SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

Herbicide Resistance from First Reports to the Present Day: Global Trends and Integrated Weed Management Approaches

Okan Güzel(Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, Directorate of Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Department of Weed Science, Ankara, TÜRKİYE)0009-0008-8172-7725
Furkan Ulaş(Sivas University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Department of Plant Protection, Sivas, TÜRKİYE)0009-0002-3052-4457
Fırat Pala(Siirt University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, Siirt, TÜRKİYE)0000-0002-4394-8841
Hüsrev Mennan(Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, Samsun, TÜRKİYE)0000-0002-1410-8114
Pages
164–172
Publication Date
2026-07-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review aims to contribute to understanding the current situation regarding herbicide resistance and evaluating approaches to existing control methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Herbicides are among the most widely used methods in modern agriculture for controlling weeds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, herbicide resistance is recognized as a major problem that negatively affects agricultural production and yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review aims to contribute to understanding the current situation regarding herbicide resistance and evaluating approaches to existing control methods.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Resistance mechanisms · sustainable agriculture · monitoring

Abstract

Herbicides are among the most widely used methods in modern agriculture for controlling weeds. However, the intensive use of herbicides over many years, mostly with active ingredients possessing the same mode of action, has led to the emergence and rapid spread of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Today, herbicide resistance is recognized as a major problem that negatively affects agricultural production and yield. In this review, cases of resistance recorded in the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database (www.weedscience.org) were examined based on global data on herbicide resistance in weeds. The study evaluated the change in herbicide resistance over the years based on countries, modes of action, active ingredients, weed species, and crop plants; it revealed in which production systems and herbicide groups resistance is concentrated. The data obtained show that resistance to commonly used modes of action, such as ALS (Acetolactate synthase), EPSP (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate), and PSII (Photosystem II) inhibitors, is frequently reported in many countries and that resistance to multiple modes of action has developed in some weed species. Consequently, it is evident that relying solely on chemical methods to manage herbicide resistance is insufficient. Therefore, it is important to adopt integrated weed management approaches that combine cultural, mechanical, biological, and chemical methods. This review aims to contribute to understanding the current situation regarding herbicide resistance and evaluating approaches to existing control methods.

Özet

Herbicides are among the most widely used methods in modern agriculture for controlling weeds. However, the intensive use of herbicides over many years, mostly with active ingredients possessing the same mode of action, has led to the emergence and rapid spread of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Today, herbicide resistance is recognized as a major problem that negatively affects agricultural production and yield. In this review, cases of resistance recorded in the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database (www.weedscience.org) were examined based on global data on herbicide resistance in weeds. The study evaluated the change in herbicide resistance over the years based on countries, modes of action, active ingredients, weed species, and crop plants; it revealed in which production systems and herbicide groups resistance is concentrated. The data obtained show that resistance to commonly used modes of action, such as ALS (Acetolactate synthase), EPSP (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate), and PSII (Photosystem II) inhibitors, is frequently reported in many countries and that resistance to multiple modes of action has developed in some weed species. Consequently, it is evident that relying solely on chemical methods to manage herbicide resistance is insufficient. Therefore, it is important to adopt integrated weed management approaches that combine cultural, mechanical, biological, and chemical methods. This review aims to contribute to understanding the current situation regarding herbicide resistance and evaluating approaches to existing control methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güzel, O., Ulaş, F., Pala, F., Mennan, H. (2026). Herbicide Resistance from First Reports to the Present Day: Global Trends and Integrated Weed Management Approaches. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1885295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (64)

