SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Embodied meaning and musical text in prepared piano performance: A semiotic-hermeneutic framework

Assem Zakirova(Kurmangazy Kazakh National Conservatory)0000-0001-8275-2641
Marlena Koilybaeva(Kurmangazy Kazakh National Conservatory)0000-0002-0539-5422
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the prepared piano in modern Kazakh music became not only an experimental technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article presents a text-oriented analysis of modern Kazakh music for prepared piano in the context of musical semiotics, hermeneutics, and intertextuality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was a complex semiotic system that combined national archetypes, the physicality of performance, and avant-garde aesthetics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the prepared piano in modern Kazakh music became not only an experimental technique.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:prepared piano · musical semiotics · Kazakh music

Abstract

The article presents a text-oriented analysis of modern Kazakh music for prepared piano in the context of musical semiotics, hermeneutics, and intertextuality. The study aimed to identify the features of the formation of the artistic text in the works of Daniyar Berzhaprakov Umai and the triptych of Roman Vlasov Shapqyn, Zhoqtau, Toi Bastar (Dala Dāýsy – “Voice of the Steppe”). The methodology combined semiotic, hermeneutic, intertextual, and analytical-interpretative approaches. As a result, it was established that the modern Kazakh school of prepared piano has formed a new model of musical thinking, in which timbre, gesture, silence, and bodily interaction with the instrument have become full-fledged carriers of meaning. In the work Umai, timbre modifications were associated with the mythological image of the goddess Umai and created a multi-level system of symbols. In the cycle Dala Dāýsy, a prepared piano was used to represent cultural memory and the ritual cycle of life, in which each part symbolized a distinct existential state: movement, grief, and rebirth. A comparison with the work of John Cage showed that Kazakh composers reinterpreted the avant-garde tradition by emphasizing the semantic richness of sound. It was concluded that the prepared piano in modern Kazakh music became not only an experimental technique. It was a complex semiotic system that combined national archetypes, the physicality of performance, and avant-garde aesthetics. The results obtained expanded the understanding of the development of non-European practices of prepared piano and demonstrated the specifics of the integration of local cultural codes into modern musical language.

