Journals / Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 183 - Sayı: 183

INNOVATION ENVIRONMENT OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

YENİLİKÇİLİK AÇISINDAN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ORTAMI

Pages
51–78
Publication Date
2014-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, we found that the foundation universities offer higher levels of an innovative environment to students in all dimensions than the state universities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Status of various dimensions (support of superior, award motivation, presence and service of available resources, support of the affiliated team and the environment) of organizational atmosphere in support of the students’ innovational activities in Turkish universities is analyzed in our study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey activity was conducted on 728 students from 8 universities nationwide to define the innovation atmosphere.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, we found that the foundation universities offer higher levels of an innovative environment to students in all dimensions than the state universities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üniversite · öğrenci · yenilik

Abstract

Status of various dimensions (support of superior, award motivation, presence and service of available resources, support of the affiliated team and the environment) of organizational atmosphere in support of the students’ innovational activities in Turkish universities is analyzed in our study. A survey activity was conducted on 728 students from 8 universities nationwide to define the innovation atmosphere. It is determined that the support of management, the affiliated team and the environment is at good levels, however the universities are found unsuccessful at providing resources to the students and at motivating them with proper rewards. Also, we found that the foundation universities offer higher levels of an innovative environment to students in all dimensions than the state universities.

Özet

Çalışmamızda, Türkiye’deki üniversitelerde, örgüt ortamının çeşitli boyutlarının (üstün desteği, ödül desteği, uygun kaynakların varlığı ve kullanıma sunulması, içinde bulunulan takım ve çevrenin desteği) öğrencilerin yenilikçi faaliyetlerinin desteklenmesindeki durumu analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda üniversitelerde; yönetim ile içinde bulunulan takım ve çevre desteğinin iyi seviyede olduğu, ancak üniversitelerin öğrencilere gerekli olan kaynağı sağlamada ve uygun ödüllerle teşvik etme konusunda başarılı olamadığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, vakıf üniversitelerinin devlet üniversitelerine göre tüm boyutlarda öğrencilere daha yüksek seviyede yenilikçi bir ortam sundukları bulgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, H., KILIÇ, A. (2014). INNOVATION ENVIRONMENT OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 183 - Sayı: 183, 51–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/124417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. AHMED P.K. (1998) “Culture and Climate for Innovation”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, (1), 30-43.
  2. AMABILE T., R. CONTI, H. COON, J. LAZENBY ve M. HERRON (1996) “Assessing The Work Environment For Creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
  3. AMABILE T.M. (1997) “Entrepreneurial Creativity Through Motivational Synergy”, Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18-26.
  4. AMABILE T.M., C.N. HADLEY ve S.J. KRAMER (2002) “Creativity Under The Gun”, Harvard Business Review, 52-61.
  5. ARENOFSKY J. (2000) “How to Put Creativity into Your Work Life”, Career World, 29, (1), 24-29.
  6. BEYCİOĞLU K. ve B. ASLAN (2009) “Okul Liderliğinde Yeni Bir Yönelim: Öğretmen Liderliği” EYEDDER- Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi 14-15
  7. Mayıs, Denizli. BOMMER M. ve D. JALAJAS (2002) “The Innovation Work Environment of High-Tech SMEs in The USA and Canada”, R&D Management, 32, (5). BURGELMAN R.A. (1983) “A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in The Diversified Major Firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, (2), 223-245.
  8. BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK Ş. (2006) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (6. Baskı), Ankara,
  9. Pegem Yayıncılık. CHANDLER G.N., C. KELLER ve D.W. LYON (2000) “Unraveling the Determinants and Consequences of an Innovation-Supportive Organizational Culture”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall 2000, 59-76.
  10. CLAPHAM M.M. (1997) “Ideational Skills Training: A Key Element in Creativity Training Program”, Creativity Research Journal, 10, 33-44.
  11. CUMMINGS A. ve G.R. OLDHAM (1997) “Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for The High Potential Employee”, California Management Review, 40, (1), 22-38.
  12. DAKHLI M. ve D.De CLERCQ (2004) “Human Capital, Social Capital, and Innovation: A Multi-Country Study”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 107-128.
  13. DAMANPOUR F. (1991) “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Determinants and Moderations”, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
  14. DITTOE W. (2002) “Innovative Models of Learning Environments”, New Directıons For Teaching and Learning, 92, Winter 2002.
  15. FRITSCH M. ve V. SLAVTCHEV (2007) “Universities and Innovation in Space”, Industry and Innovation, 14, (2), 201-218.
  16. GARCIA R. ve R. CALANTONE (2002) “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, (2), 110- 132. GOLDENBERG M. (2004) “The Future of Social Innovation in Canada”, Canadian Policy Research