SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2026 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64

The Mediating Role of Online Trust and Perceived Risk in the Relationship between Website Design and Purchase Intention

Web Sitesi Tasarımı ve Satın Alma Niyeti İlişkisinde Çevrimiçi Güven ve Algılanan Riskin Aracılık Rolü

Egehan Özkan Alakaş(OSTIM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6450-3892
Begum Sahin(ANKARA MEDİPOL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2013-5060
Murat Güler(NIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7370-2976
Pages
327–340
Publication Date
2025-04-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, while online trust reduces the perceived risk associated with website design, it is an important mediating variable in the relationship between perceived risk and increased purchase intention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the advancement of technology and the widespread use of the internet, the factors influencing purchase intention in online shopping continue to be an ongoing research topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the findings obtained from 215 university students suggest that website design has a positive effect on consumers' purchase intentions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, while online trust reduces the perceived risk associated with website design, it is an important mediating variable in the relationship between perceived risk and increased purchase intention.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Web Sitesi Tasarımı · Çevrimiçi Güven · Satın Alma Niyeti

Abstract

Due to the advancement of technology and the widespread use of the internet, the factors influencing purchase intention in online shopping continue to be an ongoing research topic. In this context, it is believed that one of the key factors affecting consumer purchasing behaviour is website design. A well-designed website is expected to play a crucial role in establishing perceived trust, a key factor in the online shopping experience that influences consumers' purchase intentions. This study examines the impact of website design on purchase intention in online shopping, with a focus on the mediating roles of trust and perceived risk. In this context, the findings obtained from 215 university students suggest that website design has a positive effect on consumers' purchase intentions. Moreover, while online trust reduces the perceived risk associated with website design, it is an important mediating variable in the relationship between perceived risk and increased purchase intention.

Özet

Teknolojinin gelişmesi ve internet kullanımının yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte, çevrimiçi alışverişte satın alma niyetini etkileyen faktörler günümüzde halen araştırma konusu olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu bağlamda, tüketici satın alma davranışlarını etkileyen temel faktörlerden birinin web sitesi tasarımı olduğu düşünülmektedir. İyi tasarlanmış bir web sitesinin, tüketicilerin satın alma niyetlerini etkileyen çevrimiçi alışveriş deneyiminde önemli bir faktör olan algılanan güvenin oluşmasında kritik bir rol oynaması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışma, web sitesi tasarımının çevrimiçi alışverişte satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini; güven ve algılanan riskin aracılık rolleri çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Bu kapsamda, 215 üniversite öğrencisinden elde edilen bulgular, web sitesi tasarımının tüketicilerin satın alma niyetleri üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, çevrimiçi güvenin web sitesi tasarımıyla ilişkili algılanan riski azalttığı ve algılanan risk ile artan satın alma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide önemli bir aracılık değişkeni olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alakaş, E. Ö., Sahin, B., Güler, M. (2025). The Mediating Role of Online Trust and Perceived Risk in the Relationship between Website Design and Purchase Intention. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2025.02.14

