SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

Karbon Emisyonları ve Makroekonomik Değişkenlerin Bankacılık İstikrarına Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Hakan Kum(NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7880-8355
Pages
65–91
Publication Date
2025-06-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bulgular, bankacılık sisteminin iklim kaynaklı risklere karşı direnç kapasitesinin artırılması yönünde politika yapıcılara öneriler sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışma, Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan piyasalar için politika odaklı öneriler sunarak iklim kaynaklı finansal riskler üzerine gelişen literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ayrıca, panel veri analizi kullanılarak karbon emisyonlarının Türk bankacılık sektörünün istikrarı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir.2005–2023 dönemine ait 20 büyük bankaya ilişkin yıllık veriler kullanılarak sabit etkiler modeli ve Sistem GMM yöntemi uygulanmıştır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bulgular, bankacılık sisteminin iklim kaynaklı risklere karşı direnç kapasitesinin artırılması yönünde politika yapıcılara öneriler sunmaktadır.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Karbon emisyonları · Bankacılık istikrarı · Dinamik panel veri analizi

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan piyasalar için politika odaklı öneriler sunarak iklim kaynaklı finansal riskler üzerine gelişen literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, panel veri analizi kullanılarak karbon emisyonlarının Türk bankacılık sektörünün istikrarı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir.2005–2023 dönemine ait 20 büyük bankaya ilişkin yıllık veriler kullanılarak sabit etkiler modeli ve Sistem GMM yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Analizde bankacılık istikrarı, üç temel gösterge ile ölçülmüştür: Takipteki kredi oranı (NPL), finansal istikrar (Z-Skor) ve varlık kârlılığı (ROA). CO₂ emisyonlarının NPL üzerinde pozitif, Z-Skor ve ROA üzerinde negatif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı etkiler yarattığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, GSYİH büyümesi bankacılık istikrarını artırıcı yönde; enflasyon ve döviz kuru oynaklığı ise zayıflatıcı yönde etkide bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, çevresel risklerin bankacılık istikrarı için bağımsız bir kırılganlık kaynağı haline geldiğini göstermektedir. Çalışmanın özgün katkısı, geleneksel makroekonomik belirleyicilerin yanı sıra çevresel faktörleri de dikkate alarak Türkiye örneğinde bankacılık istikrarını bütüncül biçimde analiz etmesidir. Bulgular, bankacılık sisteminin iklim kaynaklı risklere karşı direnç kapasitesinin artırılması yönünde politika yapıcılara öneriler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kum, H. (2025). Karbon Emisyonları ve Makroekonomik Değişkenlerin Bankacılık İstikrarına Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 65–91. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.1724029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. 350 Türkiye. (2023). Türkiye’de Bankaların İklim Değişikliği’ne Yaklaşımı. https://350turkiye.org/files/2023/10/turkiyedeki-bankalarin-iklim-degisikligine-yaklasimi_271023.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 05.03.2025
  2. Ali, S., Zhu, Y., & Javeed, S. A. (2023). The impact of macroeconomic indicators on banking sector stability: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Financial Stability, 68, 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfs.2023.101045
  3. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2012). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Economics, 34(3), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eneco.2011.04.004
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi. org/10.2307/2297968
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  6. Bandt, O. de, Kuntz, L., Pankratz, N., Pegoraro, F., Solheim, H., Sutton, G. D., Takeyama, A., & Xia, F. D. (2024). The effects of climate change‐related risks on banks: A literature review [Review of The effects of climate change‐related risks on banks: A literature review]. Journal of Economic Surveys. Wiley. https:// doi.org/10.1111/joes.12665
  7. BankTrack. (2022). Banking on Climate Chaos: Fossil Fuel Finance Report.
  8. Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3255
  9. Beck, R., Jakubik, P., & Piloiu, A. (2013). Non-performing loans: What matters in addition to the economic cycle?. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No. 1515.
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
  11. Bolton, P., Després, M., Pereira da Silva, L. A., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The green swan: Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Bank for International Settlements.
  12. Boudriga, A., Boulila Taktak, N., & Jellouli, S. (2010). Bank specific, business and institutional environment determinants of nonperforming loans: Evidence from MENA countries. Emerging Markets Review, 11(3), 252–267.
  13. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 462–468. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41558-018-0175-0
  14. Capasso, G., Gianfrate, G., & Spinelli, M. (2020). Climate change and credit risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121634
  15. Cárdenas, V. (2024). Managing Financial Climate Risk in Banking Services: A Review of Current Practices and the Challenges Ahead [Review of Managing Financial Climate Risk in Banking Services: A Review of Current Practices and the Challenges Ahead]. arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi. org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.17682
  16. Čihák, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Feyen, E., & Levine, R. (2013). Financial development in 205 economies, 1960 to 2010. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 1(2), 17–36.
