SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Inquiry / 2025 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

A Research Based On Bibliometric Mapping of Studies On “Maritime Terrorism”

“Deniz Terörizmi” Konulu Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Haritalandırılması Temelinde Bir Araştırma

Serdar Çukur(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1394-0934
Pages
514–535
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the basis of the study is to fill the literature gap and create a stepping stone for future academic studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study's primary objective is to comprehensively examine research on 'maritime terrorism'.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study yielded several conclusions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the basis of the study is to fill the literature gap and create a stepping stone for future academic studies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Deniz terörizmi · web of science · bibliyometrik analiz

Abstract

The study's primary objective is to comprehensively examine research on 'maritime terrorism'. The aim is to facilitate researchers' work. Data were accessed through the Web of Science (WOS) database, and analysed using the bibliometric analysis method and graphicalised using Vosviewer. This study yielded several conclusions. Firstly, WOS search using "maritime terrorism" revealed 403 works published between 1983 and 2024, covering various study types. The most common type of study among published works in 2010 was the article. Secondly, Md Saiful Karim (6) has the highest number of works among these works. Other, in terms of states, the United States of America ranked first among the states where the work was produced. Fourthly, English is the most preferred language, although many languages are used by authors when writing their works. Fifthly, among the indexes in which the works are published, SCI is the most preferred. Finally, among the keywords used in the studies, 'terrorism' ranks first. In addition, the basis of the study is to fill the literature gap and create a stepping stone for future academic studies.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, “deniz terörizmi” anahtar kelimesi ile yapılan çalışmaları detaylı bir şekilde incelemektir. Bu incelemede, “deniz terörizmi” konusunda çalışma yapan araştırmacılara kolaylık sağlanması hedeflenmektedir. Bu temelde, çalışmada yararlanılacak olan verilere ise Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanı üzerinden ulaşılmıştır. Bu veriler de bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi doğrultusunda analiz edilmiş ve Vosviewer yazılım programı kullanılarak grafiklendirilmiştir. Bu açıklamalar temelinde bu çalışmada bazı sonuçlara erişilmiştir. Bunlardan birincisi, WOS’ta “maritime terrorism” anahtar kelimesi temelinde yapılan tarama sonrasında 1983-2024 yılları arasında makaleden kitap bölümüne kadar çeşitli çalışma türlerinde yayımlanan 403 esere ulaşılmıştır. Bu eserler özelinde bu yıllar arasında en fazla eser 2010’da yayımlanmışken, eserler arasında sayısal olarak en fazla çalışma türünün makale olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İkincisi, bu eserler arasında en fazla esere, Md Saiful Karim (6) sahiptir. Diğeri, devletler noktasında eserin yapıldığı devletlerde ilk sırada Amerika Birleşik Devletleri bulunmaktadır. Dördüncüsü, eserlerin yazılması noktasında yazarlar tarafından birçok dil kullanılmasına rağmen, en fazla tercih edilen dil, İngilizce’dir. Beşincisi, eserlerin yayımlandığı endeksler arasında en çok SCI tercih edilmektedir. Sonuncusu ise eserlerde kullanılan anahtar kelimeler arasında ilk sırada “terrorism” vardır. Ayrıca çalışmanın oluşturulmasının temelinde ise literatürdeki boşluğun doldurulması ve gelecekte yapılacabilecek olan akademik çalışmalara basamak oluşturmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çukur, S. (2025). A Research Based On Bibliometric Mapping of Studies On “Maritime Terrorism”. International Journal of Social Inquiry, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 514–535. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1613852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. An, B. vd. (2012). Protect — a deployed game‐theoretic system for strategic security allocation for the united states coast guard. AI Magazine, 33(4), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v33i4.2401
  2. Aswani, R., vd. (2021). Is geopolitics a threat for offshore wind energy? A case of Indian Ocean Region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 32683-32694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12779-z
  3. Bakshi, N., & Gans, N. (2010). Securing the containerized supply chain: Analysis of government incentives for private investment. Management Science, 56(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1105
  4. Blettler, M. C. M. vd. (2018). Freshwater plastic pollution: Recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps. Water Research, 143, 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.015
  5. Bowen, C. vd. (2014). Maritime tourism and terrorism: Customer perceptions of the potential terrorist threat to cruise shipping. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(7), 610-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.743973
  6. Bueger, C., & Liebetrau, T. (2021). Protecting hidden infrastructure: The security politics of the global submarine data cable network. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(3), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1907129
  7. Cho, J. vd. (2015). Safety and security management with unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) in oil and gas industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.290
  8. Dang, J., & Motohashi, K. (2015). Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review, 35, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.03.012
  9. Del Giudice, V. (1985). Piracy siege mirrors 1961 case—UPI Archives. UPI. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/10/08/Piracy-siege-mirrors-1961-case/2309497592000/
  10. Denton, G. L., & Harris, J. R. (2021). The impact of illegal fishing on maritime piracy: Evidence from west africa. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(11), 938-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1594660
  11. Donthu, N. vd. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  12. Dornik, E. vd. (2005). Nursing education in Slovenia and its impact on nurses publishing in their professional journal. Nurse Education Today, 25(3), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.005
  13. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M., & Bondaroff, T. N. P. (2014). From advocacy to confrontation: Direct enforcement by environmental ngos. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 348-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12132
  14. Evren, S., & Kozak, N. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of tourism and hospitality related articles published in Turkey. Anatolia, 25(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2013.824906
  15. Fabe, A. P. (2013). The cost of terrorism: Bombings by the abu sayyaf group in the philippines. Philippine Sociological Review, 61(1), 229-250.