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Alam, S. (2020), “Examining the impact of ethical online retailing on consumers’ repurchase intention in India”, International Journal of Management, 11(6), 361-368.
  2. Alkibay, S. & B.K. Demirgüneş (2016), “Evaluating trust and perceived risk dimensions in online clothing shopping”, Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(2), 157-172.
  3. Bauer, R. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk-Taking”, in: R. Hancock (ed.), Dynamic Marketing for A Changing World: Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Association (389-398), Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
  4. Chang, H.H. & S.W. Chen (2008), “The Impact of Online Store Environment Cues on Purchase Intention”, Online Information Review, 32(6), 818-841.
  5. Chou, S. et al. (2015), “Female Online Shoppers: Examining the Mediating Roles of E-Satisfaction and E-Trust on E-Loyalty Development”, Internet Research, 25(4) 542-561.
  6. Constantinides, E. (2004), “Influencing the online consumer's behavior: The web experience”, Internet Research, 14(2), 111-126.
  7. Curtis, T. et al. (2011), “Customer loyalty, repurchase and satisfaction: A meta-analytical review”, Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 24, 1-26.
  8. Cyr, D. & C. Bonanni (2005), “Gender and website design in e-business”, International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(6), 565-582.
  9. Cyr, D. et al. (2009), “Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach”, MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 539-566.
  10. Cyr, D. et al. (2010), “Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1-2), 1-21.
  11. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  12. Fang, X. et al. (2011), “Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 123-157.
  13. Gambarov, V. (2014), “Elektronik Ticarette Güven Oluşturan Faktörler ve Satın alma Niyetine Etkileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Üretim Yönetimi ve Pazarlama Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  14. Ganguly, B. et al. (2010), “The effects of website design on purchase intention in online shopping: The mediating role of trust and the moderating role of culture”, International Journal of Electronic Business, 8(4/5), 302-330.
  15. Gefen, D. (2000), “E-commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust”, Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
  16. Gefen, D. et al. (2003), “Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model”, MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
  17. Ha, Y. & H. Im (2012), “Role of website design quality in satisfaction and Word of mouth generation”, Journal of Service Management, 23(1), 79-96.
  18. Habiboğlu, Ö. et al. (2021), “E-Perakendecilerin Bilgi Yönetimi ve Tüketici Çevrimiçi Güven Unsurlarına İlişkin Uygulamaları: Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Journal of Research in Business, 6(2), 303-318.
  19. Hassanein, K. et al. (2009), “A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment”, International Journal of Electronic Business, 7(6), 625-641.
  20. Henseler, J. et al. (2015), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  21. Hofstede, G. (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  22. Hu, L‐T. & P.M. Bentler (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  23. Jarvenpaa, S.L. et al. (2000), “Consumer trust in an Internet store”, Information Technology and Management, 1(1-2), 45-71.
  24. Kim, D.J. et al. (2008), “A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents”, Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564.
  25. Kim, H.W. et al. (2012), “Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust?”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 241-252.
  26. Kim, J. & J. Lee (2002), “Critical design factors for successful e-commerce systems”, Behavior and Information Technology, 21(3), 185-199.
  27. Kim, M. & L. Stoel (2004), “Apparel retailers: Website quality dimensions and satisfaction”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(2), 109-117.
  28. Kluckhohn, C. & W.H. Kelly (1945), “The concept of culture”, in: R. Linton (ed.), The Science of Man in the World Crisis (78-106), Columbia University Press, New York.
  29. Kroeber, A. & C. Kluckhohn (1952), Culture, Meridian Books, New York.
  30. Lee, M.K.O. & E. Turban (2001) “A trust model for consumer internet shopping”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
  31. Li, H. et al. (2015), “The interplay between value and service quality experience: E-loyalty development process through the eTailQ scale and value perception”, Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 585-615.
  32. Martin, S.S. et al. (2011), “Dual Effect of Perceived Risk on Cross-National E-commerce”, Internet Research, 21(1), 46-66.
  33. Nguyen, H.T.T. et al. (2020), “Development and validation of a scale measuring hotel website service quality (HWebSQ)”, Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100697.
  34. Ou, C.X. & C.L. Sia (2010), “Consumer trust and distrust: An issue of website design”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(12), 913- 934.
  35. Pavlou, P.A. (2003), “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
  36. Pengnate, S.F. & R. Sarathy (2017), “An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors”, Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 49-60.
  37. Preacher, K.J. & A.F. Hayes (2008), “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models”, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
  38. Segovia, R.H. et al. (2009), “Paralingual website design and trust in e-government”, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 36-49.
  39. Sharma, N. & P.G. Patterson (2000), “Switching Cost, Alternative Attractiveness and Experience as Moderators of Relationship Commitment in Professional, Consumer Services”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(5), 470- 490.
  40. Shrout, P.E. & N. Bolger (2002), “Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations”, Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
  41. Subaşı, H.H. (2012), “Elektronik Ticaret ve Güven: Bir Araştırma”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  42. Sultan, F. et al. (2005), “Determinants and role of trust in e-commerce: A large-scale empirical study”, Journal of Marketing, 69, 133-152.
  43. Tan, F.B. & P. Sutherland (2004), “Online consumer trust: a multi-dimensional model”, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(3), 40-58.
  44. Van der Heijden, H. et al. (2003), “Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives”, European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 41-48.
  45. Weisberg, J. et al. (2011), “Past purchase and intention to purchase in e-commerce: The mediation of social presence and trust”, Internet Research, 21(1), 82-96.
  46. Yaşin, B. et al. (2017), “Tüketicilerin çevrimiçi perakende alışveriş sitelerine yönelik sadakatleri üzerinde memnuniyet, güven ve kalite algılarının rolü”, Yönetim: İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(83), 24-47.
  47. Yoon, S-J. (2002), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in Online Purchase Decisions”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 47-63.