🔖

Cite This Article

Zakirova, A., Koilybaeva, M., *, A. Z. (2026). Embodied meaning and musical text in prepared piano performance: A semiotic-hermeneutic framework. Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.12975/rastmd.20261436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Agawu, K. (2004). Review: Signs of music: A guide to musical semiotics. Music and Letters, 85(1), 144–146. https://doi. org/10.1093/ml/85.1.144
  2. Berzhaprakov, D., & Dzhumalieva, T. (2025). The role of timbre-modulation space in “Umai” by Daniyar
  3. Berzhaprakov. Central Asian Journal of Art Studies, 10(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.47940/cajas.v10i2.1018
  4. Cage, J. (1960). The perilous night: Suite for piano solo. Henmar Press.
  5. Chagas, P.C. (2025). Eero Tarasti: Signs of music. A guide to musical semiotics. Die Musikforschung, 56(4), 472– 474. https:// doi.org/10.52412/mf.2003.h4.5021
  6. Cohen,D.(2017).The significance of musical rules: A summary of selected principles of organization. In Music semiotics: A network of significations (pp. 47–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090801-5
  7. Cook, N. (2013). Beyond the score: Music as performance. Oxford University Press.
  8. Devdiuk, I., & Marchuk, T. (2022). Ukrainian modernist drama in the European context. Forum for World Literature
  9. Studies, 14(2), 343–356. https://www.fwls.org/ uploads/soft/220719/1-220G9145917.pdf
  10. Dimas, A., & Sugiharto, A. (2025). EEG analysis of emotional responses to classical piano music: Comparing professional pianists and non-musicians. Polygon: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 3(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.62383/polygon. v3i1.416
  11. Dougherty, W.P., & Sheinberg, E. (2023). Semiotics in music and musicology. In Bloomsbury semiotics volume 3: Semiotics in the arts and social sciences. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi. org/10.5040/9781350139398.ch-10
  12. Dunbar-Hall, P. (1991). Semiotics as a method for the study of popular music. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 22(2), 127. https://doi. org/10.2307/836920
  13. Flückiger, M., Grosshauser, T., & Tröster, G. (2018). Influence of piano key vibration level on players’ perception and performance in piano playing. Applied Sciences, 8(12), 2697. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122697
  14. Fonte, V., Pipa, L., Williamon, A., & Lisboa, T. (2022). Memorising contemporary piano music as described by professional pianists. Music & Science, 5, 205920432211329. https:// doi.org/10.1177/20592043221132932
  15. Giacosa, G. (2023). Musical meaning and the semiotic hierarchy: Towards a cognitive semiotics of music. Public Journal of Semiotics, 10(2), 16–39. https://doi. org/10.37693/pjos.2023.10.25325
  16. Gulyanitskaya, T. (2009). Methods of music science. Muzyka. https://www.klex. ru/20mg
  17. Hagen, A., & Mills, K.A. (2022). Rhythm in literary apps. Visual Communication, 147035722210780. https://doi. org/10.1177/14703572221078038
  18. Hatten, R. S. (2017). On metaphor and syntactic troping in music. In Music semiotics: A network of significations (pp. 87–104). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315090801-8
  19. Hatten, R.S. (2004). Interpreting musical gestures, topics, and tropes: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. Indiana University Press.
  20. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  21. Jiangan, Z. (2020). The methods on forming the worldview culture of future music teachers in the process of piano learning. Intellectual Archive, 9(2). https://doi. org/10.32370/ia_2020_06_18
  22. Keefer, D., Nattiez, J.-J., & Abbate, C. (1993). Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51(1), 91. https://doi. org/10.2307/431984
  23. Kharlamova, T. (2025). Musical text as a result of intercultural communication: Creolized texts in the works of Kazakh composers. Saryn, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.59850/ saryn.2.13.2025.222
  24. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. MIT Press.
  25. Lidov, D. (2017). Reflections on musical topics and musical character in performance. In Music semiotics: A network of significations (pp. 163–172). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315090801-13
  26. Mazzola, G., Park, J., & Thalmann, F. (2011). Oniontology: Realities, communication, semiotics, and embodiment of music. In Musical creativity (pp. 5–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24517- 6_2
  27. McFadden, G., & Ricoeur, P. (1978). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 36(3), 365. https://doi. org/10.2307/430446
  28. Molino, J., Underwood, J. A., & Ayrey, C. (1990). Musical fact and the semiology of music. Music Analysis, 9(2), 105–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/854225
  29. Nattiez,J.-J.(1990).Musicanddiscourse: Toward a semiology of music. Princeton University Press.
  30. Orazbek, M., Issina, B. K., Bugenova, L., Tleulessova, A. S., Amangazykyzy, M., & Seidullayeva, G. A.(2025). The Fantasy Genre and Mythopoetic Aspects in Children’s Literature: Based on Foreign and Kazakh Literature. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8782
  31. Orlov, G. (2015). The tree of music (2nd ed.). Kompozitor.
  32. Pihel, K. J. (2025). Music semiotics in a minor key: Deleuze and Guattari’s refrain and the musical topic. Sign Systems Studies, 53(1–2), 160–194. https://doi.org/10.12697/ sss.2025.53.1-2.07
  33. Reybrouck, M. (2020a). Music and the extended computational approach. In Musical sense-making (pp. 133– 157). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274015-7
  34. Reybrouck, M. (2020b). Music as epistemic construct: From sonic experience to musical sense-making. Leonardo Music Journal, 30, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/ lmj_a_01082
  35. Ricardo, M. (2020). Music, musical semiology, musicology: Contribution of the philosophy of complexity and musical heuristics. Journal of Fine Arts, 3(1), 16–24. https:// doi.org/10.22259/2637-5885.0301004
  36. Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
  37. Romero, B.M. (2016). Musical semiotics as a tool for the social study of music. Ethnomusicology Translations, 2, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.14434/emt.v0i2.22335
  38. Scott, D. (2017). The power of music. In Musical style and social meaning (pp. 235–254). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315090696-13
  39. Spurný, L. (2014). Czech music semiology. Musicologica Brunensia, 49(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.5817/mb2014-2-4
  40. Stepanova, O. Yu. (2020). Piano culture: Experience of conceptualization. Culture of Ukraine, 68. https://doi. org/10.31516/2410-5325.068.23
  41. Sterne, J. (Ed.). (2012). The sound studies reader. Routledge.
  42. Tarasti, E. (1994). A theory of musical semiotics. Indiana University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110885187.585
  43. Vlasov, R., & Berzhaprakov, D. (2024).Prepared piano in Kazakhstan: Concert recording. YouTube. https://www.youtube. com/watch? v=Ya0N4DCYTCY&t=692s
  44. Wang, C. (2010). Professional piano education in Chinese piano music culture. International Education Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n1p92
  45. Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Iida, F. (2024). Human-robot cooperative piano playing with learning-based real-time music accompaniment. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/ tro.2024.3484633
  46. Xiao, X. (2024). Sounds of war: Timbre and audiovisual strategies of embodying trauma in contemporary piano music. Humanities Science Current Issues, 2(82), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/82-2- 30
  47. Xiaopei, C. (2020). Piano performance style and piano music teaching. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38007/ ijeis.2020.010105
  48. Yahşi, F.E. (2023). Transfer of meaning from the educator to the student in piano interpretation within the framework of the constructionist perspective. Rast Müzikoloji Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.12975/ rastmd.20231122
  49. Yessetova, A., Atembayeva, G., Mashimbayeva,A.,Usenbayev,E.,Absatarova, G., & Janseitova, S. (2020). Semiotic signs and kui performing interpretation in the paradigm of the national concepts of Kazakh music pedagogy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6192–6199. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082257
  50. Zhou, C. (2025). Stylistic and semiotic analysis of modern Chinese piano performance. Semiotica. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem- 2024-0161
  51. Zhu, T., Fournier-S’niehotta, R., Rigaux, P., & Travers, N. (2022). A framework for content- based search in large music collections. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6010023
  52. Videos Video 1. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=Ya0N4DCYTCY&t=692s
  53. Video 2. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=Ya0N4DCYTCY&t=1727s