SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 42 Sayı: 4

Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty results in patients with proximal hypospadias

Yasin Aydoğmuş
Arif Aydın
Tolga Karakan
Mümtaz Dadalı
Şahin Bağbancı
Mücahit Kabar
Melih Sunay
Ahmet Hasçiçek
Erim Ersoy
R. Cankon Germiyanoğlu
Pages
455–458
Publication Date
2016-01-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall success rate was 45.5% after the first repair.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective : To evaluate the results of the patients with primary proximal hypospadias repaired by “tubularized incised plate” urethroplasty (TIPU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty-three patients who were operated with TIPU technique in our clinic between 2003-2011 for primary hypospadias with proximal penile and penoscrotal meatus were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall success rate was 45.5% after the first repair.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2003-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Proksimal · hipospadyas · tübülarize insize plate üretroplasti

Özet

Objective : To evaluate the results of the patients with primary proximal hypospadias repaired by “tubularized incised plate” urethroplasty (TIPU). Methods: Thirty-three patients who were operated with TIPU technique in our clinic between 2003-2011 for primary hypospadias with proximal penile and penoscrotal meatus were retrospectively evaluated. Evaluation of the success in this study was, “voiding without fistula”. Results: Mean age was 6.82±3.07 (1-13). Fifteen patients (45.4%) had penoscrotal and 18 patients (54.6%) had proximal penil meatus. Postoperative success was evaluated with direct vision of voiding at the time of un-catheterization, 2 weeks and 6 months after un-catheterization. Success rates were 5/15 and 10/18 after the first repair in the level penoscrotal and proximal penil, respectively. Overall success rate was 45.5% after the first repair. Patients with urethral fistula after first repair were undergone second repair, success rates were increased to 9/15 and 16/18 in the levels of penoscrotal and proximal penil, respectively. Overall success rate after second repair was 75.8%. Conclusion: TIPU may be confidently applied for the patients with proximal hypopadias in experienced clinics, if there is not an uretral cordi or/and abnormality in the development of urethral plate. Key words: Proximal, hypospadias, tubularize incised plate urethroplasty

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydoğmuş, Y., Aydın, A., Karakan, T., Dadalı, M., Bağbancı, Ş., Kabar, M., Sunay, M., Hasçiçek, A., Ersoy, E., Germiyanoğlu, R. C. (2016). Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty results in patients with proximal hypospadias. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 4, 455–458. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2015.04.0608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994;151:464-465.
  2. Guralnick L, al-Shammari A, Williot PE, et al. Outcome of
  3. hypospadias repair using the tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty.
  4. Can J Urol 2000;7:986-991.
  5. Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G, et al. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: results of a multicenter experience. J Urol 1996;156:839-841.
  6. Yang SS, Chen SC, Hsieh CH, et al. Reoperative Snodgrass procedure. J Urol 2001;166:2342-2345.
  7. Backus LH, Defelice CA. Hypospadias-then and now. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1960;25:146-160.
  8. King L.R. Hypospadias--a one-stage repair without skin graft based on a new principle: chordee is sometimes produced by the skin alone. J Urol 1970;103:660-662.
  9. Nesbit RM. Operation for correction of distal penile ventral
  10. curvature with or without hypospadias. J Urol 1967;97:720-722.
  11. Sadlowski RW, Belman AB, King LR. Further experience with one-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol 1974;112:677-680.
  12. Kass EJ, Chung K. Glanuloplasty and in situ tubularization of the urethral plate: long-term followup. J Urol 2000;164:991-993.
  13. van Horn AC, Kass EJ. Glanuloplasty and in situ tubularization
  14. of the urethral plate: a simple reliable technique for the majority of boys with hypospadias. J Urol 1995;154:1505-1507.
  15. Bleustein CB., Esposito MP., Soslow, R. A. et al. Mechanism of healing following the Snodgrass repair. J Urol 2001;165:277-279.
  16. Genc A, Taneli C, Gunsar C, et al. Histopathological evaluation
  17. of the urethra after the Snodgrass operation: an experimental
  18. study in rabbits. BJU Int 2002;90:950-952.
  19. Snodgrass WT. Hypospadias. In: McDougal, W. S, Wein A. J, Kavoussi L. R. et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology 10th Edition Review: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011:3503-3536.
  20. Chen SC, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, et al. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int 2000;86:1050-1053.
  21. Borer J. G, Bauer S. B, Peters C. A. et al. Tubularized incised
  22. plate urethroplasty: expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias. J Urol 2001;165:581-585.
  23. Mustafa M, Wadie BS, Abol-Enein H. Dorsal dartos flap in Snodgrass hypospadias repair: how to use it? Urol Int 2008;81:215-217.
  24. Mustafa M, Wadie B.S, Abol-Enein H. Standard Snodgrass
  25. technique in conjunction with double-layer covering of the
  26. neourethra with dorsal dartos flap is the therapy of first
  27. choice for hypospadias. Int Urol Nephrol 2008;40:573-576.
  28. Braga L H, Pippi Salle, J L Lorenzo A. J. et al. Comparative
  29. analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J Urol 2007;178:1451-1456.
  30. Snodgrass W, Yucel S. Tubularized incised plate for mid shaft
  31. and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 2007;177:698-702.
  32. Zeytun H, Yiğiter M, Salman AB. The comparison of results
  33. of our surgical techniques in the hypospadias treatment; a retrospective study. Dicle Med J 2013;40:269-274.