  1. Akhter, M.J., Jensen, P.K., Mathiassen, S.K., Melander, B., Kudsk, P., 2020. Biology and management of Vulpia myuros-an emerging weed problem in no-till cropping systems in Europe. Plants, 9(6): 715.
  2. Anonymous, 2026a. Pesticides Use Database. Faostat, (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP), (Accessed: 05.01.2026).
  3. Anonymous, 2026b. Herbicides Resistance Action Committee. (https://hracglobal.com/tools/2024-hrac-global-herbicide-moa-classification), (Accessed: 05. 01.2026).
  4. Ateş, E., Süer, İ.E., Üremiş, İ., Tursun, N., 2024. Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) resistance to tribenuron methyl in wheat fields of Diyarbakır province, Türkiye. Plant Protection Bulletin, 64(3): 45-51.
  5. Bahadur, S., Verma, S.K., Prasad, S.K., Madane, A.J., Maurya, S.P., Gaurav, V.K.V., Sihag, S.K., 2015. Eco-friendly weed management for sustainable crop production-A review. Journal Crop and Weed, 11(1): 181-189.
  6. Bajwa, A.A., Khan, M.J., Bhowmik, P.C., Walsh, M., Chauhan, B.S., 2019. Sustainable weed management. In: M. Farooq and M. Pisante (Eds.), Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 249-286.
  7. Baucom, R.S., 2016. The remarkable repeated evolution of herbicide resistance. American Journal of Botany, 103(2): 181-183.
  8. Beckie, H.J., 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices. Weed Technology, 20(3): 793-814.
  9. Bhullar, M.S., Kaur,S., Kaur,T., Jhala, A.J., 2015. Integrated weed management in potato using straw mulch and atrazine. HortTechnology, 25(3): 335-339.
  10. Boylu, D., Kaya Altop, E., 2021. Determination of Herbicides Resistance in Blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 24(2): 128-140. (In Turkish).
  11. Bybee-Finley, K.A., Ryan, M.R., 2018. Advancing intercropping research and practices in industrialized agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, 8(6): 80.
  12. Charles, D., 2001. Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
  13. Cordeau, S., Triolet, M., Wayman, S., Steinberg, C., Guillemin, J.P., 2016. Bioherbicides: Dead in the water? A review of the existing products for integrated weed management. Crop protection, 87: 44-49.
  14. Çil Turgut, N., 2023. Determination of the herbicide resistance status of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.), a problem in wheat cultivation areas of the Central Black Sea Region, and investigation of its germination biology. PhD Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
  15. Délye, C., Jasieniuk, M., Le Corre, V., 2013. Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trends in Genetics, 29(11): 649-658.
  16. Demirkan, H., 2009. Review of herbicide resistance cases in the world. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 46(1): 71-78. (In Turkish).
  17. Den Breeyen, A., Lange, C., Fowler, S.V., 2022. Plant pathogens as introduced weed biological control agents: Could antagonistic fungi be important factors determining agent success or failure? Frontiers in Fungal Biology, 3: 959753.
  18. Doğan, M.N., Kaya-Altop, E., Türkseven, S.G., Serim, A.T., 2022. Determination of glyphosate-resistant Conyza spp. in orchards and vineyards in Turkey. Phytoparasitica, 50(3): 567-578.
  19. Duke, S.O., Powles, S.B., 2008. Glyphosate: A once‐in‐a‐century herbicide. Pest Management Science: Formerly Pesticide Science, 64(4): 319-325.
  20. Esposito, M., Crimaldi, M., Cirillo, V., Sarghini, F., Maggio, A., 2021. Drone and sensor technology for sustainable weed management: A review. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 8(1): 18.
  21. Garrison, A.J., Miller, A.D., Ryan, M.R., Roxburgh, S.H., Shea, K., 2014. Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management. Weed Science, 62(1): 166-176.
  22. Gianessi, L.P., 2013. The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. Pest Management Science, 69(10): 1099-1105.
