SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Nitel Sosyal Bilimler / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Türkiye’de Ruh Sağlığı Hizmetlerine Erişim Sürecinde Damgalanma Deneyimleri: Dijital Platformlardaki Kullanıcı Anlatılarının Sosyolojik Analizi/ Stigmatization Experiences in Accessing Mental Health Services in Turkey: A Sociological Analysis of User Narratives on Digital Platforms

Ali Eren Demir0000-0003-3812-3519
Pages
126–133
Publication Date
2026-06-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methodological stance draws on Christine Hine’s interpretive approach to digital research, treating online narratives not as transparent reflections of social reality but as discursively shaped productions conditioned by platform cultures, anonymity norms, and the conventions of digital communication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the stigmatization experiences of individuals seeking mental health services in Turkey, analyzing user narratives collected from digital platforms through a sociological lens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The theoretical architecture of the study integrates three complementary frameworks: Erving Goffman’s foundational stigma theory, Bruce Link and Jo Phelan’s structural stigmatization model, and Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methodological stance draws on Christine Hine’s interpretive approach to digital research, treating online narratives not as transparent reflections of social reality but as discursively shaped productions conditioned by platform cultures, anonymity norms, and the conventions of digital communication.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ruh sağlığı damgalanması · dijital platformlar · nitel içerik analizi

Abstract

This study examines the stigmatization experiences of individuals seeking mental health services in Turkey, analyzing user narratives collected from digital platforms through a sociological lens. Stigmatization is conceptualized here not as a matter of individual prejudice or attitudinal failure, but as a structurally produced and institutionally reproduced process sustained by intersecting social arrangements, organizational practices, and digital infrastructures. The theoretical architecture of the study integrates three complementary frameworks: Erving Goffman’s foundational stigma theory, Bruce Link and Jo Phelan’s structural stigmatization model, and Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence. Each framework illuminates a distinct yet interrelated dimension of the multilayered phenomenon under investigation, allowing the analysis to move fluidly between interactional, structural, and dispositional levels of explanation. The empirical basis of the study consists of 847 user posts collected from Ekşi Sözlük, Reddit, and several niche forums including spanning the years 2018 to 2024. These platforms were selected for their capacity to represent distinct segments of Turkish mental health discourse: Ekşi Sözlük for its semi-anonymous, culturally embedded discursive culture and extensive archival depth, Reddit for its fully anonymous structure and comparative international perspective and the niche forums for their concentrated data on occupational stigmatization experiences. Data were analyzed through a six-phase thematic analysis protocol following Braun and Clarke’s widely adopted framework, combining inductive coding derived from the data with deductive categories anchored in theoretical literature. The methodological stance draws on Christine Hine’s interpretive approach to digital research, treating online narratives not as transparent reflections of social reality but as discursively shaped productions conditioned by platform cultures, anonymity norms, and the conventions of digital communication.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de ruh sağlığı hizmetlerine erişim süreçlerinde yaşanan damgalanma deneyimlerini dijital platformlardaki kullanıcı anlatıları üzerinden sosyolojik bir perspektifle analiz etmektedir. Damgalanma, bireysel tutumların ötesinde toplumsal yapılar, kurumsal pratikler ve dijital altyapılar tarafından üretilen ve sürdürülen yapısal bir süreç olarak ele alınmaktadır. Goffman’ın damga kuramı, Link ve Phelan’ın yapısal damgalanma modeli ile Bourdieu’nun sembolik şiddet kavramı, bu çok katmanlı yapının farklı boyutlarını aydınlatmak amacıyla bütünleşik biçimde kullanılmaktadır. Ekşi Sözlük, Reddit ve çeşitli niş forumlardan 2018-2024 yılları arasında derlenen 847 kullanıcı paylaşımı nitel içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, psikiyatriye başvuran bireylerin dört birbirine eklemlenmiş düzeyde damgalanmayla karşılaştığını ortaya koymaktadır: aile ve yakın çevrenin etiketleyici ve dışlayıcı tutumlarından oluşan toplumsal baskı, sağlık sisteminin performans odaklı işleyişi ve yapısal yetersizliklerinin beslediği kurumsal damga, e-Nabız gibi merkezi dijital sağlık kayıt sistemlerinin kariyer ve istihdam üzerinde yarattığı mesleki tehdit, bireylerin toplumsal önyargıları kendilerine yönelterek kendi deneyimlerini değersizleştirdiği içselleştirilmiş damga. Dijital platformlar ise bu süreçte hem damgalanmanın yeniden üretildiği bir zemin olarak hem de bireylerin deneyimlerini anonim biçimde ifade edebildiği, pratik bilgi paylaştığı ve dayanışma ağları kurduğu bir ara alan olarak çift işlevli biçimde konumlanmaktadır. Çalışma ayrıca dijital sağlık altyapılarının yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte Goffman’ın klasik “gizlenebilir damga” tipolojisinin dönüşümüne dikkat çekmekte, bireyin iradesi dışında kurumsal aktörlere görünür kılınan damgayı tanımlamak üzere “saydam damga” kavramını ve bunun politika önerisi olarak “dijital unutulma hakkını” tartışmaya açmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, A. E. (2026). Türkiye’de Ruh Sağlığı Hizmetlerine Erişim Sürecinde Damgalanma Deneyimleri: Dijital Platformlardaki Kullanıcı Anlatılarının Sosyolojik Analizi/ Stigmatization Experiences in Accessing Mental Health Services in Turkey: A Sociological Analysis of User Narratives on Digital Platforms. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.47105/nsb.1886519

