SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4

SOCIAL CAPITAL MEASUREMENT IN TÜRKİYE: CREATING A SOCIAL CAPITAL INDEX ON A PROVINCIAL BASIS

TÜRKİYE’DE SOSYAL SERMAYE ÖLÇÜMÜ: İL BAZINDA SOSYAL SERMAYE ENDEKSİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Abdulmuttalip Pilatin(Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2293-2808
Pages
1031–1056
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main motivation of the study is to contribute to researchers by further expanding the social capital index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to expand the current social capital index of Türkiye covering the years 2007- 2018 for 81 provinces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the scope of the social capital index will be expanded to cover the years 2007-2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main motivation of the study is to contribute to researchers by further expanding the social capital index.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2007- 2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sermaye Endeksi · Temel Bileşen Analizi · Doğrusal İnterpolasyon

Abstract

This study aims to expand the current social capital index of Türkiye covering the years 2007- 2018 for 81 provinces. Thus, the scope of the social capital index will be expanded to cover the years 2007-2023. While creating the social capital index for Türkiye, the social capital index creation method obtained from 2 network and 2 norm variables used in many previous studies was used. For this purpose, principal component analysis was used. Index values for the years between 2019-2023 were derived by linear interpolation method. Among the index values created on a provincial basis, positive ones indicate a high social capital level, while negative values indicate a low social capital level. As of 2023, the number of provinces with positive social capital index values was determined as 46, while the number of provinces with negative values was determined as 35. When the index values were examined, it was determined that although there was no significant change over the years, the social capital levels of the provinces developed positively. Thanks to this index, social capital data on a provincial basis for Türkiye was created and long-term data set was provided to researchers. The main motivation of the study is to contribute to researchers by further expanding the social capital index.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin 2007-2018 yıllarını kapsayan 81 il bazında mevcut sosyal sermaye endeksinin genişletilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Böylece sosyal sermaye endeksinin kapsamı 2007-2023 yıllarına kapsayacak şekilde genişletilmiş olacaktır. Türkiye için sosyal sermaye endeksi oluşturulurken önceki bir çok çalışmada kullanılaniki ağ ve iki norm değişkeninden elde edilen sosyal sermaye endeksi oluşturma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla temel bileşen analizi kullanılmıştır. 2019-2023 yılları için endeks değerleri doğrusal interpolasyon yöntemiyle türetilmiştir. İl bazında oluşturulan endeks değerlerinden pozitif olanlar yüksek bir sosyal sermaye seviyesini gösterirken negatif değerler düşük sosyal sermaye seviyesini göstermektedir. 2023 yılı itibariyle sosyal sermaye endeks değeri pozitif olan il sayısı 46 iken negatif olan il sayısı 35 olarak belirlenmiştir. Endeksi değerleri incelendiğinde yıllar itibariyle önemli bir değişiklik olmamakla birlikte illerin sosyal sermaye seviyelerinin pozitif yönde geliştiği belirlenmiştir. Bu endeks sayesinde Türkiye’nin il bazında sosyal sermaye verisi oluşturularak araştırmacılara uzun vadeli bir veri seti sağlanmıştır. Çalışmanın temel motivasyon kaynağı sosyal sermaye endeksi daha da genişletilerek araştırmacılara katkı sağlamaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Pilatin, A. (2024). SOCIAL CAPITAL MEASUREMENT IN TÜRKİYE: CREATING A SOCIAL CAPITAL INDEX ON A PROVINCIAL BASIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4, 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1478800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
  2. Akar, T., & Ay, A. (2018). Sosyal sermaye ve inovasyonun ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 58, 105-126. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS421152.
  3. Akçomak S. İ., & Weel, B. (2009). Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review, 53, 544–567.
  4. Baker, W. (1990). Market networks and corporate behaviour. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 589- 625.
  5. Bourdieu, P., & Richardson, J.G. (Ed.). (1986). The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.
  6. Burt, S. R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. USA: Harvard University Press.
  7. Burt, S. R. (2005). Brokerage and closure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı; İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. (8. Baskı) Ankara: Baran Ofset.
  9. Cohen, D. & L. Prusak (2001). In good company, how social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  10. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Dasgupta, P., in Dasgupta, P. & Serageldin, I. (Ed.). (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington, D.C.:The World Bank.
  11. Davaadorj, Z. (2019). Does social capital affect dividend policy? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2019.02.010.
  12. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/ jci022.
  13. Dernekler Genel Müdürlüğü (tarihsiz). Dernek Sayıları. http://www.siviltoplum.gov.tr/dernek-sayilari sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2023
  14. Field, J. (2008). Social capital. London And Newyork: Rounlantge Taylor & Francis Group.
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
  16. Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development, Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.
  17. Glanville, J. L., & Bienenstock, E. J. (2009). A typology for understanding the connections among different forms of social capital, American behavioral scientist, 52(11), 1507-1530. https://doi. org/10.1177/0002764209331524