  23. Green, J.M., 2018. The rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate‐resistant crops. Pest Management Science, 74(5): 1035-1039.
  24. Gressel, J., 1984. Evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. In: D. Evered and G.M. Collins (Eds.), Origins and Development of Adaptation, Pitman Books, London, Ciba Foundation Symposium, 102, pp. 73-93.
  25. Gu, C., Bastiaans, L., Anten, N.P., Makowski, D., van Der Werf, W., 2021. Annual intercropping suppresses weeds: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 322: 107658.
  26. Güncan, A., 2016. Yabancı Otlar ve Mücadele Prensipleri (Güncelleştirilmiş ve İlaveli Altıncı Baskı). Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Konya, Türkiye.
  27. Hasan, M., Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S., Rosli, A.M., Hamdan, H., 2021. Bioherbicides: An eco-friendly tool for sustainable weed management. Plants, 10(6): 1212.
  28. Heap, I., 2026. The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Online, Thursday, July 2, 2026, (Available: www.weedscience.org).
  29. Hicks, H.L., Comont, D., Coutts, S.R., Crook, L., Hull, R., Norris, K., Freckleton, R.P., 2018. The factors driving evolved herbicide resistance at a national scale. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(3): 529-536.
  30. Kaya Altop, E., Erken Meral, S., Zandstra, B.H., Mennan, H., 2022. Target-site point mutation conferring resistance to ALS herbicides in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.). Phytoparasitica, 50(5): 1133-1142.
  31. Kaya‐Altop, E., Jabran, K., Pala, F., Mennan, H., 2025. Multiple resistance to EPSPS and ALS inhibitors in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) identified in Turkey. Weed Research, 65(1): e12618.
  32. Kewat, M.L., 2014. Improved weed management in Rabi crops. National Training on Advances in Weed Management, 32: 22-25.
  33. Khan, M.A., Ahmad, S., Raza, A., 2019. Integrated weed management for agronomic crops. In: M. Hasanuzzaman (Ed.), Agronomic Crops, Management Practices, Springer, Singapore, pp. 257-281.
  34. Lehnhoff, E.A., Rew, L.J., Mangold, J.M., Seipel, T., Ragen, D., 2019. Integrated management of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) with sheep grazing and herbicide. Agronomy, 9(6): 315.
  35. MacLaren, C., Storkey, J., Menegat, A., Metcalfe, H., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., 2020. An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(4): 24.
  36. Menguc C., 2018. Herbicide toxicity and alternative control strategies against to weeds. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 21(1): 61-73. (In Turkish).
  37. Mia, M.J., Massetani, F., Murri, G., Neri, D., 2020. Sustainable alternatives to chemicals for weed control in the orchard-A review. Horticultural Science, 47(1): 1-12.
  38. Moss, S.R., Naylor, R.E.L., 2002. Herbicide-resistant weeds. In: R.E.L. Naylor (Ed.), Weed Management Handbook, 9th Edn., London, pp. 225-252.
  39. Müller‐Schärer, H., Bouchemousse, S., Litto, M., McEvoy, P.B., Roderick, G.K., Sun, Y., 2020. How to better predict long-term benefits and risks in weed biocontrol: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 38: 84-91.
  40. Neve, P., 2007. Challenges for herbicide resistance evolution and management: 50 years after Harper. Weed Research, 47(5): 365-369.
  41. Neve, P., Barney, J.N., Buckley, Y., Cousens, R.D., Graham, S., Jordan, N R., Williams, M., 2018. Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: A horizon scan. Weed Research, 58(4): 250-258.
  42. Neve, P., Busi, R., Renton, M., Vila‐Aiub, M.M., 2014. Expanding the eco‐evolutionary context of herbicide resistance research. Pest Management Science, 70(9): 1385-1393.
  43. Ofosu, R., Agyemang, E.D., Márton, A., Pásztor, G., Taller, J., Kazinczi, G., 2023. Herbicide resistance: Managing weeds in a changing world. Agronomy, 13(6): 1595.
  44. Oerke, E.C., 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 144(1): 31-43.
