SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 42

Demand Regime of Turkey: A Post-Keynesian Econometric Analysis

Türkiye’nin Talep Rejimi: Post-Keynesyen Ekonometrik Bir Analiz

Anıl Bölükoğlu(NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0322-112X
Pages
163–180
Publication Date
2019-10-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, the demand regime of Turkey is found to be wage-led.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyse, from a Post-Keynesian perspective, how factor income distribution affects growth potential of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To do this, the study estimates Turkey’s demand regime between 1998-2018 by using quarterly data on the basis of the model developed by Bhaduri and Marglin (1990) and through the empirical approach of Naastepad (2006).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, the demand regime of Turkey is found to be wage-led.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Büyüme · Fonksiyonel Gelir Dağılımı · Post Keynesyen İktisat

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse, from a Post-Keynesian perspective, how factor income distribution affects growth potential of Turkey. To do this, the study estimates Turkey’s demand regime between 1998-2018 by using quarterly data on the basis of the model developed by Bhaduri and Marglin (1990) and through the empirical approach of Naastepad (2006). According to the results of the study, the demand regime of Turkey is found to be wage-led. In other words, positive effect of the expansion in consumption expenditures on economic growth triggered by increased wage shares is found to be greater than its contractionary effects on investment and export. According to the empirical results, it is argued that pro-labor economic policies would make positive contribution to economic growth in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı emek ve sermaye arasındaki gelir dağılımının Türkiye’nin büyüme potansiyelini nasıl etkilediğini Post-Keynesyen bir açıdan incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda çalışma Bhaduri ve Marglin’in (1990) geliştirdiği model temelinde Naastepad’ın (2006) ampirik yaklaşımı aracılığıyla 1998-2019 yılları arasında çeyrek dönemlik veriler yardımıyla Türkiye’nin talep rejimini tahmin etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre adı geçen zaman aralığında talep rejimi ücret çekişli bulunmuştur. Diğer bir deyişle ücret paylarındaki artıştan kaynaklanan tüketim harcamalarındaki genişlemenin büyüme üzerindeki olumlu etkisinin, yatırım ve ihracat üzerindeki daraltıcı etkisinden büyük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu ampirik sonuçlar temelinde emek yanlısı iktisat politikalarının ekonomik büyümeye olumlu katkıda bulunacağı ileri sürülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bölükoğlu, A. (2019). Demand Regime of Turkey: A Post-Keynesian Econometric Analysis. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 42, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.04.09