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Aranda, A. M., Helms, W. S., Patterson, K. D. W., Roulet, T. J., & Hudson, B. A. (2023). Standing on the Shoulders of Goffman: Advancing a Relational Research Agenda on Stigma. Business & Society, 62(7), 1339-1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221148441
  2. Bourdieu, P. (2015). Pratik Nedenler / Eylem Kuramı Üzerine (H. U. Tanrıöver, Çev.). Hil Yayınları.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Charmaz, K. (2020). Experiencing stigma and exclusion: The influence of neoliberal perspectives, practices, and policies on living with chronic illness and disability. Symbolic Interaction, 43(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.432
  5. Choudhry, F. R., Mani, V., Ming, L. C., & Khan, T. M. (2016). Beliefs and perception about mental health issues: A meta-synthesis. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 2807-2818. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S111543
  6. De Choudhury, M., & De, S. (2014). Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14526
  7. Competiello, S. K., Bizer, G. Y., & Walker, D. C. (2023). The Power of Social Media: Stigmatizing Content Affects Perceptions of Mental Health Care. Social Media + Society, 9(4), 20563051231207847. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231207847
  8. Corrigan, P. W., Larson, J. E., & Rüsch, N. (2009). Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry, 8(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00218.x
  9. Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 1(1), 16-20.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (S. B. Demir & M. Bütün, Çev.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
  11. Goffman, E. (2014). Damga: Örselenmiş Kimliğin İdare Edilişi Üzerine Notlar (Ş. Geniş, L. Ünsaldı, & S. N. Ağırnaslı, Çev.). Heretik Yayıncılık.
  12. Hine, C. (2020). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003085348
  13. Hudon, A., Perry, K., Plate, A.-S., Doucet, A., Ducharme, L., Djona, O., Aguirre, C. T., & Evoy, G. (2025). Navigating the Maze of Social Media Disinformation on Psychiatric Illness and Charting Paths to Reliable Information for Mental Health Professionals: Observational Study of TikTok Videos. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27(1), e64225. https://doi.org/10.2196/64225
  14. Ipsos. (2024). Global mental health 2024. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en/global-mental-health-2024
  15. Lasky-Fink, J., & Linos, E. (2022). Improving delivery of the social safety net: The role of stigma (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4040234). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4040234
  16. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(Volume 27, 2001), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
  17. Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public
  18. Health, 89(9), 1328-1333. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1328 Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10
  19. Lupton, D. (2018). Digital health: Critical and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  20. Lyon, D. (2018). Gözetlenen Toplum Günlük Hayatı Kontrol Etmek (G. Soykan, Çev.). Kalkedon Yayınları.
  21. Mittal, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2023). Moral Framing of Mental Health Discourse and Its Relationship to Stigma: A Comparison of Social Media and News. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580834
  22. Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016). The future of mental health care: Peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067
  23. Naslund, J. A., & Deng, D. (2021). Addressing mental health stigma in low-income and middle-income countries: A new frontier for digital mental health. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 19, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100719
  24. OECD. (2024). OECD Health Statistics 2024. https://stats.oecd.org Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
  25. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  26. Pescosolido, B. A. (2013). The public stigma of mental illness: What do we think; what do we know; what can we prove? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512471197
  27. Saha, K., Torous, J., Ernala, S. K., Rizuto, C., Stafford, A., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). A computational study of mental health awareness campaigns on social media. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 9(6), 1197-1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz028
  28. Scambler, G. (2009). Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(3), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01161.x
  29. Starvaggi, I., Dierckman, C., & Lorenzo-Luaces, L. (2024). Mental health misinformation on social media: Review and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 56, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101738
  30. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Bilgi Sistemleri Genel Müdürlüğü. (2022). Sağlık istatistikleri yıllığı 2020. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı.
  31. Torous, J., Bucci, S., Bell, I. H., Kessing, L. V., Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Whelan, P., Carvalho, A. F., Keshavan, M., Linardon, J., & Firth, J. (2021). The growing field of digital psychiatry: Current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry, 20(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20883
  32. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. World Health Organization.
  33. World Health Organization. (2025). Mental health atlas 2024: Türkiye country profile. WHO. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/mental-health/mental-health-atlas-2024-country-profiles/turkiye.pdf
  34. Yilmaz, V., & Bilir, M. K. (2022). A rights-based critique of the Turkish mental healthcare reform: Deinstitutionalisation without independent living? Disability & Society, 37(6), 933-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1867072
  35. Zhang, Z., Reavley, N., Armstrong, G., & Morgan, A. (2025). Public disclosures of mental health problems on social media and audiences’ self-reported anti-stigma effects. Health Promotion International, 40(1), daae204. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae204