Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2026 / Cilt: 34 Sayı: 67

Why Do Turkish Women Become Discouraged: Evidence from HLFS

Türkiye'de Ümidi Kırık Kadın İşgücü: HİA’dan Bulgular

Pages
301–328
Publication Date
2026-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that lower educational attainment, marriage, living in an underdeveloped region, and household factors like having preschool-aged children or elderly/disabled dependents all increase the likelihood of discouragement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the factors contributing to women's discouragement in the Turkish labour market using cross-sectional data from the Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS) for 2004-2023.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results show that lower educational attainment, marriage, living in an underdeveloped region, and household factors like having preschool-aged children or elderly/disabled dependents all increase the likelihood of discouragement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Policies that address structural, cultural, and economic barriers are necessary.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004-2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gücenmiş Kadın İşgücü · Kadın İşgücüne Katılım · İşsizlik

Abstract

This study investigates the factors contributing to women's discouragement in the Turkish labour market using cross-sectional data from the Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS) for 2004-2023. The results show that lower educational attainment, marriage, living in an underdeveloped region, and household factors like having preschool-aged children or elderly/disabled dependents all increase the likelihood of discouragement. The reduction in the probability of discouragement for the 25-34 age group is -0.721 for women with low education, compared with -0.180 for highly educated women in 2023, emphasising the protective effect of higher education against discouragement. Policies that address structural, cultural, and economic barriers are necessary.

Özet

Çalışma, Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi'nin (HİA) 2004-2023 yılları arasındaki kesitsel verilerini kullanarak, Türk işgücü piyasasında kadınların işgücüne katılımını engelleyen faktörleri incelemektedir. Düşük eğitim seviyesi, evlilik, kalkınmamış bir bölgede yaşama, hanede çocuk, yaşlı, veya engelli gibi bakıma muhtaç bireylerin bulunması kadınların gücenmiş işgücüne dahil olma olasılığını artırmaktadır. 2023 yılı için, 25-34 yaş grubunda, gücenmiş işgücüne dahil olma olasılığının 15-24 yaş grubuna göre düşük eğitimli kadınlar için %72.1, yüksek eğitimli kadınlar içinse %18 daha düşük olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Bu durum yüksek eğitimin gücenmiş işgücüne dahil olma olasılığını engelleyici bir etki sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Yapısal, kültürel ve ekonomik engelleri ele alan politikalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Elitaş, Z., Akgül, T. (2026). Why Do Turkish Women Become Discouraged: Evidence from HLFS. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 67, 301–328. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2026.01.13

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (66)

