SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Inquiry / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

THE FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND MOBILITY OF CORPORATIONS IN CONSIDERATION OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE’S AWARDS

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ HUKUKU VE AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ADALET DİVANI İÇTİHATLARI IŞIĞINDA TİCARİ ŞİRKETLERİN YERLEŞME VE SERBEST DOLAŞIM ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ

Sinan Can Konyalı
Pages
115–153
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study focuses on the examination of these problems in the light of Association Legislation and the decisions of the European Union Court of Justice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Normal 0 21 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} The freedom of mobility granted to natural persons in the European Union Association Legislation is also applicable to the member state legal persons as per the provisions in the Founding Treaty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purpose of these two rights granted to the legal persons is to increase capital flow and promote common market economy through the ablosihment of foreign – domestic corporation distinction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study focuses on the examination of these problems in the light of Association Legislation and the decisions of the European Union Court of Justice.
🔬Design:Olgu Sunumu
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Serbest Dolaşım Özgürlüğü · Yerleşme Özgürlüğü · Tüzel Kişilerin Tanınması

Abstract

Normal 0 21 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} The freedom of mobility granted to natural persons in the European Union Association Legislation is also applicable to the member state legal persons as per the provisions in the Founding Treaty. As a result, a commercial established in an EU member state can conduct commercial activities without any limitations in other EU member states. Freedom of mobility and establishment in legal persons is realized through the relocation of the corporation headquarters from one country to the other or through establishment of branches or affiliated corporations in other countries. Member states are obliged to refrain from legislating national legal provisions which restrict the commercial operations of foreign corporations in their country pursuant to the principle of freedom of movement and establishment. The main purpose of these two rights granted to the legal persons is to increase capital flow and promote common market economy through the ablosihment of foreign – domestic corporation distinction. However, the differences between member states' national legislation and the legislation regarding the conflict of laws lead to crucial problems in practice. This study focuses on the examination of these problems in the light of Association Legislation and the decisions of the European Union Court of Justice.

🔖

Cite This Article

Konyalı, S. C. (2017). THE FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND MOBILITY OF CORPORATIONS IN CONSIDERATION OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE’S AWARDS. International Journal of Social Inquiry, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 115–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/1209651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Aygül, Musa (2007), Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Şirketlere Uygulanacak Hukukun Tespiti. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  2. Aygül, Musa (2016), “Avrupa Birliği Şirketler Hukuku”, Özkan, Işıl; Süral, Ceyda; Tütüncübaşı, Uğur (Der.). Avrupa Birliği Devletler Özel Hukuku, Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi.
  3. Ansay, Tuğrul (2003), “Yabancı Şirketlerin Serbest Yerleşimi ve Tanınması”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 23 (1-2), 1-18. http://www.journals.istanbul.edu.tr/iumhmohb/article/download/1019002715/1019002304 (Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2017).
  4. Çelikel, Aysel; Erdem, B. Bahadır (2014), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  5. Doğan, Vahit (2015), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi.
  6. Ebke, Werner F. (2005), “The European Conflict-of-Corporate-Laws Revolution: Uberseering, Inspire Art and Beyond”, The International Lawyer, 38 (3), 813-853.
  7. Frost, Carsten (2005), “Transfer Of Company's Seat - An Unfolding Story in Europe”, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 36 (2), 359-387.
  8. Güngör, Gülin (2015), Tâbiiyet Hukuku. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları.
  9. Kara, Etem (2014), Avrupa Birliği'nde Şirketlerin Sınıraşan Hareketliliği. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  10. Michoudi, Theodora (2013), “Cross Border Mobility of European Corporations”, Master Thesis European Union Law, University of Amsterdam. http://dare.uva.nl/cgi/arno/show.cgi?fid=493267 (Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2017).
  11. Moroğlu, Erdoğan (2002), “Anonim Ortaklıkların Tabiiyeti ve Tanınması”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 22 (2), 413-419.
  12. Moustaki, Guy; Engammare, Valérie (2008), “Avrupa Birliği Şirketler Hukuku”, Çev. Sezgin Huysal, Ayşegül, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (1-2), 253-289.
  13. Nomer, Ergin (2013), Devletler Hususi Hukuku. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  14. Panayı, Christina HJI (2009), “Corporate Mobility in Private International Law and European Commuity Law: Debunking Some Myths”, Yearbook of European Law, 28, Oxford, 1-80.
  15. Poroy, Reha; Tekinalp, Ünal; Çamoğlu, Ersin (2014), Ortaklıklar Hukuku I. İstanbul: Vedat Kitapçılık.
  16. Reçber, Kamuran (2013), Avrupa Birliği Hukuku ve Temel Metinleri. Bursa: Dora Basım-Yayın.
  17. Roth, Wulf-Henning (2003), “From Centros to Ueberseering: Free Movement of Companies, Private International Law and Community Law”, Cambridge University Press, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52 (2), 177-208.
  18. Şanli, Cemal (2014), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk. İstanbul: Vedat Kitapçılık.
  19. Tamm, Ditlev (2013), “The History of the Court of Justice of the European Union Since its Origin”, Rosas, Alan; Levits, Egils; Bot, Yves (Ed.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law, Springer, Hague.
  20. TEKİNALP, Gülören (1976), “AET'de Tüzel Kişilerin Tanınması”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 42 (1-4), 309-322. Tekinalp, Gülören (1999-2000),”Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Ortaklıkların Merkezi Kriteri, AT Hukuku ve MÖHUK”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 19 (1-2), 909-921.
  21. 6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu Gerekçesi
  22. http://www.abgs.gov.tr
  23. http://curia.europa.eu/juris
  24. http://eur-lex.europa.eu
  25. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr
  26. TEKİNALP, Gülören (1976), “AET'de Tüzel Kişilerin Tanınması”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 42 (1-4), 309-322. Tekinalp, Gülören (1999-2000),”Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Ortaklıkların Merkezi Kriteri, AT Hukuku ve MÖHUK”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 19 (1-2), 909-921.