  17. Climate Transparency. (2021). Turkey Country Profile 2021. https://www.climate-transparency.org
  18. De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496.
  19. Delis, M. D., & Kouretas, G. P. (2011). Interest rates and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(4), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.032
  20. ESRB. (2020). Positively green: Measuring climate change risks to financial stability. European Systemic Risk Board.
  21. Feridun, M., & Güngör, H. (2020). Climate-related prudential risks in the banking sector: A review of the emerging regulatory and supervisory practices. Sustainability, 12(13), 5325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12135325
  22. Feyen, E., Utz, R. J., Huertas, I. Z., Bogdan, O., & Moon, J. (2020). Macro-financial aspects of climate change (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9109). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9109
  23. FSB Financial Stability Board. (2023). Enhancing the resilience of macroeconomic policies to global shocks: A framework for action. FSB Publications.
  24. Garanti BBVA. (2023). Entegre Faaliyet Raporu 2022. https://www.garantibbvainvestorrelations.com/tr/ images/pdf/GBFR23_entegre_TR.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 14.03.2025
  25. Gasparini, M., & Tufano, P. (2023). The Evolving Academic Field of Climate Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354507
  26. Ghosh, S., & Kanjilal, K. (2016). Long-run relationship between financial inclusion and economic growth: Evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 45, 1–15.
  27. Goncharenko, N., & Shapoval, V. (2021). Eco-innovation financing as an element of a “green” economy formation in the globalization conditions of sustainable development. Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal, 2(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2021-2-3
  28. Handajani, L., Akram, A., & Rifai, A. (2021). Sustainable banking and bank performance. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 16(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2021.v16.i01.p12
  29. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
  30. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi. org/10.2307/1913827
  31. Hoque, M. K., Masum, M. H., & Babu, M. A. (2022). Impact of financial performance on green banking disclosure: Evidence from the listed banking companies in Bangladesh. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(2), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100209
  32. Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021). Carbon tail risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1540–1571. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa071
  33. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  34. International Monetary Fund. (2023). Global Financial Stability Report: Navigating a Fragile Economy.
  35. International Monetary Fund. (2024). World Economic Outlook: Navigating global volatility.
  36. Kamu Aydınlatma Platformu (KAP), Finansal Raporlar, www.kap.org.tr
  37. Kaya, A., Bilgin, M. H., & Yücel, F. (2020). Financial development and environmental quality in Turkey: A non-linear ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15260–15272.
  38. Kovacs, A., Tanaka, M., & Hertig, G. (2022). Banking on climate: Risk disclosure and the cost of equity. Journal of Financial Stability, 59, 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100998
  39. Kutan, A. M., Ozsoz, E., & Rengifo, E. W. (2017). Cross-border banking and transmission of banking stress: Evidence from Latin America during the 2007–2009 global financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 74, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.018
  40. Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.
  41. Nazlioglu, S. (2012). Exchange rate volatility and Turkish industry-level export: Panel cointegration analysis. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 21(5), 577–589.
  42. NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System). (2020). Guide for Supervisors: Integrating climaterelated and environmental risks into prudential supervision. https://www.ngfs.net
  43. Nieto, M. J. (2019). Banks, climate risk and financial stability. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 27(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-03-2018-0043
  44. ODI. (2023). Greening the Banking Sector in Turkey: Policy Gaps and Opportunities. Overseas Development Institute.
  45. Park, H., & Kim, J. D. (2020). Transition towards green banking: role of financial regulators and financial institutions. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180- 020-00034-3
  46. Prabhu, G. N., & Aithal, P. S. (2021). A review-based research agenda on green banking service practices through green CSR activities. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences, 6(1), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0165
  47. Republic of Turkey. (2021). Paris Agreement Approval Law, Official Gazette No. 31621.
  48. Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.
  49. Sadiq, M., Ali, S., & Bashir, M. F. (2021). Environmental risk exposure and banking sector stability: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(3), 1125.
  50. Sanderson, H., Irato, D. M., Cerezo, N. P., Duel, H., Faria, P., & Torres, E. F. (2019). How do climate risks affect corporations and how could they address these risks? SN Applied Sciences, 1(12), 1725. https://doi. org/10.1007/s42452-019-1725-4
  51. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907619
  52. Trinh, H. H. (2024). Performance and capital structure: Firms exposing to climate risks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4840278
  53. TSKB. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporu 2022. https://www.tskb.com.tr/uploads/file/tskb-efr-tr-kisaversiyon. pdf, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2025
  54. UNEP FI. (2019). Principles for Responsible Banking: Key Steps to Implementation. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative
  55. Weber, O., & Feltmate, B. (2016). Sustainable Banking: Managing the Social and Environmental Impact of Financial Institutions. University of Toronto Press.
  56. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
  57. World Bank. (2023). Global Economic Prospects: The Role of Credit in Economic Growth. World Bank Group.
  58. World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org
  59. Zhang, S., Xu, G., Shu, Y., Zhu, J., & Cheng, W. (2024). Comparing developed and emerging nations’ economic development with environmental footprint for low-carbon competitiveness. Heliyon, 10(14), e34039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34039
  60. Zhang, Y. (2023). Impact of green finance and environmental protection on green economic recovery in South Asian economies: Mediating role of FinTech. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(3), 2069–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09500-0