  1. Akarçay-Gürbüz A. et al. (2014), “In Limbo: Exploring Transition to Discouragement”, The European Journal of Development Research, 26(4), 527-551.
  2. Başlevent, C. & Ö. Onaran (2003), “Are Married Women in Turkey More Likely to Become Added or Discouraged Workers?”, Labour, 17(3), 439-458.
  3. Béland-O’keefe, L. (2004), “An Examination of The Added- and the Discouraged-Worker Effects in Canada at the End of the Millennium”, Master’s Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
  4. Benati, L. (2001), “Some Empirical Evidence on the ‘Discouraged Worker’ Effect”, Economics Letters, 70(3), 387-395.
  5. Bičáková, A. (2016), “Gender Unemployment Gaps in the EU: Blame the Family”, IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 5, 22.
  6. Blau, F. et al. (2000), “Gender Differences in Pay”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75-99.
  7. Blundell, R. et al. (1998), “Unemployment, Discouraged Workers and Female Labor Supply”, Research in Economics, 52(2), 103-131.
  8. Borjas, G.J. (1996), Labor Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Bradbury, K. & J. Katz (2005), “Women's Rise: A Work in Progress”, The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Regional Review, 14(3), 58-67.
  10. Cerruti, M. (2000), “Economic Reform, Structural Adjustment and Female Labor Force Participation in Buenos Aires, Argentina”, World Development, 28(5), 879-891.
  11. Dagsvik, J.K. et al. (2013), “Labor Force Participation and The Discouraged Worker Effect”, Empirical Economics, 45(1), 401-433.
  12. Darby, J. et al. (2001), “Labor Force Participation and The Business Cycle: A Comparative Analysis of France, Japan, Sweden and the United States”, Japan and the World Economy, 13(2), 113-133.
  13. Dayıoğlu, M. & M. Kırdar (2010), “Türkiye’de Kadınların Işgücüne Katılımında Belirleyici Etkenler Ve Eğilimler”, DPT ve Dünya Bankası Refah ve Sosyal Politika Analitik Çalışma Programı Çalışma Raporu, No. 5.
  14. Deeksha, T. & P. Sourabh (2021), “Discouraged Worker Effect and Labor Market Behavior of Urban Married Women”. Asian Development Review, 38(02), 93-122.
  15. DeLoach, S.B. & M. Kurt (2013), “Discouraging Workers: Estimating the Impacts of Macroeconomic Shocks on The Search Intensity of The Unemployed”, Journal of Labor Research, 34(4), 433-454.
  16. Edwards, A.C. & J. Roberts (1994), “The Effects of Structural Adjustment on Women in Latin America”, in: S. Horton et al. (eds.), Labor Markets in an Era of Adjustment, Vol. 1 (309-324), Washington, DC: World Bank.
  17. Ehrenberg, R.G. & R.S. Smith (1988), Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, London.
  18. Ehrenberg, R.G. & R.S. Smith (2000), Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, New York: Addison-Wesley.
  19. Fallick, B. & J.F. Pingle (2007), “A cohort-based model of labor force participation”, FEDS Working Paper, 2007-09.
  20. Flaim, P.O. (1973), “Discouraged Workers and Changes in Unemployment”, Monthly Labor Review, 96(3), 8-16.
  21. Frey, B.S. & A. Stutzer (2002), Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  22. Goldin, C. (2006), “The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family”, American Economic Review, 96(2), 1-21.
  23. Gordon, P. et al. (1989), “Gender Differences in Metropolitan Travel Behaviour, Regional Studies, 23, 499-510.
  24. Hanson, S. & G. Pratt (1988), “Spatial Dimensions of The Gender Division of Labor in A Local Labor Market”, Urban Geography, 9(2), 180-202.
  25. Hanson, S. & G. Pratt (1991), “Job Search and The Occupational Segregation of Women”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(2), 229-253.
  26. Harkness, S. & J. Waldfogel (2003), “The Family Gap in Pay: Evidence from Seven Industrialized Countries”, Social Science Research, 32(2), 204-225.
  27. Hotchkiss, J.L. (2009), “Changes in the Aggregate Labor Force Participation Rate”, Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 94(4), 1-6.
  28. Ilkkaracan, I. (2012), “Why So Few Women in The Labor Market in Turkey?”, Feminist Economics, 18(1), 1-37.
  29. ILO (2015), National Employment Policies: A Guide for Workers’ Organisations, International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO.
  30. Johnston-Anumonwo, I. (1992), “The Influence of Household Type on Gender Differences in Work Trip Distance”, Professional Geographer, 44, 161-169.
  31. Karaoglan, D. & C. Okten (2015), “Labor-Force Participation of Married Women in Turkey: A Study of The Added-Worker Effect and The Discouraged-Worker Effect”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(1), 274-290.
  32. Karaoglan, D. (2009), “Discouraged Workers and The Dominance of Added Worker Effect: The Case of Turkey”, Master’s Thesis, Ankara: Bilkent University.
  33. Kaya-Bahçe, S.A. & E. Memiş (2014), “The Impact of The Economic Crisis on Joblessness in Turkey”, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 25(1), 130-153.
  34. Keith, K. & A. McWilliams (1999), “The Returns to Mobility and Job Search by Gender”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(3), 460-477.