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992, Mart). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351. doi:10.3386/w3223
  2. Amadeo, E. J. (1986). Notes on Capacity Utilisation, Distribution and Accumulation. Contributions to Political Economy, 5, 83-94. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a035705Baum, C. F. (2006). An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using STATA. College Station: STATA Press.
  3. A.F. Aysan & Y.S. Hacihasanoglu (2007), “Investigation on the Determinants of Turkish ExportBoom in 2000s”, Working Papers 2007/19, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
  4. Bhaskar, V. & A. Glyn (1995), “Investment and profitability: the evidence from the advanced countries”, in: G. Epstein & H. Gintis (eds.), Macroeconomic Policy after the Conservative Era: Studies in Investment, Saving and Finance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 175-196.
  5. Baum, C.F. (2006), An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using STATA, College Station: STATA Press.
  6. Balcilar, M. & H. Bal & N. Algan & M. Demiral (2014), “Türkiye’in İhracat Performansı: İhracat Hacminin Temel Belirleyicilerinin İncelenmesi (1995-2012)”, Ege Academic Review, 14(3), 451-462.
  7. Bhaduri, A., & Marglin, S. (1990, Aralık). Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375-393. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035141
  8. Blecker, R. A. (2002). Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models. M. Setterfield içinde, The Economics of Demand-led Growth, Challenging the Supply-Side Vision of the Long Run (s. 129-152). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  9. Bowles, S., & Boyer, R. (1995). Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: an empirical investigation. G. Epstein, & G. Gİntis içinde, Macroeconomic Policy After the Conservative Era (s. 143-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Dutt, A. K. (1984, Mart 1). Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(1), 25-40. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035533
  11. Dutt, A. K. (1990). Growth, distribution and uneven development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Ederer, S., & Stockhammer, E. (2007). Wages and aggregate demand in France: An empirical investigation. E. Hein, & A. Truger içinde, Money, Distribution, and Economic Policy- Alternatives to Orthodox Macroeconomics (s. 138-140). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  13. Gollin, D. (2002, Nisan). Getting Income Shares Right. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 458-474. doi:10.1086/338747
  14. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1989, Aralık). Product Development and International Trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1261-1283. doi:10.1086/261653
  15. Günçavdi, Ö. & A. McKay (2003), “Macroeconomic adjustment and private manufacturing investment in Turkey: a time-series analysis”, Applied Economics, 35(18), 1901-1909.
  16. Hein, E., & Vogel, L. (2007). Distribution and growth reconsidered:empirical results for six OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(3), 1-33. doi:10.1093/cje/bem047
  17. Hunt, E. K., & Lautzenheiser, M. (2011). History of Economic Thought. New York: M.E.Sharpe.
  18. Jetin, B., & Kurt, O. E. (2016). Functional income distribution and growth in Thailand: A post Keynesian econometric analysis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 39(3), 334-360. doi:10.1080/01603477.2016.1202774
  19. Kalecki, M. (2010). Theory of Economic Dynamics: An Essay on Cyclical and Long-Run Changes in Capitalist Economy. New York: Routledge.
  20. Karagöz, K. (2010), “Determining Factors of Private Investments: An Empirical Analysis for Turkey”, Sosyoekonomi, 11(11), 9-26.
  21. King, J. E. (2002). A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
  22. Klump, R., McAdam, P., & Willman, A. (2007, Şubat). Factor Substitution and Factor-Augmenting Technical Progress in the United States: A Normalized Supply-Side System Approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 183-192. doi:10.1162/rest.89.1.183
  23. Krueger, A. B. (1999, Mayıs). Measuring Labor's Share. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 45-51. doi:10.1257/aer.89.2.45
  24. Molero-Simarro, R. (2015). Functional distribution of income, aggregate demand, and economic growth in the Chinese economy, 1978–2007. International Review of Applied Economics, 29(4), 435-454. doi:10.1080/02692171.2015.1016404
  25. Naastepad, C. M., & Storm, S. (2006). OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29(2), 211-246. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477290203
  26. Naastepad, C. M. (2006, Mayıs). Technology, demand and distribution: a cumulative growth model with an application to. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 403-434. doi:10.1093/cje/bei063
  27. Onaran, Ö., & Stockhammer, E. (2005). Two Different Export-Oriented Growth Strategies: Accumulation and Distribution in Turkey and South Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(1), 65-89. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2005.11052596
  28. Onaran, Ö., & Galanis, G. (2012). Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led? National and global effects. Conditions of Work and Employment Series(31).
  29. Onaran, Ö., & Galanis, G. (2013). Is Aggregate Demand Wage-led or Profit-led? A Global Model. M. Lavoie, & E. Stcokhammer içinde, Wage-led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery (s. 71-99). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  30. Pasinetti, L. L. (2000, Aralık). Critique of the neoclassical theory of gorwth and distribution. BNL Quarterly Review, 53(215), 383-431. 10 23, 2017 tarihinde https://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/PSLQuarterlyReview/article/view/9924/9806 adresinden alındı
  31. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. (A. Goldhammer, Çev.) Cambridge, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  32. Romer, P. M. (1994, Winter). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22. doi:10.1257/jep.8.1.3
  33. Romer, P. M. (1998, Ekim). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102. doi:10.1086/261725
  34. Rowthorn, B. (1981, Sonbahar). Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth. Thames Papers in Political Economy, 81(3).
  35. Solow, R. M. (1956, Şubat). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. doi:10.2307/1884513
  36. Stockhammer, E., & Ederer, S. (2008, Haziran 26). Demand effects of the falling wage share in Austria. Empirica, 35, 481-502. doi:10.1007/s10663-008-9069-0
  37. Stockhammer, E., & Onaran, Ö. (2004). Accumulation, distribution and employment: a structural VAR approach to a Kaleckian macro model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15, 421-447. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2003.07.002
  38. Stockhammer, E., Onaran, Ö., & Ederer, S. (2009). Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 139-159. doi:10.1093/cje/ben026
  39. Bhaduri, A., & Marglin, S. (1990, Aralık). Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375-393. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035141
  40. Bowles, S., & Boyer, R. (1995). Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: an empirical investigation. G. Epstein, & G. Gİntis içinde, Macroeconomic Policy After the Conservative Era (s. 143-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Dutt, A. K. (1990). Growth, distribution and uneven development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Naastepad, C. M., & Storm, S. (2006). OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29(2), 211-246. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477290203
  43. Onaran, Ö., & Stockhammer, E. (2005). Two Different Export-Oriented Growth Strategies: Accumulation and Distribution in Turkey and South Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(1), 65-89. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2005.11052596