SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 3

The evolution and impact of Karagöz plays’ sound in early Republican Türkiye: a focus on Hayali Küçük Ali

Elif Özen(İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9948-0205
Zeynep Gonca İncedere(İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3076-6763
Metin Balay(YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4634-3191
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that sound functions both as a medium of transmission and reproduction, and that cultural memory is shaped within these auditory sites of remembrance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the process through which Karagöz plays became recognized as cultural heritage in the early years of the Republic of Türkiye, arguing that Karagöz should be regarded not only as a visual but also as an auditory form of heritage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It investigates how state policies, technological developments, and ideological shifts reshaped Karagöz performances in the transformation of their musical and sonic elements into cultural heritage, and how these changes influenced the case of the puppeteer Hayali Küçük Ali.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that sound functions both as a medium of transmission and reproduction, and that cultural memory is shaped within these auditory sites of remembrance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Early Republican Türkiye · heritagization · Karagöz

Abstract

This article examines the process through which Karagöz plays became recognized as cultural heritage in the early years of the Republic of Türkiye, arguing that Karagöz should be regarded not only as a visual but also as an auditory form of heritage. By analyzing the role of auditory components in cultural continuity and transformation, the study aims to reconsider definitions of heritage through the lens of sound. It investigates how state policies, technological developments, and ideological shifts reshaped Karagöz performances in the transformation of their musical and sonic elements into cultural heritage, and how these changes influenced the case of the puppeteer Hayali Küçük Ali. As part of the research, two musical pieces selected from the Karagöz repertoire and Küçük Ali’s performances of Aşıklık and Salıncak plays were taken as case studies; transcriptions of archival recordings from Turkish Radio and Television (TRT) were compared with Cevdet Kudret’s written texts. The analysis was conducted within the framework of parameters such as character voicing, musical elements, auditory environment, improvisation, comedic devices, ideological reflections, and contextual relations. The findings reveal that sound functions both as a medium of transmission and reproduction, and that cultural memory is shaped within these auditory sites of remembrance. The modernization of Karagöz unfolded through a sound-centered logic of adaptation, evolving into a multilayered auditory heritage extending from radio broadcasts to digital platforms. Thus, the plays have undergone a sound-oriented reinterpretation in terms of both performance and preservation. In conclusion, this study foregrounds the auditory and musical dimensions of Karagöz to examine the relationship between performance memory, ideological transformation, and technological mediation, inviting a reconsideration of the notion of an “auditory Karagöz heritage” in relation to cultural transmission and representation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özen, E., İncedere, Z. G., Balay, M., *, E. Ö. (2025). The evolution and impact of Karagöz plays’ sound in early Republican Türkiye: a focus on Hayali Küçük Ali. Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20251336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Ahıska, M. (2019). Radyonun sihirli kapısı: Garbiyatçılık ve politik öznellik (The magic gate of radio: Occidentalism and political subjectivity). Metis.
  2. And, M. (1969). Geleneksel Türk tiyatrosu: Kukla, Karagöz, Ortaoyunu (Traditional Turkish theatre: Puppet, Karagöz, Ortaoyunu). Bilgi.
  3. Arlı, A. (2018). Oryantalizm, oksidentalizm ve Şerif Mardin (Orientalism, Occidentalism and Şerif Mardin). Küre.
  4. Assmann, J. (2001). Kültürel bellek: Eski yüksek kültürlerde yazı, hatırlama ve politik kimlik (Cultural Memory: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Identity in Early High Cultures) (Tekin A., Trans.). Ayrıntı.
  5. Atay, T. (2004). Gelenekçilikle karşı- gelenekçiliğin gelgitinde Türk ‘gelenek-çi’ muhafazakârlığı (The tide of traditionalism and anti-traditionalism: Turkish ‘traditionalist’ conservatism). (Bora T. ve Gültekingil M., Ed.), Modern Türkiye’de siyasi düşünce (Volume: V, Muhafazakârlık) in Çiğdem A. (Volume Ed.) (p. 154-178). İletişim.
  6. Babadoğan, H. (2013). Understanding the transformations of Karagöz. Doctoral thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye
  7. Başar, D. (2021). A dismissed heritage: Contemporary performance in Turkey defined through Karagöz. Doctoral dissertation. Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. https://spectrum.library.concordia. ca/id/eprint/988042/
  8. Bauman, R. (2022). Performans olarak sözlü sanat (Verbal Art as Performance) (Altun I., Trans.). Millî Folklor, 34 (135), 271–284. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/millifolklor/ issue/73321/1064342
  9. Boas, F. (1940). Race, language, and culture. Macmillan.
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (Johnson R., Ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press. Cantek, L. (2008). Cumhuriyetin büluğ çağı: Gündelik yaşama dair tartışmalar (1945-1950) (The puberty age of the Republic: Debates on everyday life, 1945–1950). İletişim.
