Journals / Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

A Multilayered Productive Zakat Framework for Entrepreneurial Empowerment

Girişimciliğin Güçlendirilmesine Yönelik Çok Katmanlı Üretken Zekât Çerçevesi

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It discusses policy implications for Islamic finance, highlighting that a well-structured, multi-tier Zakat system could transform obligatory charity into a powerful tool for socioeconomic growth among vulnerable populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Zakat, a core pillar of Islam, is a religious duty requiring the redistribution of wealth to eight eligible categories (asnaf) specified in the Qur'an.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Beyond its redistributive role, Zakat has significant potential to alleviate poverty and promote broader socioeconomic empowerment when managed effectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It discusses policy implications for Islamic finance, highlighting that a well-structured, multi-tier Zakat system could transform obligatory charity into a powerful tool for socioeconomic growth among vulnerable populations.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zekât · İslami sosyal finans · üretken zekât

Abstract

Zakat, a core pillar of Islam, is a religious duty requiring the redistribution of wealth to eight eligible categories (asnaf) specified in the Qur'an. Beyond its redistributive role, Zakat has significant potential to alleviate poverty and promote broader socioeconomic empowerment when managed effectively. This study introduces the Jellyfish Zakat Model, a layered, interest-free fund system that combines structured fund pooling with Islamic social finance to direct Zakat toward immediate relief and sustainable nano-entrepreneurship. The model operates through cyclic, layered fund pools that transfer Zakat from local (micro) to national (macro) levels in a “jellyfish-like" pattern. Each layer allocates a large share to urgent aid for disadvantaged groups and a smaller share to fund nano-businesses for vulnerable individuals, helping them achieve self-sufficiency. This approach aligns with Shariah objectives of wealth sharing and social justice, fostering financial inclusion and sustainable development. Methodologically, the paper uses conceptual models and an illustrative distribution analysis based on secondary macroeconomic data from Bangladesh. Results reveal that, with full collection, the framework could support around 3.54 million nano-enterprises annually and deliver direct aid to about 53 million households. Even with a conservative 20% collection rate, over 700,000 nano-enterprises could benefit. The study also explores conditions needed for success, including regulatory reform, Islamic financial literacy, and multi-layered governance. It discusses policy implications for Islamic finance, highlighting that a well-structured, multi-tier Zakat system could transform obligatory charity into a powerful tool for socioeconomic growth among vulnerable populations.

