residency. (2025). About us. Retrieved from https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/about-us google scholar
  18. Fayomi, J.O., Mamaiev, D., Olanrewaju, A.A. (2023). Digital transformation and ease of migration process (A Case Study of Lithuania). Psychological Research (in the Balkans), 26(2), 145-160. google scholar
  19. Godin, M., Ozkul, D., & Humphris, R. (2025). Digital technologies and migration: behind, beyond, and around the black box. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51(14), 3571-3589. google scholar
  20. Guadagno, L., (2020). Migrants and the COVID-19 pandemic: An initial analysis. Migration Research Series No. 60. International Organisation for Migration (IOM). Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/mrs-60.pdf google scholar
  21. Harima, A. (2022). Transnational migration entrepreneurship during a crisis: an immediate response to challenges and opportunities emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic. Business and Society Review, 127(S1), 223-251. google scholar
  22. Hassmann, T., & Westner, M. (2025). A framework for rigorous execution and presentation of expert interviews in IS and digital transformation research. In B. Marcinkowski, A. Przybyłek, A. Jarzębowicz, N. Iivari, E. Insfran, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Advances in information systems development (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, Vol. 77). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. google scholar
  23. Henig, D. & Knight, M. D. (2023). Policrisis: Prompts for an emerging worldview. Anthropology Today, 30(2), 3-6. google scholar
  24. Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance|Digital citizenship and surveillance society—Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 731–739. google scholar
  25. Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  26. Hoang, A. L. (2025). Migration infrastructure, digital connectivity, and porous borders: Vietnamese migration to Australia. Population, Space, and Place, 31(e2868), 1-11. google scholar
  27. İlhan, E., & Görgülü Aydoğdu, A. (2019). Youtube kullanıcılarının kullanım motivasyonlarının incelenmesi [A research into Youtube users’ motivations for use]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 7(2), 1130-1153. google scholar
  28. Jünger, J. Keyling, T. (2021). Facepager. An application for automated data retrieval on the web. Retrieved from https://github.com/strohne/Facepager/releases. google scholar
  29. Kimmo, M., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2018). E-Residency as a nation branding case. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 419-428). New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209447 google scholar
  30. Kostruba, A. (2025). Managing foreign business operations in Ukraine in the context of war. Business Horizons, 68, 67-81. google scholar
  31. Kotka, T., Vargas, C., Korjus, K. (2015). Estonian e-Residency: Redefining the nation-state in the digital era. University of Oxford Cyber Studies Programme working paper, 3. Retrieved from https://proudengineers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Working_Paper_No.3_Kotka_Vargas_Korjus.pdf. google scholar
  32. Lawrence, M., Homer-Dixon, T., Janzwood, S., Rockstöm, J., Renn, O., Donges, J. F. (2024). Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7, e6, 1–16. google scholar
  33. Leurs, K. (2023). Digital migration. London: Sage. google scholar
  34. Leurs, K., Witteborn, S. (2021). Digital migration studies. In M. McAuliffe (Ed.), Research handbook on international migration and digital technology (pp. 15-28). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. google scholar
  35. Levitt, P. & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualising simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002-1039. google scholar
  36. Li, Q. (2021). Computational thinking and teacher education: An expert interview study. Human Behaviour and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 324-338. google scholar
  37. Lindley, A. (2014). Exploring crisis and migration concepts and issues. In A. Lindley (Ed.). Crisis and migration critical perspectives (pp. 1-23). New York, USA: Routledge. google scholar
  38. Liu, H., & Renn, O. (2025). Polycrisis and systemic risk: Assessment, governance, and communication. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 16, 526-549. google scholar
  39. Masso, A., Kasapoglu, T., Tammpuu, P., & Calzada, I. (2024). Datafied control and selection of digital identity: Estonian e-residency as “citizenship by connection.” Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/records/12666905 google scholar
  40. McAuliffe, M., Blower, J., & Beduschi, A. (2021). Digitalisation and artificial intelligence in migration and mobility: Transnational implications of the COVID-19 pandemic. Societies, 11(4), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11040135 google scholar
  41. Meier, S. (2025). The ultimate guide to e-Residency: Digital residency countries in 2025. Retrieved from https://citizenx.com/insights/e-residencies. google scholar
  42. Molnar, P. (2022). Territorial and digital borders and migrant vulnerability during a pandemic. In A., Triandafyllidou (Eds.), Migration and pandemics: Spaces of solidarity and spaces of exception (pp. 45–64). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. google scholar
  43. Morin, E., & Kern, B. A. (1999). Homeland earth: A manifesto for the new millenium. New Jersey, USA: Hampton Press. google scholar
  44. Nehring, D., & Hu, Y. (2021). COVID-19, nation-states and fragile transnationalism. Sociology, 56(1), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.3389/00380385211033729 google scholar
  45. Nicoli, F. & Zeitlin, J. (2024). Introduction: Escaping the politics trap? EU integration pathways beyond the polycrisis. Journal of European Public Policy. 31(10), 3011-3035. google scholar
  46. Orgad, L. (2018). Cloud communities: the dawn of global citizenship? In R. Bauböck (Eds.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 251–260). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  47. Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital diasporas: Postcoloniality, media, and affect. Interventions, 22(8), 977-993. google scholar
  48. Shah, N. (2024). When immovable bodies meet unstoppable media circulation: The aporetic body in digital migration studies. K. Leurs, S. Ponzanesi (Eds.), conducting digital migration studies: Theories and practices of the every day. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. google scholar
  49. Sheller M., & Urry J. (2006). The new mobility paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. google scholar
  50. Skovgaard-Smith, I. (2023). Transnational life and cross-border immobility during pandemic times. Global Networks, 23(1), 59-74. google scholar
  51. Starbird, K. (2020). How a crisis researcher makes sense of COVID-19 misinformation. Retrieved from nonzero. medium.com/reflecting-on-the-covid-19-infodemic-as-a-crisis-informatics-researcher-ce0656fa4d0a google scholar
  52. Sullivan, C., & Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law and Security Review, 33(4), 470-481. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.016. google scholar
  53. Swilling, M. (2013). Economic crisis, long waves, and sustainability transition: An African perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6(March): 96–115. google scholar
  54. Tammpuu, P., Masso, A. (2018). ‘Welcome to the virtual state’: Estonian e-Residency and the digitalised state as a commodity. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 21(5), 543-560. google scholar
  55. Tammpuu, P., Masso, A. (2019). Transnational digital identity as an instrument for global digital citizenship: The case of Estonia’s E-Residency. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 621-634. google scholar
  56. Tschap, N. (2024). The new Baltic way: Baltic identity in the middle of the geopolitics of digital transformation. University of Twente Student Theses. Retrieved from https://essay.utwente.nl/102316/ google scholar
  57. Triandafyllidou, A., Bivand Erdal, M., Marchetti, S., Raghuram, P., Sahin Mencutek, Z., Salamonska, J., Scholten, P., & Vintila, D. (2024). Rethinking migration studies for 2050. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 22(1), 1-21. google scholar
  58. Voss, M. Lorenz, D. S. (2016). Sociological foundations of crisis communication. In Schwarz A., Seegar M. W., Auer C. (Eds.) The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research (pp. 45–54). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell. google scholar