SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

The Effects of Peroxidase and Catalase Components of Pepper Genotypes on Phytophthora capsici Resistance

Biber Genotiplerinde Peroksidaz ve Katalaz İçeriklerinin Phytophthora capsici’ye Dayanıklılık Üzerine Etkileri

Muhemet Zeki Karipçin(Siirt Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü)0000-0003-2053-6286
Emre Demirer Durak(Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümü)0000-0001-5757-6332
Pages
65–71
Publication Date
2018-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In both inoculations, it was concluded that the enzyme contents of genotypes showing partial or complete resistance were also at elevated levels, especially the peroxidase enzyme content was specifically distinctive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, sixty landrace pepper genotypes were used to test the resistance to Phytophthora capsici.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CM 334 (Criollos de Morelos 334) P. capsici resistant genotype was selected as the control, and two inoculations were applied to all the materials evaluated for peroxidase and catalase enzyme contents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In both inoculations, it was concluded that the enzyme contents of genotypes showing partial or complete resistance were also at elevated levels, especially the peroxidase enzyme content was specifically distinctive.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biber · Phytophthora capsici · peroksidaz

Abstract

In this study, sixty landrace pepper genotypes were used to test the resistance to Phytophthora capsici. The CM 334 (Criollos de Morelos 334) P. capsici resistant genotype was selected as the control, and two inoculations were applied to all the materials evaluated for peroxidase and catalase enzyme contents. As a result of the first inoculation, genotype CM 334 and native genotypes 3 (P1), 13 (Urfa), 25 (UKST), 38 (UD), 48 (UKDT) and 57 (ANKSB) survived. As a result of the second (last) inoculation, only the CM 334 genotype survived and continued to form shoots. In both inoculations, it was concluded that the enzyme contents of genotypes showing partial or complete resistance were also at elevated levels, especially the peroxidase enzyme content was specifically distinctive. Peroxidase content of all genotypes showing resistance in the first inoculation was high, but catalase content was not very apparent in resistant and sensitive varieties. It has also been determined that P. capsici resistance appeared in the last stages of plant development, rather than in the initial stages of development. As a result of the study, it was determined that materials showing partial resistance even in the first inoculation, could be breeding materials and used in hybridization programs.

