Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 13 Özel Sayı

COMMODITY PRICES AFFECT EACH OTHER? ASYMMETRIC FREQUENCY CAUSALITY ANALYSIS

EMTİA FİYATLARI BİRBİRLERİNİ ETKİLER Mİ? ASİMETRİK FREKANS NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Melik Kamışlı(Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Bozüyük MYO)
Serap Kamışlı(Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Uygulamalı Bilimler YO)
Fatih Temizel(Anadolu Üniversitesi, İİBF, İşletme Bölümü)
Pages
1079–1093
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, short, medium and long term asymmetric causality relations between the commodities were determined

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The crises experienced in recent years have caused the traditional investment instruments to be questioned.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, data of oil, gold and silver prices between 16.09.200812.08.2017 were investigated by asymmetric frequency causality analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, short, medium and long term asymmetric causality relations between the commodities were determined
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Emtia Fiyatları · Asimetrik Frekans Nedensellik Analizi · Portföy Yönetimi

Abstract

The crises experienced in recent years have caused the traditional investment instruments to be questioned. This has led investors to focus more on commodities in portfolio construction process compared to the past. However, fluctuations in commodity prices, especially due to supply and demand, lead to the complication of the relations between alternative commodities. In this context, data of oil, gold and silver prices between 16.09.200812.08.2017 were investigated by asymmetric frequency causality analysis. As a result of this study, short, medium and long term asymmetric causality relations between the commodities were determined

Özet

Son yıllarda yaşanan krizler geleneksel yatırım araçlarının sorgulanmasına yol açmıştır. Bu durum ise yatırımcıların portföy oluşturma sürecinde emtialara eskiye oranla daha fazla yönelmelerine neden olmuştur. Bununla birlikte emtia fiyatlarında özellikle arz ve talebe bağlı olarak yaşanan dalgalanmalar ise alternatif emtialar arasındaki ilişkilerin karmaşıklaşmasına yol açmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada 16.09.2008-12.08.2017 tarihleri arasında petrol, altın ve gümüş fiyatlarına ait veriler, asimetrik frekans nedensellik analizi ile araştırılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda söz konusu emtialar arasında kısa, orta ve uzun dönemde asimetrik nedensellik ilişkileri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kamışlı, M., Kamışlı, S., Temizel, F. (2017). COMMODITY PRICES AFFECT EACH OTHER? ASYMMETRIC FREQUENCY CAUSALITY ANALYSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 13 Özel Sayı, 1079–1093. https://ajindex.com/articles/1220520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., & Ranjbar, O. (2016). Asymmetric causality using frequency domain and time- frequency https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.03.002 (wavelet) approaches. Economic Modelling, 56, 66 – 78.
  2. Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363 – 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
  3. Chang, T., Ranjbar, O., & Jooste, C. (2017). Stock Market Interactions between the BRICS and the United States: Evidence from Asymmetric Granger Causality Tests in the Frequency Domain. Iranian Economic Review, 21(2), 297 – 320. https://doi.org/10.22059/IER.2017.62105
  4. Ciner, C. (2011). Information transmission across currency futures markets: Evidence from frequency domain tests. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.02.010 Review of Financial Analysis, 20(3), 134 – 139.
  5. Ciner, C., Gurdgiev, C., & Lucey, B. M. (2013). Hedges and safe havens: An examination of stocks, bonds, gold, oil and exchange rates. International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 202 – 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.12.001.
  6. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057 – 1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
  7. Doornik, J. A., & Hansen. H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70: 927 – 939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x
  8. Geweke, J. (1982). Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 304 – 324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1982.10477803
  9. Granger, C. W. J., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden Cointegration. Department of Economics Discussion Paper 2002- 02, University of California, San Diego. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313831
  10. Hacker, R. S., & Hatemi-J, A. (2005). A test for multivariate ARCH effects. Applied Economics Letters 12 (7), 411 – 417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500092129
  11. Harri, A., Nalley, L., & Hudson, D. (2009). The Relationship between Oil, Exchange Rates, and Commodity Prices. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800002959. Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41(2), 501 – 510.
  12. Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric Causality Tests with an Application. Empirical Economics, 43 (1), 447 – 456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x
  13. Hosoya, Y. (1991). The decomposition and measurement of the interdependence between second-order stationary processes. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 88(4), 429 – 444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192551
  14. Lucey, B. M., & Tully, E. (2006). The evolving relationship between gold and silver 1978–2002: evidence from a dynamic cointegration analysis: a note. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2(1), 47 – 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17446540500426789
  15. Ma, Z., Xu, R., & Dong, X. (2015). World oil prices and agricultural commodity prices: The evidence from China. Agricultural Economics, 61, 564 – 576. https://doi.org/10.17221/6/2015-AGRICECON
  16. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75 (2), 335 – 346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
  17. Ranjbar, O., Chang, T., Nel, E., & Gupta, R. (2017). Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in South Africa: Asymmetric frequency domain approach. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 12(1), 24 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2015.1020120
  18. Reboredo, J. C. (2013). Is gold a hedge or safe haven against oil price movements?. Resources Policy, 38(2), 130 – 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.02.003.
  19. Sari, R., Hammoudeh, S., & Soytas, U. (2010). Dynamics of oil price, precious metal prices, and exchange rate. Energy Economics, 32(2), 351 – 362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.08.010
  20. Soytas, U., Sari, R., Hammoudeh, S., & Hacihasanoglu, E. (2009). World oil prices, precious metal prices and macroeconomy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.020 Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5557 – 5566.
  21. Wang, Y. S., & Chueh, Y. L. (2013). Dynamic transmission effects between the interest rate, the US dollar, and gold https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.052 oil prices. Economic Modelling, 30, 792 – 798.
  22. Yılancı, V., & Bozoklu, S. (2014). Türk Sermaye Piyasasında Fiyat ve İşlem Hacmi İlişkisi: Zamanla Değişen Asimetrik http://www.onlinedergi.com/makaledosyalari/51/pdf2014_2_5.pdf Analizi. Ege Academic Review, 14(2), 211 – 220.
  23. Zhang, Y., & Wei, Y. (2010). The crude oil market and the gold market: Evidence for cointegration, causality and price discovery. Resources Policy, 35(3), 2010, 168 – 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.05.003
  24. Ek-1: Asimetrik Frekans Nedensellik Sonuçları