Journals / Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Determination of Stakeholder Types On Web-Based Organizational Public Relations Activities

Web Tabanlı Örgütsel Halkla İlişkiler Faaliyetlerinde Paydaş Türlerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
782–795
Publication Date
2019-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results customer group is the most intense group of messages for all sectors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Companies are social organizations with economic characteristics and they are in contact with all social sectors as a part of the community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, BIST 100 Index companies web-based stakeholder relations are discussed and these companies’ target stakeholders and message contents for public relations activities were questioned.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results customer group is the most intense group of messages for all sectors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İletişim stratejisi · BIST 100 indeksi · Borsa İstanbul

Abstract

Companies are social organizations with economic characteristics and they are in contact with all social sectors as a part of the community. However, there are specific stakeholder groups that companies are specifically affiliated with and these stakeholders can be different according to the companies. Companies are in constant connection and communication with stakeholder groups so they both affect stakeholders and are influenced by them. Companies have various responsibilities for their stakeholders and they can only survive through accomplish their responsibilities to the stakeholders, meet the stakeholders' expectations, and permanently inform them about the company. In this study, BIST 100 Index companies web-based stakeholder relations are discussed and these companies’ target stakeholders and message contents for public relations activities were questioned. Stakeholder relations are evaluated by the information on these companies’ web pages and information was evaluated by content analysis method. According to results customer group is the most intense group of messages for all sectors.

Özet

Şirketler, ekonomik özelliklere sahip sosyal organizasyonlardır ve toplumun bir parçası olarak toplumun tüm kesimleri ile temas halindedir. Şirketlerin özellikle bağlı oldukları belirli paydaş grupları vardır ve bu paydaşlar şirketlere göre farklılık gösterebilir. Şirketler, paydaşları ile sürekli bağlantı ve iletişim halindedir dolayısıyla hem paydaşlarını etkiler hem de onlardan etkilenirler. Paydaşlarına yönelik çeşitli sorumlulukları olan şirketler ancak bu tür sorumluluklarını yerine getirerek hayatta kalabilir, paydaşlarının beklentilerini karşılayabilir ve onları şirket hakkında bilgilendirebilirler. Bu çalışmada, BIST 100 Endeksi şirketlerinin web tabanlı paydaş ilişkileri tartışılmış, bu şirketlerin hedef paydaşlarına yönelik halkla ilişkiler faaliyetleri incelenmiştir. Paydaş ilişkilerinin belirlenmesinde şirketlerin web sayfalarında bulunan bilgilerden yararlanılmış ve bilgiler, içerik analiz ile değerlendirilmiştir. Alınan sonuçlara göre en yoğun mesajın olduğu paydaş türü müşterilerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNTAŞ, H. B. (2019). Determination of Stakeholder Types On Web-Based Organizational Public Relations Activities. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 782–795. https://ajindex.com/articles/124383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Basten, D., Stavrou, G. and Pankratz, O. (2016). “Closing the Stakeholder Expectation Gap: Managing Customer Expectations Toward the Process of Developing Information Systems”. Project Management Journal, October/November, 70-88.
  2. Benn, S., Abratt, R. and Kleyn, N. (2016). “Reducing Reputational Risk: Evaluating Stakeholder Salience and Prioritising Stakeholder Claims”. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(6), 828-842. doi:10.1108/MIP-10-2015-0191
  3. Boiral, O. and Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2017). “Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 403-421. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2668-3
  4. Bourne, L. (2008). “Advancing Theory and Practice for Successful Implementation of Stakeholder Management in Organisations”. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(4), 587-601. doi:10.1108/17538370810906273 Brummette, J. and Zoch, L. M. (2016). “How Stakeholders’ Personal Values Influence Their Value Expectations for Legitimate Organizations”. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(3), 309-321. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-12-2015-0085
  5. Bunn, M. D., Savage, G. T. and Holloway, B. B. (2002). “Stakeholder Analysis for Multi‐Sector Innovations”. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 181-203.
  6. Clarkson, M. (1995). “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance”. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.Cornelissen, J. (2004). Corporate Communications: Theory and Practice. London: Sage. Daft, R. L. (2008). Management. Mason: Thomson South-Western. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman. Goodjik, R., (2003). “Partnership at Corporate Level: The Meaning of The Stakeholder Model”. Journal of Change Management, 3(3), 225-241.
  7. Goodpaster, K. (1991). “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53-73.
  8. Grinstein, A. and Goldman, A. (2011). “Beyond the Final Consumer: The Effectiveness of A Generalist Stakeholder Strategy”. European Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 567-595.
  9. Grosser, K. (2009). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Equality: Women as Stakeholders and The European Union Sustainability Strategy”. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(3), 290-307. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01564.x Guibert, L. and Roloff, J. (2017). “Stakeholder Dialogue: Strategic Tool or Wasted Words?” Journal of Business Strategy, 38(5), 3-11.
  10. Huang, C. and Kung, F. (2010). “Dr