SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2021 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: Ek 1

Empathy and Sexism as Predictors of Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths in University Students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Çocukluk Dönemi Cinsel İstismar Mitlerinin Yordayıcıları Olarak Empati ve Cinsiyetçilik

Nilüfer Koçtürk(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6124-1842
Seval Kızıldag Sahın(ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3357-7186
Pages
172–186
Publication Date
2021-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multiple regression results show that there is a meaningful relation between CSA myths and sexism (benevolent and hostile dimensions) and empathy variables (R = .36, R2 = .13, p = .00).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) is one of the situations that can negatively affect the emotional, mental and social life of the child.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Multiple regression results show that there is a meaningful relation between CSA myths and sexism (benevolent and hostile dimensions) and empathy variables (R = .36, R2 = .13, p = .00).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, further studies may examine the effects of trainings about these variables on the embracing CSA myths.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çocukluk dönemi · cinsel istismar · mitler

Abstract

Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) is one of the situations that can negatively affect the emotional, mental and social life of the child. Myths that determine adults' perspectives on CSA may cause the child to experience a new trauma after sexual abuse. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether sexism and empathy variables predict childhood sexual abuse myths and whether CSA myths differentiate based on gender. Participants consist of students of a state university in Turkey. In this study, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, and Childhood Sexual Abuse Myth Scale were used to collect data. Multiple regression analysis method and independent samples t test were used for statistical analysis. Multiple regression results show that there is a meaningful relation between CSA myths and sexism (benevolent and hostile dimensions) and empathy variables (R = .36, R2 = .13, p = .00). The combination of sexism and empathy variables explains 13% of total variance in students’ CSA myths. Moreover, in this study, it was determined that women had fewer myths than men. These results suggest that prevention studies at an individual level are not sufficient to prevent child sexual abuse or treat victims appropriately, and it proves that studies on a social level is absolutely necessary. In this respect, further studies may examine the effects of trainings about these variables on the embracing CSA myths.