Özet

Yerel biber genotiplerinde Phytophthora capsici ’ye dayanıklılık amacıyla yürütülen bu çalışmada, 60 adet biber genotipi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada; kontrol olarak P. capsici ’ye dayanıklı CM 334 ( Criollos de Morelos 334) genotipi seçilmiş, peroksidaz ve katalaz enzim içerikleri araştırılan tüm materyallere iki inokulasyon uygulanmıştır. İlk inokulasyon sonucunda CM 334 no’lu genotip ve 3 (P1), 13 (Urfa), 25 (UKST), 38 (Uİ), 48 (UKDT) ve 57 (ANKSB) no’lu yerli genotipler ölmemiştir. İkinci inokulasyon sonucunda ise sadece CM 334 no’lu genotip hayatta kalarak sürgün oluşumuna devam etmiştir. Her iki inokulasyonda da kısmi veya tam dayanıklılık gösteren genotiplerin enzim içeriklerinin de yüksek seviyelerde olduğu, özellikle peroksidaz enzim içeriğinin belirgin bir şekilde ayırıcı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. İlk inokulasyonda dayanıklılık gösteren tüm genotiplerin peroksidaz içeriği yüksek olarak belirlenirken, katalaz içeriği dayanıklı ve hassas çeşitlerde çok belirgin olarak ortaya çıkmamıştır. Ayrıca, P. capsici ’ye dayanıklılığın gelişmenin ilk evrelerinden daha çok, bitki gelişiminin son evrelerinde ortaya çıktığı belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, ilk inokulasyonda dahi kısmi dayanıklılık gösteren materyallerin ıslah materyalleri olabileceği ve melezleme programlarına dâhil edilebileceği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karipçin, M. Z., Durak, E. D., *, M. Z. K. (2018). The Effects of Peroxidase and Catalase Components of Pepper Genotypes on Phytophthora capsici Resistance. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.358705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Anonim, 2016. Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, (http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001), (Erişim tarihi: 05.12.2017).
  2. Black, L.L., Green, S.K., Hartman, G.L., Poulos, J.M., 1991. Pepper Diseases: A Field Guide. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, AVRDC Publication, pp. 54-56.
  3. Bosland, P., Lindsey, D., 1991. A seedling screen for Phytophthora root rot of pepper, Capsicum annuum. Plant Disease, 75(10): 1048-1050. Caverzan, A., Casassola, A., Brammer, S.P., 2016. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes involved in plant tolerance to stress. (Eds: A.K. Shanker and C. Shanker), Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants-Recent Advances and Future Perspectives, Intech Book, pp. 463-480.
  4. Desikan, R., Neill, S.J., Hancock, J.T., 2000. Hydrogen peroxide–induced gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 28(5): 773-778.
  5. Deverall, B.J., 1977. Mediation of Host-Parasite Specificity. Defense Mechanism of Plants, Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-110.
  6. Flor, H.H., 1971. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 9(1): 275-296.
  7. Gayoso, C., Pomar, F., Merino, F., Bernal, M., 2004. Oxidative metabolism and phenolic compounds in Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum infected by Phytophthora capsici Leon. Scientia Horticulturae, 102(1): 1-13.
  8. Gechev, T.S., Van Breusegem, F., Stone, J.M., Denev, I., Laloi, C., 2006. Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. Bioessays, 28(11): 1091-1101.
  9. Holub, E.B., Beynon, J.L., Crude, I.R., 1994. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization between isolates of Peronospora parasitica and accessions of arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 7(2): 223-239.
  10. Jebara, S., Jebara, M., Liman, F., Aouani, E., 2005. Changes in ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, guaicol peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in common bean nodules under salt stres. Journal of Plant Physiology, 162(8): 929-936.
  11. Jung, W.J., Jin, Y.L., Kim, K.Y., Park, R.D., Kim, T.H., 2005. Changes in pathogenesis-related proteins in pepper plants with regard to biological control of phytophthora blight with Paenibacillus illinoisensis. BioControl, 50(1): 165-178.
  12. Kim, Y.J., Hwang, B.K., Park, K.W., 1989. Expression of age-related resistance in pepper plants infected with Phytophthora capsici. Plant Disease, 73(9): 745-747.
  13. Lamour, K.H., Stam, R., Jupe, J., Huitema, E., 2012. The oomycete broad‐host‐range pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13(4): 329-337.
  14. Lee, B.K., Kim, B.S., Chang, S.W., Hwang, B.K., 2001. Aggressiveness to pumpkin cultivars of isolates of Phytophthora capsici from pumpkin and pepper. Plant Disease, 85(5): 497-500.
  15. Leonian, L.H., 1922. Stem and fruit blight of peppers caused by Phytophthora capsici sp. nov. Phytopathology, 12(9): 401-408.
  16. Mehdy, M.C., 1994. Active oxygen species in plant defense against pathogens. Plant Physiology, 105(2): 467-472.
  17. Ortega, R.G., Español, C.P., Zueco, J.C., 1991. Genetics of resistance to Phytophthora capsici in the pepper line "SCM‐334". Plant Breeding, 107(1): 50-55.
  18. Ortega, R.G., Espanol, C.P., Zueco, J.C., 1995. Interactions in the pepper‐Phytophthora capsici system. Plant Breeding, 114(1): 74-77.
  19. Palloix, A., Daubeze, A.M., Phaly, T., Pochard, E., 1990. Breeding transgressive lines of pepper for resistance to Phytophthora capsici in a recurrent selection system. Euphytica, 51(2): 141-150.
  20. Parra, G., Ristaino, J., 1998. Insensitivity to Ridomil Gold (mefenoxam) found among field isolates of Phytophthora capsici causing Phytophthora blight on bell pepper in North Carolina and New Jersey. Plant Disease, 82(6): 711-711.
  21. Pochard, E., Molot, P.M., Dominguez, G., 1983. Etude de deux nouvelles sources de resistance a P. capsici chez le piment: Confirmation de existence trois composantes distinctes dans la resistance. Agronomie, 3(4): 333-342.
  22. Sharma, Y.K., Davis, K.R., 1997. The effects of ozone on antioxidant responses in plants. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 23(3): 480-488.
  23. Sy, O., Bosland, P.W., Steiner, R., 2005. Inheritance of phytophthora stem blight resistance as compared to phytophthora root rot and phytophthora foliar blight resistance in Capsicum annuum L. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 130(1): 75-78.
  24. Şişecioğlu, M., Gülçin, İ., Çankaya, M., Atasever, A., Şehitoğlu, M.H., Kaya, H.B., Özdemir, H., 2010. Purification and characterization of peroxidase from Turkish black radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 4(12): 1187-1196.
  25. Tyler, B.M., 2001. Genetics and genomics of the oomycete–host interface. TRENDS in Genetics, 17(11): 611-614.