  12. Chen, F. P. (2013). Dünyada gölge oyunu (Shadow theatre in the world) (Gültürk B., Trans.). (Efe P., Ed.), Hayal perdesinde ulus, değişim ve geleneğin icadı (in Nation, change, and the invention of tradition in shadow theatre) (p. 1–47). Tarih Vakfı Yurt.
  13. Chion, M. (1999). The voice in cinema (C. Gorbman, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/ book/the-voice-in-cinema/9780231108232/
  14. Chion, M. (2019). Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen (Gorbman C., Ed.). Columbia University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/ chio18588
  15. Cömert, E. (2023). Muallim İsmail Hakkı Bey’in koleksiyonunda Karagöz ve Orta Oyunu musikisi (Karagöz and Orta Oyunu music in the collection of Muallim İsmail Hakkı Bey). İTÜ.
  16. Çalışkan, F. (2024). Multilayered Resonance: Re-imaginations of the history of Âşıklık (Minstrelsy). Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance, 24, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.31722/ ejmd.1469482
  17. Çolakoğlu, G. (2006). Gelenekten beslenen Karagöz (Karagöz Nourished by Tradition). Folklor/Edebiyat, 12(46), 543–554. https:// turkoloji.cu.edu.tr/HALKBILIM/gozde_ colakoglu_gelenekten_beslenen_karagoz.pdf
  18. Erol, T. (2021). Karagöz ve Halkevlerinde Karagöz folkloru (Karagöz and the folklore of People’s Houses). Gece.
  19. Gautier, A. (2014). Aurality: Listening & Knowledge in 19th Century Colombia. Duke University. https://doi. org/10.1215/9780822376262
  20. Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications, Inc; Open University.
  21. Hınçer, İ. (1960). Hayali Küçük Ali ve Karagöz (Puppeteer Küçük Ali and Karagöz). Türk Folklor Araştırmaları Dergisi, 128, 2107-2108. https://turkfolklorarastirmalari.com/pdf/128. pdf
  22. Ihsanoğlu, E. (2003). Modern Türkiye ve Osmanlı mirası (Modern Turkey and the Ottoman Heritage). Doğu Batı: Modernliğin Gölgesinde: Gelenek, 25, 41-58.
  23. Kafadar, C. (2014). How dark is the history of the night, how black the story of coffee, how bitter the tale of love: The changing measure of leisure and pleasure in early modern Istanbul. (Öztürkmen A.& E. Vitz B., Eds.), In Medieval and early modern performance in the Eastern Mediterranean (p. 243–270). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M. LMEMS-EB.1.102271
  24. Kane, B. (2014). Sound Unseen Acousmatic Sound in Theory and Practice. Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199347841.001.0001
  25. Kendirci, M. (2021). Eğlencesiz eğlence: Erken Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde eğlence ve siyasal iktidar (Joyless entertainment: Entertainment and political power in Early Republican Turkey). İletişim.
  26. Keskin, Y. (2006). İstanbul’da eğlence hayatı (1923–1938) (Entertainmet life in Istanbul (1923-1938)). Master’s thesis. Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  27. Kımışoğlu, Z. (2021). Kültürel Aktarım ve Süreklilik Bağlamında Eski ve Yeni Perde Gazelleri (Old and New Act Odes within the Context of Cultural Transmission and Continuity). Culture and Civilization, 1(1), 18- 26. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/culture/ issue/73008/1188569
  28. Koçak, D.Ö. (2008). 19. Yüzyıl sonunda İstanbul’un dönüşümü ve uygarlaşmanın iletişim ortamı olarak Osmanlı tiyatrosu (Transformation of İstanbul at the end of 19th century and Ottoman theatre as a communication medium to become civilized). Doctoral dissertation. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  29. Kudret, C. (1992). Karagöz (2. bas.), (Folklor Dizisi; No. 55). Bilgi.
  30. Kumaş, N. (2021). İstanbul Halkevleri güzel sanatlar ve temsil şubelerinin faaliyetleri (1939–1951) (Activities of Istanbul public houses fine arts and representation branches (1939–1951)). Belgi Dergisi, 21, Kış. https:// doi.org/10.33431/belgi.829437
  31. Le Fèvre-Berthelot A., (2013). Audio-Visual: Disembodied Voices in Theory, The French Journal of Media Studies. https://doi. org/10.4000/inmedia.697
  32. Marvin, C. (1990). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York (online edn, Oxford Academic, 12 Nov. 2020), https:// doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195063417.001.0001
  33. Meriç, N. (2007). Adab-ı muaşeret: Osmanlı’da gündelik hayatın değişimi (1894-1927) (Etiquette: The transformation of daily life in the Ottoman Empire (1894–1927)). Kapı.
  34. Nafiz, S. (1932, 8 Eylül). İtham ediyorum (I accuse!). Servetifünun Newspaper. https:// www.gastearsivi.com/gazete/servetifunun_ uyanis/1932-09-08/16
  35. Nart, S. (2009). 1964–1980 arası TRT radyo yayın politikaları: Toplumsal ve politik süreçte radyonun tarihsel ve kurumsal gelişimi (TRT radio broadcasting policies between 1964- 1980, (institutional and historical development of radio at the social and political process in Turkey between years 1964 and 1980)). Doctoral dissertation. Ankara University. Ankara,Türkiye.