Özet

Çocukluk dönemi cinsel istismarı (ÇDCİ), çocuğun duygusal, zihinsel ve sosyal yaşamını olumsuz etkileyebilen durumlardan biridir. Yetişkinlerin çocukluk dönemi cinsel istismarına bakış açısını belirleyen mitleri, çocuğun istismar sonrası yeni bir travma yaşamasına neden olabilir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı, cinsiyetçilik ve empati değişkenlerinin çocukluk dönemi cinsel istismar mitlerini yordayıp yordamadığını ve ÇDCİ mitlerinin cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın katılımcıları Türkiye’de bulunan bir kamu üniversitesinin öğrencilerinden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada, veri toplamak için Toronto Empati Anketi, Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeği ve Çocukluk Dönemi Cinsel İstismarına İlişkin Mitler Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. İstatistiksel analiz için çoklu regresyon analizi yöntemi ve bağımsız örnekler t testi kullanılmıştır. Çoklu regresyon sonuçları, ÇDCİ mitleri ile korumacı ve düşmanca cinsiyetçilik ile empati değişkenleri (R = .36, R2 = .13, p = .00) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Cinsiyetçilik ve empati değişkenleri öğrencilerin ÇDCİ mitlerindeki toplam varyansın %13'ünü açıklamaktadır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada kadınların erkeklere göre daha az mite sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, bireysel düzeyde önleme çalışmalarının çocuk cinsel istismarını önlemek veya mağdurları uygun şekilde tedavi etmek için yeterli olmadığına ve toplumsal düzeyde çalışmaların gerekli olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu değişkenlerle ilgili eğitimlerin ÇDCİ mitleri üzerindeki etkileri daha sonraki çalışmalarda incelenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçtürk, N., Sahın, S. K., *, N. K. (2021). Empathy and Sexism as Predictors of Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths in University Students. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 13 Sayı: Ek 1, 172–186. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.958097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Abbey A, Jacques‐Tiura AJ, LeBreton JM (2011) Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behav, 37:450-464. doi:10.1002/ab.20399
  2. Aosved AC, Long PJ (2006) Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55:481-492. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4
  3. Boakye KE (2009) Culture and nondisclosure of child sexual abuse in Ghana: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Law Soc Inq, 34:951-979. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01170.x
  4. Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. Brown S, Harkins L, Beech AR (2012) General and victim-specific empathy: Associations with actuarial risk, treatment outcome, and sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse, 24:411-430. doi:10.1177/1079063211423944
  6. Brownmiller S (2013) Against our will: Men, women and rape. Open Road Media.
  7. Burt MR (1980) Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol, 38:217-230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
  8. Büyüköztürk Ş (2007) Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  9. Cossins A, Goodman-Delahunty J, O'Brien K (2009) Uncertainty and misconceptions about child sexual abuse: Implications for the criminal justice system. Psychiatr Psychol Law, 16:435-452. doi:10.1080/13218710902930234
  10. Cromer LD (2006) Factors That influence the believing of child sexual abuse disclosure (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon) Retrieved from: https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/2901
  11. Cromer LD, Freyd JJ (2009) Hear no evil, see no evil? Associations of gender, trauma history, and values with believing trauma vignettes. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy, 9:85-96. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01185.x
  12. Cromer LD, Goldsmith RE (2010) Child sexual abuse myths: Attitudes, beliefs, and individual differences. J Child Sex Abus, 19:618-647. doi:10.1080/10538712.2010.522493
  13. Diehl C, Glaser T, Bohner G (2014) Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behav, 40:489-503. doi:10.1002/ab.21553
  14. Dobash RE, Dobash RP (2003) Women, violence and social change. Routledge.
  15. Doğan T, Bayar Ö (2018) Çocuk cinsel istismarı: Geleceğin öğretmenleri ve okul psikolojik danışmanları ne kadar biliyor?. Journal of International Social Research, 11:571-581. doi:10.17719/jisr.20185537230
  16. Dörnyei Z (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Flood M, Pease B (2009) Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10:125-142. doi:10.1177/1524838009334131
  18. Foshee VA, Linder F, MacDougall JE, Bangdiwala S (2001) Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence. Preventive Medicine, 32:128-141. doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0793
  19. Finnilä‐Tuohimaa K, Santtila P, Björnberg L, Hakala N, Niemi P, Sandnabba K (2008) Attitudes related to child sexual abuse: Scale construction and explorative study among psychologists. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49:311-323. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00635.x
  20. Glick, P, Fiske TS (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol, 70:491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  21. Goodman-Delahunty J, Martschuk N, Cossins A (2017) Validation of the Child Sexual Abuse Knowledge Questionnaire. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23:391-412. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258469
  22. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB (2007) Statistics for the behavioral sciences (7. Ed.) Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
  23. Grubb A, Turner, E (2012) Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17:443-452.doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
  24. Hall GCN, Barongan C (1997) Prevention of sexual aggression: Sociocultural risk and protective factors. American Psychologist, 52:5-14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.5
  25. Hal GCN, Sue S, Narang DS, Lilly RS (2000) Culture-specific models of men's sexual aggression: Intra-and interpersonal determinants. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 6:252-267. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.6.3.252
  26. Hestick H, Perrino CS (2009) African-American undergraduates' perceptions and attributions of child sexual abuse. J Child Sex Abus, 18:61-77. doi:10.1080/10538710802584619