  35. Klasen, S. (2002), “Low Schooling for Girls, Slower Growth for All? Cross Country Evidence on the Effect of Gender Inequality in Education on Economic Development”, World Bank Economic Review, 16(3), 345-373.
  36. Lim, J. (2000), “The Effects of the East Asian Crisis on the Employment of Women and Men: The Philippine Case”, World Development, 28(7), 1285-1306.
  37. Madden, J.F. (1981), “Why Women Work Closer to Home”, Urban Studies, 18, 181-194.
  38. Maridueña-Larrea, Á. & Á. Martín-Román (2024a), “The Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis and The Implications of Added and Discouraged Worker Effects in Latin America”, Latin American Economic Review, 33, 1-25.
  39. Maridueña-Larrea, Á. & Á. Martín-Román (2024b), “Spatial Dependence in the Cyclical Sensitivity of Labour Supply: An Analysis at the Regional Level in Ecuador”, Economies, 12(353), 1-28.
  40. Martín‐Román, Á.L. (2022), “Beyond the Added-Worker and The Discouraged-Worker Effects: The Entitled-Worker Effect”, Economic Modelling, 110, 105812, 1-23.
  41. Martín‐Román, Á.L. et al. (2020), “Labor supply and the business cycle: The Bandwagon Worker Effect”, Papers in Regional Science, 99, 1607-1642.
  42. Martín‐Román, Á.L. et al. (2023), “Natural and Cyclical Unemployment: A Stochastic Frontier Decomposition and Economic Policy Implications”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 75, 5-39.
  43. Michaud, P.C. & F. Vermeulen (2011), “A Collective Labor Supply Model with Complementarities In Leisure: Identification And Estimation By Means Of Panel Data”, Labour Economics, 18, 159-167.
  44. Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, New York: Columbia University Press.
  45. Mondal, B. et al. (2023), “Discouraged Worker Effect among Indian Women: Evidence from FLFP Survey”, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 66, 1019-1040.
  46. Mourao, P.R. (2013), “Women Out, Children Out: The Effect of Female Labor on Portuguese Preschool Enrollment Rates”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 49(1), 49-62.
  47. O'Brien, M. (2011), “Discouraged Older Male Workers and The Discouraged Worker Effect”, Australian Journal of Labor Economics, 14(3), 217-235.
  48. Özden, O. (2017), “Discouraged Workers in the Turkish Labor Market: 1988-2014”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(3), 734-750.
  49. Parsons, D.O. (1991), “The Job Search Behavior of Employed Youth”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 597-604.
  50. Pérez, C. et. al. (2020), “Two Decades of The Complementary Leisure Effect in Spain”, The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 15, 100216.
  51. Rabe-Hesketh, S. & A. Skrondal (2008), Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (2nd ed.), College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  52. Ramos-Veloza, M.A. et al. (2021), “Labor Market Indicator for Colombia”, Latin American Economic Review, 30, 1-32.
  53. Rouwendal, J. (1999), “Spatial Job Search and Commuting Distances”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(4), 491-517.
  54. Selim, S. (2006), “Türkiye’de Evli Kadınların İşgücüne Katılımı: Probit Model”, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 47-64.
  55. Tansel, A. & E.O. Kan (2012), “Labor Mobility Across the Formal/Informal Divide in Turkey: Evidence from Individual Level Data”, Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, 6271.
  56. Tansel, A. & Z.A. Ozdemir (2018), “Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis, Added And Discouraged Worker Effects in Canada”, International Journal of Manpower, 39(7), 929-936.
  57. Tansel, A. (2002), “Economic Development and Female Labor Force Participation in Turkey: Time-Series Evidence and Cross-Section Estimates”, METU/ERC Working Paper, 02/3.
  58. Taşçı, H.M. & B. Darıcı (2009), “Türkiye’de İşgücüne Katılımın Cinsiyet Ayrımına Göre İncelenmesi: Bir Mikro Veri Analizi”, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 209-233.
  59. Van Ham, M. et al. (2001), “Local Underemployment and The Discouraged Worker Effect”, Urban Studies, 38(10), 1733-1751.
  60. Van Ophem, H. (1991), “Wages, Nonwage Job Characteristics, And the Search Behavior of Employees”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(1), 145-151.
  61. Wasmer, E. (2009), “Links Between Labor Supply and Unemployment: Theory and Empirics”, Journal of Population Economics, 22(3), 773-802.
  62. Wichert, L. & W. Pohlmeier (2010), “Female Labor Force Participation and The Big Five”, ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 10-003.
  63. Wooldridge, J.M. (2009), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (4th ed.), Boston, MA: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  64. Yenilmez, F. & E. Kılıç (2018), “Türkiye’de İşgücüne Katılma Oranı-İşsizlik Oranı İlişkisi: Cinsiyet ve Eğitim Düzeyine Dayalı Bir Analiz”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13(2), 55-76.
  65. Yılmaz, A. (2005), “Unemployed Population in Turkey”, Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 15(1), 15-31.
  66. Zemlianukhina, S. & N. Zemlianukhina (2023), “The Causes and Effects of Discouragement in the Working-Age Population”, Problems of Economic Transition, 63(44-6), 203-211.