Özet

İslam’ın temel ibadetlerinden biri olup servetin Kur’an’da belirtilen sekiz hak sahibi sınıfa (asnaf) yeniden dağıtılmasını öngören dini bir yükümlülüktür. Yeniden dağıtım işlevinin ötesinde, etkin biçimde yönetilen zekât yoksulluğun azaltılmasına ve daha geniş sosyoekonomik güçlenmeye katkı sağlayabilir. Bu çalışma, yapılandırılmış fon havuzlamasını İslami sosyal finans ilkeleriyle birleştirerek zekâtı hem acil ihtiyaçların karşılanmasına hem de sürdürülebilir nano girişimciliğin desteklenmesine yönlendiren katmanlı ve faizsiz bir fon sistemi olan Denizanası Zekât Modeli’ni geliştirmektedir. Model, zekât fonlarının yerel (mikro) düzeyden ulusal (makro) düzeye doğru katmanlar arasında aktarıldığı ve ardından hak sahiplerine yapılandırılmış biçimde yeniden dağıtıldığı döngüsel bir sistem üzerine kuruludur. Her katmanda fonların büyük bölümü dezavantajlı grupların acil ihtiyaçlarına, daha küçük bir bölümü ise seçilmiş hak sahiplerinin kendi gelirlerini oluşturabilecekleri nano işletmelere tahsis edilmektedir. Yöntem olarak çalışma, kavramsal modelleme ile Bangladeş’e ilişkin ikincil makroekonomik verilere dayanan senaryo temelli bir dağılım analizini birleştirmektedir. Tam tahsilat varsayımı altında modelin yılda yaklaşık 3,54 milyon nano işletmeyi destekleyebileceği ve yaklaşık 53 milyon haneye doğrudan yardım sağlayabileceği hesaplanmaktadır. Yüzde 20 tahsilat senaryosunda dahi 700 binden fazla nano işletmenin desteklenmesi mümkündür. Bulgular, modelin uygulanabilirliğinin düzenleyici çerçeve, kurumsal yönetişim, şeffaflık, finansal okuryazarlık ve etkin çok katmanlı koordinasyona bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma, iyi yapılandırılmış bir zekât yönetim sisteminin dini yeniden dağıtım işlevini korurken finansal kapsayıcılık ve ekonomik güçlenmeye de katkı sunabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Jahangir, R. (2026). A Multilayered Productive Zakat Framework for Entrepreneurial Empowerment. Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2. https://doi.org/10.54427/ijisef.1851314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Afandi, M. F. M., Zubairi, M. I. N., Hashim, M. J., & Khamis, M. R. (2021). The role of Zakat in reducing income inequality among Muslim society in Selangor. Global Business & Management Research, 13(4), 1–12.
  2. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1999). Fiqh al-Zakat: A comparative study of Zakat regulations and philosophy in the light of the Qur’an and Sunnah (M. Kahf, Trans.). Dar Al Taqwa. (Original work published 1969).
  3. Amir, A., Hodijah, S., Isnaeni, N., Darus, R. B. M., & Amri, A. D. (2025). Zakat management in Indonesia and Malaysia and the influence of poverty levels, unemployment, and HDI on Zakat collection with income per capita as a moderating variable. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 4(1), 49–57. DOI: 10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V4I1P106.
  4. Amuda-Kannike, A. (2021). The practice of nano entrepreneurship, the issues, prospects and the position of the law: Nigeria as a case study [Paper presentation]. 5th Entrepreneurship and Security Conference/Induction/Graduation/Award Conferment Ceremony, Covenant University, Ogun State, Nigeria.
  5. Anheier, H. K. (2014). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  6. Ardener, S. (1964). The comparative study of rotating credit associations. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 94(2), 201–229.
  7. Asya'bani, N., Afifa, U. N., Widiastuti, T., Mawardi, I., & Soleh, M. (2025). Analysis of the impact of zakat fund distribution on mustahik productivity in Indonesia. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol4.iss2.art7
  8. Ayuniyyah, Q., Pramanik, A. H., Saad, N. M., & Ariffin, M. I. (2017). The comparison between consumption and production-based Zakat distribution programs for poverty alleviation and income inequality reduction. International Journal of Zakat, 2(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v2i2.22
  9. Aziz, A., & Faruk, F. (2025). Revisiting Zakat distribution in the modern era: Toward a reconstructed model. Al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics, 9(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.26740/al-uqud.v9n1.p47-59
  10. Abu Bakar, M., & Abdul Ghani, A. (2011). Towards achieving the quality of life in the management of zakat distribution to the rightful recipients (the poor and needy). International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 237–245.
  11. Bandiera, O., Burgess, R., Das, N., Gulesci, S., Rasul, I., & Sulaiman, M. (2017). Labor markets and poverty in village economies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 811–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx003
  12. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., & Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science, 348(6236), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799
  13. Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., & Schmidt, T. (2016). Cash transfers: What does the evidence say? A rigorous review of programme impact and of the role of design and implementation features. Overseas Development Institute. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/111531529868058319-0160022017/original/Day39am10749.pdf
  14. Besley, T., Coate, S., & Loury, G. (1994). Rotating savings and credit associations, credit markets and efficiency. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 701–719.
  15. Bilo, C., & Machado, A. C. (2020). The role of Zakat in the provision of social protection: A comparison between Jordan and Sudan. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(3-4), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0218
  16. Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., Aziz, S. A., & Ismail, S. S. H. (2020). Challenges of zakah management in Muslim developing countries. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 2(1), 22–31.
