Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 1995 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The identification and isolation of aerobic bacteri in semen of healthy bulls.

Sağlıklı Boğaların Spermalarından Aerobik Bakteri İzolasyon ve İdentifikasyonu

Pages
254–263
Publication Date
1995-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was concluded that, potentially pathogen bacteria can be found in semen of healthy bulls, so it has been understood that bulls ortheir semen can not be used without a microbiological canfirmation and hygienic protection should be taken .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the types of bacteria in semen of healthy bulls of various races were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 55 heatlhy buls of Holstein, Swiss Brown, Jersey, Simmental, Limousin and Brangus races have been used and semen samples have been collected by the help of sterile artificial vaginas.55 s'emen samples have been inoculated in convenient media.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was concluded that, potentially pathogen bacteria can be found in semen of healthy bulls, so it has been understood that bulls ortheir semen can not be used without a microbiological canfirmation and hygienic protection should be taken .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Boğa · Sperma · Aerobik Bakteri

Abstract

In this study, the types of bacteria in semen of healthy bulls of various races were investigated. A total of 55 heatlhy buls of Holstein, Swiss Brown, Jersey, Simmental, Limousin and Brangus races have been used and semen samples have been collected by the help of sterile artificial vaginas.55 s'emen samples have been inoculated in convenient media. Agar plates were incubated at 37 •c for 4 days in aerobic conditions w ith daily examinations and the colonies grew on them were identified. 61 bacteria w ere isolated in aerobic bacterial examinations of semen samples. Numbers and rates of isolated bacteria were established as Bacillus sp. 20 (32.8 %), Micrococcus sp. 11 (18.0 %), S. epidermidis 10 (16.4 %), E.coli 8(13.1 ), Streptococcus sp. 7 (11.5 %) and Corynebacterium sp. 5 (8.2 %), respective Iy. As a result, it was concluded that, potentially pathogen bacteria can be found in semen of healthy bulls, so it has been understood that bulls ortheir semen can not be used without a microbiological canfirmation and hygienic protection should be taken .

Özet

Bu çalışmada, değişik ırklarda sağlıklı boğaların spermalarındaki bakteri tipleri saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bunun için, Holstein, Esmer, Jersey, Simmental, Brangus ve Limousin ırklarında toplam 55 sağlıklı damızlık boğa kullanılmış ve steril sun'i vajenler yardımıyla sperma örnekleri toplanmıştır. Toplanan 55 örnekten uygun besiyerlerine ekimler yapılımıştır. Aeorobik koşullarda 37' C' de 4 gün inkube edilen besi yerleri hergün kontrol edilerek üreyen kolonilerin idenfikasyonu gerçekleştirilm i ştir. Sperma örneklerinin yapılan aeorobik bakteriyolajik muayenelerinde toplam 61 bakteri izole edilmiştir. izolatların sayı ve oranları ; Bacillus sp. 20(%32.8), Micrococcus sp. 11 (% 18.0), S. epidermidis 10(% 16.4), Streptococcus sp. 7 (% 11 .5) ve Coryne bacterium sp. 5(%8.2) olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, sağlıklı boğaların spermasında potansiyel patojen nitelikli bakterilerin de bulunabileceği düşünülerek damızlık boğaların veya bunların spermalarının mikrobiyolojik kontrollerinin yapılmadan kullanılmaması ve hijyenik önlemlerin alınması gereği anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YARDIMCI, H., AKSU, A., ERDEM, B. (1995). The identification and isolation of aerobic bacteri in semen of healthy bulls.. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 254–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/125650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. ANON (1981): Disease control in semen and embryos. FAO animal production and health paper. No.23,Rome. ARDA,M. (1978): Genel Bakteriyoloji. A.Ü.Vet.Fak. Yay., No.342. Aydın, N.,Tekin, N., Yurdaydın, N. ve Sevinç,A. (1984): Boğa spermasındaki bakteriyal floraya chloramphenicol ve ampiciline'in etkisi. A.Ü.Vet. Fak. Derg., 31 (2): 346-352.
  2. Barlett, D.E., Larson,L.L., Parker,W.G. and Howard, T.H. (1976): Specific pathogen free (SPF) frozen bovine semen:a goal? Proceedings of the sixth technical conference on artficial insemination and reproduction. Proc. 6 th. Tech. Conf. Nat. Assoc. An. Breeders. USA.pp. 11-12.
  3. Beşe. M. (1974): Mikrobiyolojide kullanılan biyokimyasal testler ve besiyerleri. A.Ü.Vet. Fak. Yay., No. 298. A.Ü Basımevi, Ankara.
  4. Brown, V.G., Schlollum, L.M. and Jarvis, B.D.W. (1974): Microbiology of bovine semerı and artifical breeding practices under New Zelland conditions. N.Z.J. Agr. Res., 17(4): 431-442.
  5. Eaglesome, M.D., Garcia, M.M. and Stewart, R.B. (1992): Microbial agents associated with bovine genital tract infections and semen Part ll. Heamophilus somnus, Mycoplasma spp and ureaplasma spp, Chlamydia; pathoges and semen contaminants; treatment of bul! semen with antimicrobial agents. Vet. Bul., 62(9): 887-910 Güneyi,F. (1992): Boğaların prepusiyel sıvı ve spermalarından bakteriyal etkenierin izolasyonu ve bunların antibiyotiklere duyarlılıkları. Tarım Ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Uzmanlık Tezi, istanbul. Hossain, M.F., Alam, M.G.S., Ahmet, J.U., Rahman, M.M. and Rahman, A. (1990): Bacreteriological examination of semen as an aid to sexual healt control in bulls. Bangladesh J. Microbiol., 7(2):85.-88. Marinov, P.and Bohnel, H. (1974): Hygienic conditions of materials for freezing bovine semen. J. Dairy Sci., 57(6): 707-711
  6. Meredith, M.J. (1970): Bacterial content of semen, collected by artifical vagina froni bu lls that ev ert the preputial epithelium. Vet. Re c., 87: 122-124. Prince,P.W., Almquist, J.O. and Reid, J.J. (1949): Bacteriological studies of bovine semen. ll. The ineidence of specifıc types of bacteria and therelatiorı to feıiility. J. Dairy Sci., 32: 849-855.
  7. Saika, G.K., Boro, B.R., Hazarika, A.K. and Ahınad, K. (1 987): Bacterial flora of seınen and tlı e ir antibiotic sensitivy pattern. Inciian Vet. Mecl.J., 11:137-139. Sevinç,A., istanbulluoğlu, E. ve Yuraydın,N. (1983): Suni tohuınlarna istasyonlarındaki boğaların sperrna ve prepusyal yıkantıl Wierzbowski, S. Nowakowski,