  16. Fu, X. vd. (2010). The impacts of maritime piracy on global economic development: The case of Somalia. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(7), 677-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.524736
  17. Garima, & Sheokand, K. (2024). Social media and millennials: Visualising insights through bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Creative Communications. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586241293529
  18. Haacke, J. (2009). The ASEAN regional forum: From dialogue to practical security cooperation? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104057
  19. Haiquan, L. (2017). The security challenges of the “one belt, one road” initiative and china’s choices. Croatian International Relations Review, 23(78), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0010
  20. Halberstam, M. (1988). Terrorism on the high seas: The achille lauro, piracy and the IMO convention on maritime safety. American Journal of International Law, 82(2), 269-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203189
  21. Ho, J. (2009). Combating piracy and armed robbery in Asia: The ReCAAP information sharing centre (isc). Marine Policy, 33(2), 432-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.08.007
  22. Hoh, A. (2019). China’s belt and road initiative in central asia and the middle east. Digest of Middle East Studies, 28(2), 241-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12191
  23. Hong, N., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2010). The international legal instruments in addressing piracy and maritime terrorism: A critical review. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.007
  24. International Crisis Group. (2004). Southern philippines backgrounder: Terrorism and the peace process. (ss. 1-43).
  25. Jablonski, R. S., & Oliver, S. (2013). The political economy of plunder: Economic opportunity and modern piracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(4), 682-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712448907
  26. Karim, Md S., (2017).The international law of maritime terrorism. Md S. Karim (Ed.). In Maritime Terrorism and the Role of Judicial Institutions in the International Legal Order (ss.39-66). Brill.
  27. Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370108
  28. King, J. (2005). The security of merchant shipping. Marine Policy, 29(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.04.006
  29. Kotcharin, S., & Maneenop, S. (2020). Geopolitical risk and corporate cash holdings in the shipping industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101862
  30. Krapels, K. vd. (2007). Midwave infrared and visible sensor performance modeling: Small craft identification discrimination criteria for maritime security. Applied Optics, 46(30), 7345-7353 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.007345
  31. Lee, C., & Sohn, D. (2016). Mapping the social capital research in communication: A bibliometric analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(4), 728-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015610074
  32. Li, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946
  33. Lorenz, A. J. (2007). The Threat of Maritime Terrorism to Israel. Maritime Terrorism Research Center. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e543b91d3840002ea68265c7a289ab6dd4091ed8
  34. Martínez-López, F. J. vd. (2018). Fifty years of the european journal of marketing: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 439-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
  35. Meerow, S. vd. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
  36. Meng, L. vd. (2018). Determining the optimal location of terror response facilities under the risk of disruption. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(2), 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2697965
  37. Mercogliano, S. R. (2017). Fourth arm of defense: Sealift and maritime logistics in the vietnam war. United States Government Printing Office.
  38. Nguyen, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Prioritizing operational risks in container shipping systems by using cognitive assessment technique. Maritime Business Review, 3(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-11-2017-0029
  39. Pallardy, R. (2024). Achille Lauro hijacking. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Achille-Lauro-hijacking
  40. Paul, J. A., & Maloni, M. J. (2010). Modeling the effects of port disasters. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 12(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.2
  41. Roach, J. A. (2004). Initiatives to enhance maritime security at sea. Marine Policy, 28(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2003.10.010
  42. Rosenberg, D., & Chung, C. (2008). Maritime security in the South China Sea: Coordinating coastal and user state priorities. Ocean Development & International Law, 39(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320701641602
  43. Senarak, C. (2021). Port cybersecurity and threat: A structural model for prevention and policy development. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.05.001
  44. Shahir, H. Y. vd. (2014). Maritime situation analysis: A multi-vessel interaction and anomaly detection framework. IEEE Joint Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1109/JISIC.2014.36
  45. Sharma, P. vd. (2021). Journal of teaching in travel &tourism: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21(2), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2020.1845283
  46. Shortland, A., & Vothknecht, M. (2011). Combating “maritime terrorism” off the coast of Somalia. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.03.004
  47. Sicard, B. vd. (2001). Risk Propensity Assessment in Military Special Operations. Military Medicine, 166(10), 871-874. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/166.10.871
  48. Sugito, S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of transformative learning research: Trends and developments from 1992 to 2023. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411092
  49. Tamphu, S. vd. (2024). Building bridges to the future of learning: Exploring artificial intelligence research using R-Studio assisted bibliometrics. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2417623. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2417623
  50. Wan, C. vd. (2022). Evaluating recovery strategies for the disruptions in liner shipping networks: A resilience approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(2), 389-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2021-0263
  51. Wang, H. vd. (2012). Global urbanization research from 1991 to 2009: A systematic research review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(3-4), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.006
  52. Yang, Z. L. vd. (2010). Facilitating uncertainty treatment in the risk assessment of container supply chains. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 9(2), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2010.11020233
  53. Yang, Z. L. vd. (2009). Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis, 29(1), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01158.x
  54. Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016