SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

The acoustic role of rosette design in the oud: An experimental study of geometric and mechanical effects

Emir Değirmenli(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the experimental oud examined here, the findings support treating the rosette as a coupled geometric and mechanically interacting component rather than as a decorative cover or an open-area descriptor alone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Oud rosettes have traditionally been discussed primarily as decorative structures covering the sound holes, although their acoustic and mechanical roles remain insufficiently resolved.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For each configuration, the structural response was characterized through bridge-mobility measurements, and the force- normalized acoustic response was measured with a calibrated microphone positioned 1 m from the instrument under standardized conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the experimental oud examined here, the findings support treating the rosette as a coupled geometric and mechanically interacting component rather than as a decorative cover or an open-area descriptor alone.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:oud acoustics · rosette geometry · aperture-edge length

Abstract

Oud rosettes have traditionally been discussed primarily as decorative structures covering the sound holes, although their acoustic and mechanical roles remain insufficiently resolved. This study investigates rosette design within a unified vibroacoustic framework. The geometric analysis considers total open area, regional open-area distribution, and total aperture-edge length, whereas the mechanical analysis considers progressive added mass and connectivity/stiffness-proxy configurations. A single fully playable oud and a set of interchangeable experimental rosettes were used to isolate local design changes from inter-instrument variability. For each configuration, the structural response was characterized through bridge-mobility measurements, and the force- normalized acoustic response was measured with a calibrated microphone positioned 1 m from the instrument under standardized conditions. The lightweight geometry series produced comparatively modest, descriptor- specific changes; the clearest openness effects occurred at the fully Closed and Open boundary conditions. Progressive added mass produced the most regular downward shift and reduction of the bridge-mobility peak around 220 Hz, whereas the connectivity/stiffness-proxy series evolved non-monotonically and was dominated by the F4 departure. In the experimental oud examined here, the findings support treating the rosette as a coupled geometric and mechanically interacting component rather than as a decorative cover or an open-area descriptor alone.

🔖

Cite This Article

Değirmenli, E., *, E. D. (2026). The acoustic role of rosette design in the oud: An experimental study of geometric and mechanical effects. Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20261434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Abdallah, M., Dreik, E., Sassi, A., Paurobally, M., & Sassi, S. (2026). Vibroacoustic sensitivity of an oud soundboard to bracing geometry. Meccanica, 61, Article 89. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11012-026-02151-1
  2. Arslan, A. A., & Alaskan, A. M. (2022). Manol udlarının yapısal, fiziksel ve malzeme özelliklerinin araştırılması. Yegah Müzikoloji Dergisi, 5(2), 317–333. https://doi. org/10.51576/ymd.1190631
  3. Bader, R. (2012). Radiation characteristics of multiple and single sound hole vihuelas and a classical guitar. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 819– 828. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3651096
  4. Bissinger, G., Williams, E. G., & Valdivia, N. (2007). Violin f-hole contribution to far-field radiation via patch near- field acoustical holography. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3899–3906. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722238
  5. Curtin, J. (2009). Measuring violin sound radiation using an impact hammer. Journal of the Violin Society of America: VSA Papers, 22(1), 186–209.
  6. Değirmenli, E. (2018). Türk müziği çalgılarından ud’da ses oluşumunun incelenmesi ve telli çalgıların ses karakteri açısından tasarımlarının belirlenmesine dair yöntem önerisi (An investigation of sound production in the Turkish musical instrument oud and a proposal for determining the design of stringed instruments from the aspect of their sound characteristics). Doctoral dissertation. Gazi University. Ankara, Türkiye.
  7. Dumond, P., & Baddour, N. (2012). Effects of using scalloped shape braces on the natural frequencies of a brace-soundboard system. Applied Acoustics, 73(11), 1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apacoust.2012.05.015
  8. Elejabarrieta, M.J., Santamaría, C., & Ezcurra, A. (2002). Air cavity modes in the resonance box of the guitar: The effect of the sound hole. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 252(3), 584–590. https://doi. org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3948
  9. Firth, I.M. (1977). Physics of the guitar at the Helmholtz and first top-plate resonances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(2), 588–593. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.381302
  10. Fletcher, N. H., & Rossing, T. D. (1998). The physics of musical instruments (2nd ed.). Springer. 387-21603-4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-
  11. Güler, M.U. (2022). Türk kültüründe udun tarihi kaynakları ve Tanzimat’tan sonra gelişen ud yapım geleneği (19–20. yüzyıl) (Historical sources of the oud in Turkish culture and the oud-making tradition that developed after the Tanzimat (19th–20th centuries)). Doctoral dissertation. Ege University. Izmir, Türkiye.
  12. Güler, M.U. (2025). Venedik Müzik Müzesi’nde “Avrupa lavtası” olarak sergilenen bir İstanbul çalgısı. Cihannüma Tarih ve Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.30517/ cihannuma.1619845
  13. Nia, H.T., Jain, A. D., Liu, Y., Alam, M.- R., Barnas, R., & Makris, N.C. (2015). The evolution of air resonance power efficiency in the violin and its ancestors. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 471(2175), 20140905. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspa.2014.0905
  14. Roohnia, M. (2026). Localized mass and stiffness effects on beam natural frequencies and modal node- antinode analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 257, 114552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ymssp.2026.114552
  15. Schleske, M. (2002a). Empirical tools in contemporary violin making: Part I. Analysis of design, materials, varnish, and normal modes. Catgut Acoustical Society Journal, 4(5), 50–64. https://www.catgutacoustical. org/journal/may02.htm
  16. Schleske, M. (2002b). Empirical tools in contemporary violin making: Part II. Psychoacoustic analysis and use of acoustical tools. Catgut Acoustical Society Journal, 4(6), 43–61. https://www.catgutacoustical. org/journal/nov02.htm
  17. Tavakoli Nia, H. (2010). Acoustic function of sound hole design in musical instruments. Master’s thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA, USA.
  18. Tufte, S., Hunt, S., & Hegarty, G. (2019). Investigations into the acoustics of the mandolin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(3_Supplement), 1751. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5101414
  19. Turan, Ö. (Ed.). (2025). Enstrüman yapımında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar: Post-zanaatkârlık ve hesaplamalı lutiyelik (Innovative approaches in instrument making: Post- craftsmanship and computational luthiery). Bidge Yayınları.
  20. Wang, L.M., & Burroughs, C.B. (1999). A tale of three violins: Comparison of radiation mechanisms measured with near- field acoustic holography. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(2_Supplement), 1328. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.426218