  17. Blattman, C., Fiala, N., & Martinez, S. (2014). Generating skilled self-employment in developing countries: Experimental evidence from Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 697–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju002
  18. Bowen, T., del Ninno, C., Andrews, C., Coll-Black, S., Johnson, K., Kawasoe, Y., Kryeziu, A., Maher, B., & Williams, A. (2020). Adaptive social protection: Building resilience to shocks. World Bank.
  19. Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and the economic challenge. Islamic Foundation.
  20. Desrochers, M., & Fischer, K. P. (2005). The power of networks: Integration and financial cooperative performance. Annals of public and cooperative economics, 76(3), 307–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1370-4788.2005.00281.x
  21. Devereux, S., Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Longhurst, R. (Eds.). (2017). Seasonality, rural livelihoods and development. Routledge.
  22. Dinc, Y., Çetin, M., Bulut, M., & Jahangir, R. (2021). Islamic financial literacy scale: an amendment in the sphere of contemporary financial literacy. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-07-2020-0156
  23. Dinc, Y., Jahangir, R., Nagayev, R., & Çakır, F. (2022). Economics of savings-based finance: An interest-free model of rotating savings and credit association in Turkey. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(2), 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2021-0115
  24. Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(1), 52–78.
  25. Fadli, Z., Astika, S., Herlina, H., & Harianti, H. (2025). Accounting treatment of Zakat at the National Zakat Agency (BAZNAS) of Nunukan Regency. Invoice: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 7(1), 57–62.
  26. Febriandika, N. R., & Rohmah, F. A. (2024). The standard for allocating Zakat social funds as an operational expense of nonprofit organizations in Indonesia, Sudan and Algeria. Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 31–42.
  27. Fonteyne, W. (2007). Cooperative banks in Europe: Policy issues (IMF Working Paper No. WP/07/159). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp07159.pdf
  28. Geertz, C. (1962). The rotating credit association: A "middle rung" in development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10(3), 241–263.
  29. Hammad, M. (2022). Overview of Zakat practices around the world (Research Report No. 69). International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth and UNICEF Afghanistan Country Office.
  30. Harahap, M. F., Jureid, J., & Hamdanil, H. (2025). Productive Zakat management in empowering micro business for poverty alleviation (Study at BAZNAS Mandailing Natal District). ILTIZAM Journal of Shariah Economics Research, 9(1), 179–191.
  31. Hasanah, I., Okafor, C., & Mohammed, A. (2026). Blockchain Technology Integration in Waqf Management to Enhance Transparency and Global Trust. Journal Islamic Economic Minangkabau, 4(3), 278–291.
  32. Hassan, M. K., Khan, M. Z. H., Miah, M. A., & Islam, M. K. (2024). The national-level potential of Zakat and its integration into the fiscal framework: Sector-specific insights from the economy of Bangladesh. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(1), 146–169.
  33. Hudayati, A., & Tohirin, A. (2010). Management of zakah: Centralised vs decentralised approach. In Seventh International Conference–The Tawhidi Epistemology: Zakat and Waqf Economy (pp. 351–374). Bangi.
  34. International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (2007, July 14). Enhancing the role of Zakāh in poverty alleviation and the management of its collection and distribution based on fiqh interpretations (ijtihād) (Resolution No. 165 [3/18]). International Islamic Fiqh Academy. https://iifa-aifi.org/en/2261.html
  35. International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (1986, October 16). Investment of Zakāh funds in profit-generating projects without attributing individual ownership to recipients (Resolution No. 15 [3/3]). International Islamic Fiqh Academy. https://iifa-aifi.org/en/32251.html
  36. Iqbal, I. (2020). Zakat: Macroeconomic and microeconomic demands. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 4(3), 1–9.
  37. Jahangir, R., & Bulut, M. (2022). Estimation of Zakat proceeds in Bangladesh: A two-approach attempt. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 8(1), 133–148.
  38. Jahangir, R., & Bulut, M. (2024). Nano entrepreneurship and saving-based finance concept in waqf literature: A systematic review and future research direction. In M. Bulut, B. Altay, & C. Korkut (Eds.), Islamic financial institutions from the early modern period to the 20th century (pp. 37–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51318-3_4
  39. Jahangir, R., Bulut, M., & Dinc, Y. (2023). Evolvement of ROSCA to real property acquisition as a form of interest-free SBF model: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review. Property Management, 41(1), 111-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-03-2022-0025
  40. Judijanto, L., Sudarmanto, E., Bakri, A. A., Jasiah, J., & Irwan, M. (2024). Analysis of effectiveness and challenges of digital Zakat management: Case study on Shopee and Tokopedia platform. West Science Islamic Studies, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsiss.v2i01.585
  41. Kahf, M. (1987). The early Islamic public revenue system: Lessons and implications. Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute.
  42. Kahf, M. (2019). Fatawa on lottery and gambling [Compiled fatawa collection, 2000–2019]. Monzer Kahf.
  43. Khaliq, A., Lutfi, M., Muin, R., & Jaya, A. (2023). Use of Zakat funds for productive purposes in Indonesia. Jurnal Ar-Ribh, 6(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.26618/jei.v6i1.10632