  18. Gönç Şavran, T. (2018). Sosyal sermaye ve sağlık arasındaki ilişki: Ampirik çalışmalar ne gösteriyor? Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 57, 53-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS413503.
  19. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. Journal of Finance, 63, 2557– 2600.
  20. Hanifan, L. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
  21. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Phil Trans R. Soc Lon. B., 359: 1435–1446.
  22. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  23. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House. Jha, A., & Chen, Y. (2015). Audit fees and social capital. Acc. Rev., 90, 611–639.
  24. Jin, J.Y., Kanagaretnam, K., Liu, Y., & Liu, N. (2019). Banks’ loan growth, loan quality, and social capital. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 21, 83–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbef.2018.11.004.
  25. Kaufmann, W., Hooghiemstra, R., & Feeney, M. K. (2018). Formal institutions, informal institutions, and red tape: A comparative study. Public Admin, 96, 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm. 12397.
  26. Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypothesis. Public Choice, 117(3–4), 341–355.
  27. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff: A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
  28. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. Eighth Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press. Marx, K. (1990). Capital I. St. Ives: Penguin.
  30. Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, London: Green and Coorparation.
  31. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  32. OECD, (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
  33. Paldam, M., & Svendsen, G.T. (2000). An essay on social capital: Looking for fire behind the smoke. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 339-366.
  34. Pejovich, S. (1999). The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets and Morality, 2, 164–181.
  35. Pilatin, A., & Ayaydın, H. (2022a). Social Capital Measurement in Turkiye: Creating an Index by Province. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 66, 235-259. https://doi.org/10.26650/jecs2021- 1033478.
  36. Pilatin, A., & Ayaydin, H. (2022b). The relationship between banks’ credit quality, credit growth and social capital: evidence from Turkish banking sector. Middle East Development Journal, 14(1), 133-170, https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2022.2074673.
  37. Pinto, P. R. (2012). Social capital as a capacity for collective action. 53–69 in Assessing Social Capital: Concept, Policy and Practice. UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
  38. Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its origins and the aplication in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1- 25.
  39. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320 - 1350.
  40. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton. USA: Princeton University Press.
  41. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
  42. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174.
  43. Routledge, B. R, & von Amsberg, J. (2003). Social capital and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 167-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00210-6.
  44. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.001.
  45. Rupasingha, A., & Goetz, S. J. (2008). US County-level Social Capital Data, 1990–2005. The Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, University Park: Penn State University.
  46. Sabatini, F. (2006). The empirics of social capital and economic development: a critical perspective. www.socialcapitalgateway.org/Sabatini sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2023
  47. Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, S., & Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Kahraman Ofset Matbaası.
  48. Smith, A. (1776). (1723-1790). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
  49. Subramanian, S. V., Kim D. J., & Kawachi, I. (2002). Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Urban Health, 79, 21–34.
  50. Şen, H., Çemrek, F., & Özaydın, Ö. (2006). Türkiye’deki İllerin SosyoEkonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11, 155-171.
  51. Tüysüz, N. (2011). Sosyal Sermayenin Ekonomik Gelişme Açısından Önemi ve Sosyal Sermaye Endeksinin Hesaplanması. Kalkınma Bakanlığı Yayın No: 2827.
  52. Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü (tarihsiz). Vakıf Sayıları. https://www.vgm.gov.tr/vakif-sorgulama/vakifsorgulama? Page=1 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2023
  53. Vatansever, F., & Doğalı, G. (2011). Comparison of Classical Interpolation Methods and Artificial Neural Network Approaches, 6 th International Advanced Technologies Symposium, Elazığ – Türkiye.
  54. Wahab, M.A. (2017). Interpolation and Extrapolation. Topics in System Engineering, Winter Term (2016/17).
  55. Winter, I. (2000a). Major themes and debates in the social capital literature: The Australian connection. Pp. 17 - 42 in Social capital and public policy in Australia, edited by Ian Winter. Melbourne: National Library of Australia.
  56. Winter, I. (2000b). Family life and social capital: towards a theorised understanding. Working Paper No. 21, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne. http://aifs32/ institute/pubs/winter4.html sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2023
  57. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.
  58. World Bank (2011). What is social capital?, www.worldbank.org, Permanent url: http://go.worldbank. org/K4LUMW43B0 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 2.01.2024.
  59. World Values Survey, 1981-1984 and 1990-1993 (ICPSR 6160). 1994. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
  60. WVS (tarihsiz). Dünya Değerler Araştırması. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2023.
  61. Yüksek Seçim Kurulu (tarihsiz). Milletvekili Genel Seçim Sonuçları. https://www.ysk.gov.tr/tr/milletvekili- genel-secim-arsivi/2644 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 2.01.2024.