  45. Peerzada, A.M., Bukhari, S.A.H., Dawood, M., Nawaz, A., Ahmad, S., Adkins, S., 2019. Weed management for healthy crop production. In: M. Hasanuzzaman (Ed.), Agronomic Crops, Management Practices, Springer, Singapore, pp. 225-256.
  46. Peterson, M.A., Collavo, A., Ovejero, R., Shivrain, V., Walsh, M.J., 2018. The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: A current summary. Pest Management Science, 74(10): 2246-2259.
  47. Powles, S.B., Yu, Q., 2010. Evolution in action: Plants resistant to herbicides. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61(1): 317-347.
  48. Radicetti, E., Mancinelli, R., 2021. Sustainable weed control in the agro-ecosystems. Sustainability, 13(15): 8639.
  49. Riemens, M., Sønderskov, M., Moonen, A.C., Storkey, J., Kudsk, P., 2022. An integrated weed management framework: A Pan-European perspective. European Journal of Agronomy, 133: 126443.
  50. Roslim, M.H.M., Juraimi, A.S., Che’Ya, N.N., Sulaiman, N., Manaf, M.N.H.A., Ramli, Z., Motmainna, M., 2021. Using remote sensing and an unmanned aerial system for weed management in agricultural crops: A review. Agronomy, 11(9): 1809.
  51. Scavo, A., Mauromicale, G., 2020. Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops. Agronomy, 10(4): 466.
  52. Sims, B., Corsi, S., Gbehounou, G., Kienzle, J., Taguchi, M., Friedrich, T., 2018. Sustainable weed management for conservation agriculture: Options for smallholder farmers. Agriculture, 8(8): 118.
  53. Sin, B., Kadıoglu, İ., 2021. Trp-574-Leu mutation in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) as a result of ALS inhibiting herbicide applications. PeerJ, 9: e11385.
  54. Süer, İ.E., Ateş, E., Tursun, N., Özaslan, C., Uludag, A., 2024. Current status of herbicide resistance of wild oats (Avena spp) in wheat fields in Mardin and Şanlıufa Provinces of Türkiye. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 21(3): 591-601.
  55. Switzer, C.M., 1957. The existence of 2,4-D-resistant strains of wild carrot. In: Proceedings of the 11th Northeastern Weed Control Conference, Columbia, pp. 315-318.
  56. Tanaka, K., Murata, K., 2017. Genetic basis underlying rapid evolution of an introduced insect Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Heritability of photoperiodic response. Environmental Entomology, 46(1): 167-173.
  57. Torra, J., Osuna, M.D., Merotto, A., Vila-Aiub, M., 2021. Multiple herbicide-resistant weeds and non-target site resistance mechanisms: A global challenge for food production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 763212.
  58. Tranel, P.J., Wright, T.R., 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: What have we learned? Weed Science, 50(6): 700-712.
  59. Türkseven, S.G., Uludağ, A., Demirci, M., Serim, A.T., 2022. Herbicide resistance in Avena sterilis subsp ludoviciana populations from the wheat fields of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46(6): 888-897.
  60. Usta, B., Karaca, M., 2021. A major problem in herbicide applications: Drifting. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 24(1): 39-48. (In Turkish).
  61. Westwood, J.H., Charudattan, R., Duke, S.O., Fennimore, S.A., Marrone, P., Slaughter, D.C., Zollinger, R., 2018. Weed management in 2050: Perspectives on the future of weed science. Weed Science, 66(3): 275-285.
  62. Yu, Q., Powles, S.B., 2014. Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: Current understanding. Pest Management Science, 70(9): 1340-1350.
  63. Zhang, W., Miao, Z., Li, N., He, C., Sun, T., 2022. Review of current robotic approaches for precision weed management. Current Robotics Reports, 3(3): 139-151.
  64. Ziska, L.H., Faulkner, S., Lydon, J., 2004. Changes in biomass and root: Shoot ratio of field-grown Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), a noxious, invasive weed, with elevated CO2: Implications for control with glyphosate. Weed Science, 52(4): 584-588.