  44. Khan, M. A. (2025). The economic and social impact of Zakat in contemporary Muslim societies. Al-Aasar, 2(1), 700–709.
  45. Latief, N. F., & Niu, F. A. L. (2020). Utilization of productive Zakat in improving Mustahik economic empowerment (Study at BAZNAS of Manado City). International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pacific, 3(2), 13–25.
  46. Ma'lufah, U., & Zaenal, M. H. (2026). The role of digital Zakat transformation in increasing muzaki participation and expanding the impact of Zakat distribution in Indonesia. International Journal of Zakat, 11(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v11i1.768
  47. Majduddin, M., Nadjib, M., Asnawi, N., Farid, M., & Danila, N. (2025). Revitalizing Zakat in the digital economy: Toward a more transparent and accountable Islamic social financing framework. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(1), 333–356.
  48. Mawardi, I., Widiastuti, T., Al Mustofa, M. U., & Hakimi, F. (2023). Analyzing the impact of productive Zakat on the welfare of Zakat recipients. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2021-0145
  49. McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014). What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world?. The World Bank Research Observer, 29(1), 48–82.
  50. Migdad, A. (2019). Managing Zakat through institutions: case of Malaysia. Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.519228
  51. Mohamad, S. A. R., Bosheya, M. S. M., Aleryani, A. S., & Zainon, M. B. M. (2024). Considering the geographic scope in the institutional distribution of Zakat. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 1828–1840. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20600
  52. Mubarokah, I. I., Muzayanah, F. N., Sulastri, Y., & Panjaitan, G. J. (2024, June). Analysis of transparency of Zakat management organization in Indonesia. In 8th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2023) (pp. 37–42). Atlantis Press.
  53. Muhammad, I. (2019). Analysis of Zakat system in high-income Islamic countries. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 16(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v16i2.219
  54. Mushuku, A., & Mayisa, J. (2014). Unlocking the door from poverty through rotating savings and credit associations: A study of group based savings in Ward 14 of Gutu District, Zimbabwe. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 11(2), 118–131.
  55. Saoki, S., & Mahir, M. (2025). Integration of Maqasid Shariah in the implementation of digital Zakat based on the E-Zakat platform at BAZNAS Surabaya. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 7(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2025.7.1.98-118
  56. Sarif, S., Ali, N. A., & Kamri, N. A. (2024). Zakat for generating sustainable income: An emerging mechanism of productive distribution. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2312598
  57. Setiawan, D., Mayes, A., & Zuryani, H. (2018). Analysis of the role of productive Zakat funds on the development of Zakat (mustahik) micro business development in Dumai City (Case study of the Amil Zakat Nasional City of Dumai City). American Journal of Economics, 8(6), 237–243.
  58. Shirazi, N. S. (2006). Providing for the resource shortfall for poverty elimination through the institution of Zakat in low-income Muslim countries. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v14i1.116
  59. Sifa, N., Bafadhal, H. H., Novealdi, H., & Pratama, A. B. (2024). Challenges and solutions of mal Zakat management: A case study of public awareness and trust in UPZ in Rimbo Bujang District. NALAR FIQH: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 15(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.30631/nf.v15i2.1553
  60. Subra, L., Kurniawan, A., Zuliansyah, A., Suhendar, S., & Fuadi, F. (2025). The role of productive Zakat in improving Mustahik welfare: A comparative study in Malaysia and Indonesia. GreenSharia: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business for Sustainability, 1(1), 34–47.
  61. Tamim, H. (2025, June 29). Is it permissible for a Zakat institution to take ownership of the Zakat and then distribute it to the eligible recipients? https://www.utrujj.org/is-it-permissible-for-a-zakat-institution-to-take-ownership-of-the-zakat-and-then-distribute-it-to-the-eligible-recipients/
  62. Wahid, H., Abdul Kader, R., & Ahmad, S. (2011). Localization of zakat distribution and the role of mosque: Perceptions of amil and zakat recipients in Malaysia [Paper presentation]. International Zakat Conference: Sustainable Zakat Development in the Poverty Alleviation and Improvement of Welfare of the Ummah, Bogor, Indonesia. https://www.ukm.my/hairun/kertas%20kerja/Paper%20Hairunnizam,%20Radiah%20and%20Sanep-MALAYSIA%20_9__final_28062011.pdf
  63. Wutsqah, U. (2021). Productive Zakat for community empowerment: An Indonesian context. Journal of Sharia Economics, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35896/jse.v3i1.179 Yusoff, M. B. (2006). Fiscal Policy in an Islamic economy and the role of Zakat. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 14(2), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v14i2.121
  64. Zaari, A. R. R. Z. R., Hasibuan, E., Rifadilla, W., & Jasin, M. R. (2025). Siyāsah Sharʿiyyah and state governance in Zakat management: A case analysis of judicial review on BAZNAS authority vis-à-vis LAZ/BAZ institutions. Jurnal Indo-Islamika, 15(1), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.15408/jii.v15i1.47047
  65. Zaenal, M. H., Choirin, M., Tsabita, K., Astuti, A. D., & Sadariyah, A. S. (2017). Principles of amil Zakat and best practice recommendations for Zakat institutions (Working Paper No, 1. Puskas BAZNAS. https://www.iconzbaznas.com/publications/index.php/pwps/article/view/19