  36. Oral, Ü. (2012). Karagöz Perde Gazelleri ve Tasavvuf (Karagöz “perde gazeli” and Sufism). İstanbul.
  37. Özçörekçi Göl, N. Z. (Hazırlayan). (2008).
  38. Gölgenin renkleri: Karagöz Tasvirleri Koleksiyonu, (Colours of Shadow: Catalogue of Karagöz Figure Collect). Halk Kültürü Bilgi ve Belge Merkezi Karagöz tasvirleri koleksiyonu kataloğu. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
  39. Özhan, M. (2011). Cumhuriyet döneminin büyük Karagöz sanatçısı Hayali Küçük Ali (The great Karagöz artist of the Republican period: Puppeteer Küçük Ali). Folklor/Edebiyat, 17(66), 157–172. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/ pub/fe/issue/26030/274161
  40. Özkan, İ. H. (1999). Isfahan, in Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı (Ed.), Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Volume 19, p. 134-135). TDV. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/isfahan-- musiki.
  41. Öztürk, S. (2006). Karagoz Co-Opted: Turkish Shadow Theatre of the Early Republic (1923- 1945). Asian Theatre Journal, 23(2), 292-313. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/atj.2006.0027.
  42. Pay, M. (2012). Gölge oyunu Karagöz ve sinema (The shadow play Karagöz and Cinema). Master’s thesis. Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  43. Petkovski, F. (2021). From community to humanity: Dance as intangible cultural heritage. Doctoral dissertation. University of California. California, US.
  44. Sevilen, M. (1969). Karagöz. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, Devlet Kitapları.
  45. Shils, E. (2003). Gelenek (Tradiation). (Arslan H., Trans.). Doğu Batı: Modernliğin Gölgesinde: Gelenek, 25, 101-131.
  46. Siyavuşgil, S. E. (1949, 14 Temmuz). Karagöz perdesinde mahalle halkı (The townsfolk in the Karagöz shadow play). Yeni Sabah Newspaper. https://www.gastearsivi.com/gazete/yeni_ sabah/1949-07-14/1
  47. Subaşı, N. (2003). Kültürel mirasın çeşitliliği ve seçicilik sorunu (The diversity of cultural heritage and the problem of selectivity). Doğu Batı: Modernliğin Gölgesinde: Gelenek, 25,135-147.
  48. Şenyer, E. (2024, Aralık 26). Perde gazeli. Karagöz Hacivat (Curtain ghazals. Karagöz Hacivat). https://www.karagoz.net/karagoz_ hacivat_perdegazeli.html
  49. Tylor, E. B. (1958). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art and custom (Volume 1). Harper&Row.(FirstPublication1871)https:// darwin- online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1871_ Tylor_PrimitiveCulture_CUL-DAR.LIB.635.pdf
  50. Uz, F. P. (2018). Nurdan Gürbilek’in denemelerinde edebiyat ve kültür eleştirisi (Critique of literature and culture in Nurdan Gürbilek’s essays). Master’s thesis. İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University, Izmir, Türkiye.
  51. Üngör, E. R. (1989). Karagöz musikisi (Karagöz music). Kültür Bakanlığı.
  52. Ünlü, C. (2008). 78 devirli taş plak kayıtlarıyla Türk gölge oyunu Karagöz, (2 CD ve kitapçık) (Turkish shadow play with 78 rpm phonograph records (2 CDs and booklet)). İstanbul: Kalan Müzik.
  53. Varışoğlu Sarpkaya, E. (2022). Karagöz oyunlarınınişlevselhalkbilimikuramıaçısından incelenmesi (Research on Karagoz shadow plays within the perspective of functional folklore theory). Folklor Akademi Dergisi, 5(3), 627- 637. https://doi.org/10.55666/folklor.1168413
  54. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford University.
  55. Yücedağ, İ. (2010). Nilüfer Göle’de Batı- dışı modernliği anlamak (Understanding non-Western modernity in Nilüfer Göle). e-Şarkiyat İlmi Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3, 69– 82. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sarkiat/ issue/11238/134309
  56. Internet References Url 1. 32 seneden beri perde arkasında Hayali Küçük Ali neler anlatıyor? (1932, 14 Aralık). Son Posta Newspaper. https:// www.gastearsivi.com/gazete/son_ posta/1932-12-14/6
  57. Url 2. Golden Horn Ensemble. (2012, Ekim 18). Geldi Cevher Tiğ-i Ateş (Karagöz’ün Şarkısı © 1996 Kalan Müzik) (Video). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=NcJqKIsAJ-c
  58. Url 3. TRT Arşiv. (2020, Mart 26). Karagöz ile Hacivat (Video). YouTube. https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=EvHSQdFhV4U