  27. Ige OK, Fawole OI (2011) Preventing child sexual abuse: parents' perceptions and practices in urban Nigeria. J Child Sex Abus, 20:695-707. doi:10.1080/10538712.2011.627584
  28. Jones ME, Russell RL, Bryant FB (1998) The structure of rape attitudes for men and women: A three-factor model. J Res Pers, 32:331-350. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2217
  29. Karasar N (2012) Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  30. Kassing LR, Prieto LR (2003) The rape-myth and blame-based beliefs of counselors-in-training toward male victims of rape. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81:455-461. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00272.x
  31. Kgalema L (2002) Victim awareness and trauma management in metropolitan police services. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. Retrieved from https://csvr.org.za/docs/policing/victimawareness.pdf
  32. Klettke B, Mellor D (2018) The effects of victim age, perceiver gender, and parental status on perceptions of victim culpability when girls or women are sexually abused. Violence Against Women, 24:650-667. doi:10.1177/1077801217717355
  33. Koçtürk N (2018) Çocuk ihmalini ve istismarını önlemede okul çalışanlarının sorumlulukları, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5:38-47. doi:10.21666/muefd.336170
  34. Koçtürk N, Kızıldağ S (2018) Çocukluk Dönemi Cinsel İstismarına İlişkin Mitler Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30:778-808. doi:10.14520/adyusbd.406626
  35. Long AD (2018) An empathy prime study of narcissism and rape myth acceptance among heterosexual college males (Doctoral dissertation, American University) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/2038516622?pq-origsite=gscholar
  36. Man-Ging CI, Böhm B, Fuchs KA, Witte S, Frick E (2015) Improving empathy in the prevention of sexual abuse against children and youngsters. J Child Sex Abus, 24:796-815. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2015.1077366
  37. Márquez-Flores MM, Márquez-Hernández VV, Granados-Gámez G (2016) Teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about child sexual abuse. J Child Sex Abus, 25:538-555. doi:10.1080/10538712.2016.1189474
  38. McMillan JH, Schumacher S (2006) Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Mendel MP (1995) The male survivor. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  39. Miller AK, Amacker AM, King AR (2011) Sexual victimization history and perceived similarity to a sexual assault victim: A path model of perceiver variables predicting victim culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 64:372-381. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9910-3
  40. Muller RT, Caldwell RA, Hunter JE (1994) Factors predicting the blaming of victims of physical child abuse or rape. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26:259-279. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.26.2.259.
  41. O’Donohue W, Yeater EA, Fanetti M (2003) Rape prevention with college males: The roles of rape myth acceptance, victim empathy, and outcome expectancies. J Interpers Violence, 18:513-531. doi:10.1177/0886260503251070
  42. Osman SL (2011) Predicting rape empathy based on victim, perpetrator, and participant gender, and history of sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 64:506-515. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9919-7
  43. Pereda N, Arch M, Guerra-González R, Llerena G, Berta-Alemany M, Saccinto E, et al (2012) Knowledge and beliefs on child sexual abuse by Spanish university students. Annals of Psychology, 28:524-531. doi:10.6018/analesps.28.2.148801
  44. Prince ER, Andrews SJ, Lamb ME, Foster JL (2018) The construction of allegedly abused children’s narratives in Scottish criminal courts. Psychol Crime Law, 24:621-651. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1399395
  45. Popović S (2017) Media role in supporting child sexual abuse myths and stereotypes: Content analysis of online CSA news and comments. In Child maltreatment & well-being: Contemporary issues, research & practice (pp. 62-63) Retrieved from http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?rad=885997
  46. Postmus JL, McMahon S, Warrener C, Macri L (2011) Factors that influence attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of students toward survivors of violence. J Soc Work Educ, 47:303-319. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900122
  47. Potts E. D (2009) Responding to reported rapes: A comparison of human services students' attitudes, knowledge, and counseling skills (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/305160597?pq-origsite=gscholar
  48. Russell KJ, Hand CJ (2017) Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and Just World Beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37:153-160. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.008
  49. Sakallı-Uğurlu N (2002) Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17:47-58.
  50. Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B (2009) The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91:62-71. doi:10.1080/00223890802484381
  51. Stermac LE, Segal ZV, Gillis R (1990) Social and cultural factors in sexual assault. In WL Marshall, DR Laws, HE Barbaree (Eds), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 143-159) Boston, MA: Springer.
  52. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  53. Tang CSK, Yan ECW (2004) Intention to participate in child sexual abuse prevention programs: A study of Chinese adults in Hong Kong. Child Abuse Negl, 28:1187-1197. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.06.008
  54. Totan T, Doğan T, Sapmaz F (2012) The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46:179-198.
  55. Truman DM, Tokar DM, Fischer AR (1996) Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape supportive attitudes and sexual aggression in dating situations. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74:555-562. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02292.x
  56. Xenos S, Smith D (2001) Perceptions of rape and sexual assault among Australian adolescents and young adults. J Interpers Violence, 16:1103-1119. doi:10.1177/088626001016011001
  57. Zafar S, Ross EC (2013) Perceptions of childhood sexual abuse survivors: Development and initial validation of a new scale to measure stereotypes of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Child Sex Abus, 22:358-378. doi:10.1080/10538712.2013.743955